Jakob Lorentzen
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Jakob Lorentzen has a total of 141 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Jens Bo Nielsen
University of Copenhagen
38 shared publications - Rasmus Feld Frisk
University of Copenhagen
10 shared publications Henrik Kirk
Department of Neuroscience and Pharmacology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
6 shared publicationsJens Bo Nielsen
Department of Neuroscience, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
5 shared publications- Lisbeth Højkjær Larsen
University of Copenhagen
5 shared publications - Svend Sparre Geertsen
Department of Nutrition, Exercise and Sports, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Neuroscience, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
5 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 16 December 2025
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. C1
Correction to: Neurorehabilitation Technologies
- 16 December 2025
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. C1
Open AccessCorrection to: Neurorehabilitation Technologies
- 25 October 2025
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 1-7
Towards Science-Based Neurorehabilitation
- 25 October 2025
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 241-255
Neurorehabilitation Technologies
- 25 October 2025
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 343-349
Afterword: Future Directions
- 25 October 2025
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 197-207
Neuroplasticity: What Is It?
- 25 October 2025
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 221-239
Neuroplasticity as a Basis for Neurorehabilitation
- 25 October 2025
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 221-239
Neuroplasticity as a Basis for Neurorehabilitation
- Open Access
- 1 February 2025
- Published by American Physiological Society in Journal of Neurophysiology
- Vol. 133 (2) , 428-439
The calcium channel blocker nimodipine inhibits spinal reflex pathways in humans
The calcium channel antagonist nimodipine significantly reduces the size of the soleus H reflex and stretch reflex in healthy individuals without affecting maximum direct motor response (Mmax) or the stretch reflex during voluntary activation. This underscores the importance of exploring nimodipine as a potential antispastic medication in the future.
- 1 February 2025
- Published by American Physiological Society in Journal of Neurophysiology
- Vol. 133 (2) , 428-439
Open AccessThe calcium channel blocker nimodipine inhibits spinal reflex pathways in humans
The calcium channel antagonist nimodipine significantly reduces the size of the soleus H reflex and stretch reflex in healthy individuals without affecting maximum direct motor response (Mmax) or the stretch reflex during voluntary activation. This underscores the importance of exploring nimodipine as a potential antispastic medication in the future.
- Open Access
- 24 April 2024
- Published by Springer Nature
Investigating the effects of nimodipine on spinal reflex measures in humans
- 24 April 2024
- Published by Springer Nature
Open AccessInvestigating the effects of nimodipine on spinal reflex measures in humans
- 1 April 2022
- Published by American Physiological Society in Journal of Neurophysiology
- Vol. 127 (4) , 1147-1158
Contribution of sensory feedback to soleus muscle activity during voluntary contraction in humans
Sensory feedback through spinal reflex pathways makes only a minor contribution to neural drive to muscles during voluntary ankle plantar flexion. This differs distinctly from observations during walking and suggests that the neural drive to ankle plantar flexors during voluntary contraction do not rely on sensory feedback through similar spinal interneuronal networks as during walking. In line with animal studies this suggests that the integration of sensory feedback in CNS is task specific.
- 1 April 2022
- Published by American Physiological Society in Journal of Neurophysiology
- Vol. 127 (4) , 1147-1158
Contribution of sensory feedback to soleus muscle activity during voluntary contraction in humans
Sensory feedback through spinal reflex pathways makes only a minor contribution to neural drive to muscles during voluntary ankle plantar flexion. This differs distinctly from observations during walking and suggests that the neural drive to ankle plantar flexors during voluntary contraction do not rely on sensory feedback through similar spinal interneuronal networks as during walking. In line with animal studies this suggests that the integration of sensory feedback in CNS is task specific.
- Open Access
- 21 December 2021
- Published by Frontiers Media SA in Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences
- Vol. 2
Neuroplasticity at Home: Improving Home-Based Motor Learning Through Technological Solutions. A Review
Background: Effective science-based motor rehabilitation requires high volume of individualized, intense physical training, which can be difficult to achieve exclusively through physical 1-on-1 sessions with a therapist. Home-based training, enhanced by technological solutions, could be a tool to help facilitate the important factors for neuroplastic motor improvements.Objectives: This review aimed to discover how the inclusion of modern information and communications technology in home-based training programs can promote key neuroplastic factors associated with motor learning in neurological disabilities and identify which challenges are still needed to overcome.Methods: We conducted a thorough literature search on technological home-based training solutions and categorized the different fundamental approaches that were used. We then analyzed how these approaches can be used to promote certain key factors of neuroplasticity and which challenges still need to be solved or require external personalized input from a therapist.Conclusions: The technological approaches to home-based training were divided into three categories: sensory stimuli training, digital exchange of information training, and telerehabilitation. Generally, some technologies could be characterized as easily applicable, which gave the opportunity to promote flexible scheduling and a larger overall training volume, but limited options for individualized variation and progression. Other technologies included individualization options through personalized feedback that might increase the training effect, but also increases the workload of the therapist. Further development of easily applicable and intelligent solutions, which can return precise feedback and individualized training suggestions, is needed to fully realize the potential of home-based training in motor learning activities.
- 21 December 2021
- Published by Frontiers Media SA in Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences
- Vol. 2
Open AccessNeuroplasticity at Home: Improving Home-Based Motor Learning Through Technological Solutions. A Review
Background: Effective science-based motor rehabilitation requires high volume of individualized, intense physical training, which can be difficult to achieve exclusively through physical 1-on-1 sessions with a therapist. Home-based training, enhanced by technological solutions, could be a tool to help facilitate the important factors for neuroplastic motor improvements.Objectives: This review aimed to discover how the inclusion of modern information and communications technology in home-based training programs can promote key neuroplastic factors associated with motor learning in neurological disabilities and identify which challenges are still needed to overcome.Methods: We conducted a thorough literature search on technological home-based training solutions and categorized the different fundamental approaches that were used. We then analyzed how these approaches can be used to promote certain key factors of neuroplasticity and which challenges still need to be solved or require external personalized input from a therapist.Conclusions: The technological approaches to home-based training were divided into three categories: sensory stimuli training, digital exchange of information training, and telerehabilitation. Generally, some technologies could be characterized as easily applicable, which gave the opportunity to promote flexible scheduling and a larger overall training volume, but limited options for individualized variation and progression. Other technologies included individualization options through personalized feedback that might increase the training effect, but also increases the workload of the therapist. Further development of easily applicable and intelligent solutions, which can return precise feedback and individualized training suggestions, is needed to fully realize the potential of home-based training in motor learning activities.