Sung-Hyuk Choi

Background: Septic shock requires careful risk stratification in patients aged 80 and over. Serum albumin levels reflect host status and, when combined with the severity of organ dysfunction, may enhance early prognostication. Here, we evaluated whether combining albumin levels with the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score upon emergency department (ED) arrival can improve risk classification. Methods: We conducted an observational study from October 2015 to May 2022 using a prospective multicenter registry of septic shock from 12 EDs in the Korean Shock Society. We included 1,300 (18.8%) patients with septic shock aged ≥80 years. The SOFA score was calculated in the ED at the time of septic shock recognition. Patients were divided into three groups according to albumin levels (cutoff, 3.5 g/dl) and the initial SOFA score (cutoff, 7): A, normal albumin with low SOFA score; B, high SOFA with normal albumin or low SOFA with low albumin; and C, low albumin with high SOFA score. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality. Results: Groups A, B, and C included 175, 592, and 533 patients, with 28-day mortality rates of 12.0%, 26.9%, and 49.3%, respectively. Adjusted odds ratios (95% CI) for mortality were 3.02 (1.76–5.18) for group B and 5.80 (3.38–9.97) for group C vs. group A. Conclusions: Combining the SOFA score with the albumin level allows early classification of patients aged ≥80 years with septic shock in the ED, facilitating treatment discussions, particularly decision-making with patients and their families.

Background: Sepsis remains a leading cause of mortality worldwide. This study evaluated the independent and combined effects of age and chronic comorbidities on clinical outcomes in patients with septic shock. Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective observational study to evaluate the factors associated with 28-day mortality in the Korean Shock Society registry between 2015 and 2023. Adults with suspected infection and refractory hypotension or hypoperfusion within 6 h of emergency department (ED) arrival were included. Patients were grouped by age (p for interaction = 0.008) suggested that the age-related gradient in mortality differed depending on comorbidity burden. Conclusions: Age and comorbidities were both significantly associated with septic shock mortality, and their significant interaction demonstrates effect modification, indicating that the prognostic impact of comorbidities differs by age group and that age-related mortality gradients are influenced by comorbidity burden.

Yoo KH, et al. J Korean Med Sci. 2026 Jun;41(22):e14. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2026.41.e14

Introduction: The defibrillation in the presence of a “shockable” rhythms in cardiac arrest are critical steps in the resuscitation of a patient. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the recognition of “shockable” rhythm and the successful abortion of the “shockable” rhythm through defibrillation, in order to assess the accuracy of fully and semi‐automated external defibrillator (AEDs). Methods: From 1 January 2019 to 31 December 2023, AED devices were distributed in the field and those equipped in 119 ambulances were collected. The devices used for electrocardiogram (ECG) analysis were the i‐PAD CU‐SP1 ^TM (SP1) (Fully AED) (CU Medical System, Wonju, Gangwon, South Korea) and CU‐HD1 ^TM (HD1) (Semi‐AED) (CU Medical System, Wonju, Gangwon, South Korea). By comparing SP1 and HD1, the ECG analysis was conducted by emergency medicine specialists for the accuracy of rhythm recognition, the appropriateness of the successful abortion of the shockable rhythm through defibrillation. Results: Among the 2157 ECGs collected, 2072 ECGs from patients with readable results were investigated and evaluated. The accuracy of recognition of the “shockable” rhythm of SP1 and HD1 was similar at 98.7% and 99.9% ( p > 0.05), and the success rate of defibrillation was similar at 84.4% and 80.5% ( p > 0.05). However, the final restoration rate of normal heart rhythm in both SP1 and HD1 was high in patients with defibrillation, so rapid defibrillation seems to increase the survival rate. Conclusions: There was no difference in the recognition rate of the “shockable” rhythm between the SP1 and HD1. However, shock delivery rate after recognition of the “shockable” rhythm was performed more in SP1 than HD1. The successful abortion of the “shockable” rhythm after defibrillation was appropriate and effective, but research according to the survival rate in hospital is considered necessary.

Background/Objectives: Sepsis is a leading cause of mortality. The AST/ALT ratio may serve as a valuable marker for prediction in patients with various diseases. This study analyzed the prognostic value of this ratio in patients with sepsis. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on data from a prospective registry of septic shock patients, collected across multiple centers from October 2015 to December 2022. The main outcome of interest was mortality within 28 days. We evaluated the predictive accuracy of 28-day mortality for variables with the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, aspartate transaminase (AST) levels, alanine transaminase (ALT) levels, the AST/ALT ratio, and the combination of the SOFA + AST/ALT ratio using the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC). A Kaplan–Meier curve was used to compare the 28-day mortality between the AST/ALT subgroups (≥1.84 and <1.84). Stepwise multivariable Cox proportional hazards analyses were performed to determine the association between 28-day mortality and an AST/ALT ratio ≥ 1.84. Results: The AST/ALT ratio had a significantly higher discriminatory ability for predicting 28-day mortality compared to either AST or ALT. In addition, combining the AST/ALT ratio with the SOFA score improved the predictive accuracy compared to the SOFA alone. A multivariable Cox regression analysis demonstrated that an AST/ALT ratio ≥ 1.84 was associated with a higher risk of death within 28 days. Conclusions: The AST/ALT ratio at emergency department admission in sepsis patients is associated with 28-day mortality and, when combined with the SOFA score, provides additional prognostic information with moderate accuracy.

Background: Early risk stratification is crucial due to septic patients’ heterogeneity. Serum albumin level may reflect the severity of sepsis and host status. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic ability of the initial sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score alone and combined with serum albumin levels for predicting 28-day mortality in patients with septic shock. Methods: We conducted an observational study using a prospective, multicenter registry of septic shock patients between October 2015 and May 2022 from 12 emergency departments in the Korean Shock Society and the results were validated by examining those from the septic shock cohort in Asan Medical Center. The primary outcome was 28-day mortality. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to compare the predictive values of SOFA score alone and SOFA score combined with serum albumin level. Results: Among 5805 septic shock patients, 1529 (26.3%) died within 28 days. Mortality increased stepwise with decreasing serum albumin levels (13.6% in albumin ≥3.5, 20.7% in 3.5–3.0, 29.7% in 3.0–2.5, 44.0% in 2.5–2.0, 56.4% in <2.0). The albumin SOFA score was calculated by adding the initial SOFA score to the 4 points assigned for albumin levels. ROC analysis for predicting 28-day mortality showed that the area under the curve for the albumin SOFA score was 0.71 (95% CI 0.70–0.73), which was significantly higher than that of the initial SOFA score alone (0.68, 95% CI: 0.67–0.69). Conclusions: The combination of the initial SOFA score with albumin can improve prognostic accuracy for patients with septic shock, suggesting the albumin SOFA score may be used as an early mortality stratification tool.

Sex differences in the in-hospital management of sepsis exist. Previous studies either included patients with sepsis that was defined using previous definitions of sepsis or evaluated the 3-h bundle therapy. Therefore, this study sought to assess sex differences in 1-h bundle therapy and in-hospital management among patients with sepsis and septic shock, defined according to the Sepsis-3 definitions. This observational study used data from Korean Shock Society (KoSS) registry, a prospective multicenter sepsis registry. Adult patients with sepsis between June 2018 and December 2021 were included in this study. The primary outcome was adherence to 1-h bundle therapy. Propensity score matching (PSM) and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed. Among 3264 patients with sepsis, 3129 were analyzed. PSM yielded 2380 matched patients (1190 men and 1190 women). After PSM, 1-h bundle therapy was performed less frequently in women than in men (13.0% vs. 19.2%; p < 0.001). Among the bundle therapy components, broad-spectrum antibiotics were administered less frequently in women than in men (25.4% vs. 31.6%, p < 0.001), whereas adequate fluid resuscitation was performed more frequently in women than in men (96.8% vs. 95.0%, p = 0.029). In multivariable logistic regression analysis, 1-h bundle therapy was performed less frequently in women than in men [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.559; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.245–1.951; p < 0.001] after adjustment. Among the bundle therapy components, broad-spectrum antibiotics were administered less frequently to women than men (aOR 1.339, 95% CI 1.118–1.605; p = 0.002), whereas adequate fluid resuscitation was performed more frequently for women than for men (aOR 0.629, 95% CI 0.413–0.959; p = 0.031). Invasive arterial blood pressure monitoring was performed less frequently in women than in men. Resuscitation fluid, vasopressor, steroid, central-line insertion, ICU admission, length of stay in the emergency department, mechanical ventilator use, and renal replacement therapy use were comparable for both the sexes. Among patients with sepsis and septic shock, 1-h bundle therapy was performed less frequently in women than in men. Continuous efforts are required to increase adherence to the 1-h bundle therapy and to decrease sex differences in the in-hospital management of patients with sepsis and septic shock.

Although the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines provide standardized and generalized guidance, they are less individualized. This review focuses on recent updates in the hemodynamic management of septic shock. Monitoring and intervention for septic shock should be personalized according to the phase of shock. In the salvage phase, fluid resuscitation and vasopressors should be given to provide life-saving tissue perfusion. During the optimization phase, tissue perfusion should be optimized. In the stabilization and de-escalation phases, minimal fluid infusion and safe fluid removal should be performed, respectively, while preserving organ perfusion. There is controversy surrounding the use of restrictive versus liberal fluid strategies after initial resuscitation. Fluid administration after initial resuscitation should depend upon the patient’s fluid responsiveness and requires individualized management. A number of dynamic tests have been proposed to monitor fluid responsiveness, which can help clinicians decide whether to give fluid or not. The optimal timing for the initiation of vasopressor agents is unknown. Recent data suggest that early vasopressor initiation should be considered. Inotropes can be considered in patients with decreased cardiac contractility associated with impaired tissue perfusion despite adequate volume status and arterial blood pressure. Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation should be considered for refractory septic shock with severe cardiac systolic dysfunction.

Ko BS, et al. J Korean Med Sci. 2023 Dec;38:e418. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e418