Kateryna Pereverza
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Kateryna Pereverza has a total of 19 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Olga Kordas
Lund University
5 shared publications Eugene Nikiforovich
2 shared publications- Karel Mulder
Delft University of Technology
2 shared publications - Oleksii Pasichnyi
Research Group for Urban Analytics and Transitions (UrbanT), Department of Sustainable Development, Environmental Science and Engineering (SEED), KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Teknikringen 10B, 100 44 Stockholm, Sweden
2 shared publications Olga Kordas
Department for Sustainable Development, Environmental Science and Engineering (SEED) KTH Royal Institute of Technology Stockholm Sweden
2 shared publicationsAleksandar Madzarevic
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 18 June 2026
- Published by Elsevier in SSRN Electronic Journal
Organising for Sustainability Transitions in Cities: How Municipalities Build a Relational Infrastructure for Transformative Portfolios
To steer transitions to sustainability in cities, municipalities need to adopt more systemic approaches for organising activities and interventions, going beyond disconnected transition experiments and projects. Transformative portfolios (TPs) refer to coherent sets of interventions that have the potential to trigger system transformations in cities. To explore TPs, we approach them as a 'relational infrastructure''-'soft' and 'hard' mechanisms that enable interconnections across interventions along different dimensions. In this paper, we explore what kind of mechanisms need to be strengthened or created in cities to enable TPs. We are also interested in identifying the challenges that municipalities face when attempting to establish such mechanisms in practice. Our study is based on empirical research within the Climate Neutral Cities network (CNC2030) in Sweden created by the strategic innovation programme "Viable Cities" in 2019. Currently, within the network new instruments are considered to achieve an integration of activities at a more systemic level, including climate city contracts, climate investment plans, and system demonstrators. The preliminary findings of this study suggest that cities even in their current practice develop ways to improve coherence and integration across interventions, but rarely in a systematic and reflexive way. Transition intermediaries like Viable Cities play an important role in supporting cities in more strategically deploying their efforts for climate transition governance. And the CNC2030 network enables the exchange of learnings and good practices across Swedish municipalities.
- 18 June 2026
- Published by Elsevier in SSRN Electronic Journal
Open AccessOrganising for Sustainability Transitions in Cities: How Municipalities Build a Relational Infrastructure for Transformative Portfolios
To steer transitions to sustainability in cities, municipalities need to adopt more systemic approaches for organising activities and interventions, going beyond disconnected transition experiments and projects. Transformative portfolios (TPs) refer to coherent sets of interventions that have the potential to trigger system transformations in cities. To explore TPs, we approach them as a 'relational infrastructure''-'soft' and 'hard' mechanisms that enable interconnections across interventions along different dimensions. In this paper, we explore what kind of mechanisms need to be strengthened or created in cities to enable TPs. We are also interested in identifying the challenges that municipalities face when attempting to establish such mechanisms in practice. Our study is based on empirical research within the Climate Neutral Cities network (CNC2030) in Sweden created by the strategic innovation programme "Viable Cities" in 2019. Currently, within the network new instruments are considered to achieve an integration of activities at a more systemic level, including climate city contracts, climate investment plans, and system demonstrators. The preliminary findings of this study suggest that cities even in their current practice develop ways to improve coherence and integration across interventions, but rarely in a systematic and reflexive way. Transition intermediaries like Viable Cities play an important role in supporting cities in more strategically deploying their efforts for climate transition governance. And the CNC2030 network enables the exchange of learnings and good practices across Swedish municipalities.
- Open Access
- 31 March 2025
- Published by Wiley in Environmental Policy and Governance
- Vol. 35 (4) , 631-646
Fostering Urban Climate Transition Through Innovative Governance Coordination
The role of cities in addressing the challenge of climate change is growing and becoming more noticeable in global debates and actions on the ground. However, transformative innovations needed for addressing complex and wicked societal challenges cannot be achieved by cities alone and require concerted efforts also at national and international levels. In addition to multi‐level governance collaborations between cities, regions and the state or horizontal networks between cities, unconventional polycentric governance arrangements are emerging that still need to be explored and understood better. This study analyses the case of the Swedish Strategic Innovation programme ‘Viable Cities’ and its ‘Climate‐neutral Cities 2030’ (CNC2030) initiative over the period of 6 years. Our analysis shows how during this time, Viable Cities successfully mediated the design and implementation across governance levels (urban, national and European) of a number of governance instruments that influenced the work of Swedish municipalities towards the goals of climate‐neutrality in their cities. Through mutual commitments, learning platforms and an alignment of instruments, this governance innovation increases the collective capacity of Swedish cities to act in the climate transition. Our study shows how intermediaries can facilitate innovative arrangements grounded in multi‐level governance alignments and inter‐urban interactions to enact and shape transformative innovation policy for urban climate transition.
- 31 March 2025
- Published by Wiley in Environmental Policy and Governance
- Vol. 35 (4) , 631-646
Open AccessFostering Urban Climate Transition Through Innovative Governance Coordination
The role of cities in addressing the challenge of climate change is growing and becoming more noticeable in global debates and actions on the ground. However, transformative innovations needed for addressing complex and wicked societal challenges cannot be achieved by cities alone and require concerted efforts also at national and international levels. In addition to multi‐level governance collaborations between cities, regions and the state or horizontal networks between cities, unconventional polycentric governance arrangements are emerging that still need to be explored and understood better. This study analyses the case of the Swedish Strategic Innovation programme ‘Viable Cities’ and its ‘Climate‐neutral Cities 2030’ (CNC2030) initiative over the period of 6 years. Our analysis shows how during this time, Viable Cities successfully mediated the design and implementation across governance levels (urban, national and European) of a number of governance instruments that influenced the work of Swedish municipalities towards the goals of climate‐neutrality in their cities. Through mutual commitments, learning platforms and an alignment of instruments, this governance innovation increases the collective capacity of Swedish cities to act in the climate transition. Our study shows how intermediaries can facilitate innovative arrangements grounded in multi‐level governance alignments and inter‐urban interactions to enact and shape transformative innovation policy for urban climate transition.
- Open Access
- 11 February 2025
- Published by Taylor & Francis
- p. 272-287
Transdisciplinary sustainability courses
Transdisciplinary courses aimed at advancing competencies and skills for dealing with complex sustainability transition challenges are an important part of sustainability education. Such courses are critically important, as they prepare students for addressing complex and intertwined challenges our society is facing. Core qualities such courses often strive for are interactions between students and stakeholders, the collaboration of students from a variety of backgrounds, peer learning through activating interactions on different layers: in project groups and the entire class, and reflexive and exploratory learning when addressing open-ended transition challenges in iterative processes. Already now and even more in the future, the design and facilitation of such transdisciplinary courses will be happening in various remote digital and hybrid formats. This chapter describes ten design principles that can be used by teachers and facilitators of transdisciplinary courses in the ever-evolving hybrid environments. We illustrate how these design principles can be operationalised with the help of different facilitation techniques. The facilitation technique examples are taken from the university course “Transdisciplinary Approaches for System Innovations”, run at KTH Royal Institute of Technology in Stockholm. With the inevitable evolution of hybrid learning environments in the future, the proposed principles can serve as the basis for reimagining transdisciplinary courses. As digital tools provide new opportunities, these principles can also be taken forward with more radical ideas to efficiently foster collaborative and reflexive learning.
- 11 February 2025
- Published by Taylor & Francis
- p. 272-287
Open AccessTransdisciplinary sustainability courses
Transdisciplinary courses aimed at advancing competencies and skills for dealing with complex sustainability transition challenges are an important part of sustainability education. Such courses are critically important, as they prepare students for addressing complex and intertwined challenges our society is facing. Core qualities such courses often strive for are interactions between students and stakeholders, the collaboration of students from a variety of backgrounds, peer learning through activating interactions on different layers: in project groups and the entire class, and reflexive and exploratory learning when addressing open-ended transition challenges in iterative processes. Already now and even more in the future, the design and facilitation of such transdisciplinary courses will be happening in various remote digital and hybrid formats. This chapter describes ten design principles that can be used by teachers and facilitators of transdisciplinary courses in the ever-evolving hybrid environments. We illustrate how these design principles can be operationalised with the help of different facilitation techniques. The facilitation technique examples are taken from the university course “Transdisciplinary Approaches for System Innovations”, run at KTH Royal Institute of Technology in Stockholm. With the inevitable evolution of hybrid learning environments in the future, the proposed principles can serve as the basis for reimagining transdisciplinary courses. As digital tools provide new opportunities, these principles can also be taken forward with more radical ideas to efficiently foster collaborative and reflexive learning.
- Open Access
- 1 September 2019
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Cleaner Production
- Vol. 232, 359-368
Linking socio-technical transition studies and organisational change management: Steps towards an integrative, multi-scale heuristic
- 1 September 2019
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Cleaner Production
- Vol. 232, 359-368
Open AccessLinking socio-technical transition studies and organisational change management: Steps towards an integrative, multi-scale heuristic
- 24 April 2019
- Published by KTH Royal Institute of Technology
Steering sustainability transitions? Modular participatory backcasting for strategic planning in the heating and cooling sector
Fostering sustainability transitions in the heating and cooling sector is a necessary and urgent issue. Steering mechanisms can enable coordination of actions by different actors towards common sus ...
- 24 April 2019
- Published by KTH Royal Institute of Technology
Steering sustainability transitions? Modular participatory backcasting for strategic planning in the heating and cooling sector
Fostering sustainability transitions in the heating and cooling sector is a necessary and urgent issue. Steering mechanisms can enable coordination of actions by different actors towards common sus ...
- Open Access
- 1 January 2019
- Published by Elsevier in Energy Policy
- Vol. 124, 123-134
Modular participatory backcasting: A unifying framework for strategic planning in the heating sector
- 1 January 2019
- Published by Elsevier in Energy Policy
- Vol. 124, 123-134
Open AccessModular participatory backcasting: A unifying framework for strategic planning in the heating sector
- 1 January 2017
- Published by Elsevier in Applied Energy
- Vol. 186, 115-125
Strategic planning for sustainable heating in cities: A morphological method for scenario development and selection
- 1 January 2017
- Published by Elsevier in Applied Energy
- Vol. 186, 115-125
Strategic planning for sustainable heating in cities: A morphological method for scenario development and selection
- 5 May 2015
- Published by Emerald Publishing in International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education
- Vol. 16 (3) , 385-401
Motivating students and lecturers for education in sustainable development
Purpose: – This paper aims at identifying factors that could contribute to the motivation of students in sustainable development (SD) education. The underlying idea of the paper is that SD education is not always as attractive among students and lecturers as many would like it to be.Design/methodology/approach: – The paper briefly reviews literature regarding behavioral change for long-term benefits. It identifies four motivators that could be effective to make people pursue longer-term objectives. It identifies if these motivators were present in five cases of successful SD education.Findings: – The four motivators for students that were identified in the literature review (a sense of autonomy, a challenge of reflection on the future role, connection with others, self-fulfillment, focus on the individual learning need) could be observed in the cases of successful SD education, although to various degrees. Individual autonomy in learning was not observed, but group autonomy was present in all cases.Research limitations/implications: – The case studies were all electives. It is unclear how the motivators could work out in mandatory courses. Moreover, the curriculum as a whole will affect the success of single courses. Successful courses being “the exception” of the curriculum might be judged differently if they would be part of the curriculum in which such courses would be the main stream. Further research is required to check if the motivators are effective in mandatory and not specifically SD-targeted courses. It is also not clear how various motivators could be applied most effectively in a curriculum.Practical implications: – The paper gives guidance to lecturers and educational managers to design attractive and effective SD education.Originality/value: – The paper treats SD education from a novel perspective: how to convey a credible behavioral message, and how to motivate students for education for SD.
- 5 May 2015
- Published by Emerald Publishing in International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education
- Vol. 16 (3) , 385-401
Motivating students and lecturers for education in sustainable development
Purpose: – This paper aims at identifying factors that could contribute to the motivation of students in sustainable development (SD) education. The underlying idea of the paper is that SD education is not always as attractive among students and lecturers as many would like it to be.Design/methodology/approach: – The paper briefly reviews literature regarding behavioral change for long-term benefits. It identifies four motivators that could be effective to make people pursue longer-term objectives. It identifies if these motivators were present in five cases of successful SD education.Findings: – The four motivators for students that were identified in the literature review (a sense of autonomy, a challenge of reflection on the future role, connection with others, self-fulfillment, focus on the individual learning need) could be observed in the cases of successful SD education, although to various degrees. Individual autonomy in learning was not observed, but group autonomy was present in all cases.Research limitations/implications: – The case studies were all electives. It is unclear how the motivators could work out in mandatory courses. Moreover, the curriculum as a whole will affect the success of single courses. Successful courses being “the exception” of the curriculum might be judged differently if they would be part of the curriculum in which such courses would be the main stream. Further research is required to check if the motivators are effective in mandatory and not specifically SD-targeted courses. It is also not clear how various motivators could be applied most effectively in a curriculum.Practical implications: – The paper gives guidance to lecturers and educational managers to design attractive and effective SD education.Originality/value: – The paper treats SD education from a novel perspective: how to convey a credible behavioral message, and how to motivate students for education for SD.
- 19 November 2013
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 29-45
Being Scared is not Enough! Motivators for Education for Sustainable Development
- 19 November 2013
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 29-45
Being Scared is not Enough! Motivators for Education for Sustainable Development