Colin James Douglas Ross
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Colin James Douglas Ross has a total of 1000 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Bruce C. Carleton
Division of Translational Therapeutics, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
83 shared publications - Shahrad Rod Rassekh
University of British Columbia
73 shared publications - Michael Reuben Hayden
Centre for Molecular Medicine and Therapeutics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
72 shared publications - Erika N. Scott
British Columbia Children’s Hospital Research Institute Vancouver British Columbia Canada
49 shared publications - David Robert Freyer
Cancer and Blood Disease Institute, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
47 shared publications - Edward A. Neuwelt
Department of Neurology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
47 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 28 May 2026
- Vol. 2 (4)
Human germline biallelic loss-of-function OSMR variants cause severe allergic disease
Samra, Sharma, et al. identify biallelic loss-of-function variants in OSMR as the cause of a new human primary atopic disorder characterized by severe early-onset eczema, eosinophilia, and elevated IgE. Loss of OSMRβ surface expression abolishes OSM-dependent STAT signaling, revealing a key role for OSM-OSMR signaling in maintaining cutaneous immune homeostasis.
- 28 May 2026
- Vol. 2 (4)
Open AccessHuman germline biallelic loss-of-function OSMR variants cause severe allergic disease
Samra, Sharma, et al. identify biallelic loss-of-function variants in OSMR as the cause of a new human primary atopic disorder characterized by severe early-onset eczema, eosinophilia, and elevated IgE. Loss of OSMRβ surface expression abolishes OSM-dependent STAT signaling, revealing a key role for OSM-OSMR signaling in maintaining cutaneous immune homeostasis.
- Open Access
- 18 March 2026
- Published by Elsevier in Molecular Therapy Nucleic Acids
- Vol. 37 (2) , 102909
sgRNA amount is a limiting factor in adenine base editing using RNA LNPs
- 18 March 2026
- Published by Elsevier in Molecular Therapy Nucleic Acids
- Vol. 37 (2) , 102909
Open AccesssgRNA amount is a limiting factor in adenine base editing using RNA LNPs
- Open Access
- 30 November 2025
- Published by Wiley in Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
- Vol. 119 (2) , 447-456
Pathway‐Informed Machine Learning Identifies Genetic Predictors of High‐Dose Methotrexate‐Induced Mucositis in Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
High‐dose methotrexate for pediatric cancer treatment is frequently associated with mucositis, which can lead to delayed or discontinued treatment and impact survival. While individual genetic variants have been implicated, the cumulative impact of genetic variation within relevant biological pathways remains unexplored. We evaluated single nucleotide polymorphisms across 18 pathways previously identified as relevant to mucositis in 278 pediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia from six academic health centers across Canada. Pathway enrichment was assessed using the Joint Association of Genetic variants tool, and a predictive model was developed using XGBoost, a supervised machine learning algorithm based on gradient‐boosted decision trees. Pathway enrichment identified significant associations in IL6 ( P = 0.04) and WNT/β‐catenin ( P = 0.048) signaling pathways. The predictive model (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.76) highlighted single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with inflammation‐ and mucosa‐related genes, including PRKCD , IL17B , MAST3 , and CAPN9 , with both risk and protective effects. Model performance dropped by 0.15 in AUC (from 0.76 to 0.61) after removing single nucleotide polymorphism features, underscoring their predictive value. This pathway‐informed approach identifies genetic contributors to methotrexate‐induced mucositis and supports polygenic risk prediction. Our findings provide a foundation for individualized toxicity risk profiling and suggest potential therapeutic targets to mitigate treatment‐limiting mucositis in pediatric oncology.
- 30 November 2025
- Published by Wiley in Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
- Vol. 119 (2) , 447-456
Open AccessPathway‐Informed Machine Learning Identifies Genetic Predictors of High‐Dose Methotrexate‐Induced Mucositis in Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
High‐dose methotrexate for pediatric cancer treatment is frequently associated with mucositis, which can lead to delayed or discontinued treatment and impact survival. While individual genetic variants have been implicated, the cumulative impact of genetic variation within relevant biological pathways remains unexplored. We evaluated single nucleotide polymorphisms across 18 pathways previously identified as relevant to mucositis in 278 pediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia from six academic health centers across Canada. Pathway enrichment was assessed using the Joint Association of Genetic variants tool, and a predictive model was developed using XGBoost, a supervised machine learning algorithm based on gradient‐boosted decision trees. Pathway enrichment identified significant associations in IL6 ( P = 0.04) and WNT/β‐catenin ( P = 0.048) signaling pathways. The predictive model (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.76) highlighted single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with inflammation‐ and mucosa‐related genes, including PRKCD , IL17B , MAST3 , and CAPN9 , with both risk and protective effects. Model performance dropped by 0.15 in AUC (from 0.76 to 0.61) after removing single nucleotide polymorphism features, underscoring their predictive value. This pathway‐informed approach identifies genetic contributors to methotrexate‐induced mucositis and supports polygenic risk prediction. Our findings provide a foundation for individualized toxicity risk profiling and suggest potential therapeutic targets to mitigate treatment‐limiting mucositis in pediatric oncology.
- Open Access
- 25 November 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Fig. 2 from Intravenous N-Acetylcysteine to Prevent Cisplatin-Induced Hearing Loss in Children: A Nonrandomized Controlled Phase I Trial
Supplementary Fig. 2 Cumulative incidence of SIOP Grade ≥2 hearing loss
- 25 November 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Fig. 2 from Intravenous N-Acetylcysteine to Prevent Cisplatin-Induced Hearing Loss in Children: A Nonrandomized Controlled Phase I Trial
Supplementary Fig. 2 Cumulative incidence of SIOP Grade ≥2 hearing loss
- Open Access
- 25 November 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Fig. 5 from Intravenous N-Acetylcysteine to Prevent Cisplatin-Induced Hearing Loss in Children: A Nonrandomized Controlled Phase I Trial
Supplementary Fig. 5 Progression-free survival in NAC treated and observation patients
- 25 November 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Fig. 5 from Intravenous N-Acetylcysteine to Prevent Cisplatin-Induced Hearing Loss in Children: A Nonrandomized Controlled Phase I Trial
Supplementary Fig. 5 Progression-free survival in NAC treated and observation patients
- Open Access
- 25 November 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Fig. 4 from Intravenous N-Acetylcysteine to Prevent Cisplatin-Induced Hearing Loss in Children: A Nonrandomized Controlled Phase I Trial
Supplementary Fig. 4 Evaluation of long-term storage of serum specimens (NAC assay)
- 25 November 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Fig. 4 from Intravenous N-Acetylcysteine to Prevent Cisplatin-Induced Hearing Loss in Children: A Nonrandomized Controlled Phase I Trial
Supplementary Fig. 4 Evaluation of long-term storage of serum specimens (NAC assay)
- Open Access
- 25 November 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Fig. 1 from Intravenous N-Acetylcysteine to Prevent Cisplatin-Induced Hearing Loss in Children: A Nonrandomized Controlled Phase I Trial
Supplementary Fig. 1 Treatment schema & Sampling Timepoints
- 25 November 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Fig. 1 from Intravenous N-Acetylcysteine to Prevent Cisplatin-Induced Hearing Loss in Children: A Nonrandomized Controlled Phase I Trial
Supplementary Fig. 1 Treatment schema & Sampling Timepoints
- Open Access
- 25 November 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Fig. 3 from Intravenous N-Acetylcysteine to Prevent Cisplatin-Induced Hearing Loss in Children: A Nonrandomized Controlled Phase I Trial
Supplementary Fig. 3 Change in serum glutathione concentrations following NAC infusion
- 25 November 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Fig. 3 from Intravenous N-Acetylcysteine to Prevent Cisplatin-Induced Hearing Loss in Children: A Nonrandomized Controlled Phase I Trial
Supplementary Fig. 3 Change in serum glutathione concentrations following NAC infusion
- Open Access
- 25 November 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Data from Intravenous N-Acetylcysteine to Prevent Cisplatin-Induced Hearing Loss in Children: A Nonrandomized Controlled Phase I Trial
Purpose:Cisplatin-induced hearing loss (CIHL) is common and permanent. As compared with earlier otoprotectants, we hypothesized N-acetylcysteine (NAC) offers potential for stronger otoprotection through stimulation of glutathione (GSH) production. This study tested the optimal dose, safety, and efficacy of NAC to prevent CIHL.Patients and Methods:In this nonrandomized, controlled phase Ia/Ib trial, children and adolescents newly diagnosed with nonmetastatic, cisplatin-treated tumors received NAC intravenously 4 hours post-cisplatin. The trial performed dose-escalation across three dose levels to establish a safe dose that exceeded the targeted peak serum NAC concentration of 1.5 mmol/L (as identified from preclinical models). Patients with metastatic disease or who were otherwise ineligible were enrolled in an observation-only/control arm. To evaluate efficacy, serial age-appropriate audiology assessments were performed. Integrated biology examined genes involved in GSH metabolism and post-NAC GSH concentrations.Results:Of 52 patients enrolled, 24 received NAC and 28 were in the control arm. The maximum tolerated dose was not reached; analysis of peak NAC concentration identified 450 mg/kg as the recommended phase II dose (RP2D). Infusion-related reactions were common. No severe adverse events occurred. Compared with the control arm, NAC decreased likelihood of CIHL at the end of cisplatin therapy [OR, 0.13; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.021–0.847; P = 0.033] and recommendations for hearing intervention at end of study (OR, 0.082; 95% CI, 0.011–0.60; P = 0.014). NAC increased GSH; GSTP1 influenced risk for CIHL and NAC otoprotection.Conclusions:NAC was safe at the RP2D, with strong evidence for efficacy to prevent CIHL, warranting further development as a next-generation otoprotectant.
- 25 November 2025
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessData from Intravenous N-Acetylcysteine to Prevent Cisplatin-Induced Hearing Loss in Children: A Nonrandomized Controlled Phase I Trial
Purpose:Cisplatin-induced hearing loss (CIHL) is common and permanent. As compared with earlier otoprotectants, we hypothesized N-acetylcysteine (NAC) offers potential for stronger otoprotection through stimulation of glutathione (GSH) production. This study tested the optimal dose, safety, and efficacy of NAC to prevent CIHL.Patients and Methods:In this nonrandomized, controlled phase Ia/Ib trial, children and adolescents newly diagnosed with nonmetastatic, cisplatin-treated tumors received NAC intravenously 4 hours post-cisplatin. The trial performed dose-escalation across three dose levels to establish a safe dose that exceeded the targeted peak serum NAC concentration of 1.5 mmol/L (as identified from preclinical models). Patients with metastatic disease or who were otherwise ineligible were enrolled in an observation-only/control arm. To evaluate efficacy, serial age-appropriate audiology assessments were performed. Integrated biology examined genes involved in GSH metabolism and post-NAC GSH concentrations.Results:Of 52 patients enrolled, 24 received NAC and 28 were in the control arm. The maximum tolerated dose was not reached; analysis of peak NAC concentration identified 450 mg/kg as the recommended phase II dose (RP2D). Infusion-related reactions were common. No severe adverse events occurred. Compared with the control arm, NAC decreased likelihood of CIHL at the end of cisplatin therapy [OR, 0.13; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.021–0.847; P = 0.033] and recommendations for hearing intervention at end of study (OR, 0.082; 95% CI, 0.011–0.60; P = 0.014). NAC increased GSH; GSTP1 influenced risk for CIHL and NAC otoprotection.Conclusions:NAC was safe at the RP2D, with strong evidence for efficacy to prevent CIHL, warranting further development as a next-generation otoprotectant.