Gursimran Thandi
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Gursimran Thandi has a total of 33 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Neil Greenberg
King’s College London, London, UK
8 shared publications - Nicola Townsend Fear
King's Centre for Military Research, King's College London, London, UK
7 shared publications - Simon Wessely
King's Centre for Military Health Research, Department of Psychological Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
5 shared publications - Roberto Jorge Rona
King’s Centre for Military Health Research, Department of Psychological Medicine, King’s College London, London, UK
3 shared publications - Josefin Sundin
Academic Department of Military Mental Health, King's College London, London, UK
2 shared publications - Margaret Jones
King's Centre for Military Health Research, Department of Psychological Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
2 shared publications
Latest Publications
- 24 December 2021
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Occupational Medicine
- Vol. 72 (2) , 91-98
Evaluation of the Warrior Programme intervention among UK ex-service personnel
Background: Research has shown that of the myriad services available to veterans in the UK, very few have been independently evaluated. This report presents the results of a randomized controlled trial assessing the impact of Time Line Therapy™ delivered by the Warrior Programme (a third-sector organization). Aims: This study was aimed to determine if the intervention is effective in reducing emotional and functional difficulties in ex-service personnel. Methods: A mixed-design analysis of variance model was used to investigate whether the Warrior Programme had a statistically significant impact on self-reported scores. The intervention and control group provided data on measures prior to and immediately after the intervention, and at 3-month follow-up. Results: Those in the intervention group (n = 23) reported statistically significant improvements in self-reported scores immediately following intervention: the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation (CORE) scores (CORE global distress mean difference [MD] = 45.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] 31–60) (CORE subjective well-being MD = 5.9, 95% CI 3.5–8.3) (CORE functioning MD = 16.7, 95% CI 11.4–21.9) (CORE problems/symptoms MD = 19.4, 95% CI 13.1–25.7), general self-efficacy (MD = −9.8, 95% CI −13.6 to –6.8), anxiety (MD = 8.6, 95% CI 5.2–12.1), depression (MD = 10, 95% CI 6.6–13.5), post-traumatic stress disorder (MD = 26.3, 95% CI 17–25) and functional impairment (MD = 11.1, 95% CI 5.3–16.8) over time, compared to the control group (n = 29). However, score improvement was not sustained over time or statistically significant at follow-up. Conclusions: The Warrior Programme was effective in reducing emotional and functional difficulties in ex-service personnel immediately after the intervention, but the effect was not sustained at 3-month follow-up.
- 24 December 2021
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Occupational Medicine
- Vol. 72 (2) , 91-98
Evaluation of the Warrior Programme intervention among UK ex-service personnel
Background: Research has shown that of the myriad services available to veterans in the UK, very few have been independently evaluated. This report presents the results of a randomized controlled trial assessing the impact of Time Line Therapy™ delivered by the Warrior Programme (a third-sector organization). Aims: This study was aimed to determine if the intervention is effective in reducing emotional and functional difficulties in ex-service personnel. Methods: A mixed-design analysis of variance model was used to investigate whether the Warrior Programme had a statistically significant impact on self-reported scores. The intervention and control group provided data on measures prior to and immediately after the intervention, and at 3-month follow-up. Results: Those in the intervention group (n = 23) reported statistically significant improvements in self-reported scores immediately following intervention: the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation (CORE) scores (CORE global distress mean difference [MD] = 45.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] 31–60) (CORE subjective well-being MD = 5.9, 95% CI 3.5–8.3) (CORE functioning MD = 16.7, 95% CI 11.4–21.9) (CORE problems/symptoms MD = 19.4, 95% CI 13.1–25.7), general self-efficacy (MD = −9.8, 95% CI −13.6 to –6.8), anxiety (MD = 8.6, 95% CI 5.2–12.1), depression (MD = 10, 95% CI 6.6–13.5), post-traumatic stress disorder (MD = 26.3, 95% CI 17–25) and functional impairment (MD = 11.1, 95% CI 5.3–16.8) over time, compared to the control group (n = 29). However, score improvement was not sustained over time or statistically significant at follow-up. Conclusions: The Warrior Programme was effective in reducing emotional and functional difficulties in ex-service personnel immediately after the intervention, but the effect was not sustained at 3-month follow-up.
- Open Access
- 1 February 2019
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Psychiatric Research
- Vol. 109, 156-163
Fourteen-year trajectories of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms in UK military personnel, and associated risk factors
- 1 February 2019
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Psychiatric Research
- Vol. 109, 156-163
Open AccessFourteen-year trajectories of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms in UK military personnel, and associated risk factors
- 10 October 2017
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Occupational Medicine
- Vol. 67 (9) , 712-714
Factors associated with smoking behaviour change in UK military personnel
Research in the UK civilian population suggests that poor mental health outcomes are associated with smoking behaviour. In the UK military population, smoking cessation is associated with deployment in the reserve forces. However, little is known about the links between mental health outcomes and smoking initiation and cessation in the UK military. The aim of this longitudinal study was to examine change in mental health and military factors associated with smoking initiation and cessation in a representative sample of UK military personnel. Data were collected between 2003 and 2009; 5138 regular and reserve military personnel were included in the analyses. The results showed that smoking initiation was associated with symptoms of psychological distress, symptoms of probable post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), relationship breakdown and deployment. These findings are consistent with existing research in civilian populations showing links between poor mental health and smoking behaviour. Furthermore, our finding that deployment is associated with smoking initiation is also in line with research from the US military and UK reserves.
- 10 October 2017
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Occupational Medicine
- Vol. 67 (9) , 712-714
Factors associated with smoking behaviour change in UK military personnel
Research in the UK civilian population suggests that poor mental health outcomes are associated with smoking behaviour. In the UK military population, smoking cessation is associated with deployment in the reserve forces. However, little is known about the links between mental health outcomes and smoking initiation and cessation in the UK military. The aim of this longitudinal study was to examine change in mental health and military factors associated with smoking initiation and cessation in a representative sample of UK military personnel. Data were collected between 2003 and 2009; 5138 regular and reserve military personnel were included in the analyses. The results showed that smoking initiation was associated with symptoms of psychological distress, symptoms of probable post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), relationship breakdown and deployment. These findings are consistent with existing research in civilian populations showing links between poor mental health and smoking behaviour. Furthermore, our finding that deployment is associated with smoking initiation is also in line with research from the US military and UK reserves.
- 15 September 2017
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Occupational Medicine
- Vol. 67 (7) , 562-568
Perceived effect of deployment on families of UK military personnel
In the UK, little is known about the perceived effects of deployment, on military families, from military personnel in theatre. To investigate military personnel’s perceptions of the impact of deployment on intimate relationships and children. Deployed service personnel who were in a relationship, and who had children, completed a survey while deployed on combat operations. Data were taken from four mental health surveys carried out in Iraq in 2009 and Afghanistan in 2010, 2011 and 2014. Among 4265 participants, after adjusting for military and social-demographic covariates, perceiving that deployment had a negative impact on intimate relationships and children was associated with psychological distress, and traumatic stress symptoms. Military personnel who reported being in danger of being injured or killed during deployment, were more likely to report a perceived negative effect of deployment on their intimate relationships. Reservists were less likely to report a perceived negative impact of deployment on their children compared with regulars. Military personnel who themselves planned to separate from their partner were more likely to report psychological distress, and stressors at home. Perceived insufficient support from the Ministry of Defence was associated with poor mental health, and holding a junior rank. Deployed UK military personnel with symptoms of psychological distress, who experienced stressors at home, were especially likely to perceive that their family were inadequately supported by the military. Those planning to separate from their partner were at increased risk of suffering with mental health problems while deployed.
- 15 September 2017
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Occupational Medicine
- Vol. 67 (7) , 562-568
Perceived effect of deployment on families of UK military personnel
In the UK, little is known about the perceived effects of deployment, on military families, from military personnel in theatre. To investigate military personnel’s perceptions of the impact of deployment on intimate relationships and children. Deployed service personnel who were in a relationship, and who had children, completed a survey while deployed on combat operations. Data were taken from four mental health surveys carried out in Iraq in 2009 and Afghanistan in 2010, 2011 and 2014. Among 4265 participants, after adjusting for military and social-demographic covariates, perceiving that deployment had a negative impact on intimate relationships and children was associated with psychological distress, and traumatic stress symptoms. Military personnel who reported being in danger of being injured or killed during deployment, were more likely to report a perceived negative effect of deployment on their intimate relationships. Reservists were less likely to report a perceived negative impact of deployment on their children compared with regulars. Military personnel who themselves planned to separate from their partner were more likely to report psychological distress, and stressors at home. Perceived insufficient support from the Ministry of Defence was associated with poor mental health, and holding a junior rank. Deployed UK military personnel with symptoms of psychological distress, who experienced stressors at home, were especially likely to perceive that their family were inadequately supported by the military. Those planning to separate from their partner were at increased risk of suffering with mental health problems while deployed.
- Open Access
- 27 January 2017
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Military Behavioral Health
- Vol. 5 (3) , 245-253
U.K. Army Medical and Unit Welfare Officers' Perceptions of Mental Health Stigma and Its Impact on Army Personnel's Mental Health Help Seeking
- 27 January 2017
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Military Behavioral Health
- Vol. 5 (3) , 245-253
Open AccessU.K. Army Medical and Unit Welfare Officers' Perceptions of Mental Health Stigma and Its Impact on Army Personnel's Mental Health Help Seeking
- Open Access
- 1 January 2017
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Psychosomatic Research
- Vol. 92, 45-48
A comparison of the Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS) across different patient populations using Rasch analysis and exploratory factor analysis
- 1 January 2017
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Psychosomatic Research
- Vol. 92, 45-48
Open AccessA comparison of the Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS) across different patient populations using Rasch analysis and exploratory factor analysis
- 1 November 2015
- Published by Elsevier in Drug and Alcohol Dependence
- Vol. 156, 78-83
Alcohol misuse in the United Kingdom Armed Forces: A longitudinal study
- 1 November 2015
- Published by Elsevier in Drug and Alcohol Dependence
- Vol. 156, 78-83
Alcohol misuse in the United Kingdom Armed Forces: A longitudinal study
- Open Access
- 14 July 2015
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Occupational Medicine
- Vol. 65 (5) , 413-416
Risk-taking behaviours among UK military reservists
Deploying in a combat role negatively impacts risk-taking behaviours, such as drinking, smoking and risky driving in regular UK military personnel. Little is known about the impact of deployment on the risk-taking behaviours of reservists. To explore the impact of deployment on risk-taking behaviours among reservists. This was a cross-sectional study. Hazardous drinking, risky driving, physical violence, smoking and attendance at accident and emergency (A&E) departments as a result of risk-taking behaviours were assessed by self-reported questionnaire. There were 1710 participants in the study; response rate 51%. The overall prevalence of risk-taking behaviours was: hazardous drinking 46%, smoking 18%, risky driving 11%, attending A&E due to risky behaviours 13% and reporting physical violence 3%. Deployment was significantly associated with risky driving [odds ratio (OR) 1.88, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.25–2.81], smoking (OR 2.02, 95% CI 1.46–2.78) and physical violence (OR 3.63, 95% CI 1.88–7.02). It is important to consider the impact of deployment and military factors on the prevalence of risk-taking behaviours in reservists as greater numbers than ever before will face the prospect of deployment to overseas conflicts.
- 14 July 2015
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Occupational Medicine
- Vol. 65 (5) , 413-416
Open AccessRisk-taking behaviours among UK military reservists
Deploying in a combat role negatively impacts risk-taking behaviours, such as drinking, smoking and risky driving in regular UK military personnel. Little is known about the impact of deployment on the risk-taking behaviours of reservists. To explore the impact of deployment on risk-taking behaviours among reservists. This was a cross-sectional study. Hazardous drinking, risky driving, physical violence, smoking and attendance at accident and emergency (A&E) departments as a result of risk-taking behaviours were assessed by self-reported questionnaire. There were 1710 participants in the study; response rate 51%. The overall prevalence of risk-taking behaviours was: hazardous drinking 46%, smoking 18%, risky driving 11%, attending A&E due to risky behaviours 13% and reporting physical violence 3%. Deployment was significantly associated with risky driving [odds ratio (OR) 1.88, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.25–2.81], smoking (OR 2.02, 95% CI 1.46–2.78) and physical violence (OR 3.63, 95% CI 1.88–7.02). It is important to consider the impact of deployment and military factors on the prevalence of risk-taking behaviours in reservists as greater numbers than ever before will face the prospect of deployment to overseas conflicts.
- Open Access
- 14 July 2015
- Published by Springer Nature in Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
- Vol. 50 (9) , 1329-1346
A systematic review of mental disorders and perpetration of domestic violence among military populations
Military populations may experience more severe forms of domestic violence than the general population. Although mental disorders are associated with domestic violence perpetration among the general population, it is not clear whether this is the case for military populations. This review aimed to establish the prevalence and odds of domestic violence perpetration among male and female military personnel with mental disorders. Systematic review: searches of eleven electronic databases were supplemented by hand searches, reference screening, citation tracking and expert recommendations. Ten studies were included; nine reporting on partner violence and one on violence against an adult family member. Median prevalence estimates were calculated for partner violence perpetration among male military personnel with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD); estimates on other disorders were not possible due to lack of data. 27.5 % of men with PTSD reported past year physical violence perpetration against a partner and 91.0 % reported past year psychological violence perpetration against a partner. Due to limited data, no median estimates could be calculated for female military personnel. Data from individual papers indicate increased odds of past year partner violence perpetration among male and female military personnel with depression; inconsistent findings were reported for risk of partner violence perpetration among male and female military personnel with PTSD. There is some evidence that mental disorders among military personnel are associated with past year domestic violence perpetration, though current data cannot confirm direction of causality. Research is needed to inform the development of interventions targeted to reduce domestic violence perpetration among military personnel.
- 14 July 2015
- Published by Springer Nature in Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
- Vol. 50 (9) , 1329-1346
Open AccessA systematic review of mental disorders and perpetration of domestic violence among military populations
Military populations may experience more severe forms of domestic violence than the general population. Although mental disorders are associated with domestic violence perpetration among the general population, it is not clear whether this is the case for military populations. This review aimed to establish the prevalence and odds of domestic violence perpetration among male and female military personnel with mental disorders. Systematic review: searches of eleven electronic databases were supplemented by hand searches, reference screening, citation tracking and expert recommendations. Ten studies were included; nine reporting on partner violence and one on violence against an adult family member. Median prevalence estimates were calculated for partner violence perpetration among male military personnel with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD); estimates on other disorders were not possible due to lack of data. 27.5 % of men with PTSD reported past year physical violence perpetration against a partner and 91.0 % reported past year psychological violence perpetration against a partner. Due to limited data, no median estimates could be calculated for female military personnel. Data from individual papers indicate increased odds of past year partner violence perpetration among male and female military personnel with depression; inconsistent findings were reported for risk of partner violence perpetration among male and female military personnel with PTSD. There is some evidence that mental disorders among military personnel are associated with past year domestic violence perpetration, though current data cannot confirm direction of causality. Research is needed to inform the development of interventions targeted to reduce domestic violence perpetration among military personnel.
- Open Access
- 9 April 2015
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Public Health
- Vol. 15 (1) , 338
Medical and Welfare Officers beliefs about post-deployment screening for mental health disorders in the UK Armed Forces: a qualitative study
This study aimed to examine currently serving United Kingdom (UK) military Medical and Welfare Officers views on the potential introduction of post-deployment screening for mental ill health. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 21 Medical and Welfare Officers. Interview transcripts were analysed using data-driven thematic analysis. Four themes were identified: positive views of screening; reliability of responses; impact on workload; and suggestions for implementation. Interviewees viewed the introduction of screening post-deployment as likely to increase awareness of mental health problems whilst also reporting that service personnel were likely to conceal their true mental health status by providing misleading responses to any screening tool. Concern over reliability of responses may provide one explanation for the reluctance of service personnel to seek help for problems, as they could feel they will not be taken seriously. Welfare Officers felt they would not have the knowledge or experience to respond to help-seeking. Although participants were concerned about potential impact on their personal workload, they indicated a desire to positively engage with the screening programme if research showed it was an effective tool to improve mental health care. Welfare and healthcare providers are well disposed towards a screening programme for mental health but highlight a few concerns in its implementation. In particular Welfare Officers appear to require more training in how to respond to mental ill health. Concerns about available funding and resources to respond to increased workload will need to be addressed should post-deployment screening for mental health be introduced in the UK military.
- 9 April 2015
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Public Health
- Vol. 15 (1) , 338
Open AccessMedical and Welfare Officers beliefs about post-deployment screening for mental health disorders in the UK Armed Forces: a qualitative study
This study aimed to examine currently serving United Kingdom (UK) military Medical and Welfare Officers views on the potential introduction of post-deployment screening for mental ill health. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 21 Medical and Welfare Officers. Interview transcripts were analysed using data-driven thematic analysis. Four themes were identified: positive views of screening; reliability of responses; impact on workload; and suggestions for implementation. Interviewees viewed the introduction of screening post-deployment as likely to increase awareness of mental health problems whilst also reporting that service personnel were likely to conceal their true mental health status by providing misleading responses to any screening tool. Concern over reliability of responses may provide one explanation for the reluctance of service personnel to seek help for problems, as they could feel they will not be taken seriously. Welfare Officers felt they would not have the knowledge or experience to respond to help-seeking. Although participants were concerned about potential impact on their personal workload, they indicated a desire to positively engage with the screening programme if research showed it was an effective tool to improve mental health care. Welfare and healthcare providers are well disposed towards a screening programme for mental health but highlight a few concerns in its implementation. In particular Welfare Officers appear to require more training in how to respond to mental ill health. Concerns about available funding and resources to respond to increased workload will need to be addressed should post-deployment screening for mental health be introduced in the UK military.