Ilaria Silvia Rossella Gorrasi

Ilaria Silvia Rossella Gorrasi

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Ilaria Silvia Rossella Gorrasi has a total of 36 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:

  • Anna Tagliabue

    Human Nutrition and Eating Disorder Research Center, Department of Public Health, Experimental and Forensic Medicine, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy

    3 shared publications
  • Cinzia Ferraris

    Laboratory of Food Education and Sport Nutrition, Department of Public Health, Experimental and Forensic Medicine, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy

    3 shared publications
  • Elisabetta Carraro

    Department of Public Health and Pediatrics, University of Turin, Turin, Italy

    2 shared publications
  • Giorgio Gilli

    Department of Public Health and Pediatrics, University of Turin, Turin, Italy

    2 shared publications
  • Giovanni Abbate Daga

    Department of Neurosciences “Rita Levi Montalcini”, University of Turin, Turin, Italy

    2 shared publications
  • Lucia Decastelli

    Centro di Riferimento per la Tipizzazione delle Salmonelle, CeRTiS, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Piemonte Liguria e Valle d’Aosta, Via Bologna, 148, 10154 Turin, Italy

    2 shared publications

Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Monitoring of enteric viruses in treated and untreated civil and livestock sewages in the Piemonte Region - Italy

    by Cristina Pignata, Marco Panizzolo, Marta Gea, Angelo Romano, Claudio Caruso, Ilaria Gorrasi, Manila Bianchi, Lucia Decastelli, Giorgio Gilli, Silvia Marro, et al.

    Background and Objective: Enteric viruses are among the main causes of water-borne infectious diseases, therefore their monitoring in waters is crucial for public health. In the present work, financed by the Piemonte Region, the occurrence of seven enteric viruses was monitored in urban sewages...

  • Open Access

    Lifestyle-Related Risk Factors of Orthorexia Can Differ among the Students of Distinct University Courses

    by Monica Guglielmetti, Ottavia Eleonora Ferraro, Ilaria Silvia Rossella Gorrasi, Elisabetta Carraro, Simona Bo, Giovanni Abbate-Daga, Anna Tagliabue, Cinzia Ferraris

    Orthorexia nervosa (ON) is defined as the excessive attention on healthy eating, and studies especially focused on food quality ON prevalence in university students can be extremely variable. The objective of this study is to investigate whether there was a difference in ON risk between health-scientific, economic-humanistic, sport sciences and dietetics and nutrition students, and to evaluate if lifestyle-related ON risk factors (dieting, physical activity, drugs and supplements use) could have an impact in different ways in determining ON risk among students attending these four programs. Participants were recruited at the University of Pavia and received a two-section questionnaire including demographic and lifestyle information and the ORTO-15 questionnaire. A total of 671 students (54% F e 46% M) completed the questionnaire (median age 21.00 (IQR 20.00–23.00), median BMI 21.77 kg/m2 (IQR 20.06–23.66 kg/m2)). The 31.2% had ORTO-15 test scores < 35, and were considered at risk of having ON. No differences were found in ON risk among the students attending the four university courses. Dieting was confirmed as the major ON risk factor for health-scientific, economic-humanistic and sport sciences students. The type of sport practiced was an important determinant of ON risk only for the economic-humanistic course, while supplements use was statistically different between sport sciences students with or without ON. Our findings may suggest that lifestyle-related risk factors of orthorexia can differ among the students of distinct university courses, but these results need to be supported by further longitudinal and prospective studies.


  • Open Access

    Use of online and paper-and-pencil questionnaires to assess the distribution of orthorexia nervosa, muscle dysmorphia and eating disorders among university students: can different approaches lead to different results?

    by Ilaria Silvia Rossella Gorrasi, Cinzia Ferraris, Raffaella Degan, Giovanni Abbate Daga, Simona Bo, Anna Tagliabue, Monica Guglielmetti, Mattia Roppolo, Giorgio Gilli, Daniela Acquadro Maran, et al.

    Purpose: Administration of questionnaires to assess the diffusion of disordered eating behaviours via the web is becoming common today. The aim of this study is to assess whether two different approaches of administering a test to assess traits of eating disorders (EDs), orthorexia nervosa (ON) and muscle dysmorphia (MD) by email recruitment and online completion (web-based survey—WBS) and by in person recruitment and paper-and-pencil completion (paper-based survey—PBS), gives different results. Methods: During 2 consecutive academic years, a self-reported questionnaire consisting of questions about personal characteristics and three tests for the evaluation of ON (ORTO-15), MD (MDDI-ITA), and EDs (EAT-26) were administered to two groups of undergraduates, respectively, as a WBS and a PBS. Results: The WBS response rate was 6.7% (N = 137), and the PBS response rate was 86.5% (N = 372). The WBS group showed a statistically significant higher prevalence of students with eating disordered behaviours (21.2% vs 5.4%) and registered a higher mean score on the EAT-26 test (13.5 ± 11.1 vs 6.0 ± 8.0); no differences between the two groups emerged for ON and MD prevalence and test scores. Moreover, in the WBS group, the number of students with one or more tests with test scores above the cut-off values was significantly higher (46.0% vs 32.3%). Conclusion: The choice of the approach to administer a questionnaire to assess the diffusion of EDs and related issues must take into account all the factors that can result in selection bias and that can affect the reliability of the results. Level of evidence: Level V, descriptive cross-sectional survey.


  • Traits of orthorexia nervosa and muscle dysmorphia in Italian university students: a multicentre study

    by Ilaria Silvia Rossella Gorrasi, Silvia Bonetta, Mattia Roppolo, Giovanni Abbate Daga, Simona Bo, Anna Tagliabue, Cinzia Ferraris, Monica Guglielmetti, Marisa Arpesella, Maddalena Gaeta, et al.

    This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of traits of orthorexia nervosa (ON) and muscle dysmorphia (MD) in a group of undergraduates, investigate the associations between the risk of these conditions and the type of university course attended, the individual characteristics (gender, BMI, amount of physical activity, supplements and medicines use, dieting) and the risk of eating disorders (EDs).


  • Open Access

    Analysis of Gluten Content in Gluten-Free Pizza from Certified Take-Away Pizza Restaurants

    by Daniela Manila Bianchi, Cristiana Maurella, Silvia Gallina, Ilaria Silvia Rossella Gorrasi, Maria Caramelli, Lucia Decastelli

    Currently, a strict gluten-free diet is the only treatment for celiac disease. In Italy, food service establishments and restaurants can be certified for providing gluten-free foods, including pizza restaurants that make both gluten-free pizza and traditional wheat-based pizza. With this study we analyzed the gluten content in samples of gluten-free pizza prepared and purchased at certified restaurants in the Turin metropolitan area. All samples, from 28 pizzas and 28 cooked dough bases, produced results below the test limit of detection, except for one sample of cooked dough, that tested positive for gluten but still below the warning level for celiac consumers (<20 ppm). Gluten-free pizza, as advertised in the restaurants surveyed, can be considered a safe option for gluten-free consumption. Attention to and compliance with good manufacturing practices, a requisite for obtaining gluten-free certification for restaurants, were noted to have a positive effect on the final product.