Carlo De Werra

Carlo De Werra

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article

Previous Organizations / Institutes

The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years


Carlo De Werra has a total of 281 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Adherence to Guidelines for Diagnosis, Staging, and Treatment for Gastric Cancer in Italy According to the View of Surgeons and Patients

    by Manrica Fabbi, Marika Sharmayne Milani, Simone Giacopuzzi, Carlo De Werra, Franco Roviello, Claudia Santangelo, Federica Galli, Angelo Benevento, Stefano Rausei

    Background: Despite the strong declining trends in incidence and mortality over the last decades, gastric cancer (GC) is still burdened with high mortality, even in high-income countries. To improve GC prognosis, several guidelines have been increasingly published with indications about the most appropriate GC management. The Italian Society of Digestive System Pathology (SIPAD) and Gastric Cancer Italian Research Group (GIRCG) designed a survey for both surgeons and patients with the purpose of evaluating the degree of application and adherence to guidelines in GC management in Italy. Materials and Methods: Between January and May 2022, a questionnaire has been administered to a sample of Italian surgeons and, in a simplified version, to members of the Patient Association “Vivere Senza Stomaco” (patients surgically treated for GC between 2008 and 2021) to investigate the diagnosis, staging, and treatment issues. Results: The survey has been completed by 125 surgeons and 125 patients. Abdominal CT with gastric hydro-distension before treatment was not widespread in both groups (47% and 42%, respectively). The rate of surgeons stating that they do not usually perform minimally invasive gastrectomy was 15%, but the rate of patients who underwent a minimally invasive approach was 22% (between 2011 and 2022). The percentage of surgeons declaring to perform extended lymphadenectomy (>D2) was 97%, although a limited lymph node dissection rate was observed in about 35% of patients. Conclusions: This survey shows several important discrepancies from surgical attitudes declared by surgeons and real data derived from the reports available to the patients, suggesting heterogeneous management in clinical practice and, thus, a not rigorous adherence to the guidelines.


  • Open Access

    Biliary Leak from Ducts of Luschka: Systematic Review of the Literature

    by Antonio Vitiello, Maria Spagnuolo, Marcello Persico, Roberto Peltrini, Giovanna Berardi, Pietro Calabrese, Carlo De Werra, Carmela Rescigno, Roberto Troisi, Vincenzo Pilone

    Injury to the Luschka ducts (LDs), also named “subvesicular” ducts, is an under-reported cause of biliary leak following laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). A systematic literature search according to PRISMA guidelines was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library including all publications that described a bile leak from an LD. A total of 136 articles were retrieved from the searched databases. After the removal of duplicates and non-eligible papers, 48 studies reporting 231 leaks were included: 20 (41.6%) case reports, 2 (4.3%) comparative studies, 7 (14.9%) meeting abstracts and 19 (40.4%) retrospective cohort articles. The rate of LD leak ranges from 0.05% to 1.9%, but injury to a duct of Luschka was the second most common cause of biliary leakage in all the cohort studies (5.5% to 41%). In 21 (43.7%) cases, the leak was successfully treated with a sphincterotomy through Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) plus or minus stenting, and in 12 (25%), re-laparoscopy was necessary.


  • Open Access

    Gallbladder Cancer

    by Carlo de Werra, Antonio Vitiello, Roberto Peltrini, Biancamaria Iacone, Anna Tedesco, Antonio Coppola, Marcello Filotico, Bianca Pacilio, Antonio Gargiulo

    Gallbladder carcinoma is a form of cancer that develops in the gallbladder, an organ located beneath the liver. This condition poses a clinical challenge due to its late diagnosis and aggressive tumor behavior. Risk factors include the presence of gallstones, advanced age, and obesity. Diagnosis of gallbladder carcinoma requires the use of various diagnostic techniques such as ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging. Cholecystectomy, the surgical removal of the gallbladder, is the primary treatment for gallbladder carcinoma. However, management and treatment may require a multidisciplinary approach, which can also involve chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and targeted therapies. Increased awareness of this disease is necessary to improve early diagnosis and treatment options, ultimately enhancing survival rates and improving the quality of life for patients with gallbladder carcinoma.

  • Open Access

    Predictive Factors for Anastomotic Leakage after Laparoscopic and Open Total Gastrectomy: A Systematic Review

    by Umberto Bracale, Roberto Peltrini, Marcello De Luca, Mariangela Ilardi, Maria Michela Di Nuzzo, Alberto Sartori, Maurizio Sodo, Michele Danzi, Francesco Corcione, Carlo De Werra

    The aim of this systematic review is to identify patient-related, perioperative and technical risk factors for esophago-jejunal anastomotic leakage (EJAL) in patients undergoing total gastrectomy for gastric cancer (GC). A comprehensive literature search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase and Scopus databases was performed. Studies providing factors predictive of EJAL by uni- and multivariate analysis or an estimate of association between EJAL and related risk factors were included. All studies were assessed for methodological quality, and a narrative synthesis of the results was performed. A total of 16 studies were included in the systematic review, with a total of 42,489 patients who underwent gastrectomy with esophago-jejunal anastomosis. Age, BMI, impaired respiratory function, prognostic nutritional index (PNI), alcohol consumption, chronic renal failure, diabetes and mixed-type histology were identified as patient-related risk factors for EJAL at multivariate analysis. Likewise, among operative factors, laparoscopic approach, anastomosis type, additional organ resection, blood loss, intraoperative time and surgeon experience were found to be predictive factors for the development of EJAL. In clinical setting, we are able to identify several risk factors for EJAL. This can improve the recognition of higher-risk patients and their outcomes.


  • Open Access

    Could Stoma Be Avoided after Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer? Experience with Transanal Tube in 195 Cases

    by Antonio Sciuto, Roberto Peltrini, Federica Andreoli, Andrea Gianmario Di Santo Albini, Maria Michela Di Nuzzo, Nello Pirozzi, Marcello Filotico, Federica Lauria, Giuseppe Boccia, Michele D’ambra, et al.

    Anastomotic leakage is the most-feared complication of rectal surgery. Transanal devices have been suggested for anastomotic protection as an alternative to defunctioning stoma, although evidence is conflicting, and no single device is widely used in clinical practice. The aim of this paper is to investigate the safety and efficacy of a transanal tube for the prevention of leakage following laparoscopic rectal cancer resection. A transanal tube was used in the cases of total mesorectal excision with low colorectal or coloanal anastomosis, undamaged doughnuts, and negative intraoperative air-leak test. The transanal tube was kept in place until the seventh postoperative day. A total of 195 consecutive patients were retrieved from a prospective surgical database and included in the study. Of these, 71.8% received preoperative chemoradiotherapy. The perioperative mortality rate was 1.0%. Anastomotic leakage occurred in 19 patients, accounting for an incidence rate of 9.7%. Among these, 13 patients underwent re-laparoscopy and ileostomy, while 6 patients were managed conservatively. Overall, the stoma rate was 6.7%. The use of a transanal tube may be a suitable strategy for anastomotic protection following restorative rectal cancer resection. This approach could avoid the burden of a stoma in selected patients with low anastomoses.


  • Open Access

    Promoting Laparoscopic Anterior Approach for a Very Low Presacral Primary Neuroendocrine Tumor Arising in a Tailgut Cyst

    by Maria Michela Di Nuzzo, Carlo De Werra, Mirella Pace, Raduan Ahmed Franca, Maria D’armiento, Umberto Bracale, Ruggero Lionetti, Michele D’ambra, Armando Calogero

    Background: Tailgut cysts are rare congenital lesions that develop in the presacral space. As they can potentially conceal primary neuroendocrine tumors, surgical excision is suggested as the treatment of choice. However, specific management guidelines have yet to be developed. A posterior approach is usually preferred for cysts extending to the third sacral vertebral body. Conversely, a transabdominal approach is preferred for lesions extending upward to achieve an optimal view of the surgical field and avoid injuries. Case report: Here, we report a case of a 48-year-old man suffering from perianal pain and constipation. Digital rectal examination and magnetic resonance imaging revealed a presacral mass below the third sacral vertebral body. A laparoscopic transabdominal presacral tumor excision was performed. The final histological diagnosis was a rare primary neuroendocrine tumor arising from a tailgut cyst. The postoperative course was uneventful, and no signs of recurrence were observed at the six-month follow-up. Conclusions: This study may help establish more well-grounded recommendations for the surgical management of rectal tumors, demonstrating that the laparoscopic transabdominal technique is safe and feasible, even for lesions below the third sacral vertebral body. This approach provided an adequate view of the presacral space, facilitating the preservation of cyst integrity, which is essential in cases of malignant pathologies.


  • Open Access

    The critical view of safety during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Strasberg Yes or No? An Italian Multicentre study

    by Lucia Ilaria Sgaramella, Angela Gurrado, Alessandro Pasculli, Nicola de Angelis, Riccardo Memeo, Francesco Paolo Prete, Stefano Berti, Graziano Ceccarelli, Marco Rigamonti, Francesco Giuseppe Aldo Badessi, et al.

    Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is considered the gold standard for the treatment of gallbladder lithiasis; nevertheless, the incidence of bile duct injuries (BDI) is still high (0.3–0.8%) compared to open cholecystectomy (0.2%). In 1995, Strasberg introduced the "Critical View of Safety" (CVS) to reduce the risk of BDI. Despite its widespread use, the scientific evidence supporting this technique to prevent BDI is controversial. Methods: Between March 2017 and March 2019, the data of patients submitted to laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 30 Italian surgical departments were collected on a national database. A survey was submitted to all members of Italian Digestive Pathology Society to obtain data on the preoperative workup, the surgical and postoperative management of patients and to judge, at the end of the procedure, if the isolation of the elements was performed according to the CVS. In the case of a declared critical view, iconographic documentation was obtained, finally reviewed by an external auditor. Results: Data from 604 patients were analysed. The study population was divided into two groups according to the evidence (Group A; n = 11) or absence (Group B; N = 593) of BDI and perioperative bleeding. The non-use of CVS was found in 54.6% of procedures in the Group A, and 25.8% in the Group B, and evaluating the operator-related variables the execution of CVS was associated with a significantly lower incidence of BDI and intraoperative bleeding. Conclusions: The CVS confirmed to be the safest technique to recognize the elements of the Calot triangle and, if correctly performed, it significantly impacted on preventing intraoperative complications. Additional educational programs on the correct application of CVS in clinical practice would be desirable to avoid extreme conditions that may require additional procedures.


  • The use of intraoperative ultrasound for diagnosis and stadiation in pancreatic head neoformations

    by C. de Werra, G. Quarto, S. Aloia, S. Perrotta, R. Del Giudice, G. Di Filippo, E. Furino, B. Amato, G. Benassai

    The intraoperative staging of the pancreatic cancer is important to make a proper treatment. For this reason the intraoperative echography is playing an important role in the right treatment choice. The intraoperative echography, that can be performed with an open or laparoscopic probe, is used to confirm the preoperative diagnosis and assess the pancreatic cancer resecability. The intraoperative echography (IOUS) or laparoscopic intraoperative echography (LIOUS) are useful to identify the patients with a non resecable cancer and perform a faster neoadjuvant treatment. The LIOUS can also avoid an useless laparotomy. The aim of this study is to assess, both in our experience and in the cited literature, the concordance rate between the pancreatic cancer preoperative staging, performed with TC and MRI (when it is available), and intraoperative staging, performed with intraoperative laparotomic or laparoscopic echography. We have analyzed the treatment management of 34 patients, who were candidate to major surgery for suspected pancreatic head cancer and who underwent to intraoperative LIOUS or IOUS staging from 2001 to 2012. LIOUS and IOUS have allowed to detect cases in which preoperative diagnosis, proved by CT and MRI, was not agreeing with intraoperative diagnosis (22 patients on 34, 64% discordance rate), avoiding the execution of a demolitive and uneseful surgery in order to guarantee the surveillance and life's quality of patients. We suggest to perform in every patients undergone to pancreatic surgery an intraoperative ultrasound exam, to detect unresecable and unpredicted lesions.


  • “Ductal adenocarcinoma in anular pancreas”

    by Giacomo Benassai, Stefano Perrotta, Ermenegildo Furino, Carlo De Werra, Sergio Aloia, Roberto Del Giudice, Bruno Amato, Gabriele Vigliotti, Gennaro Limite, Gennaro Quarto

    The annular pancreas is a congenital anomaly in which pancreatic tissue partially or completely surrounds the second portion of the duodenum. Its often located above of papilla of Vater (85%), rarely below (15%). This pancreatic tissue is often easily dissociable to the duodenum but there is same cases where it the tissue is into the muscolaris wall of the duodenum. We describe three case of annular pancreas hospitalized in our facility between January 2004 and January 2009. There were 2 male 65 and 69 years old respectively and 1 female of 60 years old, presented complaining of repeated episodes of mild epigastric pain. Laboratory tests (including tumor markers), a direct abdomen X-ray with enema, EGDS and total body CT scan were performed to study to better define the diagnosis. EUS showed the presence of tissue infiltrating the muscle layer all around the first part of duodenum. Biopsies performed found the presence of pancreatic tissue with focal areas of adenocarcinoma. Subtotal gastrectomy with Roux was performed. The histological examinations shows an annular pancreas of D1 with multiple focal area of adenocarcinoma. (T1aN0M0). We performed a follow up at 5 years. One patients died after 36 months for cardiovascular hit. Two patients, one male and one female, was 5-years disease-free. Annular pancreas is an uncommon congenital anomaly which usually presents itself in infants and newborn. Rarely it can present in late adult life with wide range of clinical severities thereby making its diagnosis difficult. Pre-operative diagnosis is often difficult. CT scan can illustrate the pancreatic tissue encircling the duodenum. ERCP and MRCP are useful in outlining the annular pancreatic duct. Surgery still remains necessary to confirm diagnosis and bypassing the obstructed segment.