David Eilam

In both humans and other animals, home demonstrates a typical functional organization, as well as behavioral and cognitive perspectives. It is an extension of individual space and accordingly reflects the identity and personification of its inhabitants. Beyond its role as a place of comfort, rest, and intimacy, home functions as a hub and anchor for traveling away from it, organizing patterns of movement, routines, and spatial memories. These, altogether, form a living range that may be considered an extension of home. Indeed, the traits of home manifest across multiple scales, ranging from the individual’s home to hometown, homeland, and, ultimately, Earth itself. Finally, the concept of home is also relevant in both homeless humans and animals that develop behavioral home substitutes under conditions of transience, mobility, or displacement. Collectively, the concept of home-at-large reveals notable similarities and a convergence of home-related behaviors between human and nonhuman species.

Hatching captive barn owl chicks underwent four developmental phases. In the first 10 days (phase 1), behavior consisted of lateral movements that gradually changed to forward progression and peaked a few days before and after eye-opening. This behavior resembled a general developmental pattern that characterizes other vertebrates. Chicks also underwent a postural change, from head bent underneath the ventrum to resting on the rear end of the trunk with the head lifted in the air. Then, once their eyes were opened, chicks became more stationary and preoccupied with visual exploration, manifested in lateral head movements and peering episodes (phase 2, until day 20). The latter behavior, which is also typical of mature owls when not on the wing, characterized the chicks’ behavior after post-hatching day 20 (phase 3), when their flight and contour feathers grew, along with shedding the down plumage and standing tall. Development culminated in active flight, first observed by days 50–60 (phase 4). Altogether, during post-hatching development, barn owl chicks gradually shifted from egg posture to the adult upright body posture. At the same time, their behavior consisted of speciation from the general developmental pattern to the typical stationary barn owl behavior, and, finally, flight was incorporated.

Objectives: We aimed to examine the relationships between body mass index (BMI) and metabolic syndrome (MS) components as a function of age and gender across weight categories. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 19,328 subjects who participated in a health-screening program. We analyzed 14,093 apparently healthy subjects with a BMI ≥ 18.5 kg/m² (ranging from 18.5 to 46 kg/m²). Results: At a BMI of 18.5 kg/m², 16% of subjects had one or more MS components (MS ≥ 1). The number of MS components increased linearly with BMI. The most prevalent components for MS1-4 were hypertension (in men) and increased waist circumference (in women). Among 6391 non-obese subjects with MS = 0, there was a linear increase in blood pressure, glucose, and triglycerides, as well as a decline in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, as BMI increased. In 2087 subjects with a BMI ≥ 30 kg/m², a true normometabolic state (MS = 0) was observed in only 7.5%, declining to less than 1% at a BMI ≥ 36 kg/m² (ATP criteria). Women were metabolically protected relative to men between the ages of 30 and 50 years. Conclusions: (A) MS components increase linearly with BMI from the lowest normal BMI and continue to increase with age and BMI; (B) metabolically healthy obesity is rare in subjects with a high BMI and declines with age; (C) hypertension is the most common component in men; and (D) in women, MS components are seen at older ages than in men for the same BMI. Metabolic health declines with age and BMI in nearly all subjects with obesity.

Since traveling in nature involves encountering various vertical structures, integration of horizontal and vertical spatial information is required. One form of such integration is to use information acquired in one plane for spatial navigation in another plane. Here we tested whether rats and ants that learned a reward location in a horizontal maze could utilize this information when the maze was rotated to a vertical orientation and vice versa. Rats that were trained in a horizontal Y-maze required more time to reach the reward when the maze was vertically rotated, but they were more accurate in choosing the correct arm. In contrast, rats tested in a horizontal maze after being trained in a vertical maze were less accurate but reached the reward faster. Changes after maze rotation were moderate and non-significant in ants, perhaps since the number of ants arriving at the reward increased over trials, diminishing the effect of maze rotation in ants compared to rats. According to the notion that horizontal spatial information is encoded in more detail than vertical information, the slow performance of rats in the vertical domain could be due to a more physically demanding task whereas their accuracy was due to a preceding detailed horizontal encoding. In contrast, rats in the vertical maze could gather less detailed information and therefore were less accurate in subsequent horizontal trials, where the lower energy cost enabled them to swiftly correct wrong choices. Altogether, the present results provide an indication for transferring spatial information between horizontal and vertical dimensions.

We tested rats on a ‘bi-level open-field’ whose two halves were separated vertically by an 8-cm step that the rats could easily ascend/descend. We sought to determine what might be the factors that shape traveling in three-dimensional environments; what makes an environment perceived as multileveled; and how are multileveled environments explored compared to two-dimensional environments? We found that rats on the bi-level open-field traveled a greater distance on the lower level compared to the upper one. They also spent a long time at the foot of the step before ascending to the upper level. They established a home-base on one level and a local base on the other one, and explored each level separately. We could not find a particular factor that accounted for the preference for the lower level. We suggest that the momentary egocentric sensation of moving vertically, together with an overall area large enough for exploration, result in perceiving an environment as multilevel. Exploration of such environments is fragmented, and each level is explored relatively independently, as has also been shown in other studies. Regarding the unanswered question of earlier studies concerning what integrates fragmented representations, this is the first study that suggests that in rats, and perhaps also in other rodent species, such integration is achieved by means of home-base behavior, resulting in the establishment of a single comprehensive representation of the multilevel environment.

We directly tested whether, when given the choice to ascend or descend, rodents would favor traveling downwards or upwards. The test incorporated different rodent species that dwell in different habitats and display different life and motor styles. Testing was performed in a three-dimensional Y-maze in which the basis was horizontal and, by rotating it, one arm of the maze could be pointing upwards at a certain angle and the other arm pointed downwards at the same angle. All the tested species displayed a general preference for descent, with rodents from complex habitats being less affected by inclination compared with rodents from flatlands. Unlike laboratory rats, wild species traveled greater distances along the lower compared to the upper maze arm. All the rodents initially tended to travel the entire length of the inclined maze arms, but such complete trips decreased with the increase in inclination. When introduced into the maze from top or bottom, flatland dwellers traveled mainly in the entry arm. Overall, when given the choice to ascend or descend, all the tested species displayed a preference to descend, perhaps as attraction to the ground, where they usually have their burrows.

Dwelling in a specific habitat requires adaptation to the habitat physical and biological properties in order to maximize fitness. Adaptations that are manifested in the organization of behavior in time and space reflect how the environment is perceived and utilized. Testing species from different habitats in the same laboratory environment can uncover the differences in their behavior and their adaptations to specific habitats. The question posed in this study is that of how two rodent species, one occupying flatlands (Tristram’s jird; Meriones tristrami) and the other occupying structured rocky habitats (common spiny mouse; Acomys dimidiatus), differ in the way that they explore the same three-dimensional laboratory environment. Individuals of these two species were introduced into an arena with a five-level ziggurat in the center, and their behavior was followed for 60 min. We found that both species preserved the typical spatiotemporal rodents’ behavior of establishing a home-base—a location that is a terminal from which they set out to explore the environment. However, the jirds, which live in flatlands, mainly travelled on the arena floor and the lower levels of the ziggurat; while, in contrast, the spiny mice, which live in rocky habitats and are used to climbing, mostly remained and travelled on the ziggurat, with some of them hardly descending to the arena floor. We suggest that the distinction in spatial behavior between the two species reflects their different motor abilities, different depth perception, and different umvelt (perceived world), in accordance with their different natural habitats.