Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article


Yolanda J. McDonald has a total of 35 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Distributive Disturbances: Examining Community Exposure to Drinking Water Contaminants Amidst the Jackson, Mississippi (USA) Water Crisis

    by Ambria N. McDonald, Yolanda J. McDonald, Andrea Chow, Julia Kosinski, Dorceta E. Taylor

    Community water systems in the United States provide drinking water to more than 300 million people annually, making their reliability fundamental to public health. In regions with long histories of racial segregation and unequal infrastructure maintenance, water system failures can deepen existing environmental injustices. This study examines water quality conditions in the Jackson, Mississippi, metropolitan area following the 2022 distribution system collapse and a decade of repeated noncompliance with the Safe Drinking Water Act’s Lead and Copper Rule (LCR). Using the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s 2024 updated LCR tap sampling protocol, water samples from 29 sites were collected. Samples were analyzed for lead, copper, iron, zinc, chlorine, sulfate, pH, and total dissolved solids concentrations. Chlorine-to-sulfate mass ratios (CSMR) were also calculated to evaluate corrosion potential. Demographic surveys, statistical analyses, and geospatial visualizations were used to interpret neighborhood-level patterns. Our findings show that all sites met primary drinking water standards and complied with LCR action levels but exceeded secondary drinking water standards at 100% of study sites. Seven sites exhibited CSMR values above the threshold, indicating increased susceptibility to corrosion. These results highlight the need for targeted corrosion control, treatment optimization, and ongoing monitoring, particularly in historically marginalized communities.

  • Open Access

    Community-Based Participatory Geographic Information Systems: Informing a Long-Term Drinking Water Research Collaboration

    by Yolanda J. McDonald, Marie A. Caiola, Samantha Wyman, Eleanor Crone, Natalie N. Robbins, Mariah D. Caballero, Shamayeta Bhattacharya


  • Micro-level inequalities in plumbing completeness along the US–Mexico borderlands

    by Ricardo Rubio, Sara E. Grineski, Timothy W. Collins, Daniel E. Adkins, Yolanda J. McDonald


  • Open Access

    The water–climate nexus: Intersections across sectors

    by Thushara Gunda, Alida A. Cantor, Emily Grubert, Angela R. Harris, Yolanda J. McDonald

    Water security and climate change are important priorities for communities and regions worldwide. The intersections between water and climate change extend across many environmental and human activities. This Primer is intended as an introduction, grounded in examples, for students and others considering the interactions between climate, water, and society. In this Primer, we summarize key intersections between water and climate across four sectors: environment; drinking water, sanitation, and hygiene; food and agriculture; and energy. We begin with an overview of the fundamental water dynamics within each of these four sectors, and then discuss how climate change is impacting water and society within and across these sectors. Emphasizing the relationships and interconnectedness between water and climate change can encourage systems thinking, which can show how activities in one sector may influence activities or outcomes in other sectors. We argue that to achieve a resilient and sustainable water future under climate change, proposed solutions must consider the water–climate nexus to ensure the interconnected roles of water across sectors are not overlooked. Toward that end, we offer an initial set of guiding questions that can be used to inform the development of more holistic climate solutions.This article is categorized under: Science of Water > Water and Environmental Change Engineering Water > Water, Health, and Sanitation Human Water > Value of Water


  • Open Access

    Where You Drink Water: An Assessment of the Tennessee, USA Public Water Supply

    by Ke Jack Ding, George M. Hornberger, Elaine L. Hill, Yolanda J. McDonald

    Monitoring drinking water quality is essential to protect people’s health and wellbeing. In the United States, the Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) database records the occurrence of a drinking water violation regulation in public water systems. A notable shortcoming of SDWIS is the lack of the contaminant concentration level about the allowable maximum contaminant threshold. In this study, we take advantage of both the SDWIS violation database and the contaminants sampling database at the state level to examine the drinking water quality of all kinds of drinking water systems in detail. We obtained sampling data (i.e., the concentration level of contaminants) of public water systems (PWSs) in Tennessee and explored the statistical distribution of contaminant concentration data in relation to the enforceable maximum regulatory contaminant level). We use both SDWIS violation records and actual concentrations of contaminants from the sampling data to study the factors that influence the drinking water quality of PWSs. We find that different types of violations were more frequent in (1) specific geological regions, (2) counties with PWSs that serve a larger population (10,000 to 100,000 people), and (3) places with abundant surface water, such as near a lake or major river. Additionally, the distribution of measured concentrations for many contaminants was not smooth but was punctuated by discontinuities at selected levels, such as at 50% of the maximum contaminant level. Such anomalies in the sampling data do not indicate violations, but more investigation is needed to determine the reasons behind the punctuated changes.


  • Open Access

    A systematic review of geospatial representation of United States community water systems

    by Yolanda J. McDonald, Kayla M. Anderson, Mariah D. Caballero, Ke Jack Ding, Douglas H. Fisher, Caroline P. Morkel, Elaine L. Hill

    This study presents a state‐level systematic review of geospatial representation of Community Water Systems (CWSs) in the United States. We conducted online searches and contacted government, water industry, and academic representatives to obtain these data. CWS geospatial data were characterized by vector type, methodological approaches, data sources, availability to the public, entities involved in creation and maintenance of data, and CWS map requirements by primacy agency. We found that 24 states and the District of Columbia had geospatial representation of CWS estimated service area boundary (ESAB) (i.e., polygons), which were harmonized to construct a geospatial database representative of available CWS ESABs. Our findings aim to prompt discussion among myriad stakeholders on the need to create, standardize, and maintain CWS ESABs to ensure water justice for all communities.


  • Drinking Water Violations and Environmental Justice in the United States, 2011–2015

    by Yolanda J. McDonald, Nicole E. Jones

    Objectives. To assess the extent to which drinking water violations in the United States differed on the basis of county race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status using the primary county served by the community water system (CWS) as the unit of analysis and to determine whether counties with higher proportions of underrepresented groups were disproportionately burdened with repeat violations. Methods. We used multivariable logistic regression to calculate odds ratios of contextual environmental justice covariates associated with initial and repeat drinking water violations. We obtained violations from the federal Safe Drinking Water Information System. Results were nonstratified and stratified on the basis of population size served by the CWS. Results. Stratified multivariable logistic regression results revealed previously unobservable patterns in nonstratified findings. Minorities face significant challenges, including exposure to poor water quality. The most notable differences in both initial and repeat violations that we observed were among CWSs that serve large populations. Our most consistent finding was the positive association of initial and repeat violations with the proportion of those who were uninsured, irrespective of stratification. Conclusions. Greater efforts are needed to ensure that counties with higher proportions of minorities, uninsured households, and low-income households have access to safe drinking water, irrespective of the size of population served by the CWS.


  • Open Access

    An analysis of the process and results of manual geocode correction

    by Yolanda J. McDonald, Michael Schwind, Daniel W. Goldberg, Amanda Lampley, Cosette M. Wheeler

    Geocoding is the science and process of assigning geographical coordinates (i.e. latitude, longitude) to a postal address. The quality of the geocode can vary dramatically depending on several variables, including incorrect input address data, missing address components, and spelling mistakes. A dataset with a considerable number of geocoding inaccuracies can potentially result in an imprecise analysis and invalid conclusions. There has been little quantitative analysis of the amount of effort (i.e. time) to perform geocoding correction, and how such correction could improve geocode quality type. This study used a low-cost and easy to implement method to improve geocode quality type of an input database (i.e. addresses to be matched) through the processes of manual geocode intervention, and it assessed the amount of effort to manually correct inaccurate geocodes, reported the resulting match rate improvement between the original and the corrected geocodes, and documented the corresponding spatial shift by geocode quality type resulting from the corrections. Findings demonstrated that manual intervention of geocoding resulted in a 90% improvement of geocode quality type, took 42 hours to process, and the spatial shift ranged from 0.02 to 151,368 m. This study provides evidence to inform research teams considering the application of manual geocoding intervention that it is a low-cost and relatively easy process to execute.