Silvana Bazzoni
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Silvana Bazzoni has a total of 36 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Jan Stovicek
Charles University
8 shared publications - Leonid Positselski
Institute of Mathematics, Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague 1, Czech Republic
7 shared publications - Dolors Herbera
Departament de Matemàtiques, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra (Barcelona), Spain
4 shared publications - Jan Šaroch
Charles University, Praha, Czech Republic
4 shared publications Luigi Salce
4 shared publications- Giovanna Le Gros3 shared publications
Latest Publications
- 2 January 2024
- Published by Walter de Gruyter GmbH in Forum Mathematicum
- Vol. 36 (6) , 1517-1528
Enochs’ conjecture for cotorsion pairs and more
Enochs’ conjecture asserts that each covering class of modules (over any ring) has to be closed under direct limits. Although various special cases of the conjecture have been verified, the conjecture remains open in its full generality. In this paper, we prove the conjecture for the classes Filt (
- 2 January 2024
- Published by Walter de Gruyter GmbH in Forum Mathematicum
- Vol. 36 (6) , 1517-1528
Enochs’ conjecture for cotorsion pairs and more
Enochs’ conjecture asserts that each covering class of modules (over any ring) has to be closed under direct limits. Although various special cases of the conjecture have been verified, the conjecture remains open in its full generality. In this paper, we prove the conjecture for the classes Filt (
- Open Access
Enochs Conjecture for cotorsion pairs and more
Enochs Conjecture asserts that each covering class of modules (over any ring) has to be closed under direct limits. Although various special cases of the conjecture have been verified, the conjecture remains open in its full generality. In this paper, we prove the conjecture for the classes $\mathrm{Filt}(\mathcal S)$ where $\mathcal S$ consists of $\aleph_n$-presented modules for some fixed $n<ω$. In particular, this applies to the left-hand class of any cotorsion pair generated by a class of $\aleph_n$-presented modules. Moreover, we also show that it is consistent with ZFC that Enochs Conjecture holds for all classes of the form $\mathrm{Filt}(\mathcal{S})$ where $\mathcal{S}$ is a set of modules. This leaves us with no explicit example of a covering class where we cannot prove that the Enochs Conjecture holds (possibly under some additional set-theoretic assumption).Open AccessEnochs Conjecture for cotorsion pairs and more
Enochs Conjecture asserts that each covering class of modules (over any ring) has to be closed under direct limits. Although various special cases of the conjecture have been verified, the conjecture remains open in its full generality. In this paper, we prove the conjecture for the classes $\mathrm{Filt}(\mathcal S)$ where $\mathcal S$ consists of $\aleph_n$-presented modules for some fixed $n<ω$. In particular, this applies to the left-hand class of any cotorsion pair generated by a class of $\aleph_n$-presented modules. Moreover, we also show that it is consistent with ZFC that Enochs Conjecture holds for all classes of the form $\mathrm{Filt}(\mathcal{S})$ where $\mathcal{S}$ is a set of modules. This leaves us with no explicit example of a covering class where we cannot prove that the Enochs Conjecture holds (possibly under some additional set-theoretic assumption). - Open Access
Fp-projective periodicity
The phenomenon of periodicity, discovered by Benson and Goodearl, is linked to the behavior of the objects of cocycles in acyclic complexes. It is known that any flat $\mathsf{Proj}$-periodic module is projective, any fp-injective $\mathsf{Inj}$-periodic module is injective, and any $\mathsf{Cot}$-periodic module is cotorsion. It is also known that any pure $\mathsf{PProj}$-periodic module is pure-projective and any pure $\mathsf{PInj}$-periodic module is pure-injective. Generalizing a result of Saroch and Stovicek, we show that every $\mathsf{FpProj}$-periodic module is weakly fp-projective. The proof is quite elementary, using only a strong form of the pure-projective periodicity and the Hill lemma. More generally, we prove that, in a locally finitely presentable Grothendieck category, every $\mathsf{FpProj}$-periodic object is weakly fp-projective. In a locally coherent category, all weakly fp-projective objects are fp-projective. We also present counterexamples showing that a non-pure $\mathsf{PProj}$-periodic module over a regular finitely generated commutative algebra (or a hereditary finite-dimensional associative algebra) over a field need not be pure-projective.
Open AccessFp-projective periodicity
The phenomenon of periodicity, discovered by Benson and Goodearl, is linked to the behavior of the objects of cocycles in acyclic complexes. It is known that any flat $\mathsf{Proj}$-periodic module is projective, any fp-injective $\mathsf{Inj}$-periodic module is injective, and any $\mathsf{Cot}$-periodic module is cotorsion. It is also known that any pure $\mathsf{PProj}$-periodic module is pure-projective and any pure $\mathsf{PInj}$-periodic module is pure-injective. Generalizing a result of Saroch and Stovicek, we show that every $\mathsf{FpProj}$-periodic module is weakly fp-projective. The proof is quite elementary, using only a strong form of the pure-projective periodicity and the Hill lemma. More generally, we prove that, in a locally finitely presentable Grothendieck category, every $\mathsf{FpProj}$-periodic object is weakly fp-projective. In a locally coherent category, all weakly fp-projective objects are fp-projective. We also present counterexamples showing that a non-pure $\mathsf{PProj}$-periodic module over a regular finitely generated commutative algebra (or a hereditary finite-dimensional associative algebra) over a field need not be pure-projective.
- 1 January 2022
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra
- Vol. 226 (1) , 106813
A characterisation of enveloping 1-tilting classes over commutative rings
- 1 January 2022
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra
- Vol. 226 (1) , 106813
A characterisation of enveloping 1-tilting classes over commutative rings
- 5 November 2021
- Published by Springer Nature in Bulletin of the Iranian Mathematical Society
- Vol. 47 (SUPPL 1) , 1-4
Isfahan School and Conference on Representation Theory of Algebras (ISCRA 2019)
- 5 November 2021
- Published by Springer Nature in Bulletin of the Iranian Mathematical Society
- Vol. 47 (SUPPL 1) , 1-4
Isfahan School and Conference on Representation Theory of Algebras (ISCRA 2019)
- 17 October 2021
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 1-26
Ring Epimorphisms, Gabriel Topologies and Contramodules
- 17 October 2021
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 1-26
Ring Epimorphisms, Gabriel Topologies and Contramodules
- Open Access
Projective covers of flat contramodules
We show that a direct limit of projective contramodules (over a right linear topological ring) is projective if it has a projective cover. A similar result is obtained for $\infty$-strictly flat contramodules of projective dimension not exceeding $1$, using an argument based on the notion of the topological Jacobson radical. Covers and precovers of direct limits of more general classes of objects, both in abelian categories with exact and with nonexact direct limits, are also discussed, with an eye towards the Enochs conjecture about covers and direct limits, using locally split (mono)morphisms as the main technique. In particular, we offer a simple elementary proof of the Enochs conjecture for the left class of an $n$-tilting cotorsion pair in an abelian category with exact direct limits.Open AccessProjective covers of flat contramodules
We show that a direct limit of projective contramodules (over a right linear topological ring) is projective if it has a projective cover. A similar result is obtained for $\infty$-strictly flat contramodules of projective dimension not exceeding $1$, using an argument based on the notion of the topological Jacobson radical. Covers and precovers of direct limits of more general classes of objects, both in abelian categories with exact and with nonexact direct limits, are also discussed, with an eye towards the Enochs conjecture about covers and direct limits, using locally split (mono)morphisms as the main technique. In particular, we offer a simple elementary proof of the Enochs conjecture for the left class of an $n$-tilting cotorsion pair in an abelian category with exact direct limits. - Open Access
- 23 February 2021
- Published by Walter de Gruyter GmbH in Forum Mathematicum
- Vol. 33 (3) , 601-629
Covering classes and 1-tilting cotorsion pairs over commutative rings
We are interested in characterising the commutative rings for which a 1-tilting cotorsion pair ( 𝒜 , 𝒯 ) {(\mathcal{A},\mathcal{T})} provides for covers, that is when the class 𝒜 {\mathcal{A}} is a covering class. We use Hrbek’s bijective correspondence between the 1-tilting cotorsion pairs over a commutative ring R and the faithful finitely generated Gabriel topologies on R . Moreover, we use results of Bazzoni–Positselski, in particular a generalisation of Matlis equivalence and their characterisation of covering classes for 1-tilting cotorsion pairs arising from flat injective ring epimorphisms. Explicitly, if 𝒢 {\mathcal{G}} is the Gabriel topology associated to the 1-tilting cotorsion pair ( 𝒜 , 𝒯 ) {(\mathcal{A},\mathcal{T})} , and R 𝒢 {R_{\mathcal{G}}} is the ring of quotients with respect to 𝒢 {\mathcal{G}} , we show that if 𝒜 {\mathcal{A}} is covering, then 𝒢 {\mathcal{G}} is a perfect localisation (in Stenström’s sense [B. Stenström, Rings of Quotients, Springer, New York, 1975]) and the localisation R 𝒢 {R_{\mathcal{G}}} has projective dimension at most one as an R -module. Moreover, we show that 𝒜 {\mathcal{A}} is covering if and only if both the localisation R 𝒢 {R_{\mathcal{G}}} and the quotient rings R / J {R/J} are perfect rings for every J ∈ 𝒢 {J\in\mathcal{G}} . Rings satisfying the latter two conditions are called 𝒢 {\mathcal{G}} -almost perfect.
- 23 February 2021
- Published by Walter de Gruyter GmbH in Forum Mathematicum
- Vol. 33 (3) , 601-629
Open AccessCovering classes and 1-tilting cotorsion pairs over commutative rings
We are interested in characterising the commutative rings for which a 1-tilting cotorsion pair ( 𝒜 , 𝒯 ) {(\mathcal{A},\mathcal{T})} provides for covers, that is when the class 𝒜 {\mathcal{A}} is a covering class. We use Hrbek’s bijective correspondence between the 1-tilting cotorsion pairs over a commutative ring R and the faithful finitely generated Gabriel topologies on R . Moreover, we use results of Bazzoni–Positselski, in particular a generalisation of Matlis equivalence and their characterisation of covering classes for 1-tilting cotorsion pairs arising from flat injective ring epimorphisms. Explicitly, if 𝒢 {\mathcal{G}} is the Gabriel topology associated to the 1-tilting cotorsion pair ( 𝒜 , 𝒯 ) {(\mathcal{A},\mathcal{T})} , and R 𝒢 {R_{\mathcal{G}}} is the ring of quotients with respect to 𝒢 {\mathcal{G}} , we show that if 𝒜 {\mathcal{A}} is covering, then 𝒢 {\mathcal{G}} is a perfect localisation (in Stenström’s sense [B. Stenström, Rings of Quotients, Springer, New York, 1975]) and the localisation R 𝒢 {R_{\mathcal{G}}} has projective dimension at most one as an R -module. Moreover, we show that 𝒜 {\mathcal{A}} is covering if and only if both the localisation R 𝒢 {R_{\mathcal{G}}} and the quotient rings R / J {R/J} are perfect rings for every J ∈ 𝒢 {J\in\mathcal{G}} . Rings satisfying the latter two conditions are called 𝒢 {\mathcal{G}} -almost perfect.
- Open Access
Covers and direct limits: a contramodule-based approach
We present applications of contramodule techniques to the Enochs conjecture about covers and direct limits, both in the categorical tilting context and beyond. In the $n$-tilting-cotilting correspondence situation, if $\mathsf A$ is a Grothendieck abelian category and the related abelian category $\mathsf B$ is equivalent to the category of contramodules over a topological ring $\mathfrak R$ belonging to one of certain four classes of topological rings (e.g., $\mathfrak R$ is commutative), then the left tilting class is covering in $\mathsf A$ if and only if it is closed under direct limits in $\mathsf A$, and if and only if all the discrete quotient rings of the topological ring $\mathfrak R$ are perfect. More generally, if $M$ is a module satisfying a certain telescope Hom exactness condition (e.g., $M$ is $\Sigma$-pure-$\operatorname{Ext}^1$-self-orthogonal) and the topological ring $\mathfrak R$ of endomorphisms of $M$ belongs to one of certain seven classes of topological rings, then the class $\mathsf{Add}(M)$ is closed under direct limits if and only if every countable direct limit of copies of $M$ has an $\mathsf{Add}(M)$-cover, and if and only if $M$ has perfect decomposition. In full generality, for an additive category $\mathsf A$ with (co)kernels and a precovering class $\mathsf L\subset\mathsf A$ closed under summands, an object $N\in\mathsf A$ has an $\mathsf L$-cover if and only if a certain object $\Psi(N)$ in an abelian category $\mathsf B$ with enough projectives has a projective cover. The $1$-tilting modules and objects arising from injective ring epimorphisms of projective dimension $1$ form a class of examples which we discuss.Open AccessCovers and direct limits: a contramodule-based approach
We present applications of contramodule techniques to the Enochs conjecture about covers and direct limits, both in the categorical tilting context and beyond. In the $n$-tilting-cotilting correspondence situation, if $\mathsf A$ is a Grothendieck abelian category and the related abelian category $\mathsf B$ is equivalent to the category of contramodules over a topological ring $\mathfrak R$ belonging to one of certain four classes of topological rings (e.g., $\mathfrak R$ is commutative), then the left tilting class is covering in $\mathsf A$ if and only if it is closed under direct limits in $\mathsf A$, and if and only if all the discrete quotient rings of the topological ring $\mathfrak R$ are perfect. More generally, if $M$ is a module satisfying a certain telescope Hom exactness condition (e.g., $M$ is $\Sigma$-pure-$\operatorname{Ext}^1$-self-orthogonal) and the topological ring $\mathfrak R$ of endomorphisms of $M$ belongs to one of certain seven classes of topological rings, then the class $\mathsf{Add}(M)$ is closed under direct limits if and only if every countable direct limit of copies of $M$ has an $\mathsf{Add}(M)$-cover, and if and only if $M$ has perfect decomposition. In full generality, for an additive category $\mathsf A$ with (co)kernels and a precovering class $\mathsf L\subset\mathsf A$ closed under summands, an object $N\in\mathsf A$ has an $\mathsf L$-cover if and only if a certain object $\Psi(N)$ in an abelian category $\mathsf B$ with enough projectives has a projective cover. The $1$-tilting modules and objects arising from injective ring epimorphisms of projective dimension $1$ form a class of examples which we discuss. - 8 January 2021
- Published by Springer Nature in Mathematische Zeitschrift
- Vol. 299 (1-2) , 1-52
Covers and direct limits: a contramodule-based approach
- 8 January 2021
- Published by Springer Nature in Mathematische Zeitschrift
- Vol. 299 (1-2) , 1-52
Covers and direct limits: a contramodule-based approach