Paolo Nesi
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Paolo Nesi has a total of 194 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Pierfrancesco Bellini
DISIT Lab, Department of Information Engineering, University of Florence, 50139 Florence, Italy
76 shared publications - Gianni Pantaleo
University of Florence
29 shared publications - Marco Fanfani
University of Florence
18 shared publications - Enrico Collini
University of Florence
16 shared publications - Daniele Cenni
University of Florence
15 shared publications - Michela Paolucci
University of Florence
14 shared publications
Latest Publications
- 4 July 2026
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 202-219
Snap4Waste: An Integrated Waste Dynamic Optimal Collection Management System
- 4 July 2026
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 202-219
Snap4Waste: An Integrated Waste Dynamic Optimal Collection Management System
- 2 July 2026
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 21-34
Smart City Digital Twin Framework for Semantic Indexing and Dynamic Modelling of 3D Buildings
- 2 July 2026
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 21-34
Smart City Digital Twin Framework for Semantic Indexing and Dynamic Modelling of 3D Buildings
- 1 July 2026
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 435-449
Assess Flooding Impacts in Urban Environment: Integrating Fluid-Dynamic Simulations in Smart City Digital Twin
- 1 July 2026
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 435-449
Assess Flooding Impacts in Urban Environment: Integrating Fluid-Dynamic Simulations in Smart City Digital Twin
- Top Cited PapersOpen Access
- 5 June 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Big Data and Cognitive Computing
- Vol. 10 (6) , 186
Human-Centered AI for Decision Support Systems: A Systematic Review of Application Domains, Architecture Designs, Current Trends and Future Directions
Artificial Intelligence is increasingly used to support decision-making across many domains. However, concerns related to transparency, reliability and human oversight indicate the need for improved human-centered AI (HCAI) approaches in decision support systems (DSSs). In this paper, a systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 in the Web of Science database: ninety research articles published between 2015 and 2025 were analyzed to investigate how HCAI is applied within DSSs in multiple application domains. HCAI + DSS research outcomes were analyzed and explored, first identifying the main architectural designs and discussing the involved components integrating human interaction, generative AI models, data and knowledge management, decision logic, and orchestration mechanisms, then focusing on specific domains and highlighting impact achieved, technologies used, and validation strategies employed. In addition, alignment with United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) was considered, and the temporal evolution of the most relevant topics was studied to identify more interesting trends and less investigated areas. Finally, findings were summarized, current limitations were discussed, and future research directions for helping researchers and practitioners in developing more reliable, explainable, and human-aware decision support systems were outlined.
- 5 June 2026
- Published by MDPI AG in Big Data and Cognitive Computing
- Vol. 10 (6) , 186
Top Cited PapersOpen AccessHuman-Centered AI for Decision Support Systems: A Systematic Review of Application Domains, Architecture Designs, Current Trends and Future Directions
Artificial Intelligence is increasingly used to support decision-making across many domains. However, concerns related to transparency, reliability and human oversight indicate the need for improved human-centered AI (HCAI) approaches in decision support systems (DSSs). In this paper, a systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 in the Web of Science database: ninety research articles published between 2015 and 2025 were analyzed to investigate how HCAI is applied within DSSs in multiple application domains. HCAI + DSS research outcomes were analyzed and explored, first identifying the main architectural designs and discussing the involved components integrating human interaction, generative AI models, data and knowledge management, decision logic, and orchestration mechanisms, then focusing on specific domains and highlighting impact achieved, technologies used, and validation strategies employed. In addition, alignment with United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) was considered, and the temporal evolution of the most relevant topics was studied to identify more interesting trends and less investigated areas. Finally, findings were summarized, current limitations were discussed, and future research directions for helping researchers and practitioners in developing more reliable, explainable, and human-aware decision support systems were outlined.
- Open Access
- 12 May 2026
- Published by Elsevier in Expert Systems with Applications
- Vol. 327
Graph neural network for continuous traffic density estimation on unmonitored roads from very few scattered measurements
- 12 May 2026
- Published by Elsevier in Expert Systems with Applications
- Vol. 327
Open AccessGraph neural network for continuous traffic density estimation on unmonitored roads from very few scattered measurements
- Top Cited PapersOpen Access
- 6 February 2026
- Published by Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) in IEEE Access
- Vol. 14, 23166-23193
Data-Driven Mobility Demand-Versus-Offer Matching by Dynamic Integration of Public and Sharing Services
A systematic transition toward more sustainable transport solutions, included among the Sustainable Development Goals of the United Nations, is one of the main challenge modern cities must face. Increasing the usage of public transport and alternative mobility, like sharing services and micro-mobility, has been indicated as the most promising strategy since it can provide wide accessibility, reduce traffic congestion and consequently contain environmental impacts. Nevertheless, the citizen behavior shift toward such solutions in place of private motor mobility is hampered by several factors, among which quality of service emerge as one of the most relevant. To support decision makers in what-if analysis, tactical and strategic planning for improving of transport services, we present MODOM (MObility Demand-Offer Matching), a lightweight agent-based simulator that takes into account public transportation offer and sharing/micro-mobility solutions to evaluate the match with respect to the city users’ demand. MODOM supports dynamic updates of people’s travel plans to react to specific conditions and produces rich, decision-grade KPIs. The simulator runs city-scale scenarios in few minutes, avoids time-consuming configurations, and is integrated with a Smart City Digital Twin for rapid what-if analysis, Snap4City. When needed for tactical planning, measured traffic can be injected by altering public transport timetables. Several experiments demonstrate that MODOM solves current simulator shortcomings and provides detailed simulation results to support decision-making processes.
- 6 February 2026
- Published by Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) in IEEE Access
- Vol. 14, 23166-23193
Top Cited PapersOpen AccessData-Driven Mobility Demand-Versus-Offer Matching by Dynamic Integration of Public and Sharing Services
A systematic transition toward more sustainable transport solutions, included among the Sustainable Development Goals of the United Nations, is one of the main challenge modern cities must face. Increasing the usage of public transport and alternative mobility, like sharing services and micro-mobility, has been indicated as the most promising strategy since it can provide wide accessibility, reduce traffic congestion and consequently contain environmental impacts. Nevertheless, the citizen behavior shift toward such solutions in place of private motor mobility is hampered by several factors, among which quality of service emerge as one of the most relevant. To support decision makers in what-if analysis, tactical and strategic planning for improving of transport services, we present MODOM (MObility Demand-Offer Matching), a lightweight agent-based simulator that takes into account public transportation offer and sharing/micro-mobility solutions to evaluate the match with respect to the city users’ demand. MODOM supports dynamic updates of people’s travel plans to react to specific conditions and produces rich, decision-grade KPIs. The simulator runs city-scale scenarios in few minutes, avoids time-consuming configurations, and is integrated with a Smart City Digital Twin for rapid what-if analysis, Snap4City. When needed for tactical planning, measured traffic can be injected by altering public transport timetables. Several experiments demonstrate that MODOM solves current simulator shortcomings and provides detailed simulation results to support decision-making processes.
- Open Access
- 1 January 2026
- Published by Firenze University Press
- p. 127-131
Da Big Data Analytic ai Data Models e Digital Twin
In the early 2000s, the rapid growth of data—driven by European Open Data policies, IoT/IoE, and digital platforms—created new opportunities for knowledge extraction. The DISIT Lab at the University of Florence shifted its research toward Big Data analytics, AI, and smart city systems. Key achievements include the Km4City knowledge model and the Snap4City platform, enabling data-driven decision support, smart mobility, urban analytics, and digital twin solutions for cities.
- 1 January 2026
- Published by Firenze University Press
- p. 127-131
Open AccessDa Big Data Analytic ai Data Models e Digital Twin
In the early 2000s, the rapid growth of data—driven by European Open Data policies, IoT/IoE, and digital platforms—created new opportunities for knowledge extraction. The DISIT Lab at the University of Florence shifted its research toward Big Data analytics, AI, and smart city systems. Key achievements include the Km4City knowledge model and the Snap4City platform, enabling data-driven decision support, smart mobility, urban analytics, and digital twin solutions for cities.