Christopher DeLuca
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Christopher DeLuca has a total of 106 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Andrew Coombs
Memorial University
12 shared publications - Jill Willis
Queensland University of Technology
11 shared publications - Bronwen Cowie
The University of Waikato
9 shared publications - Christine Harrison
King’s College London
9 shared publications - Nathan Rickey
Faculty of Education, Queen’s University, Kingston, Canada
9 shared publications - Amirhossein Rasooli
Learning Sciences & Assessment Department, NIE/NTU, Singapore
6 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 11 November 2026
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice
- p. 1-29
Formative assessment and self-regulated learning in primary education: linking evidence from a cross-cultural comparative scoping review
- 11 November 2026
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice
- p. 1-29
Open AccessFormative assessment and self-regulated learning in primary education: linking evidence from a cross-cultural comparative scoping review
- 4 July 2026
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice
- Vol. 33 (4) , 349-351
Assessment for human beings
The field of educational assessment has spent a significant amount of time researching the why, how, and what of assessment practices. Guiding questions have been: Why do we undertake assessment in...
- 4 July 2026
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice
- Vol. 33 (4) , 349-351
Assessment for human beings
The field of educational assessment has spent a significant amount of time researching the why, how, and what of assessment practices. Guiding questions have been: Why do we undertake assessment in...
- Open Access
- 11 June 2026
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice
- Vol. 33 (3) , 1-19
Educational assessment in Canada revisited
- 11 June 2026
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice
- Vol. 33 (3) , 1-19
Open AccessEducational assessment in Canada revisited
- Open Access
- 30 April 2026
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice
- p. 1-19
Learning through tensions: student teacher assessment identity development
- 30 April 2026
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice
- p. 1-19
Open AccessLearning through tensions: student teacher assessment identity development
- 2 January 2026
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice
- Vol. 33 (1) , 1-4
Assessment ecosystems
Each of the papers in this issue demonstrates how assessment practices are always and inevitably shaped by their social and political contexts. Assessment operates within a social ecosystem. In bio...
- 2 January 2026
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice
- Vol. 33 (1) , 1-4
Assessment ecosystems
Each of the papers in this issue demonstrates how assessment practices are always and inevitably shaped by their social and political contexts. Assessment operates within a social ecosystem. In bio...
- Open Access
- 30 October 2025
- Published by American Educational Research Association (AERA) in Educational Researcher
- Vol. 55 (2) , 125-133
The AI 3 Model: Future Directions for Artificial Intelligence, Assessment Innovation, and Academic Integrity
The evolution of machine learning and large language models (commonly referred to as “artificial intelligence” [AI]) presents both opportunities and challenges for teaching and learning across K–12 and higher education contexts globally. Among the most pressing concerns is that these tools can undermine the integrity of student assessment and evaluation systems. This article investigates this timely issue by examining the intersections between AI, academic integrity, and assessment innovations through a cross-national research synthesis, resulting in a novel model for educators, policymakers, and researchers. The proposed model promotes assessment policies and practices that support high integrity, authentic learning, and innovative student assessment in an era of generative AI.
- 30 October 2025
- Published by American Educational Research Association (AERA) in Educational Researcher
- Vol. 55 (2) , 125-133
Open AccessThe AI 3 Model: Future Directions for Artificial Intelligence, Assessment Innovation, and Academic Integrity
The evolution of machine learning and large language models (commonly referred to as “artificial intelligence” [AI]) presents both opportunities and challenges for teaching and learning across K–12 and higher education contexts globally. Among the most pressing concerns is that these tools can undermine the integrity of student assessment and evaluation systems. This article investigates this timely issue by examining the intersections between AI, academic integrity, and assessment innovations through a cross-national research synthesis, resulting in a novel model for educators, policymakers, and researchers. The proposed model promotes assessment policies and practices that support high integrity, authentic learning, and innovative student assessment in an era of generative AI.
- Open Access
- 3 October 2025
- Published by CISP Journal Services in International Journal of Education Policy and Leadership
- Vol. 21 (3) , 21 pp
Developing Non-Positional Teacher Leadership of Formative Assessment Practices: Findings from the Teacher-Led Learning Circles Project
This article examines the development of teacher leadership through the Teacher-Led Learning Circles project, a professional learning and research initiative across seven countries: Brazil, Côte d’Ivoire, Ghana, Malaysia, South Korea, Switzerland, and Uruguay. Through targeted professional development over one academic year, the project advanced non-positional teacher leadership and confidence in four core formative assessment strategies as well as the embedded use of these strategies by teachers. Data were collected through multiple sources, including a teacher pre-survey (n = 171), a teacher post-survey (n = 121), a teacher codification framework questionnaire (n = 113), a local facilitator questionnaire (n = 27), a local union representative questionnaire (n = 10), a national researcher questionnaire (n = 7), and seven country profiles. Findings show that when teachers are supported, their influence grows, and formative assessment practices become more embedded and confident, highlighting the potential of teacher-led professional development for sustainable educational improvement.
- 3 October 2025
- Published by CISP Journal Services in International Journal of Education Policy and Leadership
- Vol. 21 (3) , 21 pp
Open AccessDeveloping Non-Positional Teacher Leadership of Formative Assessment Practices: Findings from the Teacher-Led Learning Circles Project
This article examines the development of teacher leadership through the Teacher-Led Learning Circles project, a professional learning and research initiative across seven countries: Brazil, Côte d’Ivoire, Ghana, Malaysia, South Korea, Switzerland, and Uruguay. Through targeted professional development over one academic year, the project advanced non-positional teacher leadership and confidence in four core formative assessment strategies as well as the embedded use of these strategies by teachers. Data were collected through multiple sources, including a teacher pre-survey (n = 171), a teacher post-survey (n = 121), a teacher codification framework questionnaire (n = 113), a local facilitator questionnaire (n = 27), a local union representative questionnaire (n = 10), a national researcher questionnaire (n = 7), and seven country profiles. Findings show that when teachers are supported, their influence grows, and formative assessment practices become more embedded and confident, highlighting the potential of teacher-led professional development for sustainable educational improvement.
- 23 June 2025
- Published by Springer Nature in Metacognition and Learning
- Vol. 20 (1) , 1-29
How do students self-assess? examining the metacognitive processes of student self-assessment
- 23 June 2025
- Published by Springer Nature in Metacognition and Learning
- Vol. 20 (1) , 1-29
How do students self-assess? examining the metacognitive processes of student self-assessment
- 2 October 2024
- Published by SAGE Publications in Phi Delta Kappan
- Vol. 106 (2) , 42-46
The rise and stall of standards-based reform
The promotion and measurement of standards in compulsory education systems has been a prominent feature of Western education systems for centuries. But the COVID-19 pandemic and the rise of artificial intelligence (AI) have made the limits of current standards-based approaches to assessment more evident. Louis Volante, Don A. Klinger, and Christopher DeLuca discuss the importance of both cognitive and non-cognitive skills for the future success of schools. More authentic assessments, some of which leverage AI, can assess students’ performance in these essential domains.
- 2 October 2024
- Published by SAGE Publications in Phi Delta Kappan
- Vol. 106 (2) , 42-46
The rise and stall of standards-based reform
The promotion and measurement of standards in compulsory education systems has been a prominent feature of Western education systems for centuries. But the COVID-19 pandemic and the rise of artificial intelligence (AI) have made the limits of current standards-based approaches to assessment more evident. Louis Volante, Don A. Klinger, and Christopher DeLuca discuss the importance of both cognitive and non-cognitive skills for the future success of schools. More authentic assessments, some of which leverage AI, can assess students’ performance in these essential domains.