Inês Carvalho
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Inês Carvalho has a total of 83 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Cristina Brito
CHAM, Faculdade de Ciências Sociais e Humanas, FCSH, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, 1069-061 Lisboa, Portugal
5 shared publications - Cristina Pomilla
Wellcome Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK
5 shared publications - Jaco Barendse
Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0002, South Africa
5 shared publications Peter B. Best
Mammal Research Institute, University of Pretoria, c/o Iziko South African Museum, P.O. Box 61, Cape Town, 8000, South Africa
3 shared publications- Andreia Pereira
Instituto Dom Luiz, University of Lisbon 1 , Lisbon 1749-016
2 shared publications - Francisco Martinho
Escola de Mar, Edifício ICAT – Campus da FCUL, Lisboa, Portugal
2 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 27 December 2022
- Published by Consorci del Museu de Ciencies Naturals de Barcelona in Animal Biodiversity and Conservation
- Vol. 46 (1) , 25-33
Aquatic wild meat consumption of cetaceans in São Tomé and Príncipe (Gulf of Guinea)
Relatively little is known about cetaceans in São Tomé and Príncipe and in recent years, some episodes of cetacean bycatch and human consumption have been described. Aiming to provide insight into the reliance upon cetaceans as a source of meat, we present findings from complementary studies conducted in the islands of São Tomé and Príncipe from 2012 to 2021. Based on interviews with local residents, we assessed the prevalence of human consumption of cetaceans and identified potential sociodemographic drivers. This study provides the first comprehensive assessment of harvest (direct remove or incidental take) and consumption of cetaceans (mainly the family Delphinidae) in the country. These findings will be useful in the development of regional conservation measures and contribute to our understanding of anthropogenic activities affecting cetacean populations in the Gulf of Guinea.
- 27 December 2022
- Published by Consorci del Museu de Ciencies Naturals de Barcelona in Animal Biodiversity and Conservation
- Vol. 46 (1) , 25-33
Open AccessAquatic wild meat consumption of cetaceans in São Tomé and Príncipe (Gulf of Guinea)
Relatively little is known about cetaceans in São Tomé and Príncipe and in recent years, some episodes of cetacean bycatch and human consumption have been described. Aiming to provide insight into the reliance upon cetaceans as a source of meat, we present findings from complementary studies conducted in the islands of São Tomé and Príncipe from 2012 to 2021. Based on interviews with local residents, we assessed the prevalence of human consumption of cetaceans and identified potential sociodemographic drivers. This study provides the first comprehensive assessment of harvest (direct remove or incidental take) and consumption of cetaceans (mainly the family Delphinidae) in the country. These findings will be useful in the development of regional conservation measures and contribute to our understanding of anthropogenic activities affecting cetacean populations in the Gulf of Guinea.
- Open Access
- 1 August 2021
- Published by Elsevier in Science of The Total Environment
- Vol. 783, 147001
Assessing variability in the ratio of metal concentrations measured by DGT-type passive samplers and spot sampling in European seawaters
- 1 August 2021
- Published by Elsevier in Science of The Total Environment
- Vol. 783, 147001
Open AccessAssessing variability in the ratio of metal concentrations measured by DGT-type passive samplers and spot sampling in European seawaters
- Open Access
- 13 August 2020
- Published by Springer Nature in Heredity
- Vol. 125 (5) , 328-339
Genetic consequences of social structure in the golden-crowned sifaka
Many species are structured in social groups (SGs) where individuals exhibit complex mating strategies. Yet, most population genetic studies ignore SGs either treating them as small random-mating units or focusing on a higher hierarchical level (the population). Empirical studies acknowledging SGs have found an overall excess of heterozygotes within SGs and usually invoke inbreeding avoidance strategies to explain this finding. However, there is a lack of null models against which ecological theories can be tested and inbreeding avoidance quantified. Here, we investigate inbreeding (deviation from random mating) in an endangered forest-dwelling pair-living lemur species (Propithecus tattersalli). In particular, we measure the inbreeding coefficient (FIS) in empirical data at different scales: SGs, sampling sites and forest patches. We observe high excess of heterozygotes within SGs. The magnitude of this excess is highly dependent on the sampling scheme: while offspring are characterised by a high excess of heterozygotes (FIS < 0), the reproductive pair does not show dramatic departures from Hardy–Weinberg expectations. Moreover, the heterozygosity excess disappears at larger geographic scales (sites and forests). We use a modelling framework that incorporates details of the sifaka mating system but does not include active inbreeding avoidance mechanisms. The simulated data show that, although apparent “random mating” or even inbreeding may occur at the “population” level, outbreeding is maintained within SGs. Altogether our results suggest that social structure leads to high levels of outbreeding without the need for active inbreeding avoidance mechanisms. Thus, demonstrating and measuring the existence of active inbreeding avoidance mechanisms may be more difficult than usually assumed.
- 13 August 2020
- Published by Springer Nature in Heredity
- Vol. 125 (5) , 328-339
Open AccessGenetic consequences of social structure in the golden-crowned sifaka
Many species are structured in social groups (SGs) where individuals exhibit complex mating strategies. Yet, most population genetic studies ignore SGs either treating them as small random-mating units or focusing on a higher hierarchical level (the population). Empirical studies acknowledging SGs have found an overall excess of heterozygotes within SGs and usually invoke inbreeding avoidance strategies to explain this finding. However, there is a lack of null models against which ecological theories can be tested and inbreeding avoidance quantified. Here, we investigate inbreeding (deviation from random mating) in an endangered forest-dwelling pair-living lemur species (Propithecus tattersalli). In particular, we measure the inbreeding coefficient (FIS) in empirical data at different scales: SGs, sampling sites and forest patches. We observe high excess of heterozygotes within SGs. The magnitude of this excess is highly dependent on the sampling scheme: while offspring are characterised by a high excess of heterozygotes (FIS < 0), the reproductive pair does not show dramatic departures from Hardy–Weinberg expectations. Moreover, the heterozygosity excess disappears at larger geographic scales (sites and forests). We use a modelling framework that incorporates details of the sifaka mating system but does not include active inbreeding avoidance mechanisms. The simulated data show that, although apparent “random mating” or even inbreeding may occur at the “population” level, outbreeding is maintained within SGs. Altogether our results suggest that social structure leads to high levels of outbreeding without the need for active inbreeding avoidance mechanisms. Thus, demonstrating and measuring the existence of active inbreeding avoidance mechanisms may be more difficult than usually assumed.
- Open Access
- 31 December 2019
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 14 (12) , e0226810
From sea monsters to charismatic megafauna: Changes in perception and use of large marine animals
Marine megafauna has always elicited contrasting feelings. In the past, large marine animals were often depicted as fantastic mythological creatures and dangerous monsters, while also arousing human curiosity. Marine megafauna has been a valuable resource to exploit, leading to the collapse of populations and local extinctions. In addition, some species have been perceived as competitors of fishers for marine resources and were often actively culled. Since the 1970s, there has been a change in the perception and use of megafauna. The growth of marine tourism, increasingly oriented towards the observation of wildlife, has driven a shift from extractive to non-extractive use, supporting the conservation of at least some species of marine megafauna. In this paper, we review and compare the changes in the perception and use of three megafaunal groups, cetaceans, elasmobranchs and groupers, with a special focus on European cultures. We highlight the main drivers and the timing of these changes, compare different taxonomic groups and species, and highlight the implications for management and conservation. One of the main drivers of the shift in perception, shared by all the three groups of megafauna, has been a general increase in curiosity towards wildlife, stimulated inter alia by documentaries (from the early 1970s onwards), and also promoted by easy access to scuba diving. At the same time, environmental campaigns have been developed to raise public awareness regarding marine wildlife, especially cetaceans, a process greatly facilitated by the rise of Internet and the World Wide Web. Currently, all the three groups (cetaceans, elasmobranchs and groupers) may represent valuable resources for ecotourism. Strikingly, the economic value of live specimens may exceed their value for human consumption. A further change in perception involving all the three groups is related to a growing understanding and appreciation of their key ecological role. The shift from extractive to non-extractive use has the potential for promoting species conservation and local economic growth. However, the change in use may not benefit the original stakeholders (e.g. fishers or whalers) and there may therefore be a case for providing compensation for disadvantaged stakeholders. Moreover, it is increasingly clear that even non-extractive use may have a negative impact on marine megafauna, therefore regulations are needed.
- 31 December 2019
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 14 (12) , e0226810
Open AccessFrom sea monsters to charismatic megafauna: Changes in perception and use of large marine animals
Marine megafauna has always elicited contrasting feelings. In the past, large marine animals were often depicted as fantastic mythological creatures and dangerous monsters, while also arousing human curiosity. Marine megafauna has been a valuable resource to exploit, leading to the collapse of populations and local extinctions. In addition, some species have been perceived as competitors of fishers for marine resources and were often actively culled. Since the 1970s, there has been a change in the perception and use of megafauna. The growth of marine tourism, increasingly oriented towards the observation of wildlife, has driven a shift from extractive to non-extractive use, supporting the conservation of at least some species of marine megafauna. In this paper, we review and compare the changes in the perception and use of three megafaunal groups, cetaceans, elasmobranchs and groupers, with a special focus on European cultures. We highlight the main drivers and the timing of these changes, compare different taxonomic groups and species, and highlight the implications for management and conservation. One of the main drivers of the shift in perception, shared by all the three groups of megafauna, has been a general increase in curiosity towards wildlife, stimulated inter alia by documentaries (from the early 1970s onwards), and also promoted by easy access to scuba diving. At the same time, environmental campaigns have been developed to raise public awareness regarding marine wildlife, especially cetaceans, a process greatly facilitated by the rise of Internet and the World Wide Web. Currently, all the three groups (cetaceans, elasmobranchs and groupers) may represent valuable resources for ecotourism. Strikingly, the economic value of live specimens may exceed their value for human consumption. A further change in perception involving all the three groups is related to a growing understanding and appreciation of their key ecological role. The shift from extractive to non-extractive use has the potential for promoting species conservation and local economic growth. However, the change in use may not benefit the original stakeholders (e.g. fishers or whalers) and there may therefore be a case for providing compensation for disadvantaged stakeholders. Moreover, it is increasingly clear that even non-extractive use may have a negative impact on marine megafauna, therefore regulations are needed.
- 8 January 2017
- Published by Wiley in Molecular Ecology
- Vol. 26 (4) , 977-994
Multiple processes drive genetic structure of humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae) populations across spatial scales
Elucidating patterns of population structure for species with complex life histories, and disentangling the processes driving such patterns, remains a significant analytical challenge. Humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae) populations display complex genetic structures that have not been fully resolved at all spatial scales. We generated a data set of nuclear markers for 3575 samples spanning the seven breeding stocks and substocks found in the South Atlantic and western and northern Indian Oceans. For the total sample, and males and females separately, we assessed genetic diversity, tested for genetic differentiation between putative populations and isolation by distance, estimated the number of genetic clusters without a priori population information and estimated rates of gene flow using maximum‐likelihood and Bayesian approaches. At the ocean basin scale, structure is governed by geographical distance (IBD P < 0.05) and female fidelity to breeding areas, in line with current understanding of the drivers of broadscale population structure. Consistent with previous studies, the Arabian Sea breeding stock was highly genetically differentiated (FST 0.034–0.161; P < 0.01 for all comparisons). However, the breeding stock boundary between west South Africa and east Africa was more porous than expected based on genetic differentiation, cluster and geneflow analyses. Instances of male fidelity to breeding areas and relatively high rates of dispersal for females were also observed between the three substocks in the western Indian Ocean. The relationships between demographic units and current management boundaries may have ramifications for assessments of the status and continued protections of populations still in recovery from commercial whaling.
- 8 January 2017
- Published by Wiley in Molecular Ecology
- Vol. 26 (4) , 977-994
Multiple processes drive genetic structure of humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae) populations across spatial scales
Elucidating patterns of population structure for species with complex life histories, and disentangling the processes driving such patterns, remains a significant analytical challenge. Humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae) populations display complex genetic structures that have not been fully resolved at all spatial scales. We generated a data set of nuclear markers for 3575 samples spanning the seven breeding stocks and substocks found in the South Atlantic and western and northern Indian Oceans. For the total sample, and males and females separately, we assessed genetic diversity, tested for genetic differentiation between putative populations and isolation by distance, estimated the number of genetic clusters without a priori population information and estimated rates of gene flow using maximum‐likelihood and Bayesian approaches. At the ocean basin scale, structure is governed by geographical distance (IBD P < 0.05) and female fidelity to breeding areas, in line with current understanding of the drivers of broadscale population structure. Consistent with previous studies, the Arabian Sea breeding stock was highly genetically differentiated (FST 0.034–0.161; P < 0.01 for all comparisons). However, the breeding stock boundary between west South Africa and east Africa was more porous than expected based on genetic differentiation, cluster and geneflow analyses. Instances of male fidelity to breeding areas and relatively high rates of dispersal for females were also observed between the three substocks in the western Indian Ocean. The relationships between demographic units and current management boundaries may have ramifications for assessments of the status and continued protections of populations still in recovery from commercial whaling.
- 17 July 2014
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Marine Biology Research
- Vol. 11 (2) , 144-156
Structure and abundance of bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) in coastal Setúbal Bay, Portugal
The environmental plasticity of bottlenose dolphins leads to a range of inter-specific variations in ecological parameters that make worldwide generalizations difficult. Thus, regional studies about bottlenose dolphins are important to the overall conservation of this species. The aim of this study was to characterize for the first time bottlenose dolphins that occur in the coastal regions of Setúbal (Portugal) using two temporally distinct datasets: dataset 1 (1998–2001) and those in dataset 2 (2007–2011). Bottlenose dolphins identified in dataset 1 were considered a closed and a more cohesive group than dataset 2, with stable associations and an abundance of 106 (95% CI = 69–192) individuals. Dataset 2 seemed to be composed of an open group of 108 (95% CI = 83–177) animals, with a migration rate of 19% (SE = 0.1) individuals per year, and with low association values. The proportion of ‘regulars’ (dataset 1, 22%; dataset 2, 12%), ‘frequent’ (dataset 1, 10%; dataset 2, 14%) and ‘occasional’ (dataset 1, 68%; dataset 2, 73%) animals was relatively similar between datasets. In addition, there was no matching of individuals between datasets which could be related to large-scale movements of the individuals and/or the carrying capacity of the study area.
- 17 July 2014
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Marine Biology Research
- Vol. 11 (2) , 144-156
Structure and abundance of bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) in coastal Setúbal Bay, Portugal
The environmental plasticity of bottlenose dolphins leads to a range of inter-specific variations in ecological parameters that make worldwide generalizations difficult. Thus, regional studies about bottlenose dolphins are important to the overall conservation of this species. The aim of this study was to characterize for the first time bottlenose dolphins that occur in the coastal regions of Setúbal (Portugal) using two temporally distinct datasets: dataset 1 (1998–2001) and those in dataset 2 (2007–2011). Bottlenose dolphins identified in dataset 1 were considered a closed and a more cohesive group than dataset 2, with stable associations and an abundance of 106 (95% CI = 69–192) individuals. Dataset 2 seemed to be composed of an open group of 108 (95% CI = 83–177) animals, with a migration rate of 19% (SE = 0.1) individuals per year, and with low association values. The proportion of ‘regulars’ (dataset 1, 22%; dataset 2, 12%), ‘frequent’ (dataset 1, 10%; dataset 2, 14%) and ‘occasional’ (dataset 1, 68%; dataset 2, 73%) animals was relatively similar between datasets. In addition, there was no matching of individuals between datasets which could be related to large-scale movements of the individuals and/or the carrying capacity of the study area.
- 9 January 2014
- Published by Springer Nature in Marine Biology
- Vol. 161 (4) , 805-819
Does temporal and spatial segregation explain the complex population structure of humpback whales on the coast of West Africa?
- 9 January 2014
- Published by Springer Nature in Marine Biology
- Vol. 161 (4) , 805-819
Does temporal and spatial segregation explain the complex population structure of humpback whales on the coast of West Africa?
- 19 December 2013
- Published by National Inquiry Services Center (NISC) in African Journal of Marine Science
- Vol. 35 (4) , 501-510
Bottlenose dolphinTursiops truncatusat São Tomé Island (São Tomé and Príncipe) — relative abundance, site fidelity and social structure
- 19 December 2013
- Published by National Inquiry Services Center (NISC) in African Journal of Marine Science
- Vol. 35 (4) , 501-510
Bottlenose dolphinTursiops truncatusat São Tomé Island (São Tomé and Príncipe) — relative abundance, site fidelity and social structure
- Open Access
- 9 December 2013
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 8 (12) , e81238
Mother Knows Best: Occurrence and Associations of Resighted Humpback Whales Suggest Maternally Derived Fidelity to a Southern Hemisphere Coastal Feeding Ground
Site fidelity is common among migratory cetaceans, including humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae). In the Northern Hemisphere it has been found that fidelity to humpback whale feeding grounds is transferred maternally but this has never been shown for the species in the Southern Hemisphere. We examined this in a unique feeding area off west South Africa using resighting data of 68 individually identified humpback whales by means of photographic (tail flukes and dorsal fins) and/or molecular methods (microsatellite genotyping) over an 18 year span. We found short-term association patterns and recurrent visits typical of other feeding grounds. Males and females had different seasonality of attendance. Significant female-dominated presence corresponded to timing of an expected influx of females on their southward migration from the breeding ground: firstly non-nursing (possibly pregnant) females in mid-spring, and mothers and calves in mid-to late summer. The potential benefit of this mid-latitude feeding area for females is illustrated by a record of a cow with known age of at least 23 years that produced calves in three consecutive years, each of which survived to at least six months of age: the first record of successful post-partum ovulation for this species in the Southern Hemisphere. We recorded association of a weaned calf with its mother, and a recurring association between a non-lactating female and male over more than two years. Moreover, three animals first identified as calves returned to the same area in subsequent years, sometimes on the same day as their mothers. This, together with numerous Parent-Offspring relations detected genetically among and between resighted and non-resighted whales is strongly suggestive of maternally derived site fidelity at a small spatial scale by a small sub-population of humpback whales.
- 9 December 2013
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 8 (12) , e81238
Open AccessMother Knows Best: Occurrence and Associations of Resighted Humpback Whales Suggest Maternally Derived Fidelity to a Southern Hemisphere Coastal Feeding Ground
Site fidelity is common among migratory cetaceans, including humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae). In the Northern Hemisphere it has been found that fidelity to humpback whale feeding grounds is transferred maternally but this has never been shown for the species in the Southern Hemisphere. We examined this in a unique feeding area off west South Africa using resighting data of 68 individually identified humpback whales by means of photographic (tail flukes and dorsal fins) and/or molecular methods (microsatellite genotyping) over an 18 year span. We found short-term association patterns and recurrent visits typical of other feeding grounds. Males and females had different seasonality of attendance. Significant female-dominated presence corresponded to timing of an expected influx of females on their southward migration from the breeding ground: firstly non-nursing (possibly pregnant) females in mid-spring, and mothers and calves in mid-to late summer. The potential benefit of this mid-latitude feeding area for females is illustrated by a record of a cow with known age of at least 23 years that produced calves in three consecutive years, each of which survived to at least six months of age: the first record of successful post-partum ovulation for this species in the Southern Hemisphere. We recorded association of a weaned calf with its mother, and a recurring association between a non-lactating female and male over more than two years. Moreover, three animals first identified as calves returned to the same area in subsequent years, sometimes on the same day as their mothers. This, together with numerous Parent-Offspring relations detected genetically among and between resighted and non-resighted whales is strongly suggestive of maternally derived site fidelity at a small spatial scale by a small sub-population of humpback whales.
- 1 November 2011
- Published by National Inquiry Services Center (NISC) in African Journal of Marine Science
- Vol. 33 (3) , 353-373
Transit station or destination? Attendance patterns, movements and abundance estimate of humpback whales off west South Africa from photographic and genotypic matching
Humpback whales found off west South Africa (WSA) are known to display an atypical migration that may include temporary residency and feeding during spring and summer. At a regional scale there is uncertainty about how these whales relate to the greater West African Breeding Stock B as a whole, with evidence both for and against its division into two sub-stocks. A database containing sighting information of humpback whales intercepted by boat in the WSA region from 1983 to 2008 was compiled. It included a total of 1,820 identification images of ventral tail flukes and lateral views of dorsal fins. After systematic within- and between-year matching of images of usable quality, it yielded 154 different individuals identified by tail flukes (TF), 230 by left dorsal fins (LDF), and 237 by right dorsal fins (RDF). Microsatellite (MS) matching of 216 skin biopsies yielded 156 individuals. By linking all possible sightings of the same individuals using all available identification features, the periodicity and seasonality of 281 individual whales were examined. Sixty whales were resighted on different days of which 44 were between different calendar years. The most resightings for one individual was 11 times, seen in six different years, while the longest interval between first and last sightings was about 18 years. A resighting rate of 15.6% of whales at intervals of a year or more indicates long-term fidelity to the region. Shorter intervals of 1 – 6 months between sequential sightings in the same year may suggest temporary residency. The TF image collection from WSA was compared to TF collections from four other regions, namely Gabon, Cabinda (Angola), Namibia and the Antarctic Humpback Whale Catalogue (AHWC). Three matches were detected were between WSA (in late spring or summer) and Gabon (in winter), confirming direct movement between these regions. The capture-recapture data of four different identification features (TF, RDF, LDF and MS) from six successive subsets of data from periods with the highest collection effort (2001 – 2007), were used to calculate the number of whales that utilise the region, using both closed and open-population models. Since dorsal fins have never been used to estimate abundance for humpback whales, the different identification features were evaluated for potential biases. This revealed 9 – 14% incidence of missed matches (false negatives) when using dorsal fins that will result in an overestimate, while variation in individual fluke-up behaviour may lower estimates due to heterogeneity of individual capture probability, by as much as 57-69%. Taking into consideration the small dataset and low number of recaptures, the most consistent and precise results were obtained from a fully time-dependent version of the Jolly-Seber open-population model, with annual survival fixed at 0.96, using the MS dataset. This suggests that the WSA feeding assemblage during the months of spring and summer of the study period numbered about 500. The relationship of these whales to those (perhaps strictly migratory) that may occur here in other seasons of the year, and their links to possible migratory routes and other feeding or breeding areas remain uncertain.National Research Foundation (NRF), South Africa, under Grant Number 2047517. Earthwatch Institute (funding), The Mazda Wildlife Fund (through the provision of a field vehicle), SASOL (through the donation of two four-stroke engines), PADI Project AWARE (UK) (funding), the South African Navy (access to the shore-based look-out), the Military Academy, University of Stellenbosch (accommodation) and Iziko South African Museum (office space and support). JB gratefully received financial support in the form of bursaries from the NRF, the Society for Marine Mammalogy, University of Pretoria, and the Wildlife Society of South Africa (Charles Astley Maberley Memorial bursary). The Namibian Dolphin Project is supported by NACOMA (Namibian Coastal Conservation and Management Project), the Nedbank Go Green Fund, Mohammed bin Zayed Species Conservation Fund, the British Ecological Society, the Rufford Small Grants Foundation and the Namibia Nature Foundation. JB and TJQC received funding from the International Whaling Commission (IWC) to conduct between-region matching.http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tams20nf201
- 1 November 2011
- Published by National Inquiry Services Center (NISC) in African Journal of Marine Science
- Vol. 33 (3) , 353-373
Transit station or destination? Attendance patterns, movements and abundance estimate of humpback whales off west South Africa from photographic and genotypic matching
Humpback whales found off west South Africa (WSA) are known to display an atypical migration that may include temporary residency and feeding during spring and summer. At a regional scale there is uncertainty about how these whales relate to the greater West African Breeding Stock B as a whole, with evidence both for and against its division into two sub-stocks. A database containing sighting information of humpback whales intercepted by boat in the WSA region from 1983 to 2008 was compiled. It included a total of 1,820 identification images of ventral tail flukes and lateral views of dorsal fins. After systematic within- and between-year matching of images of usable quality, it yielded 154 different individuals identified by tail flukes (TF), 230 by left dorsal fins (LDF), and 237 by right dorsal fins (RDF). Microsatellite (MS) matching of 216 skin biopsies yielded 156 individuals. By linking all possible sightings of the same individuals using all available identification features, the periodicity and seasonality of 281 individual whales were examined. Sixty whales were resighted on different days of which 44 were between different calendar years. The most resightings for one individual was 11 times, seen in six different years, while the longest interval between first and last sightings was about 18 years. A resighting rate of 15.6% of whales at intervals of a year or more indicates long-term fidelity to the region. Shorter intervals of 1 – 6 months between sequential sightings in the same year may suggest temporary residency. The TF image collection from WSA was compared to TF collections from four other regions, namely Gabon, Cabinda (Angola), Namibia and the Antarctic Humpback Whale Catalogue (AHWC). Three matches were detected were between WSA (in late spring or summer) and Gabon (in winter), confirming direct movement between these regions. The capture-recapture data of four different identification features (TF, RDF, LDF and MS) from six successive subsets of data from periods with the highest collection effort (2001 – 2007), were used to calculate the number of whales that utilise the region, using both closed and open-population models. Since dorsal fins have never been used to estimate abundance for humpback whales, the different identification features were evaluated for potential biases. This revealed 9 – 14% incidence of missed matches (false negatives) when using dorsal fins that will result in an overestimate, while variation in individual fluke-up behaviour may lower estimates due to heterogeneity of individual capture probability, by as much as 57-69%. Taking into consideration the small dataset and low number of recaptures, the most consistent and precise results were obtained from a fully time-dependent version of the Jolly-Seber open-population model, with annual survival fixed at 0.96, using the MS dataset. This suggests that the WSA feeding assemblage during the months of spring and summer of the study period numbered about 500. The relationship of these whales to those (perhaps strictly migratory) that may occur here in other seasons of the year, and their links to possible migratory routes and other feeding or breeding areas remain uncertain.National Research Foundation (NRF), South Africa, under Grant Number 2047517. Earthwatch Institute (funding), The Mazda Wildlife Fund (through the provision of a field vehicle), SASOL (through the donation of two four-stroke engines), PADI Project AWARE (UK) (funding), the South African Navy (access to the shore-based look-out), the Military Academy, University of Stellenbosch (accommodation) and Iziko South African Museum (office space and support). JB gratefully received financial support in the form of bursaries from the NRF, the Society for Marine Mammalogy, University of Pretoria, and the Wildlife Society of South Africa (Charles Astley Maberley Memorial bursary). The Namibian Dolphin Project is supported by NACOMA (Namibian Coastal Conservation and Management Project), the Nedbank Go Green Fund, Mohammed bin Zayed Species Conservation Fund, the British Ecological Society, the Rufford Small Grants Foundation and the Namibia Nature Foundation. JB and TJQC received funding from the International Whaling Commission (IWC) to conduct between-region matching.http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tams20nf201