Danny Weyns

Self-adaptive systems (SASs) are designed to handle changes and uncertainties through a feedback loop with four core functionalities: monitoring, analyzing, planning, and execution. Recently, generative artificial intelligence (GenAI), especially the area of large language models, has shown impressive performance in data comprehension and logical reasoning. These capabilities are highly aligned with the functionalities required in SASs, suggesting a strong potential to employ GenAI to enhance SASs. However, the specific benefits and challenges of employing GenAI in SASs remain unclear. Yet, providing a comprehensive understanding of these benefits and challenges is complex due to several reasons: limited publications in the SAS field, the technological and application diversity within SASs, and the rapid evolution of GenAI technologies. To that end, this paper aims to provide researchers and practitioners a comprehensive snapshot that outlines the potential benefits and challenges of employing GenAI's within SAS. Specifically, we gather, filter, and analyze literature from four distinct research fields and organize them into two main categories to potential benefits: (i) enhancements to the autonomy of SASs centered around the specific functions of the MAPE-K feedback loop, and (ii) improvements in the interaction between humans and SASs within human-on-the-loop settings. From our study, we outline a research roadmap that highlights the challenges of integrating GenAI into SASs. The roadmap starts with outlining key research challenges that need to be tackled to exploit the potential for applying GenAI in the field of SAS. The roadmap concludes with a practical reflection, elaborating on current shortcomings of GenAI and proposing possible mitigation strategies.

Researchers and engineers of autonomous and adaptive systems have always been fascinated by computing systems that have the ability to solve problems independently. In this reflection article, we look at three main families of such computing systems that emerged over the past two decades: Self-Organizing Systems, Self-Adaptive Systems, and Symbiotic HAI Systems that leverage the collective capabilities of Humans and AI-empowered autonomous and adaptive systems. For each family of these systems, we highlight the foundations, principles, and approaches, as well as system engineering. To conclude, we look at a number of challenges for future research in three key areas of this fascinating field: technical, ethical, and regulatory. These challenges open new fundamental and engineering problems for autonomous and adaptive systems.

Self-adaptation equips a software system with a feedback loop that resolves uncertainties during operation and adapts the system to deal with them when necessary. Most self-adaptation approaches today use decision-making mechanisms that select for execution the adaptation option with the best-estimated benefit expressed as a set of adaptation goals. A few approaches also consider the estimated (one-off) cost of executing the candidate adaptation options. We argue that besides benefit and cost, decision-making in self-adaptive systems should also consider the estimated risk the system or its users would be exposed to if an adaptation option were selected for execution. Balancing all three concerns when evaluating the options for adaptation to mitigate uncertainty is essential for satisfying stakeholders’ concerns and ensuring the safety and public acceptance of self-adaptive systems. In this article, we present a reference model for decision-making in self-adaptation that considers the estimated benefit, cost, and risk as core concerns of each adaptation option. Leveraging this model, we then present an ISO/IEC/IEEE 42010 compatible architectural viewpoint that aims at supporting software architects responsible for designing robust decision-making mechanisms for self-adaptive systems. We demonstrate the applicability, usefulness, and understandability of the viewpoint through a case study where participants with experience in the engineering of self-adaptive systems performed a set of design tasks in DeltaIoT, an Internet-of-Things exemplar for research on self-adaptive systems.

Self-adaptive systems (SASs) are designed to handle changes and uncertainties through a feedback loop with four core functionalities: monitoring, analyzing, planning, and execution. Recently, generative artificial intelligence (GenAI), especially the area of large language models, has shown impressive performance in data comprehension and logical reasoning. These capabilities are highly aligned with the functionalities required in SASs, suggesting a strong potential to employ GenAI to enhance SASs. However, the specific benefits and challenges of employing GenAI in SASs remain unclear. Yet, providing a comprehensive understanding of these benefits and challenges is complex due to several reasons: limited publications in the SAS field, the technological and application diversity within SASs, and the rapid evolution of GenAI technologies. To that end, this article aims to provide researchers and practitioners a comprehensive snapshot that outlines the potential benefits and challenges of employing GenAI’s within SAS. Specifically, we gather, filter, and analyze literature from four distinct research fields and organize them into two main categories to potential benefits: (i) enhancements to the autonomy of SASs centered around the specific functions of the MAPE-K feedback loop, and (ii) improvements in the interaction between humans and SASs within human-on-the-loop settings. From our study, we outline a research roadmap that highlights the challenges of integrating GenAI into SASs. The roadmap starts with outlining key research challenges that need to be tackled to exploit the potential for applying GenAI in the field of SAS. The roadmap concludes with a practical reflection, elaborating on current shortcomings of GenAI and proposing possible mitigation strategies. ^†

A/B testing is a common approach used in industry to facilitate innovation through the introduction of new features or the modification of existing software. Traditionally, A/B tests are administrated manually and conducted sequentially, with each experiment targeting the entire population that uses the corresponding application. This approach can be time-consuming and costly, particularly when the experiments are not relevant to the entire population. To tackle these problems, we present a new self-adaptive approach called AutoPABS, short for Automated Pipelines of A/B tests using Self-adaptation. AutoPABS contributes: (1) a self-adaptive architecture that enables automated execution of A/B testing pipelines, (2) a population split component that is managed by the managing system of the self-adaptive architecture to enable more efficient A/B testing pipeline execution, and (3) a notation to specify A/B testing pipelines that can be executed using the self-adaptive architecture. We started the evaluation with a small survey to probe the appraisal of the notation and infrastructure of AutoPABS. Then we performed a series of tests to measure the gains obtained by applying a population split in an automated A/B testing pipeline, using an extension of the SEAByTE artifact. The survey results show that the participants appraise the usefulness of automating A/B testing pipelines and population split. The test results show that automatically executing pipelines of A/B tests using the self-adaptation architecture with population split accelerates the identification of statistically significant results by exploiting parallel A/B test execution compared to traditional sequential execution of A/B tests.

Large Language Models (LLMs), with their abilities in knowledge acquisition and reasoning, can potentially enhance the various aspects of Self-adaptive Systems (SAS). Yet, the potential of LLMs in SAS remains largely unexplored and ambiguous, due to the lack of literature from flagship conferences or journals in the field, such as SEAMS and TAAS. The interdisciplinary nature of SAS suggests that drawing and integrating ideas from related fields, such as software engineering and autonomous agents, could unveil innovative research directions for LLMs within SAS. To this end, this paper reports the results of a literature review of studies in relevant fields, summarizes and classifies the studies relevant to SAS, and outlines their potential to specific aspects of SAS. Literature classification: www.github.com/545659928/LLM4SAS

Self-adaptive systems (SASs) can change their structures autonomously and dynamically adapt their behaviors aiming at (i) attaining longer-term system goals and (ii) coping with inevitable dynamics and changes in their operational environments that are difficult to anticipate. As SASs directly or indirectly interact with, and affect humans, such degrees of autonomy create the necessity for these systems to be trusted or considered trustworthy. While the notions of 'trust' and 'trustworthiness' have been investigated for over a decade, particularly by the SEAMS community, trust is a broad concept that covers diverse notions and techniques and there is currently no clear view on the state of the art. To that end, we present the outcomes of an exploratory literature study that clarifies how trust as a foundational concept has been concretized and used in SASs. Based on an analysis of a set of 16 articles from the published SEAMS proceedings, we provide (i) a summary of the diverse quality attributes of SASs influenced by trust, (ii) a clarification on the different participant roles to trust establishment in SASs, and (iii) a summary of trust qualification or quantification approaches used in literature. This review provides a more holistic view on the current state of the art for attaining trust in the engineering of self-adaptive systems, and identifies research gaps worthy of further investigation.

Recently, machine learning (ML) has become a popular approach to support self-adaptation. ML has been used to deal with several problems in self-adaptation, such as maintaining an up-to-date runtime model under uncertainty and scalable decision-making. Yet, exploiting ML comes with inherent challenges. In this article, we focus on a particularly important challenge for learning-based self-adaptive systems: drift in adaptation spaces. With adaptation space, we refer to the set of adaptation options a self-adaptive system can select from to adapt at a given time based on the estimated quality properties of the adaptation options. A drift of adaptation spaces originates from uncertainties, affecting the quality properties of the adaptation options. Such drift may imply that the quality of the system may deteriorate, eventually, no adaptation option may satisfy the initial set of adaptation goals, or adaptation options may emerge that allow enhancing the adaptation goals. In ML, such a shift corresponds to a novel class appearance, a type of concept drift in target data that common ML techniques have problems dealing with. To tackle this problem, we present a novel approach to self-adaptation that enhances learning-based self-adaptive systems with a lifelong ML layer. We refer to this approach aslifelong self-adaptation. The lifelong ML layer tracks the system and its environment, associates this knowledge with the current learning tasks, identifies new tasks based on differences, and updates the learning models of the self-adaptive system accordingly. A human stakeholder may be involved to support the learning process and adjust the learning and goal models. We present a general architecture for lifelong self-adaptation and apply it to the case of drift of adaptation spaces that affects the decision-making in self-adaptation. We validate the approach for a series of scenarios with a drift of adaptation spaces using the DeltaIoT exemplar.

Large Language Models (LLMs), with their abilities in knowledge acquisition and reasoning, can potentially enhance the various aspects of Self-adaptive Systems (SAS). Yet, the potential of LLMs in SAS remains largely unexplored and ambiguous, due to the lack of literature from flagship conferences or journals in the field, such as SEAMS and TAAS. The interdisciplinary nature of SAS suggests that drawing and integrating ideas from related fields, such as software engineering and autonomous agents, could unveil innovative research directions for LLMs within SAS. To this end, this paper reports the results of a literature review of studies in relevant fields, summarizes and classifies the studies relevant to SAS, and outlines their potential to specific aspects of SAS.