David W. Roberts

Commercial nonionic surfactants are multicomponent mixtures, typically derived from ethoxylation of a primary alcohol that may be a mixture of homologues and isomers with a range of degrees of ethoxylation. Daphnia magna and Vibrio fischeri toxicity data have been obtained for several nonionic surfactants, covering a wide range of average degrees of ethoxylation and parent alcohol structure, including both narrow-range and broad-range ethoxamer distributions. These data are analyzed by means of a general narcosis quantitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR) based on calculated log P values together with mixture toxicity equations. In some cases not all components are sufficiently soluble to make their full toxic contributions. An approach for identifying such components and for taking their reduced toxic contributions into account is derived from previously published structure-solubility relationships and validated against the experimental toxicity data.

It has long been recognized that skin sensitizers either are electrophilic or can be activated to electrophilic species. Several nonanimal assays for skin sensitization are based on this premise. In the course of a project to update dermal sensitization thresholds (DST), we found a substantial number of sensitizers, with no electrophilic or pro-electrophilic alerts, that could be simply explained in terms of the sensitizer acting as a nucleophile. In some cases, the nucleophilic center is a sulfur or phosphorus atom, while in others, it is an aromatic carbon atom. For carbon-centered nucleophiles, a quantitative mechanistic model based on a combination of Hammett σ⁺ and logP values has been derived. This has been applied to rationalize several groups of known sensitizers with no electrophilic or pro-electrophilic alerts, including anacardic acids and cardols, which are known human sensitizers associated with, inter alia, cashew nut oil, mango, and Ginkgo biloba. The possibility of nucleophilic sensitization needs to be considered when evaluating new chemicals for skin sensitization potential and potency by nonanimal assays, particularly those based on the premise that skin sensitization is dependent upon reactions of electrophiles with skin protein-based nucleophiles.

The surfactant sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS), although consistently positive in the murine local lymph node assay (LLNA) for skin sensitization, shows no evidence of being a human sensitizer and is often described as a false positive, lacking structural alerts for sensitization. However, there is evidence of the cinnamyl sulfate anion being the metabolite responsible for the sensitization potential of cinnamyl alcohol to humans and in animal tests. Here, manufacturing chemistry data and physical organic chemistry principles are applied to confirm that SLS is not reactive enough to sensitize, whereas sensitization to cinnamyl alcohol via cinnamyl sulfate is plausible. Sensitization data for several other primary alcohols, including geraniol, farnesol, and possibly hydrocortisone, are also consistent with this mechanism. It seems possible that biosulfation may play a wider role than has previously been recognized in skin sensitization.

Background: Several methyl esters of sulphonic acids are listed in murine local lymph node assay (LLNA) databases, with dose-response data and EC3 values. However, some of these entries are questionable-in one case the chemical tested is not the chemical named in the databases and in others the EC3 value has been derived by extrapolation from data that do not meet the applicability criteria for the approved extrapolation method. Objectives: To consider how LLNA data came to be attributed to the wrong chemical and to address the inappropriate extrapolated EC3 values. Methods: Dose-response data for methyl hexadec-3-enesulphonate (wrongly named as methyl hexadec-1-enesulphonate), two other methyl sulphonates and hexadec-1-ene-1,3-sultone are re-evaluated using the single dose probit extrapolation method (SDPEM). The different reaction chemistry profiles of methyl hexadec-3-enesulphonate and methyl hexadec-1-enesulphonate are discussed.Results: Extrapolated EC3 values for hexadec-1-ene-1,3-sultone are the same by both methods but for the methyl sulphonates the differences are substantial. Conclusions: Current databases should be corrected and further analysed to identify other cases where EC3 values are likely to be unreliable due to inappropriate estimation by extrapolation.

Structurally similar phytochemical compounds may elicit markedly different skin sensitization responses. Eugenol and isoeugenol are natural phenylpropanoids found in various essential oils are frequently used as fragrance ingredients in consumer products due to their pleasing aromatic properties. Both compounds are also skin sensitizers with isoeugenol being a stronger sensitizer than eugenol. The most commonly accepted mechanisms for haptenation by eugenol involve formation of a quinone methide or an ortho-quinone intermediate. The mechanism for the increased skin response to isoeugenol remains elusive, although quinone methide intermediates have been proposed. The recent identification of diastereomeric 7,4'-oxyneolignans as electrophilic, thiol-depleting isoeugenol derivatives has revived interest in the possible role of elusive reactive intermediates associated with the isoeugenol's haptenation process. In the present work, integrated non-animal skin sensitization methods were performed to determine the ability of syn-7,4'-oxyneolignan to promote haptenation and activation of further molecular pathways in keratinocytes and dendritic cells, confirming it as a candidate skin sensitizer. Kinetic NMR spectroscopic studies using dansyl cysteamine (DCYA) confirmed the first ordered nature of the nucleophilic addition for the syn-7,4'-oxyneolignan. Computational studies reaffirmed the "syn" stereochemistry of the isolated 7,4'-oxyneolignans along with that of their corresponding DCYA adducts and provided evidence for the preferential stereoselectivity. A plausible rationale for isoeugenol's strong skin sensitization is proposed based on the formation of a hydroxy quinone methide as a reactive intermediate rather than the previously assumed quinone methide.

The direct peptide reactivity assay (DPRA) is an OECD test guideline method that aims to determine if a chemical is reactive enough to be a skin sensitiser. It involves incubation of the test chemical at 5 mMolar concentration for 24 h with a cysteine-based peptide at 0.5 mMolar concentration and measurement of the percentage depletion (DP) of the peptide. The kinetic direct peptide reactivity assay (kDPRA) is derived from the DPRA and involves incubating the peptide with the test chemical at a range of concentrations and incubation times to produce a data matrix of DP values, which is analysed to give a reactivity parameter logk_max that assigns chemicals to the 1A potency class (high potency) if logk_max reaches the threshold value of −2. Here the DPRA, with a threshold of 47% DP, is compared against the kDPRA for their abilities to distinguish between the 1A and non-1A potency classes. It is found that they perform very similarly against a dataset of 157 chemicals with known potency, with only marginal differences in predictive performance. The thresholds of −2.0 (kDPRA) and 47% DP (DPRA) to distinguish 1A sensitisers are not scientific absolutes but the best compromises for a heterogenous set of data containing classes of chemicals for which different thresholds would be applicable. It is concluded that although the kDPRA represents a major advance towards predicting skin sensitisation potency on a continuous basis without animal testing, it offers no significant advantage over the DPRA for the purpose of 1A classification.