Robert V. Skibbens

The cohesin complex is composed of core ring proteins (Smc1, Smc3 and Mcd1) and associated factors (Pds5, Scc3, and Rad61) that bind via Mcd1. Extrusion (looping from within a single DNA molecule) and cohesion (the tethering together of two different DNA molecules) underlie the many roles that cohesins play in chromosome segregation, gene transcription, DNA repair, chromosome condensation, replication fork progression, and genome organization. While cohesin functions flank the activities of critical cell checkpoints (including spindle assembly and DNA damage checkpoints), the extent to which checkpoints directly target cohesins, in response to aberrant cohesin function, remains unknown. Based on prior evidence that cells mutated for cohesin contain reduced Mcd1 protein, we tested whether loss of Mcd1 is based simply on cohesin instability or integrity. The results show that Mcd1 loss persists even in rad61 cells, which contain elevated levels of stable chromosome-bound cohesins, and also in scc2–4 , which do not affect cohesin complex integrity. In fact, re-elevating Mcd1 levels suppresses the temperature-sensitive growth defects of all cohesin alleles tested, revealing that Mcd1 loss is a fundamental mechanism through which cohesins are inactivated to promote cell lethality. Our findings further reveal that cells that exhibit aberrant cohesin function employ E3 ligases (such as San1) to target Mcd1 for degradation. This mechanism of degradation appears unique in that Mcd1 is reduced during S phase, when Mcd1 levels typically peak and despite a dramatic upregulation in MCD1 transcription. We infer from these latter findings that cells contain a negative feedback mechanism used to maintain Mcd1 homeostasis.

The cohesin complex is composed of core ring proteins (Smc1, Smc3 and Mcd1) and associated factors (Pds5, Scc3, and Rad61) that bind via Mcd1. Extrusion (looping from within a single DNA molecule) and cohesion (the tethering together of two different DNA molecules) underlie the many roles that cohesins play in chromosome segregation, gene transcription, DNA repair, chromosome condensation, replication fork progression, and genome organization. While cohesin functions flank the activities of critical cell checkpoints (including spindle assembly and DNA damage checkpoints), the extent to which checkpoints directly target cohesins, in response to aberrant cohesin function, remains unknown. Based on prior evidence that cells mutated for cohesin contain reduced Mcd1 protein, we tested whether loss of Mcd1 is based simply on cohesin instability or integrity. The results show that Mcd1 loss persists even in rad61 cells, which contain elevated levels of stable chromosome-bound cohesins, and also in scc2-4 , which do not affect cohesin complex integrity. In fact, re-elevating Mcd1 levels suppresses the temperature-sensitive growth defects of all cohesin alleles tested, revealing that Mcd1 loss is a fundamental mechanism through which cohesins are inactivated to promote cell lethality. Our findings further reveal that cells that exhibit aberrant cohesin function employ E3 ligases (such as San1) to target Mcd1 for degradation. This mechanism of degradation appears unique in that Mcd1 is reduced during S phase, when Mcd1 levels typically peak and despite a dramatic upregulation in MCD1 transcription. We infer from these latter findings that cells contain a negative feedback mechanism used to maintain Mcd1 homeostasis. AUTHOR SUMMARY: Cohesins are central to almost all aspects of DNA regulation (chromosome segregation, gene transcription, DNA repair, chromosome condensation, replication fork progression, and genomic organization). Cohesin also play key roles in cell checkpoints: cohesin mutations activate the spindle assembly checkpoint while double strand DNA breaks can elicit a new round of cohesin establishment. In the current study, we provide evidence for a novel cohesin surveillance system that employs E3 ligases that directly target Mcd1, a core component of the cohesin ring structure, for degradation. We further describe a feedback mechanism through which cells dramatically induce MCD1 transcription to maintain Mcd1 homeostasis. Finally, we provide evidence that requires the re-evaluation of phenotypes associated with other cohesin gene mutations.

Throughout the cell cycle, DNA molecules convert between hierarchical intramolecular (cis) and intermolecular (trans) associations. Cohesin ATPase complexes produce both types of DNA associations which collectively are required for sister chromatid segregation, chromatin condensation, genomic architecture, gene transcription, and DNA repair. The mechanisms that regulate cohesin cis- and trans-activities, however, remain controversial. A popular model is that a regulatory complex (Pds5, Irr1/Scc3, and Rad61) sits atop a core ring-like complex (Mcd1/Scc1, Smc1, and Smc3), the latter of which exhibits the inherent ATPase activities responsible for producing cis- and trans-DNA conformations. Additional proteins transiently interact with cohesins to promote cohesin deposition onto DNA (Scc2 and Scc4) or stabilize cohesin-DNA binding (Eco1/Ctf7). Of these 9 components, only RAD61 is nonessential. Recent findings, however, identified pairs of suppressor mutations that support the viability of cells individually deleted for either PDS5 or ECO1/CTF7 (herein ECO1). Intriguingly, CLN2 deletion is common in both suppressor pairs, suggesting that combined suppressor mutations may support the viability of cells co-deleted for both ECO1 and PDS5. These results further suggest that the addition of other suppressor mutations (such as ELG1 and RAD61) may support the viability of cells deleted of all auxiliary subunits—including IRR1/SCC3 (herein SCC3). Here, we test these predictions and report on novel gene deletion combinations required for cell cycle progression and cell viability.

Background: Mutations in cohesins cause cohesinopathies such as Cornelia de Lange Syndrome (CdLS) and Roberts Syndrome (RBS). Prior findings demonstrate that Esco2 (a cohesin activator) and Smc3 (a core cohesin subunit) regulate the CRL4 E3 ubiquitin ligase. SMC3 mutations, however, account for a small percentage of CdLS. Here, we test whether NIPBL , which when mutated is responsible for 65% of CdLS cases, also regulates CRL4. Results: We report that Nipbl knockdown in zebrafish embryos produces developmental abnormalities and reduces the transcription of ddb1 , which encodes a key component of CRL4 E3 ligase. The severity of phenotypes in Nipbl knockdown embryos is partially rescued by exogenous ddb1 mRNA, demonstrating that CRL4 ligase function is downstream of Nipbl. These findings suggest that aberrant accumulation of CRL4 ligase substrates contributes to developmental abnormalities. To test this model, we identified candidate CRL4 substrates in zebrafish embryos by LC–MS. The results reveal that elevated expression of one of these candidates, pparαa , is sufficient to produce developmental defects in zebrafish embryos. Conclusions: Nipbl impacts CRL4 ligase activity via regulation of ddb1 expression. We provide evidence that the aberrant accumulation of substrates is sufficient to produce developmental abnormalities consistent with those observed in RBS and CdLS models.

Cohesins promote proper chromosome segregation, gene transcription, genomic architecture, DNA condensation, and DNA damage repair. Mutations in either cohesin subunits or regulatory genes can give rise to severe developmental abnormalities (such as Robert Syndrome and Cornelia de Lange Syndrome) and also are highly correlated with cancer. Despite this, little is known about cohesin regulation. Eco1 (ESCO2/EFO2 in humans) and Rad61 (WAPL in humans) represent two such regulators but perform opposing roles. Eco1 acetylation of cohesin during S phase, for instance, stabilizes cohesin-DNA binding to promote sister chromatid cohesion. On the other hand, Rad61 promotes the dissociation of cohesin from DNA. While Eco1 is essential, ECO1 and RAD61 co-deletion results in yeast cell viability, but only within a limited temperature range. Here, we report that eco1rad61 cell lethality is due to reduced levels of the cohesin subunit Mcd1. Results from a suppressor screen further reveals that FDO1 deletion rescues the temperature-sensitive (ts) growth defects exhibited by eco1rad61 double mutant cells by increasing Mcd1 levels. Regulation of MCD1 expression, however, appears more complex. Elevated expression of MBP1, which encodes a subunit of the MBF transcription complex, also rescues eco1rad61 cell growth defects. Elevated expression of SWI6, however, which encodes the Mbp1-binding partner of MBF, exacerbates eco1rad61 cell growth and also abrogates the Mpb1-dependent rescue. Finally, we identify two additional transcription factors, Fkh1 and Fkh2, that impact MCD1 expression. In combination, these findings provide new insights into the nuanced and multi-faceted transcriptional pathways that impact MCD1 expression.

Cohesins promote proper chromosome segregation, gene transcription, genomic architecture, DNA condensation, and DNA damage repair. Mutations in either cohesin subunit or regulatory genes can give rise to severe developmental abnormalities (such as Robert Syndrome and Cornelia de Lange Syndrome) and also are highly correlated with cancer. Despite this, little is known about cohesin regulation. Eco1 (ESCO2/EFO2 in humans) and Rad61 (WAPL in humans) represent two such regulators but perform opposing roles. Eco1 acetylation of cohesin during S phase, for instance, stabilizes cohesin-DNA binding to promote sister chromatid cohesion. On the other hand, Rad61 promotes the dissociation of cohesin from DNA. While Eco1 is essential, ECO1 and RAD61 co-deletion results in yeast cell viability, but only within a limited temperature range. Here, we report that eco1 rad61 cell lethality is due to reduced levels of the cohesin subunit Mcd1. Results from a suppressor screen further reveals that FDO1 deletion rescues the temperature sensitive (ts) growth defects exhibited by eco1 rad61 double mutant cells by increasing Mcd1 levels. Regulation of MCD1 expression, however, appears more complex. Elevated expression of MBP1 , which encodes a subunit of the MBF transcription complex, also rescues eco1 rad61 cell growth defects. Elevated expression of SWI6 , however, which encodes the Mbp1-binding partner of MBF, exacerbates eco1 rad61 cell growth and also abrogates the Mpb1-dependent rescue. Finally, we identify two additional transcription factors, Fkh1 and Fkh2, that impact MCD1 expression. In combination, these findings provide new insights into the nuanced and multi-faceted transcriptional pathways that impact MCD1 expression.

Cohesins are ATPase complexes that play central roles in cellular processes such as chromosome division, DNA repair, and gene expression. Cohesinopathies arise from mutations in cohesin proteins or cohesin complex regulators and encompass a family of related developmental disorders that present with a range of severe birth defects, affect many different physiological systems, and often lead to embryonic fatality. Treatments for cohesinopathies are limited, in large part due to the lack of understanding of cohesin biology. Thus, characterizing the signaling networks that lie upstream and downstream of cohesin-dependent pathways remains clinically relevant. Here, we highlight alterations in cohesins and cohesin regulators that result in cohesinopathies, with a focus on cardiac defects. In addition, we suggest a novel and more unifying view regarding the mechanisms through which cohesinopathy-based heart defects may arise.

Eco1/Ctf7 is a highly conserved acetyltransferase that activates cohesin complexes and is critical for sister chromatid cohesion, chromosome condensation, DNA damage repair, nucleolar integrity, and gene transcription. Mutations in the human homolog of ECO1 (ESCO2/EFO2), or in genes that encode cohesin subunits, result in severe developmental abnormalities and intellectual disabilities referred to as Roberts syndrome and Cornelia de Lange syndrome, respectively. In yeast, deletion of ECO1 results in cell inviability. Codeletion of RAD61 (WAPL in humans), however, produces viable yeast cells. These eco1 rad61 double mutants, however, exhibit a severe temperature-sensitive growth defect, suggesting that Eco1 or cohesins respond to hyperthermic stress through a mechanism that occurs independent of Rad61. Here, we report that deletion of the G1 cyclin CLN2 rescues the temperature-sensitive lethality otherwise exhibited by eco1 rad61 mutant cells, such that the triple mutant cells exhibit robust growth over a broad range of temperatures. While Cln1, Cln2, and Cln3 are functionally redundant G1 cyclins, neither CLN1 nor CLN3 deletions rescue the temperature-sensitive growth defects otherwise exhibited by eco1 rad61 double mutants. We further provide evidence that CLN2 deletion rescues hyperthermic growth defects independent of START and impacts the state of chromosome condensation. These findings reveal novel roles for Cln2 that are unique among the G1 cyclin family and appear critical for cohesin regulation during hyperthermic stress.

Eco1/Ctf7 is a highly conserved acetyltransferase that activates cohesin complexes and is critical for sister chromatid cohesion, chromosome condensation, DNA damage repair, nucleolar integrity, and gene transcription. Mutations in the human homolog of ECO1 ( ESCO2/EFO2 ), or in genes that encode cohesin subunits, result in severe developmental abnormalities and intellectual disabilities referred to as Roberts Syndrome (RBS) and Cornelia de Lange Syndrome (CdLS), respectively. In yeast, deletion of ECO1 results in cell inviability. Co-deletion of RAD61 (WAPL in humans), however, produces viable yeast cells. These eco1 rad61 double mutants, however, exhibit a severe temperature-sensitive growth defect, suggesting that Eco1 or cohesins respond to hyperthermic stress through a mechanism that occurs independent of Rad61. Here, we report that deletion of the G1 cyclin CLN2 rescues the temperature sensitive lethality otherwise exhibited by eco1 rad61 mutant cells, such that the triple mutant cells exhibit robust growth over a broad range of temperatures. While Cln1, Cln2 and Cln3 are functionally redundant G1 cyclins, neither CLN1 nor CLN3 deletions rescue the temperature-sensitive growth defects otherwise exhibited by eco1 rad61 double mutants. We further provide evidence that CLN2 deletion rescues hyperthermic growth defects independent of START and impacts the state of chromosome condensation. These findings reveal novel roles for Cln2 that are unique among the G1 cyclin family and appear critical for cohesin regulation during hyperthermic stress.

The intersection through which two fundamental processes meet provides a unique vantage point from which to view cellular regulation. On the one hand, DNA replication is at the heart of cell division, generating duplicate chromosomes that allow each daughter cell to inherit a complete copy of the parental genome. Among other factors, the PCNA (proliferating cell nuclear antigen) sliding clamp ensures processive DNA replication during S phase and is essential for cell viability. On the other hand, the process of chromosome segregation during M phase—an act that occurs long after DNA replication—is equally fundamental to a successful cell division. Eco1/Ctf7 ensures that chromosomes faithfully segregate during mitosis, but functions during DNA replication to activate cohesins and thereby establish cohesion between sister chromatids. To achieve this, Eco1 binds PCNA and numerous other DNA replication fork factors that include MCM helicase, Chl1 helicase, and the Rtt101-Mms1-Mms22 E3 ubiquitin ligase. Here, we review the multi-faceted coordination between cohesion establishment and DNA replication. SUMMARY STATEMENT: New findings provide important insights into the mechanisms through which DNA replication and the establishment of sister chromatid cohesion are coupled.