Fergus V. Coakley
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Fergus V. Coakley has a total of 180 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Bryan R. Foster
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, United States
14 shared publicationsAntonio C. Westphalen
Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, 505 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94143-0628, United States
4 shared publicationsChristopher L. Amling
Department of Urology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR
4 shared publicationsDavid R. Pettersson
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Mail Code L340, Portland, OR, 97239, USA
4 shared publicationsElena K. Korngold
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, L340, Portland, OR 97239, United States
4 shared publicationsApurva A. Bonde
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, L340, Portland, OR 97239, United States
3 shared publications
Latest Publications
- 11 October 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of the American College of Radiology
- Vol. 23 (4) , 610-612
Proposal for Inclusion of Gynecology and Obstetrics in the Radiology Board Examination
- 11 October 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of the American College of Radiology
- Vol. 23 (4) , 610-612
Proposal for Inclusion of Gynecology and Obstetrics in the Radiology Board Examination
- 1 September 2024
- Published by Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) in Radiology: Artificial Intelligence
- Vol. 6 (5) , e230521
Deep Learning–based Unsupervised Domain Adaptation via a Unified Model for Prostate Lesion Detection Using Multisite Biparametric MRI Datasets
To determine whether the unsupervised domain adaptation (UDA) method with generated images improves the performance of a supervised learning (SL) model for prostate cancer (PCa) detection using multisite biparametric (bp) MRI datasets. This retrospective study included data from 5150 patients (14 191 samples) collected across nine different imaging centers. A novel UDA method using a unified generative model was developed for PCa detection using multisite bpMRI datasets. This method translates diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) acquisitions, including apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and individual diffusion-weighted (DW) images acquired using various b values, to align with the style of images acquired using b values recommended by Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) guidelines. The generated ADC and DW images replace the original images for PCa detection. An independent set of 1692 test cases (2393 samples) was used for evaluation. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used as the primary metric, and statistical analysis was performed via bootstrapping. For all test cases, the AUC values for baseline SL and UDA methods were 0.73 and 0.79 (P < .001), respectively, for PCa lesions with PI-RADS score of 3 or greater and 0.77 and 0.80 (P < .001) for lesions with PI-RADS scores of 4 or greater. In the 361 test cases under the most unfavorable image acquisition setting, the AUC values for baseline SL and UDA were 0.49 and 0.76 (P < .001) for lesions with PI-RADS scores of 3 or greater and 0.50 and 0.77 (P < .001) for lesions with PI-RADS scores of 4 or greater. UDA with generated images improved the performance of SL methods in PCa lesion detection across multisite datasets with various b values, especially for images acquired with significant deviations from the PI-RADS-recommended DWI protocol (eg, with an extremely high b value). Keywords: Prostate Cancer Detection, Multisite, Unsupervised Domain Adaptation, Diffusion-weighted Imaging, b Value Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2024
- 1 September 2024
- Published by Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) in Radiology: Artificial Intelligence
- Vol. 6 (5) , e230521
Deep Learning–based Unsupervised Domain Adaptation via a Unified Model for Prostate Lesion Detection Using Multisite Biparametric MRI Datasets
To determine whether the unsupervised domain adaptation (UDA) method with generated images improves the performance of a supervised learning (SL) model for prostate cancer (PCa) detection using multisite biparametric (bp) MRI datasets. This retrospective study included data from 5150 patients (14 191 samples) collected across nine different imaging centers. A novel UDA method using a unified generative model was developed for PCa detection using multisite bpMRI datasets. This method translates diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) acquisitions, including apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and individual diffusion-weighted (DW) images acquired using various b values, to align with the style of images acquired using b values recommended by Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) guidelines. The generated ADC and DW images replace the original images for PCa detection. An independent set of 1692 test cases (2393 samples) was used for evaluation. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used as the primary metric, and statistical analysis was performed via bootstrapping. For all test cases, the AUC values for baseline SL and UDA methods were 0.73 and 0.79 (P < .001), respectively, for PCa lesions with PI-RADS score of 3 or greater and 0.77 and 0.80 (P < .001) for lesions with PI-RADS scores of 4 or greater. In the 361 test cases under the most unfavorable image acquisition setting, the AUC values for baseline SL and UDA were 0.49 and 0.76 (P < .001) for lesions with PI-RADS scores of 3 or greater and 0.50 and 0.77 (P < .001) for lesions with PI-RADS scores of 4 or greater. UDA with generated images improved the performance of SL methods in PCa lesion detection across multisite datasets with various b values, especially for images acquired with significant deviations from the PI-RADS-recommended DWI protocol (eg, with an extremely high b value). Keywords: Prostate Cancer Detection, Multisite, Unsupervised Domain Adaptation, Diffusion-weighted Imaging, b Value Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2024
- 8 July 2024
- Published by Springer Nature in Abdominal Radiology
- Vol. 50 (1) , 261-271
Targeted biopsy of the prostate
Diagnostic multiparametric MRI of the prostate has steadily evolved over the last three decades and can now reliably depict the dominant tumor in most men with prostate cancer. In response, several methods of targeted biopsy to direct tissue sampling of suspected tumor foci seen at multiparametric MRI have been developed and successfully tested in recent years, including software-assisted MRI-ultrasound (US) fusion biopsy and direct MRI-guided in-bore biopsy. These advances are leading to a sea change in the approach to prostate cancer diagnosis, with the traditional approach of blind systematic biopsy increasingly being replaced by MRI directed targeted biopsy. This review aims to describe the current status of targeted biopsy, with an emphasis on the relative accuracy of different techniques. The results of several critical large multicenter trials are presented, while unanswered questions that require more research are highlighted.
- 8 July 2024
- Published by Springer Nature in Abdominal Radiology
- Vol. 50 (1) , 261-271
Targeted biopsy of the prostate
Diagnostic multiparametric MRI of the prostate has steadily evolved over the last three decades and can now reliably depict the dominant tumor in most men with prostate cancer. In response, several methods of targeted biopsy to direct tissue sampling of suspected tumor foci seen at multiparametric MRI have been developed and successfully tested in recent years, including software-assisted MRI-ultrasound (US) fusion biopsy and direct MRI-guided in-bore biopsy. These advances are leading to a sea change in the approach to prostate cancer diagnosis, with the traditional approach of blind systematic biopsy increasingly being replaced by MRI directed targeted biopsy. This review aims to describe the current status of targeted biopsy, with an emphasis on the relative accuracy of different techniques. The results of several critical large multicenter trials are presented, while unanswered questions that require more research are highlighted.
- 12 January 2024
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography
- Vol. 48 (3) , 378-381
Prototype Description and Ex Vivo Evaluation of a System for Combined Endorectal Magnetic Resonance Imaging and In-Bore Biopsy of the Prostate
We describe early ex vivo proof-of-concept testing of a novel system composed of a disposable endorectal coil and converging multichannel needle guide with a reusable clamp stand, embedded electronics, and baseplate to allow for endorectal magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and in-bore MRI-targeted biopsy of the prostate as a single integrated procedure. Using prostate phantoms imaged with standard T2-weighted sequences in a Siemens 3T Prisma MR scanner, we measured the signal-to-noise ratio in successive 1-cm distances from the novel coil and from a commercially available inflatable balloon coil and measured the lateral and longitudinal deviation of the tip of a deployed MR compatible needle from the intended target point. Signal-to-noise ratio obtained with the novel system was significantly better than the inflatable balloon coil at each of five 1-cm intervals, with a mean improvement of 78% (P < 0.05). In a representative sampling of 15 guidance channels, the mean lateral deviation for MR imaging–guided needle positioning was 1.7 mm and the mean longitudinal deviation was 2.0 mm. Our ex vivo results suggest that our novel system provides significantly improved signal-to-noise ratio when compared with an inflatable balloon coil and is capable of accurate MRI-guided needle deployment.
- 12 January 2024
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography
- Vol. 48 (3) , 378-381
Prototype Description and Ex Vivo Evaluation of a System for Combined Endorectal Magnetic Resonance Imaging and In-Bore Biopsy of the Prostate
We describe early ex vivo proof-of-concept testing of a novel system composed of a disposable endorectal coil and converging multichannel needle guide with a reusable clamp stand, embedded electronics, and baseplate to allow for endorectal magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and in-bore MRI-targeted biopsy of the prostate as a single integrated procedure. Using prostate phantoms imaged with standard T2-weighted sequences in a Siemens 3T Prisma MR scanner, we measured the signal-to-noise ratio in successive 1-cm distances from the novel coil and from a commercially available inflatable balloon coil and measured the lateral and longitudinal deviation of the tip of a deployed MR compatible needle from the intended target point. Signal-to-noise ratio obtained with the novel system was significantly better than the inflatable balloon coil at each of five 1-cm intervals, with a mean improvement of 78% (P < 0.05). In a representative sampling of 15 guidance channels, the mean lateral deviation for MR imaging–guided needle positioning was 1.7 mm and the mean longitudinal deviation was 2.0 mm. Our ex vivo results suggest that our novel system provides significantly improved signal-to-noise ratio when compared with an inflatable balloon coil and is capable of accurate MRI-guided needle deployment.
- 26 September 2022
- Published by Elsevier in Clinical Imaging
- Vol. 92, 112-116
Intermediate-term oncological outcomes after a negative endorectal coil multiparametric MRI of the prostate in patients without biopsy proven prostate cancer
- 26 September 2022
- Published by Elsevier in Clinical Imaging
- Vol. 92, 112-116
Intermediate-term oncological outcomes after a negative endorectal coil multiparametric MRI of the prostate in patients without biopsy proven prostate cancer
- 18 February 2022
- Published by Elsevier in Clinical Imaging
- Vol. 84, 135-139
MRI appearance of BRCA-associated prostate cancer
- 18 February 2022
- Published by Elsevier in Clinical Imaging
- Vol. 84, 135-139
MRI appearance of BRCA-associated prostate cancer
- 1 November 2021
- Published by Elsevier in Clinical Imaging
- Vol. 79, 337-340
Cowper's gland hyperplasia: A potential pitfall at MRI of the prostate
- 1 November 2021
- Published by Elsevier in Clinical Imaging
- Vol. 79, 337-340
Cowper's gland hyperplasia: A potential pitfall at MRI of the prostate
- Top Cited Papers
- 21 April 2020
- Published by Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) in Radiology
- Vol. 296 (1) , 76-84
Variability of the Positive Predictive Value of PI-RADS for Prostate MRI across 26 Centers: Experience of the Society of Abdominal Radiology Prostate Cancer Disease-focused Panel
Wide variation in prostate cancer detection is seen across all Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System scores for men with suspected or biopsy-proven untreated prostate cancer who undergo MRI. Background Prostate MRI is used widely in clinical care for guiding tissue sampling, active surveillance, and staging. The Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) helps provide a stand...
- 21 April 2020
- Published by Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) in Radiology
- Vol. 296 (1) , 76-84
Top Cited PapersVariability of the Positive Predictive Value of PI-RADS for Prostate MRI across 26 Centers: Experience of the Society of Abdominal Radiology Prostate Cancer Disease-focused Panel
Wide variation in prostate cancer detection is seen across all Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System scores for men with suspected or biopsy-proven untreated prostate cancer who undergo MRI. Background Prostate MRI is used widely in clinical care for guiding tissue sampling, active surveillance, and staging. The Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) helps provide a stand...
- 1 November 2018
- Published by Elsevier in Clinical Imaging
- Vol. 52, 177-179
MRI of prolapsed polypoid adenomyoma: Expanding the differential diagnosis for the broccoli sign
- 1 November 2018
- Published by Elsevier in Clinical Imaging
- Vol. 52, 177-179
MRI of prolapsed polypoid adenomyoma: Expanding the differential diagnosis for the broccoli sign
- 1 September 2018
- Published by Elsevier in Clinical Imaging
- Vol. 51, 273-278
Dominant intraprostatic cancer confirmed by direct MRI-guided biopsy: Concordance with histopathological findings
- 1 September 2018
- Published by Elsevier in Clinical Imaging
- Vol. 51, 273-278
Dominant intraprostatic cancer confirmed by direct MRI-guided biopsy: Concordance with histopathological findings