Daniel Hernandez-Deckers
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Daniel Hernandez-Deckers has a total of 47 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Ann M. Fridlind
National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS), New York, NY, USA
17 shared publications Toshihisa Matsui
NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Code 612, Greenbelt, MD, USA
15 shared publicationsScott Braun
NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Code 612, Greenbelt, MD, USA
8 shared publications- Scott Edward Giangrande
Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York, USA
7 shared publications - Thiago Souza Biscaro
Divisão de Satélites e Sensores Meteorológicos, Coordenação-Geral de Ciências da Terra, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais, Rodovia Presidente Dutra, Km 40, SP-RJ, 12630-000, Cachoeira Paulista, SP, Brasil
7 shared publications - Toshi Matsui
Mesoscale Atmospheric Processes Laboratory, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA
7 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 17 July 2026
- Published by Copernicus GmbH in Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
- Vol. 26 (14) , 10071-10099
Aerosol-deep convection interaction based on joint cell-thermal tracking in Large Eddy Simulations during the TRACER campaign
In cumulus clouds, aerosol concentrations control cloud droplet concentrations, modifying cloud radiative properties, precipitation processes, and cloud electrification. However, mechanisms of aerosol-deep convection interactions are not well understood due to complex cloud dynamics and microphysics. We investigate the interaction of aerosols with isolated deep convection using Large Eddy Simulations of two cases during the TRacking Aerosol Convection interactions ExpeRiment (TRACER) near Houston, Texas, using a joint cell-thermal tracking algorithm. Cumulus thermals are droplet generators, since supersaturation and droplet nucleation coincide with thermal centers, where the strongest updrafts occur. Primary ice crystal formation does not take place inside thermals, but at layers where previous thermals detrained moisture. As subsequent thermals containing supercooled droplets penetrate these layers, hail and graupel form at or near these thermals. Higher aerosol concentrations result in higher droplet concentrations that suppress drizzle, delay warm rain processes, and transport more moisture aloft. This increases snow and ice amount, as well as graupel and hail, leading to more lightning. Polluted thermals initiate at slightly higher altitudes, and are slightly larger and faster, suggesting a weak invigoration. We also find more thermals per cell, but fewer isolated cells, since convection is more aggregated and intense, especially near the end of the 24 h simulation. Non-linear mesoscale feedback likely triggered by temperature and moisture responses to aerosol-thermal interactions causes the aggregation. Time-lagged aerosol-reinitialization experiments show that the mesoscale response is the predominant forcing for the invigoration. These changes happen within one day, on a smaller scale than previously suggested.
- 17 July 2026
- Published by Copernicus GmbH in Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
- Vol. 26 (14) , 10071-10099
Open AccessAerosol-deep convection interaction based on joint cell-thermal tracking in Large Eddy Simulations during the TRACER campaign
In cumulus clouds, aerosol concentrations control cloud droplet concentrations, modifying cloud radiative properties, precipitation processes, and cloud electrification. However, mechanisms of aerosol-deep convection interactions are not well understood due to complex cloud dynamics and microphysics. We investigate the interaction of aerosols with isolated deep convection using Large Eddy Simulations of two cases during the TRacking Aerosol Convection interactions ExpeRiment (TRACER) near Houston, Texas, using a joint cell-thermal tracking algorithm. Cumulus thermals are droplet generators, since supersaturation and droplet nucleation coincide with thermal centers, where the strongest updrafts occur. Primary ice crystal formation does not take place inside thermals, but at layers where previous thermals detrained moisture. As subsequent thermals containing supercooled droplets penetrate these layers, hail and graupel form at or near these thermals. Higher aerosol concentrations result in higher droplet concentrations that suppress drizzle, delay warm rain processes, and transport more moisture aloft. This increases snow and ice amount, as well as graupel and hail, leading to more lightning. Polluted thermals initiate at slightly higher altitudes, and are slightly larger and faster, suggesting a weak invigoration. We also find more thermals per cell, but fewer isolated cells, since convection is more aggregated and intense, especially near the end of the 24 h simulation. Non-linear mesoscale feedback likely triggered by temperature and moisture responses to aerosol-thermal interactions causes the aggregation. Time-lagged aerosol-reinitialization experiments show that the mesoscale response is the predominant forcing for the invigoration. These changes happen within one day, on a smaller scale than previously suggested.
- Open Access
- 14 April 2026
- Published by Copernicus GmbH
- Vol. 2025
Reply on RC1
In cumulus clouds, aerosol concentrations control cloud droplet concentrations, modifying cloud radiative properties, precipitation processes, and cloud electrification. However, mechanisms of aerosol-deep convection interactions are not well understood due to complex cloud dynamics and microphysics. We investigate the interaction of aerosols with isolated deep convection using Large Eddy Simulations during the TRacking Aerosol Convection interactions ExpeRiment (TRACER) in the Houston area, using a joint cell-thermal tracking algorithm. Cumulus thermals are droplet generators, since supersaturation and droplet nucleation coincide with thermal centers, where the strongest updrafts occur. Primary ice crystal formation does not take place inside thermals, but at layers where previous thermals detrained moisture. As subsequent thermals containing supercooled droplets penetrate these layers, hail and graupel form at or near these thermals. Higher aerosol concentrations result in higher droplet concentrations that suppress drizzle, delay warm rain processes, and transport more moisture aloft. This increases snow and ice amount, as well as graupel and hail, also associated with more lightning. Also, thermals initiate slightly higher, are slightly larger and faster, suggesting a weak invigoration. We also find more thermals per cell, albeit fewer isolated cells. Convection aggregates more, explaining the lower isolated cell count, and enhancing convection, especially near the end of the 24-hour integration. This non-linear mesoscale feedback is likely triggered by temperature and moisture responses due to aerosol-thermal interactions. Additional time-lagged aerosol-reinialization experiments show that the mesoscale response is the predominant forcing for the invigoration. These changes happen within one day, on a smaller scale than previously suggested.
- 14 April 2026
- Published by Copernicus GmbH
- Vol. 2025
Open AccessReply on RC1
In cumulus clouds, aerosol concentrations control cloud droplet concentrations, modifying cloud radiative properties, precipitation processes, and cloud electrification. However, mechanisms of aerosol-deep convection interactions are not well understood due to complex cloud dynamics and microphysics. We investigate the interaction of aerosols with isolated deep convection using Large Eddy Simulations during the TRacking Aerosol Convection interactions ExpeRiment (TRACER) in the Houston area, using a joint cell-thermal tracking algorithm. Cumulus thermals are droplet generators, since supersaturation and droplet nucleation coincide with thermal centers, where the strongest updrafts occur. Primary ice crystal formation does not take place inside thermals, but at layers where previous thermals detrained moisture. As subsequent thermals containing supercooled droplets penetrate these layers, hail and graupel form at or near these thermals. Higher aerosol concentrations result in higher droplet concentrations that suppress drizzle, delay warm rain processes, and transport more moisture aloft. This increases snow and ice amount, as well as graupel and hail, also associated with more lightning. Also, thermals initiate slightly higher, are slightly larger and faster, suggesting a weak invigoration. We also find more thermals per cell, albeit fewer isolated cells. Convection aggregates more, explaining the lower isolated cell count, and enhancing convection, especially near the end of the 24-hour integration. This non-linear mesoscale feedback is likely triggered by temperature and moisture responses due to aerosol-thermal interactions. Additional time-lagged aerosol-reinialization experiments show that the mesoscale response is the predominant forcing for the invigoration. These changes happen within one day, on a smaller scale than previously suggested.
- Open Access
- 14 April 2026
- Published by Copernicus GmbH
- Vol. 2025
Reply on RC2
In cumulus clouds, aerosol concentrations control cloud droplet concentrations, modifying cloud radiative properties, precipitation processes, and cloud electrification. However, mechanisms of aerosol-deep convection interactions are not well understood due to complex cloud dynamics and microphysics. We investigate the interaction of aerosols with isolated deep convection using Large Eddy Simulations during the TRacking Aerosol Convection interactions ExpeRiment (TRACER) in the Houston area, using a joint cell-thermal tracking algorithm. Cumulus thermals are droplet generators, since supersaturation and droplet nucleation coincide with thermal centers, where the strongest updrafts occur. Primary ice crystal formation does not take place inside thermals, but at layers where previous thermals detrained moisture. As subsequent thermals containing supercooled droplets penetrate these layers, hail and graupel form at or near these thermals. Higher aerosol concentrations result in higher droplet concentrations that suppress drizzle, delay warm rain processes, and transport more moisture aloft. This increases snow and ice amount, as well as graupel and hail, also associated with more lightning. Also, thermals initiate slightly higher, are slightly larger and faster, suggesting a weak invigoration. We also find more thermals per cell, albeit fewer isolated cells. Convection aggregates more, explaining the lower isolated cell count, and enhancing convection, especially near the end of the 24-hour integration. This non-linear mesoscale feedback is likely triggered by temperature and moisture responses due to aerosol-thermal interactions. Additional time-lagged aerosol-reinialization experiments show that the mesoscale response is the predominant forcing for the invigoration. These changes happen within one day, on a smaller scale than previously suggested.
- 14 April 2026
- Published by Copernicus GmbH
- Vol. 2025
Open AccessReply on RC2
In cumulus clouds, aerosol concentrations control cloud droplet concentrations, modifying cloud radiative properties, precipitation processes, and cloud electrification. However, mechanisms of aerosol-deep convection interactions are not well understood due to complex cloud dynamics and microphysics. We investigate the interaction of aerosols with isolated deep convection using Large Eddy Simulations during the TRacking Aerosol Convection interactions ExpeRiment (TRACER) in the Houston area, using a joint cell-thermal tracking algorithm. Cumulus thermals are droplet generators, since supersaturation and droplet nucleation coincide with thermal centers, where the strongest updrafts occur. Primary ice crystal formation does not take place inside thermals, but at layers where previous thermals detrained moisture. As subsequent thermals containing supercooled droplets penetrate these layers, hail and graupel form at or near these thermals. Higher aerosol concentrations result in higher droplet concentrations that suppress drizzle, delay warm rain processes, and transport more moisture aloft. This increases snow and ice amount, as well as graupel and hail, also associated with more lightning. Also, thermals initiate slightly higher, are slightly larger and faster, suggesting a weak invigoration. We also find more thermals per cell, albeit fewer isolated cells. Convection aggregates more, explaining the lower isolated cell count, and enhancing convection, especially near the end of the 24-hour integration. This non-linear mesoscale feedback is likely triggered by temperature and moisture responses due to aerosol-thermal interactions. Additional time-lagged aerosol-reinialization experiments show that the mesoscale response is the predominant forcing for the invigoration. These changes happen within one day, on a smaller scale than previously suggested.
- Open Access
- 13 April 2026
- Published by Copernicus GmbH
- Vol. 2025
Reply on CC1
In cumulus clouds, aerosol concentrations control cloud droplet concentrations, modifying cloud radiative properties, precipitation processes, and cloud electrification. However, mechanisms of aerosol-deep convection interactions are not well understood due to complex cloud dynamics and microphysics. We investigate the interaction of aerosols with isolated deep convection using Large Eddy Simulations during the TRacking Aerosol Convection interactions ExpeRiment (TRACER) in the Houston area, using a joint cell-thermal tracking algorithm. Cumulus thermals are droplet generators, since supersaturation and droplet nucleation coincide with thermal centers, where the strongest updrafts occur. Primary ice crystal formation does not take place inside thermals, but at layers where previous thermals detrained moisture. As subsequent thermals containing supercooled droplets penetrate these layers, hail and graupel form at or near these thermals. Higher aerosol concentrations result in higher droplet concentrations that suppress drizzle, delay warm rain processes, and transport more moisture aloft. This increases snow and ice amount, as well as graupel and hail, also associated with more lightning. Also, thermals initiate slightly higher, are slightly larger and faster, suggesting a weak invigoration. We also find more thermals per cell, albeit fewer isolated cells. Convection aggregates more, explaining the lower isolated cell count, and enhancing convection, especially near the end of the 24-hour integration. This non-linear mesoscale feedback is likely triggered by temperature and moisture responses due to aerosol-thermal interactions. Additional time-lagged aerosol-reinialization experiments show that the mesoscale response is the predominant forcing for the invigoration. These changes happen within one day, on a smaller scale than previously suggested.
- 13 April 2026
- Published by Copernicus GmbH
- Vol. 2025
Open AccessReply on CC1
In cumulus clouds, aerosol concentrations control cloud droplet concentrations, modifying cloud radiative properties, precipitation processes, and cloud electrification. However, mechanisms of aerosol-deep convection interactions are not well understood due to complex cloud dynamics and microphysics. We investigate the interaction of aerosols with isolated deep convection using Large Eddy Simulations during the TRacking Aerosol Convection interactions ExpeRiment (TRACER) in the Houston area, using a joint cell-thermal tracking algorithm. Cumulus thermals are droplet generators, since supersaturation and droplet nucleation coincide with thermal centers, where the strongest updrafts occur. Primary ice crystal formation does not take place inside thermals, but at layers where previous thermals detrained moisture. As subsequent thermals containing supercooled droplets penetrate these layers, hail and graupel form at or near these thermals. Higher aerosol concentrations result in higher droplet concentrations that suppress drizzle, delay warm rain processes, and transport more moisture aloft. This increases snow and ice amount, as well as graupel and hail, also associated with more lightning. Also, thermals initiate slightly higher, are slightly larger and faster, suggesting a weak invigoration. We also find more thermals per cell, albeit fewer isolated cells. Convection aggregates more, explaining the lower isolated cell count, and enhancing convection, especially near the end of the 24-hour integration. This non-linear mesoscale feedback is likely triggered by temperature and moisture responses due to aerosol-thermal interactions. Additional time-lagged aerosol-reinialization experiments show that the mesoscale response is the predominant forcing for the invigoration. These changes happen within one day, on a smaller scale than previously suggested.
- Open Access
- 7 January 2026
- Published by Copernicus GmbH
- Vol. 2025, 1-33
Comment on egusphere-2025-5149
In cumulus clouds, aerosol concentrations control cloud droplet concentrations, modifying cloud radiative properties, precipitation processes, and cloud electrification. However, mechanisms of aerosol-deep convection interactions are not well understood due to complex cloud dynamics and microphysics. We investigate the interaction of aerosols with isolated deep convection using Large Eddy Simulations during the TRacking Aerosol Convection interactions ExpeRiment (TRACER) in the Houston area, using a joint cell-thermal tracking algorithm. Cumulus thermals are droplet generators, since supersaturation and droplet nucleation coincide with thermal centers, where the strongest updrafts occur. Primary ice crystal formation does not take place inside thermals, but at layers where previous thermals detrained moisture. As subsequent thermals containing supercooled droplets penetrate these layers, hail and graupel form at or near these thermals. Higher aerosol concentrations result in higher droplet concentrations that suppress drizzle, delay warm rain processes, and transport more moisture aloft. This increases snow and ice amount, as well as graupel and hail, also associated with more lightning. Also, thermals initiate slightly higher, are slightly larger and faster, suggesting a weak invigoration. We also find more thermals per cell, albeit fewer isolated cells. Convection aggregates more, explaining the lower isolated cell count, and enhancing convection, especially near the end of the 24-hour integration. This non-linear mesoscale feedback is likely triggered by temperature and moisture responses due to aerosol-thermal interactions. Additional time-lagged aerosol-reinialization experiments show that the mesoscale response is the predominant forcing for the invigoration. These changes happen within one day, on a smaller scale than previously suggested.
- 7 January 2026
- Published by Copernicus GmbH
- Vol. 2025, 1-33
Open AccessComment on egusphere-2025-5149
In cumulus clouds, aerosol concentrations control cloud droplet concentrations, modifying cloud radiative properties, precipitation processes, and cloud electrification. However, mechanisms of aerosol-deep convection interactions are not well understood due to complex cloud dynamics and microphysics. We investigate the interaction of aerosols with isolated deep convection using Large Eddy Simulations during the TRacking Aerosol Convection interactions ExpeRiment (TRACER) in the Houston area, using a joint cell-thermal tracking algorithm. Cumulus thermals are droplet generators, since supersaturation and droplet nucleation coincide with thermal centers, where the strongest updrafts occur. Primary ice crystal formation does not take place inside thermals, but at layers where previous thermals detrained moisture. As subsequent thermals containing supercooled droplets penetrate these layers, hail and graupel form at or near these thermals. Higher aerosol concentrations result in higher droplet concentrations that suppress drizzle, delay warm rain processes, and transport more moisture aloft. This increases snow and ice amount, as well as graupel and hail, also associated with more lightning. Also, thermals initiate slightly higher, are slightly larger and faster, suggesting a weak invigoration. We also find more thermals per cell, albeit fewer isolated cells. Convection aggregates more, explaining the lower isolated cell count, and enhancing convection, especially near the end of the 24-hour integration. This non-linear mesoscale feedback is likely triggered by temperature and moisture responses due to aerosol-thermal interactions. Additional time-lagged aerosol-reinialization experiments show that the mesoscale response is the predominant forcing for the invigoration. These changes happen within one day, on a smaller scale than previously suggested.
- Open Access
- 15 December 2025
- Published by Copernicus GmbH
- Vol. 2025, 1-33
Comment on egusphere-2025-5149
In cumulus clouds, aerosol concentrations control cloud droplet concentrations, modifying cloud radiative properties, precipitation processes, and cloud electrification. However, mechanisms of aerosol-deep convection interactions are not well understood due to complex cloud dynamics and microphysics. We investigate the interaction of aerosols with isolated deep convection using Large Eddy Simulations during the TRacking Aerosol Convection interactions ExpeRiment (TRACER) in the Houston area, using a joint cell-thermal tracking algorithm. Cumulus thermals are droplet generators, since supersaturation and droplet nucleation coincide with thermal centers, where the strongest updrafts occur. Primary ice crystal formation does not take place inside thermals, but at layers where previous thermals detrained moisture. As subsequent thermals containing supercooled droplets penetrate these layers, hail and graupel form at or near these thermals. Higher aerosol concentrations result in higher droplet concentrations that suppress drizzle, delay warm rain processes, and transport more moisture aloft. This increases snow and ice amount, as well as graupel and hail, also associated with more lightning. Also, thermals initiate slightly higher, are slightly larger and faster, suggesting a weak invigoration. We also find more thermals per cell, albeit fewer isolated cells. Convection aggregates more, explaining the lower isolated cell count, and enhancing convection, especially near the end of the 24-hour integration. This non-linear mesoscale feedback is likely triggered by temperature and moisture responses due to aerosol-thermal interactions. Additional time-lagged aerosol-reinialization experiments show that the mesoscale response is the predominant forcing for the invigoration. These changes happen within one day, on a smaller scale than previously suggested.
- 15 December 2025
- Published by Copernicus GmbH
- Vol. 2025, 1-33
Open AccessComment on egusphere-2025-5149
In cumulus clouds, aerosol concentrations control cloud droplet concentrations, modifying cloud radiative properties, precipitation processes, and cloud electrification. However, mechanisms of aerosol-deep convection interactions are not well understood due to complex cloud dynamics and microphysics. We investigate the interaction of aerosols with isolated deep convection using Large Eddy Simulations during the TRacking Aerosol Convection interactions ExpeRiment (TRACER) in the Houston area, using a joint cell-thermal tracking algorithm. Cumulus thermals are droplet generators, since supersaturation and droplet nucleation coincide with thermal centers, where the strongest updrafts occur. Primary ice crystal formation does not take place inside thermals, but at layers where previous thermals detrained moisture. As subsequent thermals containing supercooled droplets penetrate these layers, hail and graupel form at or near these thermals. Higher aerosol concentrations result in higher droplet concentrations that suppress drizzle, delay warm rain processes, and transport more moisture aloft. This increases snow and ice amount, as well as graupel and hail, also associated with more lightning. Also, thermals initiate slightly higher, are slightly larger and faster, suggesting a weak invigoration. We also find more thermals per cell, albeit fewer isolated cells. Convection aggregates more, explaining the lower isolated cell count, and enhancing convection, especially near the end of the 24-hour integration. This non-linear mesoscale feedback is likely triggered by temperature and moisture responses due to aerosol-thermal interactions. Additional time-lagged aerosol-reinialization experiments show that the mesoscale response is the predominant forcing for the invigoration. These changes happen within one day, on a smaller scale than previously suggested.
- Open Access
- 27 October 2025
- Published by Copernicus GmbH
- Vol. 2025, 1-33
Comment on egusphere-2025-5149
In cumulus clouds, aerosol concentrations control cloud droplet concentrations, modifying cloud radiative properties, precipitation processes, and cloud electrification. However, mechanisms of aerosol-deep convection interactions are not well understood due to complex cloud dynamics and microphysics. We investigate the interaction of aerosols with isolated deep convection using Large Eddy Simulations during the TRacking Aerosol Convection interactions ExpeRiment (TRACER) in the Houston area, using a joint cell-thermal tracking algorithm. Cumulus thermals are droplet generators, since supersaturation and droplet nucleation coincide with thermal centers, where the strongest updrafts occur. Primary ice crystal formation does not take place inside thermals, but at layers where previous thermals detrained moisture. As subsequent thermals containing supercooled droplets penetrate these layers, hail and graupel form at or near these thermals. Higher aerosol concentrations result in higher droplet concentrations that suppress drizzle, delay warm rain processes, and transport more moisture aloft. This increases snow and ice amount, as well as graupel and hail, also associated with more lightning. Also, thermals initiate slightly higher, are slightly larger and faster, suggesting a weak invigoration. We also find more thermals per cell, albeit fewer isolated cells. Convection aggregates more, explaining the lower isolated cell count, and enhancing convection, especially near the end of the 24-hour integration. This non-linear mesoscale feedback is likely triggered by temperature and moisture responses due to aerosol-thermal interactions. Additional time-lagged aerosol-reinialization experiments show that the mesoscale response is the predominant forcing for the invigoration. These changes happen within one day, on a smaller scale than previously suggested.
- 27 October 2025
- Published by Copernicus GmbH
- Vol. 2025, 1-33
Open AccessComment on egusphere-2025-5149
In cumulus clouds, aerosol concentrations control cloud droplet concentrations, modifying cloud radiative properties, precipitation processes, and cloud electrification. However, mechanisms of aerosol-deep convection interactions are not well understood due to complex cloud dynamics and microphysics. We investigate the interaction of aerosols with isolated deep convection using Large Eddy Simulations during the TRacking Aerosol Convection interactions ExpeRiment (TRACER) in the Houston area, using a joint cell-thermal tracking algorithm. Cumulus thermals are droplet generators, since supersaturation and droplet nucleation coincide with thermal centers, where the strongest updrafts occur. Primary ice crystal formation does not take place inside thermals, but at layers where previous thermals detrained moisture. As subsequent thermals containing supercooled droplets penetrate these layers, hail and graupel form at or near these thermals. Higher aerosol concentrations result in higher droplet concentrations that suppress drizzle, delay warm rain processes, and transport more moisture aloft. This increases snow and ice amount, as well as graupel and hail, also associated with more lightning. Also, thermals initiate slightly higher, are slightly larger and faster, suggesting a weak invigoration. We also find more thermals per cell, albeit fewer isolated cells. Convection aggregates more, explaining the lower isolated cell count, and enhancing convection, especially near the end of the 24-hour integration. This non-linear mesoscale feedback is likely triggered by temperature and moisture responses due to aerosol-thermal interactions. Additional time-lagged aerosol-reinialization experiments show that the mesoscale response is the predominant forcing for the invigoration. These changes happen within one day, on a smaller scale than previously suggested.
- Open Access
- 24 October 2025
- Published by Copernicus GmbH in EGUsphere
- Vol. 2025, 1-33
Aerosol-deep convection interaction based on joint cell-thermal tracking in Large Eddy Simulations during the TRACER campaign
In cumulus clouds, aerosol concentrations control cloud droplet concentrations, modifying cloud radiative properties, precipitation processes, and cloud electrification. However, mechanisms of aerosol-deep convection interactions are not well understood due to complex cloud dynamics and microphysics. We investigate the interaction of aerosols with isolated deep convection using Large Eddy Simulations during the TRacking Aerosol Convection interactions ExpeRiment (TRACER) in the Houston area, using a joint cell-thermal tracking algorithm. Cumulus thermals are droplet generators, since supersaturation and droplet nucleation coincide with thermal centers, where the strongest updrafts occur. Primary ice crystal formation does not take place inside thermals, but at layers where previous thermals detrained moisture. As subsequent thermals containing supercooled droplets penetrate these layers, hail and graupel form at or near these thermals. Higher aerosol concentrations result in higher droplet concentrations that suppress drizzle, delay warm rain processes, and transport more moisture aloft. This increases snow and ice amount, as well as graupel and hail, also associated with more lightning. Also, thermals initiate slightly higher, are slightly larger and faster, suggesting a weak invigoration. We also find more thermals per cell, albeit fewer isolated cells. Convection aggregates more, explaining the lower isolated cell count, and enhancing convection, especially near the end of the 24-hour integration. This non-linear mesoscale feedback is likely triggered by temperature and moisture responses due to aerosol-thermal interactions. Additional time-lagged aerosol-reinialization experiments show that the mesoscale response is the predominant forcing for the invigoration. These changes happen within one day, on a smaller scale than previously suggested.
- 24 October 2025
- Published by Copernicus GmbH in EGUsphere
- Vol. 2025, 1-33
Open AccessAerosol-deep convection interaction based on joint cell-thermal tracking in Large Eddy Simulations during the TRACER campaign
In cumulus clouds, aerosol concentrations control cloud droplet concentrations, modifying cloud radiative properties, precipitation processes, and cloud electrification. However, mechanisms of aerosol-deep convection interactions are not well understood due to complex cloud dynamics and microphysics. We investigate the interaction of aerosols with isolated deep convection using Large Eddy Simulations during the TRacking Aerosol Convection interactions ExpeRiment (TRACER) in the Houston area, using a joint cell-thermal tracking algorithm. Cumulus thermals are droplet generators, since supersaturation and droplet nucleation coincide with thermal centers, where the strongest updrafts occur. Primary ice crystal formation does not take place inside thermals, but at layers where previous thermals detrained moisture. As subsequent thermals containing supercooled droplets penetrate these layers, hail and graupel form at or near these thermals. Higher aerosol concentrations result in higher droplet concentrations that suppress drizzle, delay warm rain processes, and transport more moisture aloft. This increases snow and ice amount, as well as graupel and hail, also associated with more lightning. Also, thermals initiate slightly higher, are slightly larger and faster, suggesting a weak invigoration. We also find more thermals per cell, albeit fewer isolated cells. Convection aggregates more, explaining the lower isolated cell count, and enhancing convection, especially near the end of the 24-hour integration. This non-linear mesoscale feedback is likely triggered by temperature and moisture responses due to aerosol-thermal interactions. Additional time-lagged aerosol-reinialization experiments show that the mesoscale response is the predominant forcing for the invigoration. These changes happen within one day, on a smaller scale than previously suggested.
- Open Access
- 25 September 2025
- Published by Copernicus GmbH in Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
- Vol. 25 (18) , 11199-11231
Warm-phase microphysical evolution in large-eddy simulations of tropical cumulus congestus: evaluating drop size distribution evolution using polarimetry retrievals, in situ measurements, and a thermal-based framework
Owing to uncertainties in convective microphysics processes, improving parameterizations in Earth system models (ESMs) can benefit from observationally constrained cases suitable for scaling between cloud-resolving models and ESMs. We propose a benchmark large-eddy simulation (LES) cumulus congestus case study from the NASA Cloud, Aerosol, and Monsoon Processes Philippines Experiment (CAMP2Ex) for evaluating and improving ESMs in single-column model (SCM) mode. We seek observational constraints using novel polarimetric retrievals and in situ cloud microphysics measurements. Simulations using bulk and bin microphysics initialized with observed aerosol profiles are compared to cloud-top retrievals of cloud droplet effective radius (Reff), effective variance (νeff), and number concentration (Nd) from the airborne Research Scanning Polarimeter (RSP). Both schemes reproduce characteristics of cloud-top Nd and Reff that increase and decrease with altitude, respectively. Cloud-top Nd is low-biased relative to RSP retrievals in both schemes, potentially due to limitations in both simulations and retrieval assumptions. Cloud-top Reff is low-biased in the bulk scheme but reasonably reproduced by the bin scheme. Profiles of Nd and Reff are sensitive to the collision–coalescence process and the vertical variation in aerosol size distribution. Comparison of simulated and in situ droplet size distributions (DSDs) shows that, to first order, integrated moments are always sensitive to sizes µm and can also be sensitive to larger sizes if the DSDs are sufficiently broad, with implications for the assumed maximum observed size retrieved by the RSP. The bin scheme captures the observed extended tail of the DSD, while the bulk scheme is unable to due to parametric constraints. Differences in expected relationships between in situ measurements of cloud cores and cloud-top retrievals by RSP demonstrate difficulty in constraining well the case presented herein. Finally, a thermal-tracking framework demonstrates that the dilution of Nd throughout a thermal's lifetime is heavily determined by collision–coalescence and the height-varying aerosol distribution and that, in the absence of these, the impact of entrainment on diluting Nd is largely offset by secondary activation. Implications for evaluating warm-phase convective microphysics schemes in ESMs and translating results for use on global, space-based polarimetry platforms are discussed.- 25 September 2025
- Published by Copernicus GmbH in Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
- Vol. 25 (18) , 11199-11231
Open AccessWarm-phase microphysical evolution in large-eddy simulations of tropical cumulus congestus: evaluating drop size distribution evolution using polarimetry retrievals, in situ measurements, and a thermal-based framework
Owing to uncertainties in convective microphysics processes, improving parameterizations in Earth system models (ESMs) can benefit from observationally constrained cases suitable for scaling between cloud-resolving models and ESMs. We propose a benchmark large-eddy simulation (LES) cumulus congestus case study from the NASA Cloud, Aerosol, and Monsoon Processes Philippines Experiment (CAMP2Ex) for evaluating and improving ESMs in single-column model (SCM) mode. We seek observational constraints using novel polarimetric retrievals and in situ cloud microphysics measurements. Simulations using bulk and bin microphysics initialized with observed aerosol profiles are compared to cloud-top retrievals of cloud droplet effective radius (Reff), effective variance (νeff), and number concentration (Nd) from the airborne Research Scanning Polarimeter (RSP). Both schemes reproduce characteristics of cloud-top Nd and Reff that increase and decrease with altitude, respectively. Cloud-top Nd is low-biased relative to RSP retrievals in both schemes, potentially due to limitations in both simulations and retrieval assumptions. Cloud-top Reff is low-biased in the bulk scheme but reasonably reproduced by the bin scheme. Profiles of Nd and Reff are sensitive to the collision–coalescence process and the vertical variation in aerosol size distribution. Comparison of simulated and in situ droplet size distributions (DSDs) shows that, to first order, integrated moments are always sensitive to sizes µm and can also be sensitive to larger sizes if the DSDs are sufficiently broad, with implications for the assumed maximum observed size retrieved by the RSP. The bin scheme captures the observed extended tail of the DSD, while the bulk scheme is unable to due to parametric constraints. Differences in expected relationships between in situ measurements of cloud cores and cloud-top retrievals by RSP demonstrate difficulty in constraining well the case presented herein. Finally, a thermal-tracking framework demonstrates that the dilution of Nd throughout a thermal's lifetime is heavily determined by collision–coalescence and the height-varying aerosol distribution and that, in the absence of these, the impact of entrainment on diluting Nd is largely offset by secondary activation. Implications for evaluating warm-phase convective microphysics schemes in ESMs and translating results for use on global, space-based polarimetry platforms are discussed. - Open Access
- 20 January 2025
- Published by Copernicus GmbH
- Vol. 2024, 1-51
Comment on egusphere-2024-2413
Improving parameterizations of convective microphysics in Earth system models (ESMs) requires well-constrained cases suitable for scaling between cloud-resolving models and ESMs. We propose a benchmark large eddy simulation (LES) cumulus congestus case study from the NASA Cloud, Aerosol, and Monsoon Processes Philippines Experiment (CAMP2Ex) and demonstrate its observational constraints using novel polarimetric retrievals and in situ cloud microphysics measurements. Simulations using bulk and bin microphysics with observed aerosol input are compared to cloud-top retrievals of cloud droplet effective radius (Reff) and number concentration (Nd) from the airborne Research Scanning Polarimeter (RSP). The bulk scheme reasonably reproduces characteristic profiles of cloud-top Nd that decrease with altitude, while the bin simulation realizes greater discrepancies due to weaker precipitation formation. The Nd profile is strongly sensitive to the collision-coalescence process and the vertically resolved aerosol distribution, but appears well-constrained, whereas a persistent low-bias in Reff is evident in both schemes. Comparison of simulated and in situ droplet size distributions (DSDs) show that low-biased Reff originates from a cloud droplet mode that is too narrow relative to observations. Finally, a thermal-tracking framework demonstrates that the dilution of Nd throughout a thermal's lifetime is heavily determined by collision-coalescence and the height-varying aerosol distribution, and that in the absence of these, the impact of entrainment on diluting Nd is largely offset by continuous aerosol activation. Implications for developing warm-phase convective microphysics schemes for ESMs, evaluation of cumulus congestus using single column model versions of ESMs, and translating results to global, space-based polarimetry platforms are discussed.
- 20 January 2025
- Published by Copernicus GmbH
- Vol. 2024, 1-51
Open AccessComment on egusphere-2024-2413
Improving parameterizations of convective microphysics in Earth system models (ESMs) requires well-constrained cases suitable for scaling between cloud-resolving models and ESMs. We propose a benchmark large eddy simulation (LES) cumulus congestus case study from the NASA Cloud, Aerosol, and Monsoon Processes Philippines Experiment (CAMP2Ex) and demonstrate its observational constraints using novel polarimetric retrievals and in situ cloud microphysics measurements. Simulations using bulk and bin microphysics with observed aerosol input are compared to cloud-top retrievals of cloud droplet effective radius (Reff) and number concentration (Nd) from the airborne Research Scanning Polarimeter (RSP). The bulk scheme reasonably reproduces characteristic profiles of cloud-top Nd that decrease with altitude, while the bin simulation realizes greater discrepancies due to weaker precipitation formation. The Nd profile is strongly sensitive to the collision-coalescence process and the vertically resolved aerosol distribution, but appears well-constrained, whereas a persistent low-bias in Reff is evident in both schemes. Comparison of simulated and in situ droplet size distributions (DSDs) show that low-biased Reff originates from a cloud droplet mode that is too narrow relative to observations. Finally, a thermal-tracking framework demonstrates that the dilution of Nd throughout a thermal's lifetime is heavily determined by collision-coalescence and the height-varying aerosol distribution, and that in the absence of these, the impact of entrainment on diluting Nd is largely offset by continuous aerosol activation. Implications for developing warm-phase convective microphysics schemes for ESMs, evaluation of cumulus congestus using single column model versions of ESMs, and translating results to global, space-based polarimetry platforms are discussed.