Jennifer A. Rothman

Pediatric autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) is a heterogeneous disease with significant morbidity due to the underlying condition and its treatment. Evidence-based guidelines for evaluation and management are lacking. Data from 399 patients with AIHA followed at 15 pediatric centers were collected to identify factors associated with secondary diagnoses, recurrent/chronic course, therapeutic efficacy, and mortality. Most had AIHA associated with secondary diagnoses including Evans syndrome (142/385 [37%]), other autoimmunity (86/392 [22%]), and inborn errors of immunity (IEI; 68/379 [18%]). Of 305 patients tested, 82% had abnormal functional immune results. Genetic testing for IEI was performed in 109 of 348 patients (31%), with pathogenic findings identified in 32% of those tested. Patients with IEI or other autoimmunity more frequently had abnormal immunoglobulin and complement testing. Prevalence of IEI was not different between those presenting with and without infection. The median number of treatments for the first AIHA episode was 2 (range, 0-17). Of those with warm AIHA, 31% received steroid-sparing therapy during the first episode. Patients with recurrent AIHA (42%) had a higher rate of abnormal immune tests (odds ratio [OR], 2.29; P = .012), Evans syndrome (OR, 4.85; P< .001), IEI (OR, 3.88; P< .001), and other autoimmune disorders (OR, 3.29; P< .001). With a median follow-up of 4.9 years (range, 0-19.4), 72 of 257 (28%) with warm AIHA continued to have active disease on treatment. Of the 399 patients, 10 died, all of whom had secondary diagnoses. Expansive immune evaluation, monitoring, and targeted treatments directed at immune diagnoses are needed for pediatric AIHA, highlighting the need for evidence-based pediatric AIHA guidelines.

Severe aplastic anemia (SAA) is a rare, life-threatening disease with acquired pancytopenia and hypocellular bone marrow. ESCALATE evaluated eltrombopag in combination with immunosuppressive therapy (IST) in pediatric patients (aged 1 to <18 years) with relapsed/refractory (R/R) or treatment-naïve SAA. The eltrombopag starting dose was 25 mg/d for patients aged 1 to <6 years and 50 mg/d for patients aged 6 to <18 years; dose modifications (maximum dose, 150 mg/d) were allowed to achieve a target platelet count of 50 × 109/L to 200 × 109/L. Eltrombopag was administered with cyclosporine A, with or without horse antithymocyte globulin, for 26 weeks and could be extended if clinically beneficial. Fifty-one patients were treated (R/R SAA, n = 14; treatment-naïve SAA, n = 37). Data were analyzed overall and as 2 cohorts: R/R and treatment-naïve cohorts. The overall response rate (ORR; per North American Pediatric Aplastic Anemia Consortium criteria) at 26 weeks was 54.9% in both cohorts combined and 71.4% and 48.6% in the R/R and treatment-naïve cohorts, respectively; most responders had sustained responses after discontinuing eltrombopag. Among baseline transfusion-dependent patients, 66.7% and 76.7% achieved red blood cell and platelet transfusion independence, respectively, with rates of 70% and 80% for the R/R cohort and 65.6% and 75.8% for the treatment-naïve cohort, respectively. The most common treatment-related adverse events were abnormalities in liver function tests, including increased bilirubin (43.1%), alanine aminotransferase (37.3%), and aspartate aminotransferase (33.3%). Eltrombopag with IST showed a trend toward a favorable ORR in the R/R cohort, with no new safety signals. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03025698.

Pediatric moderate aplastic anemia (MAA) lacks defined diagnostic criteria and a clear standard-of-care due to the limited knowledge of its pathophysiology and natural history. The approach to MAA has been historically inconsistent as the proposed survey demonstrates. To understand current diagnostic and management practices for patients with MAA, a survey was conducted among members of the North American Pediatric Aplastic Anemia Consortium (NAPAAC), including 104 providers across 57 institutions. The survey demonstrates broad variability regarding the working definition, diagnostic work-up, and therapeutic management of children with MAA. The diagnostic work-up and treatment options for children with MAA are largely driven by management guidelines for pediatric severe aplastic anemia (SAA). Treatment triggers, type of therapy, and outcomes varied widely among respondents. Curated next generation sequencing panels and whole exome/whole genome sequencing were included by only 55% and 9% of respondents, respectively which suggests the need to more broadly consider inherited bone marrow failure syndromes in the differential diagnosis for these patients. Effective and risk-adapted treatment for MAA requires a better understanding of the biology, natural history, and treatment outcomes for this heterogeneous population.

There are no agreed upon terminology to define “refractory” pediatric immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). Guidelines are therefore limited to arbitrary and outdated definitions. The Pediatric ITP Consortium of North America held a meeting in 2023 to define this entity. With 100% agreement, the faculty established that pediatric ITP that is refractory to emergent therapy could be defined as no platelet response after treatment with all eligible emergent pharmacotherapies. With 100% agreement, the working group established that pediatric patients with ITP that continue to demonstrate high disease burden and/or no platelet response despite treatment with multiple classes of disease-modifying therapies represent a challenging subset of ITP. These patients are at higher risk of ongoing disease burden and merit additional investigation as well as consideration for clinical trials or novel therapies. Future efforts to define disease burden and disease response will be completed in collaboration with the ITP International Working Group.

Severe aplastic anemia (SAA) is a rare potentially fatal hematologic disorder. Although overall outcomes with treatment are excellent, there are variations in management approach, including differences in treatment between adult and pediatric patients. Certain aspects of treatment are under active investigation in clinical trials. Because of the rarity of the disease, some pediatric hematologists may have relatively limited experience with the complex management of SAA. The following recommendations reflect an up‐to‐date evidence‐based approach to the treatment of children with relapsed or refractory SAA.

Severe aplastic anemia (SAA) is a rare potentially fatal hematologic disorder. Although overall outcomes with treatment are excellent, there are variations in management approach, including differences in treatment between adult and pediatric patients. Certain aspects of treatment are under active investigation in clinical trials. Because of the rarity of the disease, some pediatric hematologists may have relatively limited experience with the complex management of SAA. The following recommendations reflect an up‐to‐date evidence‐based approach to the treatment of children with newly diagnosed SAA.

Objective of this study is to quantify benefit-risk tradeoffs pertaining to potential gene therapies among adults and parents/caregivers of children with sickle cell disease (SCD). A discrete-choice experiment survey was developed in which respondents selected their preferred treatment alternatives in a series of experimentally controlled pairs of hypothetical gene therapies and a “no gene therapy” option. Gene therapy alternatives were defined based on the chance of eliminating SCD symptoms, expected increases in life expectancy they could offer, treatment-related risk of death, and potential increases in lifetime cancer risk. Respondents made selections based on their current disease severity and in the context of expectations of worsened disease. Three clinical sites and 1 patient organization recruited 174 adult patients and 109 parents of children with SCD to complete the survey. Adult and parent respondents were generally willing to choose gene therapies, but the adults required higher expected levels of efficacy (ie, higher chance of eliminating symptoms) than parents to choose gene therapies that conferred mortality risks of ≥10%. When adults and parents of children with less severe symptoms were asked to consider scenarios of higher levels of disease severity, the increased risk tolerance, and the lowest acceptable level of efficacy for gene therapies with mortality risks dropped by >50%. Baseline SCD symptoms are a major driver of gene therapy acceptability. Adults and parents of patients with milder symptoms may prefer other treatment options; however, an expectation of symptoms deterioration triggers strong reassessment of the acceptable benefit-risk balance of this novel technology.

The efficacy and safety of rivipansel, a predominantly E-selectin antagonist, were studied in a phase 3, randomized, controlled trial for vaso-occlusive crisis (VOC) requiring hospitalization (RESET). A total of 345 subjects (204 adults and 141 children) were randomized and 320 were treated (162 with rivipansel, 158 with placebo) with an IV loading dose, followed by up to 14 additional 12-hourly maintenance doses of rivipansel or placebo, in addition to standard care. Rivipansel was similarly administered during subsequent VOCs in the Open-label Extension (OLE) study. In the full analysis population, the median time to readiness for discharge (TTRFD), the primary end point, was not different between rivipansel and placebo (−5.7 hours, P = .79; hazard ratio, 0.97), nor were differences seen in secondary end points of time to discharge (TTD), time to discontinuation of IV opioids (TTDIVO), and cumulative IV opioid use. Mean soluble E-selectin decreased 61% from baseline after the loading dose in the rivipansel group, while remaining unchanged in the placebo group. In a post hoc analysis, early rivipansel treatment within 26.4 hours of VOC pain onset (earliest quartile of time from VOC onset to treatment) reduced median TTRFD by 56.3 hours, reduced median TTD by 41.5 hours, and reduced median TTDIVO by 50.5 hours, compared with placebo (all P < .05). A similar subgroup analysis comparing OLE early-treatment with early-treatment RESET placebo showed a reduction in TTD of 23.1 hours (P = .062) and in TTDIVO of 30.1 hours (P = .087). Timing of rivipansel administration after pain onset may be critical to achieving accelerated resolution of acute VOC. Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02187003 (RESET), NCT02433158 (OLE).