Allison Piovesan

Background: Accurate mapping of microarray probes to gene loci is essential for a reliable interpretation of gene expression data, yet available probe annotations are often incomplete or outdated. In this study, we aimed to develop and apply an expert-curated approach for the reannotation of human microarray probes and to assess its impact on transcriptome data interpretation. Methods: Human microarray probe sequences were reannotated by integrating information from platform databases with BLAST alignment against updated reference transcripts, followed by manual expert curation of probe-to-locus assignments. As a proof of concept, we reanalysed an integrated normal-human-heart transcriptome map, focusing on 17 genes with high and 17 with low expression variability. We then applied the curated annotation to 1032 probes representing genes involved in one-carbon metabolism in an integrated transcriptome map of trisomy 21 versus euploid human fibroblasts. The impact of reannotation on gene expression estimates was assessed, and eight selected genes were experimentally validated by Real-Time RT-PCR in independent fibroblast samples. Results: Manual curation identified annotation discrepancies for 132/357 (37.0%) probes among genes with high expression variability and 24/43 (55.8%) probes among genes with low expression variability in the heart transcriptome map. In the trisomy 21 versus euploid fibroblast dataset, 341/1032 (33.0%) probes required reassignment or removal. Incorporation of the curated annotations modified expression estimates and improved their consistency for multiple genes. Experimental validation of eight selected genes showed a positive correlation between Real-Time RT-PCR and reannotated transcriptome data (r = 0.67). Conclusions: Expert-curated reannotation of microarray probes identified substantial annotation discrepancies and corrected probe-to-locus assignments affecting a considerable proportion of probes, with measurable consequences for gene expression estimates. The resulting set of 1432 manually curated probe annotations provides an updated resource for the interpretation of legacy human microarray datasets and highlights the need for more comprehensive and usable automated pipelines capable of reproducing expert-level probe assignment.

Down syndrome (DS) is caused by the presence of an extra copy of full or partial human chromosome 21 (Hsa21). Partial (segmental) trisomy 21 (PT21) is the duplication of only a delimited region of Hsa21 and can be associated or not to DS: the study of PT21 cases is an invaluable model for addressing genotype–phenotype correlation in DS. Previous works reported systematic reanalyses of 132 subjects with PT21 and allowed the identification of a 34-kb highly restricted DS critical region (HR-DSCR) as the minimal region whose duplication is shared by all PT21 subjects diagnosed with DS. We report clinical data and cytogenetic analysis of two children with PT21, one with DS and the other without DS. Moreover, we performed a systematic bibliographic search for any new PT21 report. Clinical and cytogenetic analyses of the two PT21 children have been reported: in Case 1 the duplication involves the whole long arm of Hsa21, except for the last 2.7 Mb, which are deleted as a consequence of an isodicentric 21: the HR-DSCR is within the duplicated regions and the child is diagnosed with DS. In Case 2 the duplication involves 7.1 Mb of distal 21q22, with a deletion of 2.1 Mb of proximal 20p, as a consequence of an unbalanced translocation: the HR-DSCR is not duplicated and the child presents with psychomotor development delay but no clinical signs of DS. Furthermore, two PT21 reports recently published (named Case 3 and 4) have been discussed: Case 3 has DS diagnosis, nearly full trisomy for Hsa21 and a monosomy for the 21q22.3 region. Case 4 is a baby without DS and a 0.56-Mb duplication of 21q22.3. Genotype–phenotype correlation confirmed the presence of three copies of the HR-DSCR in all DS subjects and two copies in all non-DS individuals. The results presented here are fully consistent with the hypothesis that the HR-DSCR is critically associated with DS diagnosis. No exception to this pathogenetic model was found. Further studies are needed to detect genetic determinants likely located in the HR-DSCR and possibly responsible for core DS features, in particular intellectual disability.

Background Down syndrome (DS) is caused by the presence of an extra copy of full or partial human chromosome 21 (Hsa21). Partial (segmental) trisomy 21 (PT21) is the duplication of only a delimited region of Hsa21 and can be associated or not to DS: the study of PT21 cases is an invaluable model for addressing genotype-phenotype correlation in DS. Previous works reported systematic reanalyses of 132 subjects with PT21 and allowed the identification of a 34-kb highly restricted DS critical region (HR-DSCR) as the minimal region whose duplication is shared by all PT21 subjects diagnosed with DS. Methods We report clinical data and cytogenetic analysis of two children with PT21, one with DS and the other without DS. Moreover, we performed a systematic bibliographic search for any new PT21 report. Results Clinical and cytogenetic analyses of the two PT21 children have been reported: in Case 1 the duplication involves the whole long arm of Hsa21, except for the last 2.7 Mb, which are deleted as a consequence of an isodicentric 21: the HR-DSCR is within the duplicated regions and the child is diagnosed with DS. In Case 2 the duplication involves 7.1 Mb of distal 21q22, with a deletion of 2.1 Mb of proximal 20p, as a consequence of an unbalanced translocation: the HR-DSCR is not duplicated and the child presents with psychomotor development delay but no clinical signs of DS. Furthermore, two PT21 reports recently published (named Case 3 and 4) have been discussed: Case 3 has DS diagnosis, nearly full trisomy for Hsa21 and a monosomy for the 21q22.3 region. Case 4 is a baby without DS and a 0.56-Mb duplication of 21q22.3. Genotype-phenotype correlation confirmed the presence of three copies of the HR-DSCR in all DS subjects and two copies in all non-DS individuals. Conclusions The results presented here are fully consistent with the hypothesis that the HR-DSCR is critically associated with DS diagnosis. No exception to this pathogenetic model was found. Further studies are needed to detect genetic determinants likely located in the HR-DSCR and possibly responsible for core DS features, in particular intellectual disability.

Down syndrome (DS) is characterised by several clinical features including intellectual disability (ID) and craniofacial dysmorphisms. In 1976, Jackson and coll. identified a checklist of signs for clinical diagnosis of DS; the utility of these checklists in improving the accuracy of clinical diagnosis has been recently reaffirmed, but they have rarely been revised. The purpose of this work is to reassess the characteristic phenotypic signs and their frequencies in 233 DS subjects, following Jackson's checklist. 63.77% of the subjects showed more than 12 signs while none showed less than 5, confirming the effectiveness of Jackson's checklist for the clinical diagnosis of DS. An association between three phenotypic signs emerged, allowing us to distinguish two sub-phenotypes: Brachycephaly, short and broad Hands, short Neck (BHN), which is more frequent, and "non-BHN". The strong association of these signs might be interpreted in the context of the growth defects observed in DS children suggesting decreased cell proliferation. Lastly, cognitive assessments were investigated for 114 subjects. The lack of association between the presence of a physical sign or the number of signs present in a subject and cognitive skills disproves the stereotype that physical characteristics are predictive of degree of ID.

Down Syndrome (DS) is the most common genetic alteration responsible for intellectual disability, which refers to deficits in both intellectual and adaptive functioning. According to this, individuals with Down Syndrome (DS) reach developmental milestones (e.g., sitting, walking, and babbling) in the same order as their typically developing peers, but later in life. Since developmental milestones are the first blocks on which development builds, the aims of the current study are to: (i) expand the knowledge of developmental milestone acquisition; and (ii) explore the relationship between developmental milestone acquisition and later development. For this purpose 105 children/adolescents with DS were involved in this study, divided in two groups, Preschoolers (n = 39) and School-age participants (n = 66). Information on the age of acquisition of Sitting, Walking, Babbling, and Sphincter Control was collected, together with cognitive, motor, and adaptive functioning. Sitting predicted later motor development, but, with age, it became less important in predicting motor development in everyday life. Babbling predicted later language development in older children. Finally, Sphincter Control emerged as the strongest predictor of motor, cognitive, language, and adaptive skills, with its role being more evident with increasing age. Our data suggest that the age of reaching the milestones considered in the study has an influence on successive development, a role that can be due to common neural substrates, the environment, and the developmental cascade effect.

This work investigates the role of metabolite levels in the intellectual impairment of subjects with Down syndrome (DS). Homocysteine, folate, vitamin B12, uric acid (UA), creatinine levels and MTHFR C677T genotype were analyzed in 147 subjects with DS. For 77 subjects, metabolite levels were correlated with cognitive tests. Griffiths-III test was administered to 28 subjects (3.08–6.16 years) and WPPSI-III test was administered to 49 subjects (7.08–16.08 years). Significant correlations were found among some metabolite levels and between homocysteine levels and MTHFR C677T genotype. Moreover, homocysteine, UA and creatinine levels resulted increased with age. We did not find any correlation between metabolites and cognitive test score in the younger group. Homocysteine showed statistically significant correlation with WPPSI-III subtest scores when its level is ≥ 7.35 µmol/L, remaining correlated in higher thresholds only for non-verbal area scores. Vitamin B12 showed correlations with all WPPSI-III subtest scores when its level is < 442 pg/mL. The relevance of the present findings is the detection of a specific metabolite threshold related with a better or worse cognitive score, suggesting that vitamin B12 and homocysteine may have a role in cognitive development in children with DS.

Trisomy 21 (Down syndrome, DS) is the main human genetic cause of intellectual disability (ID). Lejeune hypothesized that DS could be considered a metabolic disease, and we found that subjects with DS have a specific plasma and urinary metabolomic profile. In this work we confirmed the alteration of mitochondrial metabolism in DS and also investigated if metabolite levels are related to cognitive aspects of DS. We analyzed the metabolomic profiles of plasma samples from 129 subjects with DS and 46 healthy control (CTRL) subjects by ¹H Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR). Multivariate analysis of the NMR metabolomic profiles showed a clear discrimination (up to 94% accuracy) between the two groups. The univariate analysis revealed a significant alteration in 7 metabolites out of 28 assigned unambiguously. Correlations among the metabolite levels in DS and CTRL groups were separately investigated and statistically significant relationships appeared. On the contrary, statistically significant correlations among the NMR-detectable part of DS plasma metabolome and the different intelligence quotient ranges obtained by Griffiths-III or WPPSI-III tests were not found. Even if metabolic imbalance provides a clear discrimination between DS and CTRL groups, it appears that the investigated metabolomic profiles cannot be associated with the degree of ID.

Background: Down syndrome (DS) is characterized by the presence of an extra full or partial human chromosome 21 (Hsa21). An invaluable model to define genotype‐phenotype correlations in DS is the study of the extremely rare cases of partial (segmental) trisomy 21 (PT21), the duplication of only a delimited region of Hsa21 associated or not to DS. A systematic retrospective reanalysis of 125 PT21 cases described up to 2015 allowed the creation of the most comprehensive PT21 map and the identification of a 34‐kb highly restricted DS critical region (HR‐DSCR) as the minimal region whose duplication is shared by all PT21 subjects diagnosed with DS. We reanalyzed at higher resolution three cases previously published and we accurately searched for any new PT21 reports in order to verify whether HR‐DSCR limits could prospectively be confirmed and possibly refined.Methods: Hsa21 partial duplications of three PT21 subjects were refined by adding array‐based comparative genomic hybridization data. Seven newly described PT21 cases fulfilling stringent cytogenetic and clinical criteria have been incorporated into the PT21 integrated map.Results: The PT21 map now integrates fine structure of Hsa21 sequence intervals of 132 subjects onto a common framework fully consistent with the presence of a duplicated HR‐DSCR, on distal 21q22.13 sub‐band, only in DS subjects and not in non‐DS individuals. No documented exception to the HR‐DSCR model was found.Conclusions: The findings presented here further support the association of the HR‐DSCR with the diagnosis of DS, representing an unbiased validation of the original model. Further studies are needed to identify and characterize genetic determinants presumably located in the HR‐DSCR and functionally associated to the critical manifestations of DS.