Richard Taillet

A "gravity tunnel" is the name given to a fictitious deep shaft drilled inside the Earth so that objects dropped from the surface of the Earth would free fall without ever touching the walls. It is well known that because of the rotation of the Earth, such tunnels are not straight lines but instead they emerge westward of the antipodal point, when the Earth is approximated as a rotating sphere. In this article, we determine the shape of gravity tunnels by taking into account the polar flattening of the Earth resulting from its rotation. The Earth is described as a McLaurin spheroid, an exact equilibrium shape for a rotating homogeneous deformable body that provides a fair description of the actual shape of the Earth. It turns out that the gravitational force acting on an object located inside the spheroid has a simple form (it is harmonic), so that it is straightforward to compute analytically the free fall trajectories. This study follows a procedure presented several times in this journal and elsewhere, i.e., the trajectory is first computed in the geocentric (non-rotating) frame, and it is then analysed in the terrestrial (rotating) frame. We find that when the flattening of the Earth is taken into account, gravity tunnels have no exit: an object dropped from a point of the surface (other than on the equator or a pole) never reaches the surface again, unless the flattening has very specific (and unnatural) values. We also compute the deviations from the vertical for short falls and compare them to standard eastwards and southwards deviation expressions obtained with other modelizations of the gravity of the rotating Earth, in particular, for a rotating spherical body. (C) 2018 American Association of Physics Teachers.

A hardening of the proton and helium fluxes is observed above a few hundreds of GeV/nuc. The distribution of local sources of primary cosmic rays has been suggested as a potential solution to this puzzling behavior. Some authors even claim that a single source is responsible for the observed anomalies. But how probable these explanations are? To answer that question, our current description of cosmic ray Galactic propagation needs to be replaced by the Myriad model. In the former approach, sources of protons and helium nuclei are treated as a jelly continuously spread over space and time. A more accurate description is provided by the Myriad model where sources are considered as point-like events. This leads to a probabilistic derivation of the fluxes of primary species, and opens the possibility that larger-than-average values may be observed at the Earth. For a long time though, a major obstacle has been the infinite variance associated to the probability distribution function which the fluxes follow. Several suggestions have been made to cure this problem but none is entirely satisfactory. We go a step further here and solve the infinite variance problem of the Myriad model by making use of the generalized central limit theorem. We find that primary fluxes are distributed according to a stable law with heavy tail, well-known to financial analysts. The probability that the proton and helium anomalies are sourced by local SNR can then be calculated. The p-values associated to the CREAM measurements turn out to be small, unless somewhat unrealistic propagation parameters are assumed.

EPJ Web of Conferences, open-access proceedings in physics and astronomy

Astronomy & Astrophysics (A&A) is an international journal which publishes papers on all aspects of astronomy and astrophysics

Astronomy & Astrophysics (A&A) is an international journal which publishes papers on all aspects of astronomy and astrophysics

Astronomy & Astrophysics (A&A) is an international journal which publishes papers on all aspects of astronomy and astrophysics