Shuichiro Shiina

Liver disease has emerged as a critical and escalating public health concern worldwide, with the Asia-Pacific region at the forefront of this challenge due to its vast population and diverse socioeconomic landscape. Over the coming five decades, this region will experience profound changes in liver disease patterns, shaped by rapid urbanization, lifestyle modifications, advancements in medical technologies, and evolving public health strategies. This article offers an in-depth analysis of six transformative areas defining the trajectory of liver disease in the region. First, it highlights the alarming rise of metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis, diseases driven by modern lifestyle factors and inherent metabolic susceptibilities. Concurrently, it celebrates the declining burden of viral hepatitis, underscoring the success of sustained public health interventions. However, new challenges are emerging, such as the growing impact of environmental and occupational exposures on liver health. Breakthroughs in genomic and epigenetic research promise to advance precision medicine, offering targeted therapeutic solutions. Additionally, the integration of artificial intelligence, big data, and telemedicine is poised to revolutionize liver disease management, improving accessibility and personalized care. Finally, the article emphasizes the critical role of robust health policies, preventive strategies, and cross-border collaboration in shaping a healthier future. By synthesizing these insights, the study aims to guide innovative and effective responses to the evolving liver disease landscape in the Asia-Pacific region.

Globally, the incidence and associated mortality of primary liver cancer have been steadily increasing. Currently, 80% of cases are found in Asia. Curative resection is applicable in only 20% of patients; therefore, various nonsurgical treatment modalities have been developed. Image-guided percutaneous liver tumor ablation is regarded as the best option for treating early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, skills and knowledge in ablation can vary among operators. Furthermore, Asia has the highest number of ablation procedures for HCC and the largest number of doctors performing ablation worldwide. Thus, the Asian Conference on Tumor Ablation has developed guidelines for HCC. These guidelines will discuss indications, pre-ablative diagnosis and planning, techniques, peri-ablative management, evaluation of therapeutic effectiveness, complications, post-ablative follow-up, prevention of recurrence, and treatment of recurrence for HCC.

Introduction: Proton beam therapy (PBT) is known to be an effective locoregional treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, few comparative studies in treatment-naïve cases have been reported. The aim of this study was to compare the survival outcomes of PBT with those of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in patients with treatment-naïve solitary HCC. Methods: Ninety-five consecutive patients with treatment-naïve HCC, a single nodule measuring ≤5 cm in diameter, and a Child-Pugh score of ≤8 who were treated with PBT at the University of Tsukuba Hospital between 2001 and 2013 were enrolled in the study. In addition, 836 patients with treatment-naïve HCC treated by RFA at the University of Tokyo Hospital during the same period were analyzed as controls. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared in 83 patient pairs after propensity score matching. Results: The 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year RFS rates were 86.6%, 49.5%, and 35.5%, respectively, in the PBT group and 59.5%, 34.0%, and 20.9% in the RFA group (p = 0.058); the respective OS rates were 97.6%, 77.8%, and 57.1% in the PBT group and 95.1%, 81.7%, and 67.7% in the RFA group (p = 0.16). Regarding adverse effects, no grade 3 or higher adverse events were noted in the PBT; however, two grade 3 adverse events occurred within 30 days of RFA in the RFA group: one hemoperitoneum and one hemothorax. Discussion: After propensity score matching, PBT showed no significant difference in RFS and OS compared to RFA. PBT can be an alternative for patients with solitary treatment-naïve HCC.

This prospective study investigated the impact of cabozantinib exposure on proteinuria and muscle toxicity, in a cohort of 14 Japanese patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). We measured the trough concentration of cabozantinib (C_trough) weekly for 6 weeks after starting treatment. Although the initial dose was less than 60 mg in most cases, dose interruption occurred in 79%, primarily because of proteinuria and/or malaise. The median and coefficient of variation of maximum C_trough at 7–42 d were 929.0 ng/mL and 59.2%, respectively. The urinary protein-to-creatinine ratio (UPCR), serum creatine kinase, and serum aldolase values were all significantly elevated following treatment. Moreover, maximum changes in serum creatine kinase and aldolase were significantly associated with maximum C_trough (r = 0.736, p < 0.01; r = 0.798, p < 0.001; respectively). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed that changes in serum creatine kinase ≥70.5 U/L and aldolase ≥6.1 U/L from baseline relatively accurately predicted inclusion in the high-maximum C_trough (≥929.0 ng/mL) group, with an area under the ROC of 0.929 and 0.833, respectively. Measurement of serum creatine kinase and aldolase may increase the clinical usefulness of cabozantinib treatment for uHCC and help alleviate difficulties with dose adjustments.

This study investigated the inhibitory effect of levocarnitine supplementation on sarcopenia progression in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients treated with lenvatinib. We evaluated the skeletal muscle index (SMI). After propensity score matching for age, sex, modified albumin-bilirubin grade, baseline presence of sarcopenia, and branched-chain amino acid administration, we selected 17 patients who received levocarnitine supplementation after starting lenvatinib therapy and 17 propensity-score-matched patients who did not receive levocarnitine. Sarcopenia was present in 76% of the patients at baseline. Changes in baseline SMI at 6 and 12 weeks of treatment were significantly suppressed in the group with levocarnitine supplementation compared with those without (p = 0.009 and p = 0.018, respectively). While there were no significant differences in serum free carnitine levels in cases without levocarnitine supplementation between baseline and after 6 weeks of treatment (p = 0.193), free carnitine levels were significantly higher after 6 weeks of treatment compared with baseline in cases with levocarnitine supplementation (p < 0.001). Baseline SMI and changes in baseline SMI after 6 weeks of treatment were significantly correlated with free carnitine levels (r = 0.359, p = 0.037; and r = 0.345, p = 0.045, respectively). Levocarnitine supplementation can suppress sarcopenia progression during lenvatinib therapy.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common cancer worldwide. Recent international guidelines request an identification of the stage and patient background/condition for an appropriate decision for the management direction. Radiomics is a technology based on the quantitative extraction of image characteristics from radiological imaging modalities. Artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms are the principal axis of the radiomics procedure and may provide various results from large data sets beyond conventional techniques. This review article focused on the application of the radiomics-related diagnosis of HCC using radiological imaging (computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and ultrasound (B-mode, contrast-enhanced ultrasound, and elastography)), and discussed the current role, limitation and future of ultrasound. Although the evidence has shown the positive effect of AI-based ultrasound in the prediction of tumor characteristics and malignant potential, posttreatment response and prognosis, there are still a number of issues in the practical management of patients with HCC. It is highly expected that the wide range of applications of AI for ultrasound will support the further improvement of the diagnostic ability of HCC and provide a great benefit to the patients.

Background: The guidewire (GW) plays an important role in pancreatobiliary endoscopy. GW quality is a critical factor in the effectiveness and efficiency of pancreatobiliary endoscopy. In this study, we evaluate a new 0.025 inch multipurpose endoscopic GW: the M-Through. Methods: Our study was a multicenter retrospective analysis. We enrolled patients who underwent endoscopic procedures using the M-Through between May 2018 and April 2020. Patients receiving the following endoscopic treatments were enrolled: common bile duct (CBD) stone extraction, endoscopic drainage for distal and hilar malignant biliary obstruction (MBO), and endoscopic drainage for acute cholecystitis. For each procedure, we examined the rate of success without GW exchange. Results: A total of 170 patients (80 with CBD stones, 60 with MBO, and 30 with cholecystitis) were enrolled. The rate of completion without GW exchange was 100% for CBD stone extraction, 83.3% for endoscopic drainage for MBO, and 43.3% for endoscopic drainage for cholecystitis. In unsuccessful cholecystitis cases with the original GW manipulator, 1 of 8 cases succeeded in the manipulator exchange. Including 6 cases who changed GW after the manipulator exchange, 11 of 16 cases succeeded in changing GW. There was significant difference in the success rate between the manipulator exchange and GW exchange (p = 0.03). The insertion of devices and stent placement after biliary cannulation (regardless of type) were almost completed with M-through. We observed no intraoperative GW-related adverse events such as perforation and bleeding due to manipulation. Conclusion: The 0.025 inch M-Through can be used for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related procedures efficiently and safely. Our study found high rates of success without GW exchange in all procedures except for endoscopic drainage for cholecystitis. This GW is considered (1) excellent for supportability of device insertion to remove CBD stones; (2) good for seeking the biliary malignant stricture but sometimes need the help of a hydrophilic GW; (3) suboptimal for gallbladder drainage that require a high level of seeking ability.

Background: Endoscopic management of common bile duct stones (CBDS) is standard; however, various techniques are performed via the papilla, and the best procedure in terms of both efficacy and safety has not been determined. Methods: Endoscopic procedures were classified into five categories according to endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) and balloon dilation (BD): (1) EST, (2) endoscopic papillary BD (≤10 mm) (EPBD), (3) EST followed by BD (≤10 mm) (ESBD), (4) endoscopic papillary large BD (≥12 mm) (EPLBD), and (5) EST followed by large BD (≥12 mm) (ESLBD). We performed a literature review of prospective and retrospective studies to compare efficacy and adverse events (AEs). Each procedure was associated with different efficacy and AE profiles. Results: In total, 19 prospective and seven retrospective studies with a total of 3930 patients were included in this study. For EST, the complete stone removal rate at the first session, rate of mechanical lithotripsy (ML), and rate of overall AEs in EST were superior to EPBD, but a higher rate of bleeding was found for EST. Based on one retrospective study, complete stone removal rate at the first session, rate of ML, and rate of overall AEs were superior for ESBD vs. EST, and the rate of bleeding for the former was also lower. Complete stone removal rate at the first session and rate of ML for ESLBD were superior to those for EST, with no significant difference in rate of AEs. For EST vs. EPLBD, complete stone removal rate at the first session and rate of ML were superior for the latter. For EPLBD vs. ESLBD, the efficacy and safety were similar. Conclusions: ESBD is considered the best procedure for the management of small CBDS, but strong evidence is lacking. For large CBDS, both ESLBD and EPLBD are similar.

Background: COVID-19 has been giving the devastating impact on the current medical care system. There are quite many guidelines on COVID-19, but only a few on the management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) during COVID-19 pandemic.Aims: We develop these recommendations to preserve adequate clinical practice for the management of HCC.Methods: Experts of HCC in the Asia–Pacific region exchanged opinions via webinar, and these recommendations were formed.Results: Close contact should be minimized to reduce possible exposure of both medical staff and patients to the novel coronavirus. To prevent transmission of the virus, meticulous hygiene measures are important. With the decrease in regular medical service, the medical staff may be mobilized to provide COVID-19-related patient care. However, diagnosis and treatment of HCC should not be delayed because of COVID-19 pandemic. The management of HCC should be the same as in non-pandemic circumstances. HCC is highly malignant, thus it is recommended not to delay curative treatment such as surgery and ablation. However, a kind of triage is necessary even among patients with HCC when resources are insufficient for all to be treated. Curative treatments should be periodized and cytoreductive or non-curative treatment such as vascular interventions and systemic therapy may be postponed until it can be performed safely with sufficient resources. For patients with confirmed or suspected to be infected with the novel coronavirus, diagnosis and treatment should be postponed until the virus is eliminated or they are confirmed as not being infected with it.Conclusions: These are collection of measures implemented by front-line medical professionals. We would evolve these recommendations over time as more real-world data becomes available.