Randy J. Read
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Randy J. Read has a total of 1000 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Thomas Charles Terwilliger
New Mexico Consortium, Los Alamos, USA
41 shared publications - Paul David Adams
Molecular Biophysics and Integrated Bioimaging Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, USA
37 shared publications Airlie J. McCoy
Cambridge Institute for Medical Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
34 shared publications- Airlie J. McCoy
Cambridge Institute for Medical Research, Department of Haematology, University of Cambridge, The Keith Peters Building, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0XY, United Kingdom
22 shared publications - Robert D. Oeffner
Department of Haematology, Cambridge Institute for Medical Research, University of Cambridge, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0XY, United Kingdom
18 shared publications Pavel V. Afonine
Molecular Biophysics and Integrated Bioimaging Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, USA
17 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 24 June 2026
- Published by International Union of Crystallography (IUCr) in Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology
- Vol. 82 (7) , 813-823
Scotty : lattice coincidences for macromolecular crystallographic phasing
When a macromolecular crystal lattice targeted for study is closely related to a previously studied crystal lattice, phasing the target crystal by difference (fast-)Fourier transform (DFFT) methods is preferable to performing molecular replacement. The application Scotty , within the Phasertng codebase, is software for the identification of coincident lattices and downstream processing. All crystallographic PDB entries are organized into a scikit-learn `BallTree' index under the Niggli cell distance metric `NCDist'. Nearest neighbours under the metric are progressed to test structure-factor intensity correlation. The structure from the lattice with the highest correlation with the target is used to phase the target lattice, and the coordinates are taken forward to coordinate refinement using a wide convergence radius protocol. The method can identify lattice coincidences accounting for very significant non-isomorphism. The nearest-neighbour search is space-group agnostic, so that coincident lattices are identified even when the nominal space groups are different, the symmetry of one lattice being described as a subgroup of the other or a higher metric symmetry.
- 24 June 2026
- Published by International Union of Crystallography (IUCr) in Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology
- Vol. 82 (7) , 813-823
Open AccessScotty : lattice coincidences for macromolecular crystallographic phasing
When a macromolecular crystal lattice targeted for study is closely related to a previously studied crystal lattice, phasing the target crystal by difference (fast-)Fourier transform (DFFT) methods is preferable to performing molecular replacement. The application Scotty , within the Phasertng codebase, is software for the identification of coincident lattices and downstream processing. All crystallographic PDB entries are organized into a scikit-learn `BallTree' index under the Niggli cell distance metric `NCDist'. Nearest neighbours under the metric are progressed to test structure-factor intensity correlation. The structure from the lattice with the highest correlation with the target is used to phase the target lattice, and the coordinates are taken forward to coordinate refinement using a wide convergence radius protocol. The method can identify lattice coincidences accounting for very significant non-isomorphism. The nearest-neighbour search is space-group agnostic, so that coincident lattices are identified even when the nominal space groups are different, the symmetry of one lattice being described as a subgroup of the other or a higher metric symmetry.
- Top Cited PapersOpen Access
- 1 April 2026
- Published by Springer Nature in Nature Methods
- Vol. 23 (4) , 785-795
AlphaFold as a prior: experimental structure determination conditioned on a pretrained neural network
Advances in machine learning have transformed structural biology, enabling swift and accurate prediction of protein structure from sequence. However, key challenges persist in modeling side-chain packing, condition-dependent conformational changes and biomolecular interactions, largely because of limited high-quality training data. At the same time, emerging experimental techniques such as cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM), cryo-electron tomography (cryo-ET) and high-throughput crystallography are generating vast amounts of structural information but converting these data into mechanistically interpretable atomic models often remains difficult. Here we show that integrating experimental measurements directly into protein structure prediction can overcome these limitations. We introduce ROCKET, an augmentation of AlphaFold2 that refines predicted structures using cryo-EM, cryo-ET and X-ray crystallography data. By optimizing structures in the space of coevolutionary embeddings rather than Cartesian coordinates, ROCKET captures biologically meaningful structural variation that is inaccessible to AlphaFold2 alone and to existing automated modeling approaches, especially when the signal-to-noise ratio is low. ROCKET enables scalable, automated model building without retraining and provides a general framework for integrating experimental observables with biomolecular machine learning.
- 1 April 2026
- Published by Springer Nature in Nature Methods
- Vol. 23 (4) , 785-795
Top Cited PapersOpen AccessAlphaFold as a prior: experimental structure determination conditioned on a pretrained neural network
Advances in machine learning have transformed structural biology, enabling swift and accurate prediction of protein structure from sequence. However, key challenges persist in modeling side-chain packing, condition-dependent conformational changes and biomolecular interactions, largely because of limited high-quality training data. At the same time, emerging experimental techniques such as cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM), cryo-electron tomography (cryo-ET) and high-throughput crystallography are generating vast amounts of structural information but converting these data into mechanistically interpretable atomic models often remains difficult. Here we show that integrating experimental measurements directly into protein structure prediction can overcome these limitations. We introduce ROCKET, an augmentation of AlphaFold2 that refines predicted structures using cryo-EM, cryo-ET and X-ray crystallography data. By optimizing structures in the space of coevolutionary embeddings rather than Cartesian coordinates, ROCKET captures biologically meaningful structural variation that is inaccessible to AlphaFold2 alone and to existing automated modeling approaches, especially when the signal-to-noise ratio is low. ROCKET enables scalable, automated model building without retraining and provides a general framework for integrating experimental observables with biomolecular machine learning.
- Open Access
- 26 November 2025
- Published by International Union of Crystallography (IUCr) in Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology
- Vol. 81 (12) , 678-692
Xtricorder : a likelihood-enhanced self-rotation function and application to a machine learning-enhanced Matthews prediction of asymmetric unit copy number
Analysis of crystallographic diffraction data after collection and integration but before phasing gives the crystallographer a `first-look' assessment of data quality and flags potential challenges in subsequent structure determination. We here report the development of Xtricorder , a `first-look' application specifically targeted at likelihood-based phasing. Xtricorder incorporates the full array of analyses previously available in the Phaser codebase, with some enhancements and updates, in a more streamlined and accessible implementation. In addition, Xtricorder offers a likelihood-enhanced self-rotation function. A novel graphical representation of the self-rotation function, the `composite-section diagram', presents the results for user inspection and has the added advantage that, in an adapted form, it is appropriate for training a convolutional neural network to enhance the standard Matthews analysis and double the accuracy of asymmetric unit copy-number prediction. We investigate the usefulness of the likelihood-enhanced self-rotation function in `first-look' analyses, exploring the circumstances under which the self-rotation function results are useful, and discuss the application to AI-generated structure prediction.
- 26 November 2025
- Published by International Union of Crystallography (IUCr) in Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology
- Vol. 81 (12) , 678-692
Open AccessXtricorder : a likelihood-enhanced self-rotation function and application to a machine learning-enhanced Matthews prediction of asymmetric unit copy number
Analysis of crystallographic diffraction data after collection and integration but before phasing gives the crystallographer a `first-look' assessment of data quality and flags potential challenges in subsequent structure determination. We here report the development of Xtricorder , a `first-look' application specifically targeted at likelihood-based phasing. Xtricorder incorporates the full array of analyses previously available in the Phaser codebase, with some enhancements and updates, in a more streamlined and accessible implementation. In addition, Xtricorder offers a likelihood-enhanced self-rotation function. A novel graphical representation of the self-rotation function, the `composite-section diagram', presents the results for user inspection and has the added advantage that, in an adapted form, it is appropriate for training a convolutional neural network to enhance the standard Matthews analysis and double the accuracy of asymmetric unit copy-number prediction. We investigate the usefulness of the likelihood-enhanced self-rotation function in `first-look' analyses, exploring the circumstances under which the self-rotation function results are useful, and discuss the application to AI-generated structure prediction.
- Open Access
- 22 August 2025
- Published by Wiley in Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
- Vol. 94 (1) , 302-313
Model Quality Assessment for CASP16
The CASP16 evaluation of model accuracy (EMA) experiment assessed the ability of predictors to estimate the accuracy of predicted models, with a particular emphasis on multimeric assemblies. Expanding on the CASP15 framework, CASP16 introduced a new evaluation mode (QMODE3) focused on selecting high‐quality models from large‐scale AlphaFold2‐derived model pools generated by MassiveFold. Three primary evaluation tasks were therefore conducted: QMODE1 assessed global structure accuracy, QMODE2 focused on the accuracy of interface residues, and QMODE3 tested model selection performance. Predictors were evaluated using a diverse set of OpenStructure‐based metrics, and a novel penalty‐based ranking scheme was developed for QMODE3 to handle score interdependence and varying prediction quality distributions. Additionally, we explored the accuracy and utility of predicted local confidence measures now made available on a per‐atom basis by methods that invoke AlphaFold3. Results showed that methods incorporating AlphaFold3‐derived features—particularly per‐atom pLDDT—performed best in estimating local accuracy and in utility for experimental structure solution. For QMODE3, performance varied significantly across monomeric, homomeric, and heteromeric target categories and underscored the ongoing challenge of evaluating complex assemblies.
- 22 August 2025
- Published by Wiley in Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
- Vol. 94 (1) , 302-313
Open AccessModel Quality Assessment for CASP16
The CASP16 evaluation of model accuracy (EMA) experiment assessed the ability of predictors to estimate the accuracy of predicted models, with a particular emphasis on multimeric assemblies. Expanding on the CASP15 framework, CASP16 introduced a new evaluation mode (QMODE3) focused on selecting high‐quality models from large‐scale AlphaFold2‐derived model pools generated by MassiveFold. Three primary evaluation tasks were therefore conducted: QMODE1 assessed global structure accuracy, QMODE2 focused on the accuracy of interface residues, and QMODE3 tested model selection performance. Predictors were evaluated using a diverse set of OpenStructure‐based metrics, and a novel penalty‐based ranking scheme was developed for QMODE3 to handle score interdependence and varying prediction quality distributions. Additionally, we explored the accuracy and utility of predicted local confidence measures now made available on a per‐atom basis by methods that invoke AlphaFold3. Results showed that methods incorporating AlphaFold3‐derived features—particularly per‐atom pLDDT—performed best in estimating local accuracy and in utility for experimental structure solution. For QMODE3, performance varied significantly across monomeric, homomeric, and heteromeric target categories and underscored the ongoing challenge of evaluating complex assemblies.
- Open Access
- 14 August 2025
- Published by Wiley in Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
- Vol. 94 (1) , 314-329
Highlights of Model Quality Assessment in CASP16
Model quality assessment (MQA) remains a critical component of structural bioinformatics for both structure predictors and experimentalists seeking to use predictions for downstream applications. In CASP16, the Evaluation of Model Accuracy (EMA) category featured both global and local quality estimation for multimeric assemblies (QMODE1 and QMODE2), as well as a novel QMODE3 challenge—requiring predictors to identify the best five models from thousands generated by MassiveFold. This paper presents detailed results from several leading CASP16 EMA methods, highlighting the strengths and limitations of the approaches.
- 14 August 2025
- Published by Wiley in Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
- Vol. 94 (1) , 314-329
Open AccessHighlights of Model Quality Assessment in CASP16
Model quality assessment (MQA) remains a critical component of structural bioinformatics for both structure predictors and experimentalists seeking to use predictions for downstream applications. In CASP16, the Evaluation of Model Accuracy (EMA) category featured both global and local quality estimation for multimeric assemblies (QMODE1 and QMODE2), as well as a novel QMODE3 challenge—requiring predictors to identify the best five models from thousands generated by MassiveFold. This paper presents detailed results from several leading CASP16 EMA methods, highlighting the strengths and limitations of the approaches.
- Open Access
Xtricorder: A likelihood-enhanced self-rotation function and application to a machine-learning enhanced Matthews prediction of asymmetric unit copy number
Analysis of crystallographic diffraction data before phasing gives the crystallographer a ‘first look’ at the nature of the problem and the context in which the structure determination will be performed. We here report the development of Xtricorder , an application that targets analysis of crystallographic data specifically for likelihood-based phasing. As well as porting many of the analyses previously available but relatively inaccessible in our Phaser codebase, Xtricorder offers a likelihood-enhanced self-rotation function. A novel and intuitive graphical representation of the self-rotation function presents the results for user inspection, and has the added advantage that, in an adapted form, is appropriate for training a convolutional neural network to enhance the standard Matthews analysis and more accurately predict the number of copies in the asymmetric unit. We investigate the usefulness of the likelihood-enhanced self-rotation function in ‘first look’ analyses, exploring the circumstances under which the self-rotation function results are useful, and discuss the application to AI-generated structure prediction. Synopsis Xtricorder is a new tool for analysing crystallographic data prior to phasing, featuring a likelihood-enhanced self-rotation function and graphical output that aids both user interpretation and machine learning-based prediction of asymmetric unit content.
Open AccessXtricorder: A likelihood-enhanced self-rotation function and application to a machine-learning enhanced Matthews prediction of asymmetric unit copy number
Analysis of crystallographic diffraction data before phasing gives the crystallographer a ‘first look’ at the nature of the problem and the context in which the structure determination will be performed. We here report the development of Xtricorder , an application that targets analysis of crystallographic data specifically for likelihood-based phasing. As well as porting many of the analyses previously available but relatively inaccessible in our Phaser codebase, Xtricorder offers a likelihood-enhanced self-rotation function. A novel and intuitive graphical representation of the self-rotation function presents the results for user inspection, and has the added advantage that, in an adapted form, is appropriate for training a convolutional neural network to enhance the standard Matthews analysis and more accurately predict the number of copies in the asymmetric unit. We investigate the usefulness of the likelihood-enhanced self-rotation function in ‘first look’ analyses, exploring the circumstances under which the self-rotation function results are useful, and discuss the application to AI-generated structure prediction. Synopsis Xtricorder is a new tool for analysing crystallographic data prior to phasing, featuring a likelihood-enhanced self-rotation function and graphical output that aids both user interpretation and machine learning-based prediction of asymmetric unit content.
- Open Access
- 20 May 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Current Issues in Molecular Biology
- Vol. 47 (5) , 375
The Molecular Pathology of Pre-Eclamptic Hypertension
The central role of angiotensinogen in the control of blood pressure is revealed by a series of crystallographic structures, including complexes with renin. Specifically, the structures provide an understanding of the sequential molecular events that lead to the pre-eclamptic hypertensive crises of pregnancy. The release of the precursor vasopressor peptide from the amino-terminal tail of angiotensinogen appears to be modulated by a redox-sensitive disulphide bridge. Our findings indicate that the activation of the thiol-switch in the circulating maternal angiotensinogen occurs at the placental level in response to oxidative stress, exacerbated by placental insufficiency. We propose here that a contributory factor is the inherent redox stress accompanying the placental exchange of oxygenation between the haemoglobin of the mother (oxy-HbA) and the deoxygenated haemoglobin of the foetus (deoxy-HbF).
- 20 May 2025
- Published by MDPI AG in Current Issues in Molecular Biology
- Vol. 47 (5) , 375
Open AccessThe Molecular Pathology of Pre-Eclamptic Hypertension
The central role of angiotensinogen in the control of blood pressure is revealed by a series of crystallographic structures, including complexes with renin. Specifically, the structures provide an understanding of the sequential molecular events that lead to the pre-eclamptic hypertensive crises of pregnancy. The release of the precursor vasopressor peptide from the amino-terminal tail of angiotensinogen appears to be modulated by a redox-sensitive disulphide bridge. Our findings indicate that the activation of the thiol-switch in the circulating maternal angiotensinogen occurs at the placental level in response to oxidative stress, exacerbated by placental insufficiency. We propose here that a contributory factor is the inherent redox stress accompanying the placental exchange of oxygenation between the haemoglobin of the mother (oxy-HbA) and the deoxygenated haemoglobin of the foetus (deoxy-HbF).
- Open Access
- 17 April 2025
- Published by Wiley
Model Quality Assessment for CASP16
The CASP16 Evaluation of Model Accuracy (EMA) experiment assessed the ability of predictors to estimate the accuracy of predicted models, with a particular emphasis on multimeric assemblies. Expanding on the CASP15 framework, CASP16 introduced a new evaluation mode (QMODE3) focused on selecting high-quality models from large-scale AlphaFold2-derived model pools generated by MassiveFold. Three primary evaluation tasks were therefore conducted: QMODE1 assessed global structure accuracy, QMODE2 focused on the accuracy of interface residues, and QMODE3 tested model selection performance. Predictors were evaluated using a diverse set of OpenStructure-based metrics, and a novel penalty-based ranking scheme was developed for QMODE3 to handle score interdependence and varying prediction quality distributions. Additionally, we explored the accuracy and utility of predicted local confidence measuresnow made available on a per-atom basis by methods that invoke AlphaFold3. Results showed that methods incorporating AlphaFold3-derived features – particularly per-atom pLDDT – performed best in estimating local accuracy and in utility for experimental structure solution. For QMODE3, performance varied significantly across monomeric, homomeric, and heteromeric target categories, and underscored the ongoing challenge of evaluating complex assemblies.
- 17 April 2025
- Published by Wiley
Open AccessModel Quality Assessment for CASP16
The CASP16 Evaluation of Model Accuracy (EMA) experiment assessed the ability of predictors to estimate the accuracy of predicted models, with a particular emphasis on multimeric assemblies. Expanding on the CASP15 framework, CASP16 introduced a new evaluation mode (QMODE3) focused on selecting high-quality models from large-scale AlphaFold2-derived model pools generated by MassiveFold. Three primary evaluation tasks were therefore conducted: QMODE1 assessed global structure accuracy, QMODE2 focused on the accuracy of interface residues, and QMODE3 tested model selection performance. Predictors were evaluated using a diverse set of OpenStructure-based metrics, and a novel penalty-based ranking scheme was developed for QMODE3 to handle score interdependence and varying prediction quality distributions. Additionally, we explored the accuracy and utility of predicted local confidence measuresnow made available on a per-atom basis by methods that invoke AlphaFold3. Results showed that methods incorporating AlphaFold3-derived features – particularly per-atom pLDDT – performed best in estimating local accuracy and in utility for experimental structure solution. For QMODE3, performance varied significantly across monomeric, homomeric, and heteromeric target categories, and underscored the ongoing challenge of evaluating complex assemblies.
- Open Access
AlphaFold as a Prior: Experimental Structure Determination Conditioned on a Pretrained Neural Network
Advances in machine learning have transformed structural biology, enabling swift and accurate prediction of protein structure from sequence. However, challenges persist in capturing sidechain packing, condition-dependent conformational dynamics, and biomolecular interactions, primarily due to scarcity of high-quality training data. Emerging techniques, including cryo-electron tomography (cryo-ET) and high-throughput crystallography, promise vast new sources of structural data, but translating experimental observations into mechanistically interpretable atomic models remains a key bottleneck. Here, we address these challenges by improving the efficiency of structural analysis through combining experimental measurements with a landmark protein structure prediction method – AlphaFold2. We present an augmentation of AlphaFold2, ROCKET, that refines its predictions using cryo-EM, cryo-ET, and X-ray crystallography data, and demonstrate that this approach captures biologically important structural variation that AlphaFold2 does not. By performing structure optimization in the space of coevolutionary embeddings, rather than Cartesian coordinates, ROCKET automates difficult modeling tasks, such as flips of functional loops and domain rearrangements, that are beyond the scope of current state-of-the-art methods and, in some instances, even manual human modeling. The ability to efficiently sample these barrier-crossing rearrangements unlocks a new horizon for scalable and automated model building. Crucially, ROCKET does not require retraining of AlphaFold2 and is readily adaptable to multimers, ligand-cofolding, and other data modalities. Conversely, our differentiable crystal-lographic and cryo-EM target functions are capable of augmenting other structure prediction methods. ROCKET thus provides an extensible framework for the integration of experimental observables with biomolecular machine learning.
Open AccessAlphaFold as a Prior: Experimental Structure Determination Conditioned on a Pretrained Neural Network
Advances in machine learning have transformed structural biology, enabling swift and accurate prediction of protein structure from sequence. However, challenges persist in capturing sidechain packing, condition-dependent conformational dynamics, and biomolecular interactions, primarily due to scarcity of high-quality training data. Emerging techniques, including cryo-electron tomography (cryo-ET) and high-throughput crystallography, promise vast new sources of structural data, but translating experimental observations into mechanistically interpretable atomic models remains a key bottleneck. Here, we address these challenges by improving the efficiency of structural analysis through combining experimental measurements with a landmark protein structure prediction method – AlphaFold2. We present an augmentation of AlphaFold2, ROCKET, that refines its predictions using cryo-EM, cryo-ET, and X-ray crystallography data, and demonstrate that this approach captures biologically important structural variation that AlphaFold2 does not. By performing structure optimization in the space of coevolutionary embeddings, rather than Cartesian coordinates, ROCKET automates difficult modeling tasks, such as flips of functional loops and domain rearrangements, that are beyond the scope of current state-of-the-art methods and, in some instances, even manual human modeling. The ability to efficiently sample these barrier-crossing rearrangements unlocks a new horizon for scalable and automated model building. Crucially, ROCKET does not require retraining of AlphaFold2 and is readily adaptable to multimers, ligand-cofolding, and other data modalities. Conversely, our differentiable crystal-lographic and cryo-EM target functions are capable of augmenting other structure prediction methods. ROCKET thus provides an extensible framework for the integration of experimental observables with biomolecular machine learning.
- Open Access
- 1 November 2024
- Published by International Union of Crystallography (IUCr) in Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology
- Vol. 80 (11) , 765
Welcoming two new Co-editors
Two new Co-editors are welcomed to Acta Cryst. D – Structural Biology.
- 1 November 2024
- Published by International Union of Crystallography (IUCr) in Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology
- Vol. 80 (11) , 765
Open AccessWelcoming two new Co-editors
Two new Co-editors are welcomed to Acta Cryst. D – Structural Biology.