David Milovich
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
David Milovich has a total of 6 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Ioannis Souldatos
Mathematics Department, University of Detroit Mercy, Detroit, USA
2 shared publications - Menachem Kojman
University of the Negev
2 shared publications - Santi Spadaro
Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
2 shared publications - Andrea Medini
Department of Mathematics, University of Wisconsin, 480 Lincoln Drive, Madison, WI 53706, USA
1 shared publication - G. J. Ridderbos
Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science, TU Delft, Postbus 5031, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands
1 shared publication Jorge L. Guerrero
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 1 January 2018
- Published by Institute of Mathematics, Polish Academy of Sciences in Fundamenta Mathematicae
- Vol. 243 (2) , 179-193
Non-absoluteness of model existence at ℵω
Friedman et al. (2013) considered the question whether model existence of L-omega 1,(omega)-sentences is absolute for transitive models of ZFC, in the sense that if V subset of W are transitive models of ZFC with the same ordinals, phi is an element of V and V satisfies"phi is an L-omega 1,(omega)-sentence", then V satisfies Phi if and only if W satisfies Phi where Phi is a first-order sentence with parameters phi and alpha asserting that phi has a model of size aleph(alpha). From Friedman et al. (2013) we know that the answer is positive for alpha = 0, 1, and under the negation of CH the answer is negative for all alpha > 1. Under GCH, and assuming the consistency of a supercompact cardinal, the answer remains negative for each alpha > 1, except the case when alpha =omega which is an open question in Friedman et al. (2013). We answer the open question by providing a negative answer under GCH even for alpha= omega. Our examples are incomplete sentences. In fact, the same sentences can be used to prove a negative answer under GCH for all alpha > 1 assuming the consistency of a Mahlo cardinal. Thus, the large cardinal assumption is relaxed from a supercompact in Friedman et al. (2013) to a Mahlo cardinal. Finally, we consider the absoluteness question for the aleph(alpha)-amalgamation property of L-omega 1,(omega)-sentences (under substructure). We prove that assuming GCH, aleph(alpha)-amalgamation is non-absolute for 1 < alpha < omega. This answers a question of Sinapova and Souldatos (2017). The cases alpha = 1 and a infinite remain open. As a corollary we show that it is non-absolute that the amalgamation spectrum of an L-omega 1,(omega)-sentence is empty.
- 1 January 2018
- Published by Institute of Mathematics, Polish Academy of Sciences in Fundamenta Mathematicae
- Vol. 243 (2) , 179-193
Non-absoluteness of model existence at ℵω
Friedman et al. (2013) considered the question whether model existence of L-omega 1,(omega)-sentences is absolute for transitive models of ZFC, in the sense that if V subset of W are transitive models of ZFC with the same ordinals, phi is an element of V and V satisfies"phi is an L-omega 1,(omega)-sentence", then V satisfies Phi if and only if W satisfies Phi where Phi is a first-order sentence with parameters phi and alpha asserting that phi has a model of size aleph(alpha). From Friedman et al. (2013) we know that the answer is positive for alpha = 0, 1, and under the negation of CH the answer is negative for all alpha > 1. Under GCH, and assuming the consistency of a supercompact cardinal, the answer remains negative for each alpha > 1, except the case when alpha =omega which is an open question in Friedman et al. (2013). We answer the open question by providing a negative answer under GCH even for alpha= omega. Our examples are incomplete sentences. In fact, the same sentences can be used to prove a negative answer under GCH for all alpha > 1 assuming the consistency of a Mahlo cardinal. Thus, the large cardinal assumption is relaxed from a supercompact in Friedman et al. (2013) to a Mahlo cardinal. Finally, we consider the absoluteness question for the aleph(alpha)-amalgamation property of L-omega 1,(omega)-sentences (under substructure). We prove that assuming GCH, aleph(alpha)-amalgamation is non-absolute for 1 < alpha < omega. This answers a question of Sinapova and Souldatos (2017). The cases alpha = 1 and a infinite remain open. As a corollary we show that it is non-absolute that the amalgamation spectrum of an L-omega 1,(omega)-sentence is empty.
- Open AccessNon-Absoluteness of Model Existence at $\aleph_ω$In [FHK13], the authors considered the question whether model-existence of $L_{\omega_1,\omega}$-sentences is absolute for transitive models of ZFC, in the sense that if $V \subseteq W$ are transitive models of ZFC with the same ordinals, $\varphi\in V$ and $V\models "\varphi \text{ is an } L_{\omega_1,\omega}\text{-sentence}"$, then $V \models "\varphi \text{ has a model of size } \aleph_\alpha"$ if and only if $W \models "\varphi \text{ has a model of size } \aleph_\alpha"$. From [FHK13] we know that the answer is positive for $\alpha=0,1$ and under the negation of CH, the answer is negative for all $\alpha>1$. Under GCH, and assuming the consistency of a supercompact cardinal, the answer remains negative for each $\alpha>1$, except the case when $\alpha=\omega$ which is an open question in [FHK13]. We answer the open question by providing a negative answer under GCH even for $\alpha=\omega$. Our examples are incomplete sentences. In fact, the same sentences can be used to prove a negative answer under GCH for all $\alpha>1$ assuming the consistency of a Mahlo cardinal. Thus, the large cardinal assumption is relaxed from a supercompact in [FHK13] to a Mahlo cardinal. Finally, we consider the absoluteness question for the $\aleph_\alpha$-amalgamation property of $L_{\omega_1,\omega}$-sentences (under substructure). We prove that assuming GCH, $\aleph_\alpha$-amalgamation is non-absolute for $1<\alpha<\omega$. This answers a question from [SS]. The cases $\alpha=1$ and $\alpha$ infinite remain open. As a corollary we get that it is non-absolute that the amalgamation spectrum of an $L_{\omega_1,\omega}$-sentence is empty.Open AccessNon-Absoluteness of Model Existence at $\aleph_ω$In [FHK13], the authors considered the question whether model-existence of $L_{\omega_1,\omega}$-sentences is absolute for transitive models of ZFC, in the sense that if $V \subseteq W$ are transitive models of ZFC with the same ordinals, $\varphi\in V$ and $V\models "\varphi \text{ is an } L_{\omega_1,\omega}\text{-sentence}"$, then $V \models "\varphi \text{ has a model of size } \aleph_\alpha"$ if and only if $W \models "\varphi \text{ has a model of size } \aleph_\alpha"$. From [FHK13] we know that the answer is positive for $\alpha=0,1$ and under the negation of CH, the answer is negative for all $\alpha>1$. Under GCH, and assuming the consistency of a supercompact cardinal, the answer remains negative for each $\alpha>1$, except the case when $\alpha=\omega$ which is an open question in [FHK13]. We answer the open question by providing a negative answer under GCH even for $\alpha=\omega$. Our examples are incomplete sentences. In fact, the same sentences can be used to prove a negative answer under GCH for all $\alpha>1$ assuming the consistency of a Mahlo cardinal. Thus, the large cardinal assumption is relaxed from a supercompact in [FHK13] to a Mahlo cardinal. Finally, we consider the absoluteness question for the $\aleph_\alpha$-amalgamation property of $L_{\omega_1,\omega}$-sentences (under substructure). We prove that assuming GCH, $\aleph_\alpha$-amalgamation is non-absolute for $1<\alpha<\omega$. This answers a question from [SS]. The cases $\alpha=1$ and $\alpha$ infinite remain open. As a corollary we get that it is non-absolute that the amalgamation spectrum of an $L_{\omega_1,\omega}$-sentence is empty.
- Open Access
Chaos and periodicity on star graphs
For a continuous self-map of a star graph to be Li-Yorke chaotic and to have full periodicity, we prove some new sufficient conditions on the orbit of the center.
Open AccessChaos and periodicity on star graphs
For a continuous self-map of a star graph to be Li-Yorke chaotic and to have full periodicity, we prove some new sufficient conditions on the orbit of the center.
- 1 September 2016
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic
- Vol. 22 (3) , 353-354
Kenneth Kunen, Set Theory, Studies in Logic: Mathematical Logic and Foundations, Vol. 34, College Publications, London, 2011, viii + 401 pp.
- 1 September 2016
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic
- Vol. 22 (3) , 353-354
Kenneth Kunen, Set Theory, Studies in Logic: Mathematical Logic and Foundations, Vol. 34, College Publications, London, 2011, viii + 401 pp.
- Open Access
On the strong Freese-Nation property
We show that there is a boolean algebra that has the Freese-Nation property (FN) but not the strong Freese-Nation property (SFN), thus answering a question of Heindorf and Shapiro. Along the way, we produce some new characterizations of the FN and SFN in terms of sequences of elementary submodels.
Open AccessOn the strong Freese-Nation property
We show that there is a boolean algebra that has the Freese-Nation property (FN) but not the strong Freese-Nation property (SFN), thus answering a question of Heindorf and Shapiro. Along the way, we produce some new characterizations of the FN and SFN in terms of sequences of elementary submodels.
- 22 March 2016
- Published by Springer Nature in Order
- Vol. 34 (1) , 91-111
On the Strong Freese-Nation Property
- 22 March 2016
- Published by Springer Nature in Order
- Vol. 34 (1) , 91-111
On the Strong Freese-Nation Property
- 23 July 2014
- Published by Springer Nature in Israel Journal of Mathematics
- Vol. 202 (1) , 195-225
Noetherian type in topological products
- 23 July 2014
- Published by Springer Nature in Israel Journal of Mathematics
- Vol. 202 (1) , 195-225
Noetherian type in topological products
- Open Access
Forbidden rectangles in compacta
We establish negative results about "rectangular" local bases in compacta. For example, there is no compactum where all points have local bases of cofinal type \omega x \omega_2. For another, the compactum \beta\omega has no nontrivially rectangular local bases, and the same is consistently true of \beta\omega \ \omega: no local base in \beta\omega has cofinal type \kappa x c if \kappa < m_{\sigma-n-linked} for some n in [1,\omega). Also, CH implies that every local base in \beta\omega \ \omega has the same cofinal type as one in \beta\omega. We also answer a question of Dobrinen and Todorcevic about cofinal types of ultrafilters: the Fubini square of a filter on \omega always has the same cofinal type as its Fubini cube. Moreover, the Fubini product of nonprincipal P-filters on \omega is commutative modulo cofinal equivalence.
Open AccessForbidden rectangles in compacta
We establish negative results about "rectangular" local bases in compacta. For example, there is no compactum where all points have local bases of cofinal type \omega x \omega_2. For another, the compactum \beta\omega has no nontrivially rectangular local bases, and the same is consistently true of \beta\omega \ \omega: no local base in \beta\omega has cofinal type \kappa x c if \kappa < m_{\sigma-n-linked} for some n in [1,\omega). Also, CH implies that every local base in \beta\omega \ \omega has the same cofinal type as one in \beta\omega. We also answer a question of Dobrinen and Todorcevic about cofinal types of ultrafilters: the Fubini square of a filter on \omega always has the same cofinal type as its Fubini cube. Moreover, the Fubini product of nonprincipal P-filters on \omega is commutative modulo cofinal equivalence.
- Open Access
Noetherian type in topological products
The cardinal invariant "Noetherian type" of a topological space $X$ (Nt(X)) was introduced by Peregudov in 1997 to deal with base properties that were studied by the Russian School as early as 1976. We study its behavior in products and box-products of topological spaces. We prove in Section 2: 1) There are spaces $X$ and $Y$ such that $Nt(X \times Y) < \min\{Nt(X), Nt(Y)\}$. 2) In several classes of compact spaces, the Noetherian type is preserved by the operations of forming a square and of passing to a dense subspace. The Noetherian type of the Cantor Cube of weight $\aleph_\omega$ with the countable box topology, $(2^{\aleph_\omega})_\delta$, is shown in Section 3 to be closely related to the combinatorics of covering collections of countable subsets of $\aleph_\omega$. We discuss the influence of principles like $\square_{\aleph_\omega}$ and Chang's conjecture for $\aleph_\omega$ on this number and prove that it is not decidable in ZFC (relative to the consistency of ZFC with large cardinal axioms). Within PCF theory we establish the existence of an $(\aleph_4,\aleph_1)$-sparse covering family of countable subsets of $\aleph_\omega$. From this follows an absolute upper bound of $\aleph_4$ on the Noetherian type of $(2^{\aleph_\omega})_\delta$. The proof uses ideas from Shelah's proof that if $\kappa^+ <\lambda$ then his ideal $I[\lambda]$ contains a stationary set consisting of points of cofinality $\kappa$.Open AccessNoetherian type in topological products
The cardinal invariant "Noetherian type" of a topological space $X$ (Nt(X)) was introduced by Peregudov in 1997 to deal with base properties that were studied by the Russian School as early as 1976. We study its behavior in products and box-products of topological spaces. We prove in Section 2: 1) There are spaces $X$ and $Y$ such that $Nt(X \times Y) < \min\{Nt(X), Nt(Y)\}$. 2) In several classes of compact spaces, the Noetherian type is preserved by the operations of forming a square and of passing to a dense subspace. The Noetherian type of the Cantor Cube of weight $\aleph_\omega$ with the countable box topology, $(2^{\aleph_\omega})_\delta$, is shown in Section 3 to be closely related to the combinatorics of covering collections of countable subsets of $\aleph_\omega$. We discuss the influence of principles like $\square_{\aleph_\omega}$ and Chang's conjecture for $\aleph_\omega$ on this number and prove that it is not decidable in ZFC (relative to the consistency of ZFC with large cardinal axioms). Within PCF theory we establish the existence of an $(\aleph_4,\aleph_1)$-sparse covering family of countable subsets of $\aleph_\omega$. From this follows an absolute upper bound of $\aleph_4$ on the Noetherian type of $(2^{\aleph_\omega})_\delta$. The proof uses ideas from Shelah's proof that if $\kappa^+ <\lambda$ then his ideal $I[\lambda]$ contains a stationary set consisting of points of cofinality $\kappa$. - Open Access
The (λ, κ)-Freese-Nation property for boolean algebras and compacta
We study a two-parameter generalization of the Freese-Nation Property of boolean algebras and its order-theoretic and topological consequences. For every regular infinite \kappa, the (\kappa,\kappa)-FN, the (\kappa^+,\kappa)-FN, and the \kappa-FN are known to be equivalent; we show that the family of properties (\lambda,\mu)-FN for \lambda>\mu form a true two-dimensional hierarchy that is robust with respect to coproducts, retracts, and the exponential operation. The (\kappa,\aleph_0)-FN in particular has strong consequences for base properties of compacta (stronger still for homogeneous compacta), and these consequences have natural duals in terms of special subsets of boolean algebras. We show that the (\kappa,\aleph_0)-FN also leads to a generalization of the equality of weight and \pi-character in dyadic compacta. Elementary subalgebras and their duals, elementary quotient spaces, were originally used to define the (\lambda, \kappa)-FN and its topological dual, which naturally generalized from Stone spaces to all compacta, thereby generalizing Shchepin's notion of openly generated compacta. We introduce a simple combinatorial definition of the (\lambda, \kappa)-FN that is equivalent to the original for regular infinite cardinals \lambda>\kappa.
Open AccessThe (λ, κ)-Freese-Nation property for boolean algebras and compacta
We study a two-parameter generalization of the Freese-Nation Property of boolean algebras and its order-theoretic and topological consequences. For every regular infinite \kappa, the (\kappa,\kappa)-FN, the (\kappa^+,\kappa)-FN, and the \kappa-FN are known to be equivalent; we show that the family of properties (\lambda,\mu)-FN for \lambda>\mu form a true two-dimensional hierarchy that is robust with respect to coproducts, retracts, and the exponential operation. The (\kappa,\aleph_0)-FN in particular has strong consequences for base properties of compacta (stronger still for homogeneous compacta), and these consequences have natural duals in terms of special subsets of boolean algebras. We show that the (\kappa,\aleph_0)-FN also leads to a generalization of the equality of weight and \pi-character in dyadic compacta. Elementary subalgebras and their duals, elementary quotient spaces, were originally used to define the (\lambda, \kappa)-FN and its topological dual, which naturally generalized from Stone spaces to all compacta, thereby generalizing Shchepin's notion of openly generated compacta. We introduce a simple combinatorial definition of the (\lambda, \kappa)-FN that is equivalent to the original for regular infinite cardinals \lambda>\kappa.