Jinhan Pae

This study investigates the intragroup flows of brand royalties within large Korean business groups, known as chaebols. We find that member firms pay a greater amount of brand royalties when the business groups they are part of adopt a holding company governance structure, consistent with the bitter denunciation that chaebols transfer wealth from member firms to holding companies over which they have direct control. However, member firms pay a smaller amount of brand royalties when their related‐party transactions (RPTs) are monitored by a designated RPT committee on the board of directors. The results show that monitoring RPTs is effective in mitigating the alleged unethical wealth transfer through excessive brand royalties within large business groups. Our study adds to the literature on RPTs by shedding new light on brand royalty, specifically by illustrating how intragroup brand royalties are determined and charged to member firms, and by introducing the RPT committees as a new internal governance mechanism to discourage abusive RPTs.

With pervasive pension funding deficits, Korean firms have been under pressure to improve their funding levels. We examine whether firms have incentives to set obligation‐decreasing pension assumptions when they have large pension deficits (pension obligations in excess of plan assets) and when they make insufficient contributions to external pension funds. We find that firms report larger actuarial gains (or smaller actuarial losses) associated with the remeasurement of pension liabilities when their pension funding ratio (the ratio of the fair value of plan assets to defined benefit obligations) is lower and when contributions to plan assets relative to pension service costs are smaller. Next, upon the introduction of a minimum pension funding guideline, we find that the effect of the funding ratio and contributions to pension funds on actuarial gains and losses is more pronounced for firms whose funding ratios are slightly below the minimum funding ratio than it is for firms whose funding ratios exceed or fall short of the minimum by a large margin. Our results indicate that firms opportunistically exercise discretion regarding corporate pension accounting under International Financial Reporting Standards to comply with pension funding regulations, thereby reducing perceived pension deficits.

In the wake of the global financial crisis, we compare Korean firms that voluntarily disclosed their revaluation in a timely manner with those that did not. We find that firms are more likely to disclose revaluation when they hire a large, reputable appraisal firm and when they have a large number of revaluation increments. We observe a significantly positive market reaction to the voluntary disclosure of the revaluation results. A positive market reaction is mainly observed for firms that hired a large, reputable appraisal firm, had a large number of revaluation increments, and were under greater financial distress before revaluation.

We investigate the relationship between a firm’s conditional financial reporting policy and the tendency to understate pension liabilities in the statement of financial position. We focus on two primary actuarial assumptions for pension liabilities, the discount rate and the salary growth rate, because a small bias in these two actuarial assumptions has a big effect on the estimate of pension liabilities and firms have some latitude in choosing these rates. We predict and find that firms are less likely to choose an upwardly biased discount rate and/or a downwardly biased salary growth rate when their earnings reflect bad news on a timelier basis than good news. Even though the salary growth result is somewhat weak, overall results suggest that firms are less likely to understate their pension liabilities by choosing pension obligation increasing actuarial assumptions when their financial reporting is conditionally more conservative.

Prior literature suggests that the effect of adopting the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) could vary by country-specific or firm-specific factors. In particular, we focus on the effect of the strength of corporate governance of a firm, a firm-specific characteristic, prior to the adoption of IFRS. Specifically, we use the Korea Corporate Governance Stock Price Index, a metric for the corporate governance structure in Korea, to examine whether the corporate governance structure influences the effect of IFRS adoption on the analyst’s earnings forecasts in Korea. We find that the beneficial effect of IFRS adoption on analyst forecast errors is observed for firms with moderate corporate governance prior to IFRS adoption, but not for firms with superior or inferior corporate governance. We interpret our findings such that firms with strong or weak corporate governance do not benefit from IFRS adoption, because firms with strong corporate governance already had transparent information system prior to IFRS adoption and firms with weak corporate governance failed to implement IFRS properly.

When the fair value accounting (FVA) option for property, plant, and equipment was introduced in the midst of the global financial crisis, a significant proportion of Korean firms elected FVA. We attribute this unusual boom in asset revaluations to the nation's culture of government intervention and civilian compliance, which was particularly espoused during this period of financial turmoil, and a foreseeable option to switch back to historical cost accounting. We find that among those firms whose debt‐to‐equity ratios are low, public firms opt for the FVA option more often than private firms, suggesting that the need to communicate fair value information with diversified equity holders is more important than the need to do so with creditors. In contrast, among those firms whose debt‐to‐equity ratios are high enough to warrant such unfavorable dispositions as new debt freezes and monitoring by regulators, we find no difference in the FVA choice between private and public firms. These findings imply that during the global financial crisis, private firms that rely heavily on debt financing have a strong incentive to utilize FVA to comply with government guidelines for the debt‐to‐equity ratio and to ease a potential hold‐up problem by influential creditors.

This study investigates the performance of analysts when they match the asymmetric timeliness of their earnings forecast revisions (i.e., asymmetric forecast timeliness) with the asymmetric timeliness of firms’ reported earnings (i.e., asymmetric earnings timeliness). We find that better timeliness‐matching analysts produce more accurate earnings forecasts and elicit stronger market reactions to their forecast revisions. Further, better timeliness‐matching analysts issue less biased earnings forecasts, more profitable stock recommendations and have more favorable career outcomes. Overall, our results indicate that analysts’ ability to incorporate conditional conservatism into their earnings forecasts is an important reflection of analyst expertise and professional success.

This paper investigates whether corporate philanthropic decisions are associated with a firm’s listing status and business group affiliation. Analyzing a large sample of public and private firms in Korea, we find that (1) public firms make more charitable contributions than private firms and (2) business group-affiliated firms make more charitable contributions than non-affiliated firms. The results suggest that public firms, owing to greater public scrutiny, and business groups, owing to higher political costs, are encouraged to make more corporate charitable contributions. Further, we find that (3) greater corporate giving by public firms than private firms is more pronounced for business group-affiliated firms, compared with non-affiliated firms. The result is consistent with business groups’ strategic coordination of their affiliates’ philanthropic decisions to tunnel business group resources out to controlling shareholders who hold a larger portion of private affiliates than public affiliates.