Einar Ringø
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Einar Ringø has a total of 213 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Mohamed Ashour
Fish Resources Research Center, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia
7 shared publications - Rolf Erik Olsen
Department of Biology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NO-7491, Trondheim, Norway
5 shared publications - Srirengaraj Vijayaram
Xiamen Key Laboratory for Feed Quality Testing and Safety Evaluation , Fisheries College, Jimei University , Xiamen , China
5 shared publications - Ehab El-Haroun
Department of Integrative Agriculture, College of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, United Arab Emirates University, P.O. Box 15551, Al Ain, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
4 shared publications Hien Van Doan
Department of Animal and Aquatic Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
4 shared publications- Hien Van Doan
Department of Animal and Aquatic Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Functional Feed Innovation Center (Funcfeed), Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
4 shared publications
Latest Publications
- 10 September 2026
- Published by Wiley in Reviews in Aquaculture
- Vol. 18 (4)
Dietary Components Modulate the Gut Microbiota of Farmed Fish: Advances from the past Decade
The composition of fish gut microbiota has direct implications for aquaculture productivity as alterations in these microbes profoundly affect several physiological functions of the fish. Nowadays, aquaculture feeding strategies increasingly shift from animal‐derived diets toward more sustainable plant‐based diets; understanding how the influence of a specific dietary component on fish gut microbiota has become increasingly important. Furthermore, the advancement of microbial genome sequencing technologies provides more comprehensive information on the effects of various dietary components on the gut microbiota of fish. Changes in these macronutrients and micronutrients can disrupt the eubiosis, gradually leading to dysbiosis by selectively enriching microbial guilds with distinct metabolic capacities, ultimately affecting the host‐microbial interaction, gut homeostasis, and overall fish health. Mostly, animal‐derived proteins and marine oils often favour the growth of bacteria that can metabolize proteins and lipids, whereas plant‐based proteins support the growth of bacteria that can ferment complex carbohydrates to produce beneficial metabolites, including short‐chain fatty acids. Feed additives are important to modulate the gut microbiota of fish via enhancing the abundance of beneficial bacterial species. Therefore, formulating aquafeeds by targeting on promoting the growth of beneficial gut microbiota and assessing the value of feed ingredients via considering the gut homeostasis indices seems useful. This review upgrades our knowledge on how dietary components interact and regulate the gut microbiota, ultimately influencing overall fish performance. Designing next‐generation aquafeeds and developing precision nutrition for the fish and their microbiota using advanced omics and artificial intelligence technologies to develop climate‐resilient fish farming is crucial.
- 10 September 2026
- Published by Wiley in Reviews in Aquaculture
- Vol. 18 (4)
Dietary Components Modulate the Gut Microbiota of Farmed Fish: Advances from the past Decade
The composition of fish gut microbiota has direct implications for aquaculture productivity as alterations in these microbes profoundly affect several physiological functions of the fish. Nowadays, aquaculture feeding strategies increasingly shift from animal‐derived diets toward more sustainable plant‐based diets; understanding how the influence of a specific dietary component on fish gut microbiota has become increasingly important. Furthermore, the advancement of microbial genome sequencing technologies provides more comprehensive information on the effects of various dietary components on the gut microbiota of fish. Changes in these macronutrients and micronutrients can disrupt the eubiosis, gradually leading to dysbiosis by selectively enriching microbial guilds with distinct metabolic capacities, ultimately affecting the host‐microbial interaction, gut homeostasis, and overall fish health. Mostly, animal‐derived proteins and marine oils often favour the growth of bacteria that can metabolize proteins and lipids, whereas plant‐based proteins support the growth of bacteria that can ferment complex carbohydrates to produce beneficial metabolites, including short‐chain fatty acids. Feed additives are important to modulate the gut microbiota of fish via enhancing the abundance of beneficial bacterial species. Therefore, formulating aquafeeds by targeting on promoting the growth of beneficial gut microbiota and assessing the value of feed ingredients via considering the gut homeostasis indices seems useful. This review upgrades our knowledge on how dietary components interact and regulate the gut microbiota, ultimately influencing overall fish performance. Designing next‐generation aquafeeds and developing precision nutrition for the fish and their microbiota using advanced omics and artificial intelligence technologies to develop climate‐resilient fish farming is crucial.
- Open Access
- 23 June 2026
- Published by Scilight Press Pty Ltd in Aquatic Life and Ecosystems
- Vol. 2 (2)
Ecological Basis and Aquaculture Use of Copepods as Live Feed with Emphasis on Nutritional Value, Production Constraints, and Future Directions
Copepods are a good live feed for aquaculture because they feed a variety of fish and crustacean larvae. Their roles in larviculture are explained by their ecological role in the transfer of energy from primary producers to higher trophic levels. Copepods exhibit higher levels of protein, amino acid profiles, digestive enzymes, and essential fatty acids, such as docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), which are critical for larval growth, neural development, stress resilience, and survival, when compared to conventional live feeds like rotifers and Artemia nauplii. Despite all of these advantages, copepod use is constrained by significant production constraints. Complex life cycles, sensitivity to environmental changes, changes in the nutritional makeup of algal diets, and difficulties achieving reliable high-density production are some of the difficulties that mass culture faces. The persistent obstacles continue to restrict their widespread commercial use. This review summarizes what is currently known about the ecological importance of copepods, assesses their nutritional value and production limitations, and suggests important lines of inquiry to improve their widespread use as sustainable live feed in aquaculture.
- 23 June 2026
- Published by Scilight Press Pty Ltd in Aquatic Life and Ecosystems
- Vol. 2 (2)
Open AccessEcological Basis and Aquaculture Use of Copepods as Live Feed with Emphasis on Nutritional Value, Production Constraints, and Future Directions
Copepods are a good live feed for aquaculture because they feed a variety of fish and crustacean larvae. Their roles in larviculture are explained by their ecological role in the transfer of energy from primary producers to higher trophic levels. Copepods exhibit higher levels of protein, amino acid profiles, digestive enzymes, and essential fatty acids, such as docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), which are critical for larval growth, neural development, stress resilience, and survival, when compared to conventional live feeds like rotifers and Artemia nauplii. Despite all of these advantages, copepod use is constrained by significant production constraints. Complex life cycles, sensitivity to environmental changes, changes in the nutritional makeup of algal diets, and difficulties achieving reliable high-density production are some of the difficulties that mass culture faces. The persistent obstacles continue to restrict their widespread commercial use. This review summarizes what is currently known about the ecological importance of copepods, assesses their nutritional value and production limitations, and suggests important lines of inquiry to improve their widespread use as sustainable live feed in aquaculture.
- Open Access
- 1 March 2026
- Published by KEAI Publishing in Aquaculture and Fisheries
- Vol. 11 (2) , 232-241
Natural antioxidants to extend the shelf-life of seafood: A mini review
- 1 March 2026
- Published by KEAI Publishing in Aquaculture and Fisheries
- Vol. 11 (2) , 232-241
Open AccessNatural antioxidants to extend the shelf-life of seafood: A mini review
- 7 February 2026
- Published by Springer Nature in Current Microbiology
- Vol. 83 (3) , 162
Advancing Aquaculture Health and Efficiency: A Comprehensive Update on Synbiotic Applications in Fish and Shellfish Farming
- 7 February 2026
- Published by Springer Nature in Current Microbiology
- Vol. 83 (3) , 162
Advancing Aquaculture Health and Efficiency: A Comprehensive Update on Synbiotic Applications in Fish and Shellfish Farming
- Open Access
- 1 January 2026
- Published by Wiley in Aquaculture Nutrition
- Vol. 2026 (1)
Nutritional Impacts of Arthrospira platensis Nanoparticles on Growth, Intestinal and Liver Histology, Antioxidant Status, and Immunological Response in Mullet ( Mugil cephalus )
This study investigates the impact of dietary supplementation with nanoparticles of Arthrospira platensis (previously known as Spirulina platensis ) on the performance of the mullet Mugil cephalus during a 63‐day feeding trial. Fish (14.75 ± 0.23 g/fish) were randomly distributed into five groups of 30 fish per hapa, with three replicates per group. Five experimental diets were prepared to assess nano‐ A. platensis supplementation at three inclusion levels: 0.5, 5, and 10 g/kg (SN 0.05% , SN 0.5% , and SN 1% ). Two control groups were included for comparison: a negative control without additives (S 0% ) and a positive control with 1% non‐nanoform A. platensis (S 1% ). Among all SN groups, the fish fed the SN 0.05% diet showed significant ( p ≤ 0.05) values for final weight (FW), specific growth rate (SGR), weight gain (WG), feed conversion ratio (FCR), protein efficiency ratio (PER), and feed efficiency ratio (FER). Also, the middle intestine showed marked improvements ( p ≤ 0.05) in villus height and width, muscularis mucosa thickness, and the number of goblet cells when fish were fed the various SN levels or the S 1% diet. Moreover, fish treated with A. platensis nanoparticles showed a noticeable enhancement in hepatic histomorphology, with the SN 0.05% group exhibiting the most intact hepatic structure. However, the S 0% diet had the highest alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) compared to other diets supplemented with different A. platensis levels. No significant difference ( p > 0.05) in albumin levels was observed. Non‐nano A. platensis improved immunoglobulin M (IgM) activity compared with the control (S 0% ). The nanoform diets resulted in the highest lysozyme (LYZ) activity, with the SN 0.05% treatment showing the highest values of all groups. Fish fed A. platensis , either as nanoparticles or in its non‐nano form, showed significantly lower triglyceride and cholesterol levels ( p ≤ 0.05) than those that were fed the control diet (S 0% ). Additionally, all diets containing either nano‐ or non‐nanoform A. platensis (SN 0.05% , SN 0.5% , SN 1% , and S 1% ) resulted in increased activities of glutathione peroxidase (GPx), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and catalase (CAT), alongside decreased malondialdehyde (MDA) levels, in comparison to S 0 %. In general, our findings showed that A. platensis nanoparticles improve M. cephalus growth performance, intestinal and hepatic histomorphology, immune response, feed utilization, and antioxidant enzyme activity. Therefore, nano‐ A. platensis could be an efficient feed additive for M. cephalus , making mullet farming more environmentally friendly and cost‐effective.
- 1 January 2026
- Published by Wiley in Aquaculture Nutrition
- Vol. 2026 (1)
Open AccessNutritional Impacts of Arthrospira platensis Nanoparticles on Growth, Intestinal and Liver Histology, Antioxidant Status, and Immunological Response in Mullet ( Mugil cephalus )
This study investigates the impact of dietary supplementation with nanoparticles of Arthrospira platensis (previously known as Spirulina platensis ) on the performance of the mullet Mugil cephalus during a 63‐day feeding trial. Fish (14.75 ± 0.23 g/fish) were randomly distributed into five groups of 30 fish per hapa, with three replicates per group. Five experimental diets were prepared to assess nano‐ A. platensis supplementation at three inclusion levels: 0.5, 5, and 10 g/kg (SN 0.05% , SN 0.5% , and SN 1% ). Two control groups were included for comparison: a negative control without additives (S 0% ) and a positive control with 1% non‐nanoform A. platensis (S 1% ). Among all SN groups, the fish fed the SN 0.05% diet showed significant ( p ≤ 0.05) values for final weight (FW), specific growth rate (SGR), weight gain (WG), feed conversion ratio (FCR), protein efficiency ratio (PER), and feed efficiency ratio (FER). Also, the middle intestine showed marked improvements ( p ≤ 0.05) in villus height and width, muscularis mucosa thickness, and the number of goblet cells when fish were fed the various SN levels or the S 1% diet. Moreover, fish treated with A. platensis nanoparticles showed a noticeable enhancement in hepatic histomorphology, with the SN 0.05% group exhibiting the most intact hepatic structure. However, the S 0% diet had the highest alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) compared to other diets supplemented with different A. platensis levels. No significant difference ( p > 0.05) in albumin levels was observed. Non‐nano A. platensis improved immunoglobulin M (IgM) activity compared with the control (S 0% ). The nanoform diets resulted in the highest lysozyme (LYZ) activity, with the SN 0.05% treatment showing the highest values of all groups. Fish fed A. platensis , either as nanoparticles or in its non‐nano form, showed significantly lower triglyceride and cholesterol levels ( p ≤ 0.05) than those that were fed the control diet (S 0% ). Additionally, all diets containing either nano‐ or non‐nanoform A. platensis (SN 0.05% , SN 0.5% , SN 1% , and S 1% ) resulted in increased activities of glutathione peroxidase (GPx), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and catalase (CAT), alongside decreased malondialdehyde (MDA) levels, in comparison to S 0 %. In general, our findings showed that A. platensis nanoparticles improve M. cephalus growth performance, intestinal and hepatic histomorphology, immune response, feed utilization, and antioxidant enzyme activity. Therefore, nano‐ A. platensis could be an efficient feed additive for M. cephalus , making mullet farming more environmentally friendly and cost‐effective.
- Open Access
- 1 January 2026
- Published by Royal Academic Press LLC in Animal Reports
- Vol. 2 (1) , 105-139
Natural antibacterial compounds from aquatic animals for controlling fish pathogenic bacteria: Mechanisms, efficacy, and prospects for sustainable aquaculture
Aquaculture faces escalating bacterial disease burdens and mounting antimicrobial resistance (AMR) driven by intensive production and extensive antibiotic use, threatening animal health, productivity, and One Health security. This review synthesizes current knowledge on natural antibacterial compounds derived from aquatic animals, with a primary focus on antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) and related metabolites from finfish, crustaceans, mollusks, echinoderms, gastropods, cnidarians, and other invertebrates. After outlining the global status of major Gram-negative and Gram-positive fish and shellfish pathogens, their infection routes, and the limitations of conventional control measures, the review critically examines skin mucus, serum and organ factors, hemolymph-derived AMPs, tissue lectins, and non protein bioactives such as chitin, chitosan, and carotenoids. Particular emphasis is placed on cationic, α helical AMPs (≈350 reported from aquatic invertebrates) that exhibit broad-spectrum activity against Vibrio spp., Aeromonas spp., Streptococcus spp., Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, and Salmonella through membrane disruption, intracellular targeting, and immunomodulation, often with lower resistance propensity than conventional antibiotics. Less conventional sources, including echinoderms, gastropods, and cnidarians, are highlighted for their structurally diverse peptides, saponins, and microbiome-derived metabolites that show promising in vitro and in vivo efficacy and compatibility with saline environments. The review further discusses omics driven discovery, bioinformatics-guided peptide design, and biotechnological production (recombinant systems, synthetic analogs, and valorization of processing by products) as key enablers for scale up and standardization. Finally, major challenges—variability of natural sources, cost, regulatory hurdles, safety, and environmental fate—are evaluated alongside research and policy priorities needed to translate aquatic-animal-derived antibacterials into integrated, commercially viable tools for sustainable, antibiotic sparing aquaculture.
- 1 January 2026
- Published by Royal Academic Press LLC in Animal Reports
- Vol. 2 (1) , 105-139
Open AccessNatural antibacterial compounds from aquatic animals for controlling fish pathogenic bacteria: Mechanisms, efficacy, and prospects for sustainable aquaculture
Aquaculture faces escalating bacterial disease burdens and mounting antimicrobial resistance (AMR) driven by intensive production and extensive antibiotic use, threatening animal health, productivity, and One Health security. This review synthesizes current knowledge on natural antibacterial compounds derived from aquatic animals, with a primary focus on antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) and related metabolites from finfish, crustaceans, mollusks, echinoderms, gastropods, cnidarians, and other invertebrates. After outlining the global status of major Gram-negative and Gram-positive fish and shellfish pathogens, their infection routes, and the limitations of conventional control measures, the review critically examines skin mucus, serum and organ factors, hemolymph-derived AMPs, tissue lectins, and non protein bioactives such as chitin, chitosan, and carotenoids. Particular emphasis is placed on cationic, α helical AMPs (≈350 reported from aquatic invertebrates) that exhibit broad-spectrum activity against Vibrio spp., Aeromonas spp., Streptococcus spp., Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, and Salmonella through membrane disruption, intracellular targeting, and immunomodulation, often with lower resistance propensity than conventional antibiotics. Less conventional sources, including echinoderms, gastropods, and cnidarians, are highlighted for their structurally diverse peptides, saponins, and microbiome-derived metabolites that show promising in vitro and in vivo efficacy and compatibility with saline environments. The review further discusses omics driven discovery, bioinformatics-guided peptide design, and biotechnological production (recombinant systems, synthetic analogs, and valorization of processing by products) as key enablers for scale up and standardization. Finally, major challenges—variability of natural sources, cost, regulatory hurdles, safety, and environmental fate—are evaluated alongside research and policy priorities needed to translate aquatic-animal-derived antibacterials into integrated, commercially viable tools for sustainable, antibiotic sparing aquaculture.
- Open Access
- 16 October 2025
- Published by Walter de Gruyter GmbH in Annals of Animal Science
Antibiotic alternative treatment methods in shrimp aquaculture
Shrimp aquaculture is a key element of the global seafood sector. However, outbreaks related to bacterial and viral infections pose a serious threat to its productivity and sustainability. While the application of antibiotics has been a long-standing practice of combating these infections, their uncontrolled use has led to antimicrobial resistance, ecological disturbance, and perturbation of the beneficial microbiota. This review critically examines current antibiotic alternatives in shrimp aquaculture, with a particular focus on strategies targeting viral diseases. Emphasis is placed on biological approaches – using probiotics, prebiotics, immunostimulants, phytobiotics (e.g., herbal extracts & essential oils), and dietary interventions – as well as emerging technologies including nanotechnology and phage therapy. By synthesizing recent research, the review highlights eco-friendly, effective methods for enhancing shrimp health and disease resistance. It aims to bridge existing gaps in shrimp immunoprophylaxis and offer a framework for sustainable, antibiotic-free disease management in aquaculture.
- 16 October 2025
- Published by Walter de Gruyter GmbH in Annals of Animal Science
Open AccessAntibiotic alternative treatment methods in shrimp aquaculture
Shrimp aquaculture is a key element of the global seafood sector. However, outbreaks related to bacterial and viral infections pose a serious threat to its productivity and sustainability. While the application of antibiotics has been a long-standing practice of combating these infections, their uncontrolled use has led to antimicrobial resistance, ecological disturbance, and perturbation of the beneficial microbiota. This review critically examines current antibiotic alternatives in shrimp aquaculture, with a particular focus on strategies targeting viral diseases. Emphasis is placed on biological approaches – using probiotics, prebiotics, immunostimulants, phytobiotics (e.g., herbal extracts & essential oils), and dietary interventions – as well as emerging technologies including nanotechnology and phage therapy. By synthesizing recent research, the review highlights eco-friendly, effective methods for enhancing shrimp health and disease resistance. It aims to bridge existing gaps in shrimp immunoprophylaxis and offer a framework for sustainable, antibiotic-free disease management in aquaculture.
- Open Access
- 8 July 2025
- Vol. 11 (3) , 501-541
Probiotics, gut microbiota, and brain health: Exploring therapeutic pathways
The gut microbiome plays a significant role in regulating gastrointestinal (GI) function and modulating the gut–brain axis, which describes the bidirectional communication between the GI tract and the central nervous system (CNS). Its involvement in digestion, immunity, and neurophysiology is well recognized. This study offers novel insights by focusing on psychobiotics, a class of probiotics with targeted neuroactive properties. These microorganisms influence brain function through defined mechanisms, including modulation of neuroinflammation, neurotransmitter production (GABA, serotonin), regulation of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis, and vagus nerve signaling. Our work critically examines recent advances in applications of psychobiotics for neurological disorders such as Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease, multiple sclerosis, and autism spectrum disorder. By integrating evidence from microbiome research, neuroimmunology, and clinical studies, we identify promising microbial strains and mechanistic pathways with therapeutic potential. This study contributes original perspectives by highlighting underexplored microbe–host interactions and proposing targeted microbial interventions as adjuncts to conventional neurotherapies. Further research is needed to validate strain-specific effects, long-term efficacy, and safety profiles in clinical settings.
- 8 July 2025
- Vol. 11 (3) , 501-541
Open AccessProbiotics, gut microbiota, and brain health: Exploring therapeutic pathways
The gut microbiome plays a significant role in regulating gastrointestinal (GI) function and modulating the gut–brain axis, which describes the bidirectional communication between the GI tract and the central nervous system (CNS). Its involvement in digestion, immunity, and neurophysiology is well recognized. This study offers novel insights by focusing on psychobiotics, a class of probiotics with targeted neuroactive properties. These microorganisms influence brain function through defined mechanisms, including modulation of neuroinflammation, neurotransmitter production (GABA, serotonin), regulation of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis, and vagus nerve signaling. Our work critically examines recent advances in applications of psychobiotics for neurological disorders such as Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease, multiple sclerosis, and autism spectrum disorder. By integrating evidence from microbiome research, neuroimmunology, and clinical studies, we identify promising microbial strains and mechanistic pathways with therapeutic potential. This study contributes original perspectives by highlighting underexplored microbe–host interactions and proposing targeted microbial interventions as adjuncts to conventional neurotherapies. Further research is needed to validate strain-specific effects, long-term efficacy, and safety profiles in clinical settings.