Stacey Lowery Bretz
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Stacey Lowery Bretz has a total of 161 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Kelli R. Galloway
Department of Chemistry & Biochemistry, Miami University, Oxford, Ohio 45056, United States
7 shared publications- Maia Popova
University of North Carolina at Greensboro
6 shared publications Alexandra R. Brandriet
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Miami University, Oxford, Ohio 45056, United States
4 shared publicationsKimberly J. Linenberger
Department of Chemistry & Biochemistry, Kennesaw State University, Kennesaw, Georgia, 30144
4 shared publicationsNathaniel P. Grove
4 shared publicationsTimothy N. Abell
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Miami University, Oxford, Ohio 45056, United States
4 shared publications
Latest Publications
- 3 December 2021
- Published by American Chemical Society (ACS) in Journal of Chemical Education
- Vol. 99 (2) , 1100-1105
Investigating Meaningful Learning in Virtual Reality Organic Chemistry Laboratories
- 3 December 2021
- Published by American Chemical Society (ACS) in Journal of Chemical Education
- Vol. 99 (2) , 1100-1105
Investigating Meaningful Learning in Virtual Reality Organic Chemistry Laboratories
- 17 February 2021
- Published by American Chemical Society (ACS) in Journal of Chemical Education
- Vol. 98 (4) , 1064-1076
Measuring Changes in Undergraduate Chemistry Students’ Reasoning with Reaction Coordinate Diagrams: A Longitudinal, Multi-institution Study
- 17 February 2021
- Published by American Chemical Society (ACS) in Journal of Chemical Education
- Vol. 98 (4) , 1064-1076
Measuring Changes in Undergraduate Chemistry Students’ Reasoning with Reaction Coordinate Diagrams: A Longitudinal, Multi-institution Study
- 23 October 2020
- Published by Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC) in Chemistry Education Research and Practice
- Vol. 22 (1) , 199-213
Investigating first-year undergraduate chemistry students’ reasoning with reaction coordinate diagrams when choosing among particulate-level reaction mechanisms
Reaction coordinate diagrams (RCDs) are an important tool used to visualize the energetics of a chemical reaction. RCDs provide information about the kinetics of the reaction, the mechanism by which the reaction occurs, and the relative thermodynamic stability of the molecules in a reaction. Previous research studies have characterized student thinking about chemical kinetics, including their confusion in distinguishing between kinetics and thermodynamics. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 44 students enrolled in a second-semester, first-year undergraduate chemistry course to elicit students’ ideas about surface features of RCDs and to examine how students connect those surface features to features of particulate-level reaction mechanisms. Students were provided both a gas-phase reaction and its accompanying RCD, and then they were asked to choose the particulate-level reaction mechanism that best corresponded to both the reaction and the RCD from among several possible particulate-level reaction mechanisms. Students were asked to explain their reasoning throughout the interview. Findings include students who chose the correct mechanism with appropriate reasoning, as well as students who chose the correct mechanism yet still expressed inaccurate ideas related to the surface features of RCDs and the concepts encoded within them. Students struggled to explain and reason with surface features such as peaks, valleys, and peak height. Moreover, students frequently found it difficult to identify meaningful connections between these surface features, the stoichiometry of the reaction, and the steps in a reaction mechanism. In addition, many students failed to mention important features of RCDs when describing their reasoning about the connections between particulate-level reaction mechanisms and RCDs. The implications for incorporating these research findings into teaching practices in first-year undergraduate chemistry contexts are discussed.
- 23 October 2020
- Published by Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC) in Chemistry Education Research and Practice
- Vol. 22 (1) , 199-213
Investigating first-year undergraduate chemistry students’ reasoning with reaction coordinate diagrams when choosing among particulate-level reaction mechanisms
Reaction coordinate diagrams (RCDs) are an important tool used to visualize the energetics of a chemical reaction. RCDs provide information about the kinetics of the reaction, the mechanism by which the reaction occurs, and the relative thermodynamic stability of the molecules in a reaction. Previous research studies have characterized student thinking about chemical kinetics, including their confusion in distinguishing between kinetics and thermodynamics. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 44 students enrolled in a second-semester, first-year undergraduate chemistry course to elicit students’ ideas about surface features of RCDs and to examine how students connect those surface features to features of particulate-level reaction mechanisms. Students were provided both a gas-phase reaction and its accompanying RCD, and then they were asked to choose the particulate-level reaction mechanism that best corresponded to both the reaction and the RCD from among several possible particulate-level reaction mechanisms. Students were asked to explain their reasoning throughout the interview. Findings include students who chose the correct mechanism with appropriate reasoning, as well as students who chose the correct mechanism yet still expressed inaccurate ideas related to the surface features of RCDs and the concepts encoded within them. Students struggled to explain and reason with surface features such as peaks, valleys, and peak height. Moreover, students frequently found it difficult to identify meaningful connections between these surface features, the stoichiometry of the reaction, and the steps in a reaction mechanism. In addition, many students failed to mention important features of RCDs when describing their reasoning about the connections between particulate-level reaction mechanisms and RCDs. The implications for incorporating these research findings into teaching practices in first-year undergraduate chemistry contexts are discussed.
- 19 October 2020
- Published by American Chemical Society (ACS) in Journal of Chemical Education
- Vol. 97 (11) , 4196-4201
Adapting Interactive Interview Tasks to Remote Data Collection: Human Subjects Research That Requires Annotations and Manipulations of Chemical Structures During the COVID-19 Pandemic
- 19 October 2020
- Published by American Chemical Society (ACS) in Journal of Chemical Education
- Vol. 97 (11) , 4196-4201
Adapting Interactive Interview Tasks to Remote Data Collection: Human Subjects Research That Requires Annotations and Manipulations of Chemical Structures During the COVID-19 Pandemic
- 26 June 2020
- Published by American Chemical Society (ACS) in Journal of Chemical Education
- Vol. 97 (7) , 1841-1851
Development of the Reaction Coordinate Diagram Inventory: Measuring Student Thinking and Confidence
- 26 June 2020
- Published by American Chemical Society (ACS) in Journal of Chemical Education
- Vol. 97 (7) , 1841-1851
Development of the Reaction Coordinate Diagram Inventory: Measuring Student Thinking and Confidence
- 1 August 2019
- Published by American Chemical Society (ACS) in Journal of Chemical Education
- Vol. 96 (9) , 1804-1812
Development of the Enthalpy and Entropy in Dissolution and Precipitation Inventory
- 1 August 2019
- Published by American Chemical Society (ACS) in Journal of Chemical Education
- Vol. 96 (9) , 1804-1812
Development of the Enthalpy and Entropy in Dissolution and Precipitation Inventory
- Top Cited Papers
- 12 February 2019
- Published by American Chemical Society (ACS) in Journal of Chemical Education
- Vol. 96 (2) , 193-195
Evidence for the Importance of Laboratory Courses
- 12 February 2019
- Published by American Chemical Society (ACS) in Journal of Chemical Education
- Vol. 96 (2) , 193-195
Top Cited PapersEvidence for the Importance of Laboratory Courses
- 8 February 2019
- Published by American Chemical Society (ACS) in Journal of Chemical Education
- Vol. 96 (3) , 393-397
Supporting the Growth and Impact of the Chemistry-Education-Research Community
- 8 February 2019
- Published by American Chemical Society (ACS) in Journal of Chemical Education
- Vol. 96 (3) , 393-397
Supporting the Growth and Impact of the Chemistry-Education-Research Community