Jennifer Gerson
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Jennifer Gerson has a total of 6 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Philip J. Corr
Department of Psychology, City, University of London, UK
3 shared publicationsAnke C. Plagnol
Department of Psychology, City, University of London, UK
2 shared publications- Anke C. Plagnol
University of Cambridge
1 shared publication - Briana M. Trifiro
Boston University
1 shared publication - Lara Zibarras
Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, City St George’s, University of London, London, UK
1 shared publication - Lynsey Mahmood
A School of Psychology , University of Kent , Canterbury , UK
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- 7 October 2023
- Published by Taylor & Francis
- p. 200-216
Research design and evidence-based practice
Organisational psychology is an evidence-based discipline rooted in scientific research and methodology. In this chapter we will introduce the Scientist Practitioner Model, which underpins good practice, and explore the implications for evidence-based practice. The chapter will offer an introduction to research design, covering the process of qualitative and quantitative research, design and analysis. We will also cover some current issues in the field of psychological research methods.
- 7 October 2023
- Published by Taylor & Francis
- p. 200-216
Research design and evidence-based practice
Organisational psychology is an evidence-based discipline rooted in scientific research and methodology. In this chapter we will introduce the Scientist Practitioner Model, which underpins good practice, and explore the implications for evidence-based practice. The chapter will offer an introduction to research design, covering the process of qualitative and quantitative research, design and analysis. We will also cover some current issues in the field of psychological research methods.
- Open Access
- 1 April 2019
- Published by SAGE Publications in Social Media + Society
- Vol. 5 (2)
Social Media Usage Patterns: Research Note Regarding the Lack of Universal Validated Measures for Active and Passive Use
The existing literature regarding social media use provides extant evidence supporting the claim that usage patterns ultimately have the capability of impacting users. However, the vast majority of the literature is based upon experimental laboratory settings where participants are observed by researchers. The current article asserts that there is a significant deficiency within the discipline regarding the validated measurement of usage patterns of social networking sites (SNSs) and offers guidance for those who may want to develop a general measure.
- 1 April 2019
- Published by SAGE Publications in Social Media + Society
- Vol. 5 (2)
Open AccessSocial Media Usage Patterns: Research Note Regarding the Lack of Universal Validated Measures for Active and Passive Use
The existing literature regarding social media use provides extant evidence supporting the claim that usage patterns ultimately have the capability of impacting users. However, the vast majority of the literature is based upon experimental laboratory settings where participants are observed by researchers. The current article asserts that there is a significant deficiency within the discipline regarding the validated measurement of usage patterns of social networking sites (SNSs) and offers guidance for those who may want to develop a general measure.
- 1 November 2017
- Published by Hogrefe Publishing Group in Journal of Individual Differences
- Vol. 38 (4) , 256-264
Dimensionality of the Iowa-Netherlands Comparison Orientation Measure and Its Relationship to Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory
The aims of this study were, first, to reassess the factor structure of the Iowa-Netherlands Social Comparison Orientation Measure (INCOM) and, second, to explore the associations of its factors with the Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory (RST) of personality. Data from 337 respondents were collected via online questionnaire. Structural equation models were used to assess the factor structure of the INCOM and test for relationships with RST traits. The results confirmed previous findings that the INCOM contains two factors: Ability, which relates to the comparison of performance, and Opinion, which relates to the comparison of thoughts and emotions. The two-factor model was found to be superior to the commonly used one-factor solution. The models further revealed significant relationships with RST factors: positive associations between the Ability factor and the Behavioral Inhibition System (BIS) and Behavioral Approach System (BAS) Reward Reactivity; positive associations between the Opinion factor and BAS Reward Reactivity and Goal-Drive Persistence, and a negative association with BAS Impulsivity. These findings indicate that using the INCOM as a single scale is likely to miss significant unique relationships. Our findings also provide new insight into how individual differences in personality may influence social comparison behavior.
- 1 November 2017
- Published by Hogrefe Publishing Group in Journal of Individual Differences
- Vol. 38 (4) , 256-264
Dimensionality of the Iowa-Netherlands Comparison Orientation Measure and Its Relationship to Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory
The aims of this study were, first, to reassess the factor structure of the Iowa-Netherlands Social Comparison Orientation Measure (INCOM) and, second, to explore the associations of its factors with the Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory (RST) of personality. Data from 337 respondents were collected via online questionnaire. Structural equation models were used to assess the factor structure of the INCOM and test for relationships with RST traits. The results confirmed previous findings that the INCOM contains two factors: Ability, which relates to the comparison of performance, and Opinion, which relates to the comparison of thoughts and emotions. The two-factor model was found to be superior to the commonly used one-factor solution. The models further revealed significant relationships with RST factors: positive associations between the Ability factor and the Behavioral Inhibition System (BIS) and Behavioral Approach System (BAS) Reward Reactivity; positive associations between the Opinion factor and BAS Reward Reactivity and Goal-Drive Persistence, and a negative association with BAS Impulsivity. These findings indicate that using the INCOM as a single scale is likely to miss significant unique relationships. Our findings also provide new insight into how individual differences in personality may influence social comparison behavior.
- 1 October 2017
- Published by Elsevier in Personality and Individual Differences
- Vol. 117, 81-90
Passive and Active Facebook Use Measure (PAUM): Validation and relationship to the Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory
- 1 October 2017
- Published by Elsevier in Personality and Individual Differences
- Vol. 117, 81-90
Passive and Active Facebook Use Measure (PAUM): Validation and relationship to the Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory
- Open Access
- 1 October 2016
- Published by Elsevier in Computers in Human Behavior
- Vol. 63, 813-822
Subjective well-being and social media use: Do personality traits moderate the impact of social comparison on Facebook?
- 1 October 2016
- Published by Elsevier in Computers in Human Behavior
- Vol. 63, 813-822
Open AccessSubjective well-being and social media use: Do personality traits moderate the impact of social comparison on Facebook?