Heather Lin
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Heather Lin has a total of 290 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Ying Yuan
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
29 shared publications - Funda Meric-Bernstam
Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
28 shared publications - Amadeo B. Biter
Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. 3
27 shared publications - Amber Johnson
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center 2 Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory, Division of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Houston, Texas
27 shared publications - Amir Anthony Jazaeri
Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
27 shared publications - Barrett C. Lawson
Department of Anatomic Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
27 shared publications
Latest Publications
- 10 November 2026
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
Surgery and Tile-Based Radiation Therapy Versus Surgery and Stereotactic Radiation for Newly Diagnosed Brain Metastases: A Randomized, Open-Label, Phase III Trial
Purpose: Postoperative stereotactic radiation (SRT) is the standard-of-care for resected brain metastases. Implantation of cesium-131 collagen tiles (tile-based radiation therapy [TBRT]) initiates focal radiation immediately after resection, potentially offering therapeutic and logistical advantages. Radiation One and Done Study, a randomized, open-label, noninferiority, phase III trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04365374 ), compared the safety and efficacy of resection with TBRT (R + TBRT) with resection with SRT (R + SRT) for patients with a newly diagnosed brain metastasis indicated for surgical resection. Methods: Across 32 US centers, patients were preoperatively randomly assigned 1:1 to R + TBRT or R + SRT. Any nonresected brain metastases received SRT postoperatively. Co-primary outcomes were time-to-surgical bed recurrence (SBR) and surgical bed recurrence-free survival (SB-RFS). Outcomes were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards models with stratification factors as covariates. Multiplicity was controlled by hierarchical testing. Analyses used the prespecified modified intention-to-treat (mITT) population (patients who underwent surgery, had pathologic confirmation of brain metastasis, and had follow-up information). Results: From April 2021 to August 2025, 230 patients were randomly assigned (115 per arm), 204 of whom (103 R + TBRT, 101 R + SRT) comprised the mITT population. The median follow-up was 12.9 months. The median time-to-SBR was not reached in R + TBRT versus 17.4 months in R + SRT (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.06 [95% CI, 0.01 to 0.46]; P = .0070). SB-RFS was improved with R + TBRT, with a median of not reached versus 10.9 months in R + SRT (HR, 0.48 [95% CI, 0.30 to 0.76]; P = .0021). Overall adverse events did not appear to differ: 83 patients (79.0% [95% CI, 70.0 to 86.4]) in R + TBRT versus 67 patients (80.7% [95% CI, 70.6 to 88.6]) in R + SRT. Conclusion: For patients with newly diagnosed brain metastases requiring resection, R + TBRT significantly improved SBR and SB-RFS, demonstrating both noninferiority and superiority.
- 10 November 2026
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
Surgery and Tile-Based Radiation Therapy Versus Surgery and Stereotactic Radiation for Newly Diagnosed Brain Metastases: A Randomized, Open-Label, Phase III Trial
Purpose: Postoperative stereotactic radiation (SRT) is the standard-of-care for resected brain metastases. Implantation of cesium-131 collagen tiles (tile-based radiation therapy [TBRT]) initiates focal radiation immediately after resection, potentially offering therapeutic and logistical advantages. Radiation One and Done Study, a randomized, open-label, noninferiority, phase III trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04365374 ), compared the safety and efficacy of resection with TBRT (R + TBRT) with resection with SRT (R + SRT) for patients with a newly diagnosed brain metastasis indicated for surgical resection. Methods: Across 32 US centers, patients were preoperatively randomly assigned 1:1 to R + TBRT or R + SRT. Any nonresected brain metastases received SRT postoperatively. Co-primary outcomes were time-to-surgical bed recurrence (SBR) and surgical bed recurrence-free survival (SB-RFS). Outcomes were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards models with stratification factors as covariates. Multiplicity was controlled by hierarchical testing. Analyses used the prespecified modified intention-to-treat (mITT) population (patients who underwent surgery, had pathologic confirmation of brain metastasis, and had follow-up information). Results: From April 2021 to August 2025, 230 patients were randomly assigned (115 per arm), 204 of whom (103 R + TBRT, 101 R + SRT) comprised the mITT population. The median follow-up was 12.9 months. The median time-to-SBR was not reached in R + TBRT versus 17.4 months in R + SRT (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.06 [95% CI, 0.01 to 0.46]; P = .0070). SB-RFS was improved with R + TBRT, with a median of not reached versus 10.9 months in R + SRT (HR, 0.48 [95% CI, 0.30 to 0.76]; P = .0021). Overall adverse events did not appear to differ: 83 patients (79.0% [95% CI, 70.0 to 86.4]) in R + TBRT versus 67 patients (80.7% [95% CI, 70.6 to 88.6]) in R + SRT. Conclusion: For patients with newly diagnosed brain metastases requiring resection, R + TBRT significantly improved SBR and SB-RFS, demonstrating both noninferiority and superiority.
- Open Access
- 3 August 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Supplementary Data from Improving Anti–CTLA-4 Therapies through Peptide Masking and Fragment Crystallizable Non-fucosylation: Preclinical Characterization of Three Novel Antibodies
The Supplementary File contains figures S1 to S15 and Table S1, which contain supporting data for the experiments reported in the main manuscript.
- 3 August 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessSupplementary Data from Improving Anti–CTLA-4 Therapies through Peptide Masking and Fragment Crystallizable Non-fucosylation: Preclinical Characterization of Three Novel Antibodies
The Supplementary File contains figures S1 to S15 and Table S1, which contain supporting data for the experiments reported in the main manuscript.
- Open Access
- 3 August 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Data from Improving Anti–CTLA-4 Therapies through Peptide Masking and Fragment Crystallizable Non-fucosylation: Preclinical Characterization of Three Novel Antibodies
Purpose:The anti–cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) monoclonal antibody, ipilimumab (IPI), has shown clinical benefit across multiple tumor types, both as monotherapy and in combination with nivolumab or chemotherapy. However, not all tumors respond, and peripheral effects can lead to immune-related adverse events. We characterized three novel anti–CTLA-4 antibodies: peptide-masked [PROBODY conditionally activatable therapeutic (PB)], non-fucosylated (NF), and combined NF-PB (BMS-986288). Experimental Design:We evaluated the preclinical characteristics, including pharmacodynamics, tolerability, antitumor activity and efficacy, and peripheral immune responses, of these novel anti–CTLA-4 antibodies using in vitro systems, animal models, and human data. This includes data from preclinical mouse models of colorectal cancer as well as non–small cell lung cancer. Results:NF demonstrated greater T-cell priming and antitumor activity than both IPI and the unmasked PB antibody in cell-based assays and mouse models. Whereas the intact PB antibody showed minimal CTLA-4 binding and peripheral immune activation, unmasking restored its functional activity to levels comparable with those of IPI. Unmasked anti–CTLA-4 NF-PB retained the effectiveness of anti–CTLA-4 NF, and both molecules demonstrated more profound antitumor activity, increased effector memory T-cell response, and prolonged survival in mouse models compared with IPI. Anti–CTLA-4 NF-PB demonstrated reduced peripheral immune responses compared with anti–CTLA-4 NF or IPI in non-human primates and patients with solid tumors. Conclusions:Anti–CTLA-4 NF-PB has enhanced antitumor activity, efficacy, and reduced peripheral activity in preclinical models, and has the potential to provide therapeutic benefit in solid tumors.See related commentary by Galvez-Cancino et al., p. 3112
- 3 August 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessData from Improving Anti–CTLA-4 Therapies through Peptide Masking and Fragment Crystallizable Non-fucosylation: Preclinical Characterization of Three Novel Antibodies
Purpose:The anti–cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) monoclonal antibody, ipilimumab (IPI), has shown clinical benefit across multiple tumor types, both as monotherapy and in combination with nivolumab or chemotherapy. However, not all tumors respond, and peripheral effects can lead to immune-related adverse events. We characterized three novel anti–CTLA-4 antibodies: peptide-masked [PROBODY conditionally activatable therapeutic (PB)], non-fucosylated (NF), and combined NF-PB (BMS-986288). Experimental Design:We evaluated the preclinical characteristics, including pharmacodynamics, tolerability, antitumor activity and efficacy, and peripheral immune responses, of these novel anti–CTLA-4 antibodies using in vitro systems, animal models, and human data. This includes data from preclinical mouse models of colorectal cancer as well as non–small cell lung cancer. Results:NF demonstrated greater T-cell priming and antitumor activity than both IPI and the unmasked PB antibody in cell-based assays and mouse models. Whereas the intact PB antibody showed minimal CTLA-4 binding and peripheral immune activation, unmasking restored its functional activity to levels comparable with those of IPI. Unmasked anti–CTLA-4 NF-PB retained the effectiveness of anti–CTLA-4 NF, and both molecules demonstrated more profound antitumor activity, increased effector memory T-cell response, and prolonged survival in mouse models compared with IPI. Anti–CTLA-4 NF-PB demonstrated reduced peripheral immune responses compared with anti–CTLA-4 NF or IPI in non-human primates and patients with solid tumors. Conclusions:Anti–CTLA-4 NF-PB has enhanced antitumor activity, efficacy, and reduced peripheral activity in preclinical models, and has the potential to provide therapeutic benefit in solid tumors.See related commentary by Galvez-Cancino et al., p. 3112
- Open Access
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Figure S1 from Inflammation Mediated by Gut Microbiome Alterations Promotes Lung Cancer Development and an Immunosuppressed Tumor Microenvironment
Supplementary figure S1. Effects of fecal microbiota transfer from Lcn2-deficient mice in various mouse models.
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessFigure S1 from Inflammation Mediated by Gut Microbiome Alterations Promotes Lung Cancer Development and an Immunosuppressed Tumor Microenvironment
Supplementary figure S1. Effects of fecal microbiota transfer from Lcn2-deficient mice in various mouse models.
- Open Access
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Table S5 from Inflammation Mediated by Gut Microbiome Alterations Promotes Lung Cancer Development and an Immunosuppressed Tumor Microenvironment
Differentially expressed genes in the myeloid cluster of the colonic lamina propria.
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessTable S5 from Inflammation Mediated by Gut Microbiome Alterations Promotes Lung Cancer Development and an Immunosuppressed Tumor Microenvironment
Differentially expressed genes in the myeloid cluster of the colonic lamina propria.
- Open Access
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Table S6 from Inflammation Mediated by Gut Microbiome Alterations Promotes Lung Cancer Development and an Immunosuppressed Tumor Microenvironment
Differentially expressed genes in the tumor microenvironment.
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessTable S6 from Inflammation Mediated by Gut Microbiome Alterations Promotes Lung Cancer Development and an Immunosuppressed Tumor Microenvironment
Differentially expressed genes in the tumor microenvironment.
- Open Access
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Figure S2 from Inflammation Mediated by Gut Microbiome Alterations Promotes Lung Cancer Development and an Immunosuppressed Tumor Microenvironment
Supplementary figure S2. scRNA-seq of the colonic lamina propria in the syngeneic mice following FMT.
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessFigure S2 from Inflammation Mediated by Gut Microbiome Alterations Promotes Lung Cancer Development and an Immunosuppressed Tumor Microenvironment
Supplementary figure S2. scRNA-seq of the colonic lamina propria in the syngeneic mice following FMT.
- Open Access
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Table S1 from Inflammation Mediated by Gut Microbiome Alterations Promotes Lung Cancer Development and an Immunosuppressed Tumor Microenvironment
Table S1 from Inflammation Mediated by Gut Microbiome Alterations Promotes Lung Cancer Development and an Immunosuppressed Tumor Microenvironment
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessTable S1 from Inflammation Mediated by Gut Microbiome Alterations Promotes Lung Cancer Development and an Immunosuppressed Tumor Microenvironment
Table S1 from Inflammation Mediated by Gut Microbiome Alterations Promotes Lung Cancer Development and an Immunosuppressed Tumor Microenvironment
- Open Access
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Table S2 from Inflammation Mediated by Gut Microbiome Alterations Promotes Lung Cancer Development and an Immunosuppressed Tumor Microenvironment
Comparative analysis of microbial abundance in murine fecal samples across FMT groups.
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessTable S2 from Inflammation Mediated by Gut Microbiome Alterations Promotes Lung Cancer Development and an Immunosuppressed Tumor Microenvironment
Comparative analysis of microbial abundance in murine fecal samples across FMT groups.
- Open Access
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Figure S4 from Inflammation Mediated by Gut Microbiome Alterations Promotes Lung Cancer Development and an Immunosuppressed Tumor Microenvironment
Supplementary Figure S4. Immune changes within the TME induced by inflammation related to gut microbiome alterations.
- 17 June 2026
- Published by American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
Open AccessFigure S4 from Inflammation Mediated by Gut Microbiome Alterations Promotes Lung Cancer Development and an Immunosuppressed Tumor Microenvironment
Supplementary Figure S4. Immune changes within the TME induced by inflammation related to gut microbiome alterations.