Koji Yamamoto
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Koji Yamamoto has a total of 44 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Machiko Tamaki
Japan Oil Engineering Company, Limited, Tokyo 104-0054, Japan
4 shared publications- Ray Boswell
National Energy Technology Laboratory
4 shared publications - Timothy Scott Collett
United States Geological Survey
4 shared publications - Jun Yoneda
National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology
3 shared publications Takayuki Kanno
Japan Oil, Gas and Metals National Corporation, JOGMEC, 1-2-2 Hamada, Mihama-ku, Chiba-shi, Chiba 261-0025, Japan
3 shared publications- Evgeniy Myshakin Myshakin
NETL Site Support Contractor, National Energy Technology Laboratory
2 shared publications
Latest Publications
- 12 July 2022
- Published by American Chemical Society (ACS) in Energy & Fuels
- Vol. 36 (14) , 7382-7390
Sand Migration Simulation during Gas Production from Gas Hydrate Reservoir at Kuparuk 7–11–12 site in the Prodhoe Bay Unit, Alaska
- 12 July 2022
- Published by American Chemical Society (ACS) in Energy & Fuels
- Vol. 36 (14) , 7382-7390
Sand Migration Simulation during Gas Production from Gas Hydrate Reservoir at Kuparuk 7–11–12 site in the Prodhoe Bay Unit, Alaska
- 12 July 2022
- Published by American Chemical Society (ACS) in Energy & Fuels
- Vol. 36 (15) , 7921-7924
Virtual Special Issue of Recent Advances on Gas Hydrates Scientific Drilling in Alaska
- 12 July 2022
- Published by American Chemical Society (ACS) in Energy & Fuels
- Vol. 36 (15) , 7921-7924
Virtual Special Issue of Recent Advances on Gas Hydrates Scientific Drilling in Alaska
- Top Cited PapersOpen Access
- 29 April 2022
- Published by American Chemical Society (ACS) in Energy & Fuels
- Vol. 36 (10) , 5047-5062
Review of Past Gas Production Attempts from Subsurface Gas Hydrate Deposits and Necessity of Long-Term Production Testing
- 29 April 2022
- Published by American Chemical Society (ACS) in Energy & Fuels
- Vol. 36 (10) , 5047-5062
Top Cited PapersOpen AccessReview of Past Gas Production Attempts from Subsurface Gas Hydrate Deposits and Necessity of Long-Term Production Testing
- Open Access
- 27 April 2022
- Published by American Chemical Society (ACS) in Energy & Fuels
- Vol. 36 (10) , 5167-5184
Scientific Results of the Hydrate-01 Stratigraphic Test Well Program, Western Prudhoe Bay Unit, Alaska North Slope
- 27 April 2022
- Published by American Chemical Society (ACS) in Energy & Fuels
- Vol. 36 (10) , 5167-5184
Open AccessScientific Results of the Hydrate-01 Stratigraphic Test Well Program, Western Prudhoe Bay Unit, Alaska North Slope
- Open Access
- 22 February 2022
- Published by American Chemical Society (ACS) in Energy & Fuels
- Vol. 36 (5) , 2447-2461
New Insights into the Occurrence and Implications of Mobile Water in Gas Hydrate Systems
- 22 February 2022
- Published by American Chemical Society (ACS) in Energy & Fuels
- Vol. 36 (5) , 2447-2461
Open AccessNew Insights into the Occurrence and Implications of Mobile Water in Gas Hydrate Systems
- 1 January 2022
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 183-194
Gas Hydrate Drilling in the Nankai Trough, Japan
- 1 January 2022
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 183-194
Gas Hydrate Drilling in the Nankai Trough, Japan
- Open Access
- 21 December 2021
- Published by American Chemical Society (ACS) in Energy & Fuels
- Vol. 36 (1) , 210-226
Numerical History-Matching of Modeling and Actual Gas Production Behavior and Causes of the Discrepancy of the Nankai Trough Gas-Hydrate Production Test Cases
- 21 December 2021
- Published by American Chemical Society (ACS) in Energy & Fuels
- Vol. 36 (1) , 210-226
Open AccessNumerical History-Matching of Modeling and Actual Gas Production Behavior and Causes of the Discrepancy of the Nankai Trough Gas-Hydrate Production Test Cases
- Open Access
- 3 December 2021
- Published by American Chemical Society (ACS) in Energy & Fuels
- Vol. 35 (24) , 20026-20036
Comparison of the Vertical Gas-Hydrate Production Profile with the Simulation Results Obtained Using Geophysical Log-Based Reservoir Characteristics and Reasons for Their Discrepancies in the Nankai Trough
- 3 December 2021
- Published by American Chemical Society (ACS) in Energy & Fuels
- Vol. 35 (24) , 20026-20036
Open AccessComparison of the Vertical Gas-Hydrate Production Profile with the Simulation Results Obtained Using Geophysical Log-Based Reservoir Characteristics and Reasons for Their Discrepancies in the Nankai Trough
- Open Access
- 12 October 2021
- Published by Frontiers Media SA in Frontiers in Energy Research
- Vol. 9
Review of Energy Efficiency of the Gas Production Technologies From Gas Hydrate-Bearing Sediments
Even in the carbon-neutral age, natural gas will be valuable as environment-friendly fuel that can fulfill the gap between the energy demand and supply from the renewable energies. Marine gas hydrates are a potential natural gas source, but gas production from deposits requires additional heat input owing to the endothermic nature of their dissociation. The amount of fuel needed to produce a unit of energy is important to evaluate energy from economic and environmental perspectives. Using the depressurization method, the value of the energy return on investment or invested (EROI) can be increased to more than 100 for the dissociation process and to approximately 10 or more for the project life cycle that is comparable to liquefied natural gas (LNG) import. Gas transportation through an offshore pipeline from the offshore production facility can give higher EROI than floating LNG; however, the latter has an advantage of market accessibility. If the energy conversion from methane to hydrogen or ammonia at the offshore facility and carbon capture and storage (CCS) can be done at the production site, problems of carbon dioxide emission and market accessibility can be solved, and energy consumption for energy conversion and CCS should be counted to estimate the value of the hydrate resources.
- 12 October 2021
- Published by Frontiers Media SA in Frontiers in Energy Research
- Vol. 9
Open AccessReview of Energy Efficiency of the Gas Production Technologies From Gas Hydrate-Bearing Sediments
Even in the carbon-neutral age, natural gas will be valuable as environment-friendly fuel that can fulfill the gap between the energy demand and supply from the renewable energies. Marine gas hydrates are a potential natural gas source, but gas production from deposits requires additional heat input owing to the endothermic nature of their dissociation. The amount of fuel needed to produce a unit of energy is important to evaluate energy from economic and environmental perspectives. Using the depressurization method, the value of the energy return on investment or invested (EROI) can be increased to more than 100 for the dissociation process and to approximately 10 or more for the project life cycle that is comparable to liquefied natural gas (LNG) import. Gas transportation through an offshore pipeline from the offshore production facility can give higher EROI than floating LNG; however, the latter has an advantage of market accessibility. If the energy conversion from methane to hydrogen or ammonia at the offshore facility and carbon capture and storage (CCS) can be done at the production site, problems of carbon dioxide emission and market accessibility can be solved, and energy consumption for energy conversion and CCS should be counted to estimate the value of the hydrate resources.