Thomas Paul O'BRien
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Thomas Paul O'BRien has a total of 240 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- J. Bernard Blake
Space Science Applications Laboratory The Aerospace Corporation El Segundo CA USA
17 shared publications - Seth G. Claudepierre
University of California Los Angeles
17 shared publications - Drew L. Turner
Johns Hopkins University
12 shared publications - Mark Dixon Looper
The Aerospace Corporation, El Segundo, CA, USA
9 shared publications - Geoffrey D. Reeves
The New Mexico Consortium, Space Sciences Los Alamos NM USA
8 shared publications - Harlan E. Spence
The University of New Hampshire Durham NH USA
6 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 22 July 2025
- Published by Springer Nature in Space Science Reviews
- Vol. 221 (5) , 1-42
The Relativistic Electron Magnetic Spectrometer (REMS) Instrument
As we move towards proliferated space and smaller, more cost-effective satellites, miniaturization of quality science instrumentation is becoming necessary and possible. This paper describes the Relativistic Electron Magnetic Spectrometer (REMS), a miniaturization of NASA’s Van Allen Probes’ MagEIS-Medium instrument, which was designed to measure radiation belt electrons. REMS was designed, built, and delivered for NASA’s GTOSat mission (Blum et al. in Proc. SPIE 11389, micro- and nanotechnology sensors, systems, and applications XII, 113892E, 2020), and was integrated onto the spacecraft bus in 2021. REMS’s electron energy range is one decade and can be set between ∼30–1500 keV. The GTOSat REMS main rate electron energy centroids range from 136–1088 keV. REMS has 9 electron main rate energy channels and 32 electron histogram channels per detector pixel, allowing for more precise energy measurements that enable background subtraction as was accomplished with MagEIS. GTOSat REMS measures ∼400–9000 keV protons. The angular resolution ranges from ∼3°–20° depending on the REMS orientation and the detector pixel in question. On the spinning GTOSat, REMS provides a pitch angle resolution down to 5.63° (32 sectors per spin) for the main rate electron data product, 30° for the proton data product, and 22.5° for the histogram data product. A different sectoring choice would alter the pitch angle resolution. At the time of writing, the mission is awaiting a launch. In the meantime, REMS has been included in additional mission concepts and proposals. The REMS instrument provides high quality energy and pitch angle resolved measurements of electrons and protons, enabling future exploration and monitoring of Earth’s radiation belts with small satellites.
- 22 July 2025
- Published by Springer Nature in Space Science Reviews
- Vol. 221 (5) , 1-42
Open AccessThe Relativistic Electron Magnetic Spectrometer (REMS) Instrument
As we move towards proliferated space and smaller, more cost-effective satellites, miniaturization of quality science instrumentation is becoming necessary and possible. This paper describes the Relativistic Electron Magnetic Spectrometer (REMS), a miniaturization of NASA’s Van Allen Probes’ MagEIS-Medium instrument, which was designed to measure radiation belt electrons. REMS was designed, built, and delivered for NASA’s GTOSat mission (Blum et al. in Proc. SPIE 11389, micro- and nanotechnology sensors, systems, and applications XII, 113892E, 2020), and was integrated onto the spacecraft bus in 2021. REMS’s electron energy range is one decade and can be set between ∼30–1500 keV. The GTOSat REMS main rate electron energy centroids range from 136–1088 keV. REMS has 9 electron main rate energy channels and 32 electron histogram channels per detector pixel, allowing for more precise energy measurements that enable background subtraction as was accomplished with MagEIS. GTOSat REMS measures ∼400–9000 keV protons. The angular resolution ranges from ∼3°–20° depending on the REMS orientation and the detector pixel in question. On the spinning GTOSat, REMS provides a pitch angle resolution down to 5.63° (32 sectors per spin) for the main rate electron data product, 30° for the proton data product, and 22.5° for the histogram data product. A different sectoring choice would alter the pitch angle resolution. At the time of writing, the mission is awaiting a launch. In the meantime, REMS has been included in additional mission concepts and proposals. The REMS instrument provides high quality energy and pitch angle resolved measurements of electrons and protons, enabling future exploration and monitoring of Earth’s radiation belts with small satellites.
- Open Access
- 31 July 2023
- Published by American Astronomical Society
Recommending Low-Cost Compact Space Environment and Space Weather Effects Sensor Suites for NASA Missions
Whitepaper #450 in the Decadal Survey for Solar and Space Physics (Heliophysics) 2024-2033. Main topics: space weather applications; infrastructure/workforce/other programmatic. Additional topics: space weather research/operations/research loop; other programmatic; […]
- 31 July 2023
- Published by American Astronomical Society
Open AccessRecommending Low-Cost Compact Space Environment and Space Weather Effects Sensor Suites for NASA Missions
Whitepaper #450 in the Decadal Survey for Solar and Space Physics (Heliophysics) 2024-2033. Main topics: space weather applications; infrastructure/workforce/other programmatic. Additional topics: space weather research/operations/research loop; other programmatic; […]
- Open Access
- 31 July 2023
- Published by American Astronomical Society
Future Needs for Space Weather Forecasting
Whitepaper #036 in the Decadal Survey for Solar and Space Physics (Heliophysics) 2024-2033. Main topics: space weather applications. Additional topics: space weather research/operations/research loop; space-based missions/projects; space weather
- 31 July 2023
- Published by American Astronomical Society
Open AccessFuture Needs for Space Weather Forecasting
Whitepaper #036 in the Decadal Survey for Solar and Space Physics (Heliophysics) 2024-2033. Main topics: space weather applications. Additional topics: space weather research/operations/research loop; space-based missions/projects; space weather
- Open Access
- 27 March 2023
- Published by American Geophysical Union (AGU) in Space Weather
- Vol. 21 (3)
Specifying High Altitude Electrons Using Low‐Altitude LEO Systems: Updates to the SHELLS Model
We describe a new version of the SHELLS model, which specifies the outer electron belt environment as observed by the Van Allen Probes using the Kp Index and data from Polar‐orbiting Operational Environmental Satellites and the Meteorological Operational satellites as inputs. The updated model combines the radial, angular and energy dependence into a single neural network, allowing for specification of the electron environment for a set of user input energy, L‐shell and Bmirror values. We demonstrate that the model can accurately reproduce the outer electron radiation belt dynamics using both out‐of‐sample data from the Van Allen Probes and measurements from the Combined X‐ray Dosimeter instrument on GPS. This updated model will provide valuable characterization of the internal charging hazard for non‐GEO orbits, particularly in the post‐Van Allen Probes era.
- 27 March 2023
- Published by American Geophysical Union (AGU) in Space Weather
- Vol. 21 (3)
Open AccessSpecifying High Altitude Electrons Using Low‐Altitude LEO Systems: Updates to the SHELLS Model
We describe a new version of the SHELLS model, which specifies the outer electron belt environment as observed by the Van Allen Probes using the Kp Index and data from Polar‐orbiting Operational Environmental Satellites and the Meteorological Operational satellites as inputs. The updated model combines the radial, angular and energy dependence into a single neural network, allowing for specification of the electron environment for a set of user input energy, L‐shell and Bmirror values. We demonstrate that the model can accurately reproduce the outer electron radiation belt dynamics using both out‐of‐sample data from the Van Allen Probes and measurements from the Combined X‐ray Dosimeter instrument on GPS. This updated model will provide valuable characterization of the internal charging hazard for non‐GEO orbits, particularly in the post‐Van Allen Probes era.
- 10 August 2022
- Published by American Geophysical Union (AGU) in Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics
- Vol. 127 (8)
Electron Precipitation Curtains—Simulating the Microburst Origin Hypothesis
We explore the hypothesis that electron precipitation curtains such as those observed by the AeroCube‐6 satellite pair can be produced by electron microbursts. Precipitation curtains are latitudinal structures of stable precipitation that persist for timescales of 10s of seconds or longer. The electrons involved have energies of 10–100s of keV. The microburst formation hypothesis states that a source region in the equatorial region produces a series of very low frequency chorus wave emissions. Each of these emissions in turn produces a microburst of electron precipitation, filling the drift and bounce loss cone on the local field line. Electrons in the drift loss cone remain on the field line and bounce‐phase mix over subsequent bounces while also drifting in azimuth. When observed at downstream azimuths by a satellite equipped with an integral energy sensor, no bounce phase structure remains, or, equivalently, the same time profile is present when two such satellites pass by many seconds apart. The spatial structure that remains reflects the pattern of microburst sources. Statistical studies of where and when curtains occur have indicated that some, but not all, curtains could be caused by microbursts. We use test particle tracing in a dipole magnetic field to show that spatially stationary source regions generating periodic microbursts can produce curtain signatures azimuthally downstream. We conclude that one viable explanation for many of the curtains observed by the AeroCube‐6 pair is the accumulation of drift‐dispersed microburst electron byproducts in the drift loss cone.
- 10 August 2022
- Published by American Geophysical Union (AGU) in Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics
- Vol. 127 (8)
Electron Precipitation Curtains—Simulating the Microburst Origin Hypothesis
We explore the hypothesis that electron precipitation curtains such as those observed by the AeroCube‐6 satellite pair can be produced by electron microbursts. Precipitation curtains are latitudinal structures of stable precipitation that persist for timescales of 10s of seconds or longer. The electrons involved have energies of 10–100s of keV. The microburst formation hypothesis states that a source region in the equatorial region produces a series of very low frequency chorus wave emissions. Each of these emissions in turn produces a microburst of electron precipitation, filling the drift and bounce loss cone on the local field line. Electrons in the drift loss cone remain on the field line and bounce‐phase mix over subsequent bounces while also drifting in azimuth. When observed at downstream azimuths by a satellite equipped with an integral energy sensor, no bounce phase structure remains, or, equivalently, the same time profile is present when two such satellites pass by many seconds apart. The spatial structure that remains reflects the pattern of microburst sources. Statistical studies of where and when curtains occur have indicated that some, but not all, curtains could be caused by microbursts. We use test particle tracing in a dipole magnetic field to show that spatially stationary source regions generating periodic microbursts can produce curtain signatures azimuthally downstream. We conclude that one viable explanation for many of the curtains observed by the AeroCube‐6 pair is the accumulation of drift‐dispersed microburst electron byproducts in the drift loss cone.
- 10 August 2022
- Published by American Geophysical Union (AGU) in Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics
- Vol. 127 (8)
Drift Phase Structure Implications for Radiation Belt Transport
We examine drift phase structure in the electron radiation belt observations to differentiate radial transport mechanisms. Impulsive electrostatic or electromagnetic fields can cause radial transport and produce drift echoes (periodic drift phase structures with energy‐dependent period). Narrow‐band standing electromagnetic wave fields can also cause radial transport, while producing energy‐independent periodic drift phase structures. Broad‐band, random‐phase electromagnetic wave fields can cause radial transport, but do not necessarily produce drift phase structure. We present results of three case studies showing little association between drift phase structure and approximately MeV electron flux enhancements in the outer belt. We estimate the amplitude of drift phase structures expected for impulsive or narrow‐band interactions to compete with broad‐band, random‐phase waves. We show that the observed drift phase structure is typically much smaller than would be present if either impulses or narrow‐band waves were the dominant cause of radial transport. We conclude that radial transport is primarily consistent with the broad‐band, random‐phase, small perturbations assumed in quasilinear diffusion theory, although we cannot rule out the unlikely possibility that radial transport plays little role in radiation belt dynamics.
- 10 August 2022
- Published by American Geophysical Union (AGU) in Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics
- Vol. 127 (8)
Drift Phase Structure Implications for Radiation Belt Transport
We examine drift phase structure in the electron radiation belt observations to differentiate radial transport mechanisms. Impulsive electrostatic or electromagnetic fields can cause radial transport and produce drift echoes (periodic drift phase structures with energy‐dependent period). Narrow‐band standing electromagnetic wave fields can also cause radial transport, while producing energy‐independent periodic drift phase structures. Broad‐band, random‐phase electromagnetic wave fields can cause radial transport, but do not necessarily produce drift phase structure. We present results of three case studies showing little association between drift phase structure and approximately MeV electron flux enhancements in the outer belt. We estimate the amplitude of drift phase structures expected for impulsive or narrow‐band interactions to compete with broad‐band, random‐phase waves. We show that the observed drift phase structure is typically much smaller than would be present if either impulses or narrow‐band waves were the dominant cause of radial transport. We conclude that radial transport is primarily consistent with the broad‐band, random‐phase, small perturbations assumed in quasilinear diffusion theory, although we cannot rule out the unlikely possibility that radial transport plays little role in radiation belt dynamics.
- 23 April 2022
- Published by American Geophysical Union (AGU) in Space Weather
- Vol. 20 (4)
Thank You to Our 2021 Peer Reviewers
Key Point: The editors thank the 2021 peer reviewers
- 23 April 2022
- Published by American Geophysical Union (AGU) in Space Weather
- Vol. 20 (4)
Thank You to Our 2021 Peer Reviewers
Key Point: The editors thank the 2021 peer reviewers
- Open Access
- 11 February 2022
- Published by Wiley in ESS Open Archive
Electron Precipitation Curtains - Simulating the Microburst Origin Hypothesis
We explore the hypothesis that electron precipitation curtains such as those observed by the AeroCube-6 satellite pair can be produced by electron microbursts. Precipitation curtains are latitudinal structures of stable precipitation that persist for timescales of 10s of seconds or longer. The electrons involved have energies of 10s-100s of keV. The microburst formation hypothesis states that a source region in the equatorial region produces a series of very low frequency chorus wave emissions. Each of these emissions in turn produces a microburst of electron precipitation, filling the drift and bounce loss cone on the local field line. Electrons in the drift loss cone remain on the field line and bounce-phase mix over subsequent bounces while also drifting in azimuth. When observed at downstream azimuths by a satellite equipped with an integral energy sensor, no bounce phase structure remains, or, equivalently, the same time profile is present when two such satellites pass by many seconds apart. The spatial structure that remains reflects the pattern of microburst sources. Statistical studies of where and when curtains occur have indicated that some, but not all, curtains could be caused by microbursts. We use test particle tracing in a dipole magnetic field to show that spatially stationary source regions generating periodic microbursts can produce curtain signatures azimuthally downstream. We conclude that one viable explanation for many of the curtains observed by the AeroCube-6 pair is the accumulation of drift-dispersed microburst electron byproducts in the drift loss cone.
- 11 February 2022
- Published by Wiley in ESS Open Archive
Open AccessElectron Precipitation Curtains - Simulating the Microburst Origin Hypothesis
We explore the hypothesis that electron precipitation curtains such as those observed by the AeroCube-6 satellite pair can be produced by electron microbursts. Precipitation curtains are latitudinal structures of stable precipitation that persist for timescales of 10s of seconds or longer. The electrons involved have energies of 10s-100s of keV. The microburst formation hypothesis states that a source region in the equatorial region produces a series of very low frequency chorus wave emissions. Each of these emissions in turn produces a microburst of electron precipitation, filling the drift and bounce loss cone on the local field line. Electrons in the drift loss cone remain on the field line and bounce-phase mix over subsequent bounces while also drifting in azimuth. When observed at downstream azimuths by a satellite equipped with an integral energy sensor, no bounce phase structure remains, or, equivalently, the same time profile is present when two such satellites pass by many seconds apart. The spatial structure that remains reflects the pattern of microburst sources. Statistical studies of where and when curtains occur have indicated that some, but not all, curtains could be caused by microbursts. We use test particle tracing in a dipole magnetic field to show that spatially stationary source regions generating periodic microbursts can produce curtain signatures azimuthally downstream. We conclude that one viable explanation for many of the curtains observed by the AeroCube-6 pair is the accumulation of drift-dispersed microburst electron byproducts in the drift loss cone.
- Open Access
- 8 February 2022
- Published by Wiley in ESS Open Archive
Drift Phase Structure Implications for Radiation Belt Transport
We examine drift phase structure in the electron radiation belt observations to differentiate radial transport mechanisms. Impulsive electrostatic or electromagnetic fields can cause radial transport and produce drift echoes (periodic drift phase structures with energy-dependent period). Narrow-band standing electromagnetic wave fields can also cause radial transport, while producing energy-independent periodic drift phase structures. Broad-band, random-phase electromagnetic wave fields can cause radial transport, but do not necessarily produce drift phase structure. We present results of three case studies showing little association between drift phase structure and ~MeV electron flux enhancements in the outer belt. We estimate the amplitude of drift phase structures expected for impulsive or narrow-band interactions to compete with broad-band, random-phase waves. We show that the observed drift phase structure is typically much smaller than would be present if either impulses or narrow-band waves were the dominant cause of radial transport. We conclude that radial transport is primarily consistent with the broad-band, random-phase, small perturbations assumed in quasilinear diffusion theory, although we cannot rule out the unlikely possibility that radial transport plays little role in radiation belt dynamics.
- 8 February 2022
- Published by Wiley in ESS Open Archive
Open AccessDrift Phase Structure Implications for Radiation Belt Transport
We examine drift phase structure in the electron radiation belt observations to differentiate radial transport mechanisms. Impulsive electrostatic or electromagnetic fields can cause radial transport and produce drift echoes (periodic drift phase structures with energy-dependent period). Narrow-band standing electromagnetic wave fields can also cause radial transport, while producing energy-independent periodic drift phase structures. Broad-band, random-phase electromagnetic wave fields can cause radial transport, but do not necessarily produce drift phase structure. We present results of three case studies showing little association between drift phase structure and ~MeV electron flux enhancements in the outer belt. We estimate the amplitude of drift phase structures expected for impulsive or narrow-band interactions to compete with broad-band, random-phase waves. We show that the observed drift phase structure is typically much smaller than would be present if either impulses or narrow-band waves were the dominant cause of radial transport. We conclude that radial transport is primarily consistent with the broad-band, random-phase, small perturbations assumed in quasilinear diffusion theory, although we cannot rule out the unlikely possibility that radial transport plays little role in radiation belt dynamics.