A. H. F. Guimarães
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
A. H. F. Guimarães has a total of 13 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Ernesto Vieira Neto
São Paulo State University (UNESP)
2 shared publications - Nikolai V. Brilliantov
Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology
2 shared publications A. Valio
1 shared publication- Adriana Valio
Mackenzie Presbyterian University
1 shared publication - Alexander N. Gorban
University of Leicester
1 shared publication - F Spahn
Institute of Physics, University of Potsdam, Am Neuen Palais 10, D-14469 Potsdam, Germany
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 12 July 2018
- Published by American Astronomical Society in The Astronomical Journal
- Vol. 156 (2) , 50
The Best Planets to Harbor Detectable Exomoons
Albeit the discovery of thousands of extrasolar planets, so far no exomoon has been found. This may be due to a lack of dynamical investigation of the best regions around the planets for a satellite to exist. We provide a list of the best candidates of exomoon hosting planets using the Kepler database. The inner and outer stability boundaries of an exomoon orbital semimajor axis were calculated for all planets. The first limit is the minimum distance to the planet such that the object will not disintegrate due to tidal forces, the Roche limit, that depends on the moon density. The outer boundary is the region where an exomoon may exist for a long period of time. Both limits are a function of the planet mass, calculated from its radius inferred from the observed transit depth. Each planet has been tested with the exomoon mass estimated for three values of moon–planet distance, and the moon radius for five different densities (ice, ice–rock, rock, rock–iron, and iron), totalling 15 different combinations. For the planet to be considered a suitable exomoon host, the system has to pass three criteria: (i) the planet–moon distance should be greater than the Roche limit; (ii) the system center-of-mass is within the planet; and (iii) the moon transit depth is greater than twice the light-curve noise (Combined Differential Photometric Precision). After processing all the data, 54 planets were left from the Kepler list with putative “visible” satellites, thus providing the best candidates for an exomoon search.
- 12 July 2018
- Published by American Astronomical Society in The Astronomical Journal
- Vol. 156 (2) , 50
The Best Planets to Harbor Detectable Exomoons
Albeit the discovery of thousands of extrasolar planets, so far no exomoon has been found. This may be due to a lack of dynamical investigation of the best regions around the planets for a satellite to exist. We provide a list of the best candidates of exomoon hosting planets using the Kepler database. The inner and outer stability boundaries of an exomoon orbital semimajor axis were calculated for all planets. The first limit is the minimum distance to the planet such that the object will not disintegrate due to tidal forces, the Roche limit, that depends on the moon density. The outer boundary is the region where an exomoon may exist for a long period of time. Both limits are a function of the planet mass, calculated from its radius inferred from the observed transit depth. Each planet has been tested with the exomoon mass estimated for three values of moon–planet distance, and the moon radius for five different densities (ice, ice–rock, rock, rock–iron, and iron), totalling 15 different combinations. For the planet to be considered a suitable exomoon host, the system has to pass three criteria: (i) the planet–moon distance should be greater than the Roche limit; (ii) the system center-of-mass is within the planet; and (iii) the moon transit depth is greater than twice the light-curve noise (Combined Differential Photometric Precision). After processing all the data, 54 planets were left from the Kepler list with putative “visible” satellites, thus providing the best candidates for an exomoon search.
- 1 January 2016
- Published by PACIS - Panamerican Association for Computational Interdisciplinary Sciences in Journal of Computational Interdisciplinary Sciences
- Vol. 7 (3)
Exoplanet Classification with Data Mining
- 1 January 2016
- Published by PACIS - Panamerican Association for Computational Interdisciplinary Sciences in Journal of Computational Interdisciplinary Sciences
- Vol. 7 (3)
Exoplanet Classification with Data Mining
- Open Access
- 1 January 2014
- Published by IOP Publishing in New Journal of Physics
- Vol. 16 (1) , 013031
A statistical model of aggregate fragmentation
- 1 January 2014
- Published by IOP Publishing in New Journal of Physics
- Vol. 16 (1) , 013031
Open AccessA statistical model of aggregate fragmentation
- Open Access
- 9 April 2004
- Published by EDP Sciences in Astronomy & Astrophysics
- Vol. 418 (2) , 759-764
A note on the horseshoe confinement model: The Poynting-Robertson effect
Astronomy & Astrophysics (A&A) is an international journal which publishes papers on all aspects of astronomy and astrophysics
- 9 April 2004
- Published by EDP Sciences in Astronomy & Astrophysics
- Vol. 418 (2) , 759-764
Open AccessA note on the horseshoe confinement model: The Poynting-Robertson effect
Astronomy & Astrophysics (A&A) is an international journal which publishes papers on all aspects of astronomy and astrophysics