Mark A. Ditzler

Translation is carried out by the most conserved assemblies in biology. Among these assemblies, the ribosome and RNase P are central players. These ancient ribonucleoprotein complexes achieved structural and functional maturity by the last universal common ancestor (LUCA) of life. In prior work, we reconstructed the evolutionary history of the ribosome using its three-dimensional structure, based on accretion and molecular fingerprints that date back to life’s earliest stages. Here, we extend our structural phylogenetic framework—based on the accretion model—to RNase P, a ribonucleoprotein responsible for processing pre-tRNAs. By sampling RNase P RNA (RPR) sequences and structures across phylogeny and partitioning them into RNA fragments based on insertion fingerprints, we characterize the state of RPR at LUCA and reconstruct the chronology of its emergence. The chronology reveals that RNase P, like the ribosome, accreted modular RNA elements over evolution, while preserving the structure of preexisting elements, thus maintaining a structural record. We used interactions with tRNA to link and unify the evolutionary trajectories of RPR and rRNA. These results support the view that RNase P and the ribosome coevolved as part of a functionally integrated system. The ancestral catalytic sites of rRNA and RPR formed by the same process, fusion of two stem–elbow–stem elements. Analysis of these two coevolving RNAs also suggests that some of their accreted elements share common ancestry. Application of the accretion model requires correct secondary structures and was successful for RPR only when the traditional secondary structure was corrected by reorganizing a pseudoknot.

Translation of symbols in one chemical language into another defined genetics. Yet, the co-linearity of codons and amino acids is so commonplace an idea that few even ask how it arose. Readout is done by two distinct sets of proteins, called aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (AARS). AARS must enforce the rules first used to assemble themselves. To understand the roots of translation we must experimentally test the structural codes that the earliest AARS•tRNA cognate pairs used to recognize both amino acid and RNA substrates. We present here new results on five different facets of that problem. (i) The surfaces of structures coded by opposite strands of the same gene have opposite polarities. Core residues in proteins from one strand are surface residues in proteins from the other strand. The complementarity of base pairing thus projects into the proteome. That leads in turn to contrasting amino acid and RNA substrate binding modes. (ii) E. coli reproduces in vivo a nested hierarchy of active excerpts, or “urzymes”, similar to those we had designed as models for ancestral AARS. (iii) A third novel deletion produced in vivo and a new Class II urzyme suggests how to design bidirectional urzyme genes. (iv) Codon middle-base pairing provides a basis to constrain Class I and II AARS family trees. (v) AARS urzymes acylate Class-specific subsets of an RNA library, showing RNA substrate specificity for the first time. Four new tree-building tools augment these results to compose a viable platform for experimental study of the origins of genetic coding.

The reflexive translation of symbols in one chemical language to another defined genetics. Yet, the co-linearity of codons and amino acids is so commonplace an idea that few even ask how it arose. Readout is done by two distinct sets of proteins, called aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (AARS). AARS must enforce the rules first used to assemble themselves. The roots of translation lie in experimentally testing the structural codes that the earliest AARS•tRNA cognate pairs used to recognize both amino acid and RNA substrates. We review here new results on five different facets of that problem. (i) The surfaces of structures coded by opposite strands of the same gene have opposite polarities. The corresponding proteins then fold up “inside out” relative to one another. The inversion symmetry of base pairing thus projects into the proteome. That leads in turn to contrasting amino acid and RNA substrate binding modes. (ii) E. coli reproduces in vivo the nested hierarchy of active excerpts we had designed as models—protozymes and urzymes—for ancestral AARS. (iii) A third novel deletion produced in vivo and a new Class II urzyme suggest how to design bidirectional urzyme genes. (iv) Codon middle-base pairing provides a basis to constrain Class I and II AARS family trees. (v) AARS urzymes acylate Class-specific subsets of an RNA library, showing RNA substrate specificity for the first time. Four new phylogenetic routines augment these results to compose a viable platform for experimental study of the origins of genetic coding. Significance Statement The origin of genetic coding poses questions distinct from those faced studying the evolution of enzymes since the first cells. Modern enzymes that translate the code range in size from ∼330 to ∼970 amino acids. Ancestral forms cannot have been nearly as complex. Moreover, such primitive enzymes likely could enforce only a much-reduced coding alphabet. Structural and molecular biology data point to a broad sketch of events leading to the code. That research platform will enable us to see how Nature came to store information about the physical chemistry of amino acids in the coding table. That, in turn, allowed searching of a very broad amino acid sequence space. Selection could then learn how to assemble amino acids into functional, reflexive catalysts. Those catalysts had rates and fidelities consistent with bootstrapping the modern coding alphabet. New phylogenetic algorithms need to be developed to fully test that putative sketch experimentally.

In vitro selection is a powerful tool that can be used to understand basic principles of molecular evolution. We used in vitro selection to understand how changes in length and the accumulation of point mutations enable the evolution of functional RNAs. Using RNA populations of various lengths, we performed a series of in vitro experiments to select for ribozymes with RNA ligase activity. We identified a core ribozyme structure that was robust to changes in RNA length, high levels of mutagenesis, and increased selection pressure. Elaboration on this core structure resulted in improved activity which we show is consistent with a larger trend among functional RNAs in which increasing motif size can lead to an exponential improvement in fitness. We conclude that elaboration on conserved core structures is a preferred mechanism in RNA evolution. This conclusion, drawn from selections of RNAs from random sequences, is consistent with proposed evolutionary histories of specific biological RNAs. More generally, our results indicate that modern RNA structures can be used to infer ancestral structures. Our observations also suggest a mechanism by which structural outcomes of early RNA evolution would be largely reproducible even though RNA fitness landscapes consist of disconnected clusters of functional sequences.

The potential for biopolymers to evolve new structures has important consequences for their ability to optimize function and our attempts to reconstruct their evolutionary histories. Prior work with in vitro systems suggests that structural remodeling of RNA is difficult to achieve through the accumulation of point mutations or through recombination events. Sequence duplication may represent an alternative mechanism that can more readily lead to the evolution of new structures. Structural and sequence elements in many RNAs and proteins appear to be the products of duplication events, indicating that this mechanism plays a major role in molecular evolution. Despite the potential significance of this mechanism, little experimental data is available concerning the structural and evolutionary consequences of duplicating biopolymer sequences. To assess the structural consequences of sequence duplication on the evolution of RNA, we mutagenized an RNA sequence containing two copies of an ATP aptamer and subjected the resulting population to multiple in vitro evolution experiments. We identified multiple routes by which duplication, followed by the accumulation of functional point mutations, allowed our populations to sample two entirely different secondary structures. The two structures have no base pairs in common, but both structures contain two copies of the same ATP-binding motif. We do not observe the emergence of any other functional secondary structures beyond these two. Although this result suggests a limited capacity for duplication to support short-term functional innovation, major changes in secondary structure, like the one observed here, should be given careful consideration as they are likely to frustrate attempts to infer deep evolutionary histories of functional RNAs.

Mineral surfaces are often proposed as the sites of critical processes in the emergence of life. Clay minerals in particular are thought to play significant roles in the origin of life including polymerizing, concentrating, organizing, and protecting biopolymers. In these scenarios, the impact of minerals on biopolymer folding is expected to influence evolutionary processes. These processes include both the initial emergence of functional structures in the presence of the mineral and the subsequent transition away from the mineral-associated niche. The initial evolution of function depends upon the number and distribution of sequences capable of functioning in the presence of the mineral, and the transition to new environments depends upon the overlap between sequences that evolve on the mineral surface and sequences that can perform the same functions in the mineral's absence. To examine these processes, we evolved self-cleaving ribozymes in vitro in the presence or absence of Na-saturated montmorillonite clay mineral particles. Starting from a shared population of random sequences, RNA populations were evolved in parallel, along separate evolutionary trajectories. Comparative sequence analysis and activity assays show that the impact of this clay mineral on functional structure selection was minimal; it neither prevented common structures from emerging, nor did it promote the emergence of new structures. This suggests that montmorillonite does not improve RNA's ability to evolve functional structures; however, it also suggests that RNAs that do evolve in contact with montmorillonite retain the same structures in mineral-free environments, potentially facilitating an evolutionary transition away from a mineral-associated niche.

In vitro evolution experiments have long been used to evaluate the roles of RNA in both modern and ancient biology, and as a tool for biotechnology applications. The conditions under which these experiments have been conducted, however, do not reflect the range of cellular environments in modern biology or our understanding of chemical environments on the early earth, when the atmosphere and oceans were largely anoxic and soluble Fe²⁺ was abundant. To test the impact of environmental factors relevant to RNA's potential role in the earliest forms of life, we evolved populations of self-cleaving ribozymes in an anoxic atmosphere with varying pH in the presence of either Fe²⁺ or Mg²⁺. Populations evolved under these different conditions are dominated by different sequences and secondary structures, demonstrating global differences in the underlying fitness landscapes. Comparisons between evolutionary outcomes and catalytic activities also indicate that Mg²⁺ can readily take the place of Fe²⁺ in supporting the catalysis of RNA cleavage at neutral pH, but not at lower pH. These results highlight the importance of considering the specific environments in which functional biopolymers evolve when evaluating their potential roles in the origin of life, extant biology, or biotechnology.