Eirik Hugaas Ofstad

We aimed to explore 1st year residents’ responses to five different uncertainty tolerance (UT) measures, varying in their specificity to physicians a

Background: Emergency departments (EDs) provide urgent care to diverse patients. Medication-related tasks, crucial for safe diagnosis and treatment, often receive inadequate attention. Clinical pharmacists, experts in medication management, can improve outcomes and reduce costs. Objectives: To investigate how the introduction of clinical pharmacists affects ED junior physicians’ work-time distribution, with particular focus on medication-related tasks. Design: A stepped-wedge design was employed, introducing pharmacists across three Norwegian EDs over a 9-month period, with each ED starting at staggered intervals. Methods: Using the Work Observation Method By Activity Timing (WOMBAT) methodology, we observed junior physicians’ activities in three EDs. The pharmacists were encouraged to adapt to the ED setting, integrate into the team, and identify ways to apply their expertise effectively. Medication reconciliation became their primary focus. We recorded 251 h of observation in the period without pharmacists present and 287 h in the intervention period, with pharmacists present. The proportion of time spent on different tasks was compared between the two periods. Results: Junior physicians spent 81.0% of their work time on non-medication-related tasks, 11.6% on standby/movement, and 8.7% on medication-related tasks. There was no evidence that the overall time distribution was affected by the intervention. However, in ED2, the proportion of time spent on medication-related documentation was reduced from 6.1% to 2.5%, while standby time increased from 6.1% to 13% with pharmacists present. Face-to-face interactions with pharmacists accounted for less than 2% of the junior physicians’ work time in all EDs. Conclusion: In three Norwegian EDs, junior physicians’ work time was predominantly spent on non-medication-related tasks, with only 8.7% dedicated to medication-related tasks. The introduction of clinical pharmacists did not significantly impact junior physicians’ overall work-time distribution. Further research should investigate pharmacists’ impact on ED care quality and efficiency.

Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is recommended for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), but its role in primary CDI is unclear. To investigate the efficacy and safety of FMT in primary CDI. Randomized, open-label, noninferiority, multicenter trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03796650). Hospitals and primary care facilities in Norway. Adults with CDI (C difficile toxin in stool and ≥3 loose stools daily) and no previous CDI within 365 days before enrollment. FMT without antibiotic pretreatment versus oral vancomycin, 125 mg 4 times daily for 10 days. The primary end point was clinical cure (firm stools or P for noninferiority < 0.001, rejecting the hypothesis that response to FMT is 25 percentage points lower than response to vancomycin). Eleven patients in the FMT group and 4 in the vancomycin group had additional C difficile treatment. Clinical cure at day 14 and no recurrence with or without additional treatment was observed in 40 of 51 patients (78.4%) with FMT and 30 of 49 (61.2%) with vancomycin (difference, 17.2 percentage points [95.2% CI, -0.7 to 35.1 percentage points]). No significant differences in adverse events were observed between groups. Open-label design and reliance on clinical end points. FMT may be considered as first-line therapy in primary CDI. South-East Norway Health Trust.

Background: Medication lists prepared in the emergency department (ED) form the basis for diagnosing and treating patients during hospitalization. Since incomplete medication information may lead to patient harm, it is crucial to obtain a correct and complete medication list at hospital admission. In this cross-sectional retrospective study we wanted to explore medication information completeness in admission notes from Norwegian EDs and investigate which factors were associated with level of completeness. Methods: Medication information was assessed for completeness by applying five evaluation criteria; generic name, formulation, dose, frequency, and indication for use. A medication completeness score in percent was calculated per medication, per admission note and per criterion. Quantile regression analysis was applied to investigate which variables were associated with medication information completeness. Results: Admission notes for patients admitted between October 2018 and September 2019 and using at least one medication were included. A total of 1,080 admission notes, containing 8,604 medication orders, were assessed. The individual medications had a mean medication completeness score of 88.1% (SD 16.4), while admission notes had a mean medication completeness score of 86.3% (SD 16.2). Over 90% of all individual medications had information about generic name, formulation, dose and frequency stated, while indication for use was only present in 60%. The use of an electronic tool to prepare medication information had a significantly strong positive association with completeness. Hospital visit within the last 30 days, the patient’s living situation, number of medications in use, and which hospital the patient was admitted to, were also associated with information completeness. Conclusions: Medication information completeness in admission notes was high, but potential for improvement regarding documentation of indication for use was identified. Applying an electronic tool when preparing admission notes in EDs seems crucial to safeguard completeness of medication information.

15.08.2023: Leder - I høst begynner rekordmange på medisinstudiet i Norge og i LIS1-tjeneste på norske sykehus.

29.05.2023: Originalartikkel - Leger i spesialisering del 1 opplevde stor grad av medisinsk usikkerhet og brukte begrepene sikker/usikker og trygg/utrygg om hverandre.

Background Emergency department (ED) pharmacists reduce medication errors and improve quality of medication use. Patient perceptions and experiences with ED pharmacists have not been studied. The aim of this study was to explore patients’ perceptions of and experiences with medication-related activities in the ED, with and without an ED pharmacist present. Methods We conducted 24 semistructured individual interviews with patients admitted to one ED in Norway, 12 before and 12 during an intervention, where pharmacists performed medication-related tasks close to patients and in collaboration with ED staff. Interviews were transcribed and analysed applying thematic analysis. Results From our five developed themes, we identified that: (1) Our informants had low awareness and few expectations of the ED pharmacist, both with and without the pharmacist present. However, they were positive to the ED pharmacist. (2) Our informants expressed a variation of trust in the healthcare system, healthcare professionals and electronic systems, though the majority expressed a high level of trust. They believed that their medication list was automatically updated and assumed to get the correct medication. (3) Some informants felt responsible to have an overview of their medication use, while others expressed low interest in taking responsibility regarding their medication. (4) Some informants did not want involvement from healthcare professionals in medication administration, while others expressed no problems with giving up control. (5) Medication information was important for all informants to feel confident in medication use, but the need for information differed. Conclusion Despite being positive to pharmacists, it did not seem important to our informants who performed the medication-related tasks, as long as they received the help they needed. The degree of trust, responsibility, control and information varied among ED patients. These dimensions can be applied by healthcare professionals to tailor medication-related activities to patients’ individual needs.