Allison Martin

Introduction: Chronic dyspnoea is a prevalent and clinically significant symptom, often indicative of underlying cardiorespiratory disease. It is frequently under-reported by patients and under-recognised in primary care, with these challenges exacerbated in rural and remote communities where disease burden is greater and patients experience barriers to timely diagnosis and management. The BREATHE SMART trial aims to implement and evaluate an innovative, fully digital self-screening system for chronic dyspnoea, integrated into general practice workflows and information technology infrastructure. This approach seeks to enhance early detection and management of chronic cardiorespiratory conditions across diverse practice settings. Methods and analysis: This multisite proof-of-concept study will test a software platform delivering a preconsultation self-screening questionnaire across 40 general practices in urban, rural and remote Australia. The system identifies eligible patients (≥18 years, consenting to SMS communication with their practice), issues an automated SMS that administers a validated dyspnoea screening questionnaire, and summarises responses for integration into the electronic medical record. Process evaluation will assess acceptability and utility using deidentified audit data, software metrics and qualitative feedback from patients, staff and general practitioners (GPs) via surveys, interviews and focus groups. Approximately 12 000 patients will be screened over 12 months. Primary outcomes will include the proportion completing self-screening and prevalence of chronic dyspnoea and secondary outcomes will include the rate of newly diagnosed chronic dyspnoea-related conditions (ie, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and heart failure) in the preceding 12 months and during the intervention period. Ethics and dissemination: Ethics approval was granted by the University of New South Wales Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) (iRECS6645) and the University of Notre Dame Australia HREC (2024-155). Participating practices and each GP will provide written, informed consent. All patients being screened will provide electronic informed consent. Results of the study will be disseminated through various forums, including peer-reviewed publications and presentation at national and international conferences. Following the study, participating practices will be provided with a summary of the findings of the study, together with a full copy of any publications and a plain language statement for participants, which will be made available in the practices. Trial registration number: ACTRN12624001451594.

Introduction: Chronic dyspnoea is a prevalent symptom, and primary care is ideally placed to identify and manage it. However, chronic dyspnoea is under-reported by patients and can be a diagnostic dilemma for practitioners. A fully automated system of patient screening, coupled with a clinical decision support system (CDSS) that uses a validated and evidence-based dyspnoea algorithm, may improve detection, diagnosis and management of the condition. There is currently no CDSS validated for chronic dyspnoea diagnosis and management in primary care in Australia. The objectives of this study are to assess the clinical impact of a CDSS for chronic dyspnoea in primary care. We hypothesise that the use of the CDSS will lead to a clinically significant improvement in patient-reported dyspnoea scores, reduced time to diagnosis and healthcare costs at 12 months compared with standard care. Methods and analysis: The BREATHE study is an open-label, cluster-randomised controlled trial of standard of care compared with a CDSS. General practices (n=40) in metropolitan, regional/rural and rural/remote settings will be recruited and randomised equally to pre-screening for chronic dyspnoea and usual standard-of-care management or pre-screening and CDSS-guided management. The CDSS includes an algorithm derived from a robust data and clinical knowledge model and incorporates evidence-based recommendations for the assessment and management of chronic dyspnoea. It is integrated into general practice medical software systems, fitting in the workflow of general practitioners (GPs). Eligible patients will be ≥18 years old and will have previously consented to receive SMS communication from their practice. In-scope patients will receive an automated text message prior to their GP appointment and will be screened for chronic dyspnoea (≥4 weeks). Patients identified with chronic dyspnoea will be invited to participate in the BREATHE study and followed up for 12 months. The primary outcome is improvement in the Dyspnoea-12 (D-12) score from baseline to 12 months, measured by the Dyspnoea-12 (D-12) questionnaire. Secondary outcomes include disease-specific questionnaires to assess changes in clinical outcomes, time to final diagnosis, quality of life, healthcare utilisation and costs incurred to patients. Trial registration number: The trial is registered at ANZCTR (ACTRN12624001451594). ANZCTR is a primary registry that meets the requirements of the ICMJE and is listed on the ICTRP Registry Network. Ethics and dissemination: The study protocol has been approved by the University of New South Wales Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) (iRECS6645) and complies with the National Health and Medical Research Council ethical guidelines. Participating practices and each GP will provide written, informed consent. All patients being screened will provide electronic informed consent. Results of the study will be disseminated through various forums, including peer-reviewed publications and presentation at national and international conferences. Following the study, participating practices will be provided with a summary of the findings of the study, together with a full copy of any publications and a plain language statement for participants, which will be made available in the practice reception area.

Background: To explore the perspectives of GPs, non-GP specialists, and allied health professionals on the role of primary care in diagnosing and managing chronic breathlessness, the barriers faced, and the resources needed to optimise care of patients with chronic breathlessness. Methods: This was a qualitative study involving focus group discussions that included 35 GPs, non-GP specialists, and allied health professionals. Topics explored included: (1) views on the role of primary care in diagnosing and managing chronic breathlessness; (2) barriers to optimal assessment in primary care; and (3) facilitators to further optimise the care of patients with chronic breathlessness. Results: All participants considered that primary care has a central role to play in the assessment and management of chronic breathlessness, but greater access to referral services, suitable funding structures, and upskilling on the use of diagnostic tests such as spirometry and electrocardiography are required for this to be realised. Both GPs and non-GP specialists described great potential for developing better linkages, including new ways of referral and online consultations, greater ease of referral to allied health services, even if conducted virtually, for patients with functional causes of breathlessness. Participants identified a need to develop integrated breathlessness clinics for patients referred by GPs, which would ensure patients receive optimal care in the shortest possible time frame. Conclusions: GPs are crucial to achieving optimal care for breathless patients, especially given the multifactorial and multimorbid nature of breathlessness; however, there are significant gaps in services and resources at present that limit their ability to perform this role.

Introduction: Heart disease in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common but neglected comorbidity. Patients with COPD are frequently excluded from clinical trials of treatments aimed at reducing cardiac morbidity and mortality, which has led to undertreatment of cardiovascular disease in patients with COPD. A particular concern in COPD is the underuse of beta (β)-blockers. There is observational evidence that cardioselective β-blockers are safe and may even reduce mortality risk in COPD, although some evidence is conflicting. There is an urgent need to answer the research question: Are cardioselective β-blockers safe and of benefit in people with moderately severe COPD? The proposed study will investigate whether cardioselective β-blocker treatment in patients with COPD reduces mortality and cardiac and respiratory morbidity. Methods and analyses: This is a double-blind, randomised controlled trial to be conducted in approximately 26 sites in Australia, New Zealand, India, Sri Lanka and other countries as required. Participants with COPD will be randomised to either bisoprolol once daily (range 1.25–5 mg, dependent on tolerated dose) or matched placebo, in addition to receiving usual care for their COPD over the study duration of 24 months. The study will enrol 1164 participants with moderate to severe COPD, aged 40–85 years. Participants will be symptomatic from their COPD and have a postbronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV ₁ ) ≥30% and ≤70% predicted and a history of at least one exacerbation requiring systemic corticosteroids, antibiotics or both in the prior 24 months. Ethics and dissemination: The study protocol has been approved by the Sydney Local Health District Human Research Ethics Committee at The Concord Repatriation General Hospital. Trial registration numbers: NCT03917914 ; CTRI/2020/08/027322.

Background Clinical trials are an important research method for improving medical knowledge and patient care. Multiple international and national guidelines stipulate the need for data quality and assurance. Many strategies and interventions are developed to reduce error in trials, including standard operating procedures, personnel training, data monitoring, and design of case report forms. However, guidelines are nonspecific in the nature and extent of necessary methods. Objective This article gathers information about current data quality tools and procedures used within Australian clinical trial sites, with the aim to develop standard data quality monitoring procedures to ensure data integrity. Methods Relevant information about data quality management methods and procedures, error levels, data monitoring, staff training, and development were collected. Staff members from 142 clinical trials listed on the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) clinical trials Web site were invited to complete a short self-reported semiquantitative anonymous online survey. Results Twenty (14%) clinical trials completed the survey. Results from the survey indicate that procedures to ensure data quality varies among clinical trial sites. Centralized monitoring (65%) was the most common procedure to ensure high-quality data. Ten (50%) trials reported having a data management plan in place and two sites utilized an error acceptance level to minimize discrepancy, set at <5% and 5 to 10%, respectively. The quantity of data variables checked (10–100%), the frequency of visits (once-a-month to annually), and types of variables (100%, critical data or critical and noncritical data audits) for data monitoring varied among respondents. The average time spent on staff training per person was 11.58 hours over a 12-month period and the type of training was diverse. Conclusion Clinical trial sites are implementing ad hoc methods pragmatically to ensure data quality. Findings highlight the necessity for further research into “standard practice” focusing on developing and implementing publicly available data quality monitoring procedures.