Mario F. Teisl
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Mario F. Teisl has a total of 107 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Caroline L. Noblet
11 shared publications- Brian E. Roe
Department of Agricultural, Environmental and Development Economics, Ohio State University, Columbus, USA
9 shared publications Kevin J. Boyle
Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg VA 24061-0002 USA
8 shared publicationsBrian Roe
Department of Agricultural, Environmental and Development Economics, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
7 shared publicationsAlan S. Levy
Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, Food and Drug Administration, 5100 Paint Branch Parkway, College Park, MD 20740, USA
6 shared publications- Jonathan Rubin
University of Maine
5 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 30 April 2019
- Published by MDPI AG in Sustainability
- Vol. 11 (9) , 2522
A Social-Ecological System Framework for Marine Aquaculture Research
Aquaculture has been responsible for an impressive growth in the global supply of seafood. As of 2016, more than half of all global seafood production comes from aquaculture. To meet future global seafood demands, there is need and opportunity to expand marine aquaculture production in ways that are both socially and ecologically sustainable. This requires integrating biophysical, social, and engineering sciences. Such interdisciplinary research is difficult due to the complexity and multi-scale aspects of marine aquaculture and inherent challenges researchers face working across disciplines. To this end, we developed a framework based on Elinor Ostrom’s social–ecological system framework (SESF) to guide interdisciplinary research on marine aquaculture. We first present the framework and the social–ecological system variables relevant to research on marine aquaculture and then illustrate one application of this framework to interdisciplinary research underway in Maine, the largest producer of marine aquaculture products in the United States. We use the framework to compare oyster aquaculture in two study regions, with a focus on factors influencing the social and biophysical carrying capacity. We conclude that the flexibility provided by the SESF is well suited to inform interdisciplinary research on marine aquaculture, especially comparative, cross-case analysis.
- 30 April 2019
- Published by MDPI AG in Sustainability
- Vol. 11 (9) , 2522
Open AccessA Social-Ecological System Framework for Marine Aquaculture Research
Aquaculture has been responsible for an impressive growth in the global supply of seafood. As of 2016, more than half of all global seafood production comes from aquaculture. To meet future global seafood demands, there is need and opportunity to expand marine aquaculture production in ways that are both socially and ecologically sustainable. This requires integrating biophysical, social, and engineering sciences. Such interdisciplinary research is difficult due to the complexity and multi-scale aspects of marine aquaculture and inherent challenges researchers face working across disciplines. To this end, we developed a framework based on Elinor Ostrom’s social–ecological system framework (SESF) to guide interdisciplinary research on marine aquaculture. We first present the framework and the social–ecological system variables relevant to research on marine aquaculture and then illustrate one application of this framework to interdisciplinary research underway in Maine, the largest producer of marine aquaculture products in the United States. We use the framework to compare oyster aquaculture in two study regions, with a focus on factors influencing the social and biophysical carrying capacity. We conclude that the flexibility provided by the SESF is well suited to inform interdisciplinary research on marine aquaculture, especially comparative, cross-case analysis.
- 1 November 2018
- Published by Elsevier in Energy Policy
- Vol. 122, 601-611
Seeing clearly in a virtual reality: Tourist reactions to an offshore wind project
- 1 November 2018
- Published by Elsevier in Energy Policy
- Vol. 122, 601-611
Seeing clearly in a virtual reality: Tourist reactions to an offshore wind project
- 1 October 2017
- Published by Elsevier in Biomass and Bioenergy
- Vol. 105, 155-163
Social acceptability of establishing forest-based biorefineries in Maine, United States
- 1 October 2017
- Published by Elsevier in Biomass and Bioenergy
- Vol. 105, 155-163
Social acceptability of establishing forest-based biorefineries in Maine, United States
- Open Access
- 30 August 2017
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Agricultural and Resource Economics Review
- Vol. 46 (2) , 175-185
Special Issue on the Economics of Changing Coastal Resources: The Nexus of Food, Energy, and Water Systems.
Viewed through the perspective of the nexus of food, energy, and water systems, improved management of coastal resources requires enhanced understanding of cross-system and cross-scale interactions and dynamics. The economics of changing coastal resources hinges on increased understanding of complex tradeoffs associated with these complex multisystem and multiscale relationships. How diverse forms of change will affect water quantity and quality as well as food and energy production in coastal areas is not well understood. Coastal resources provide many goods and services and influence markedly the nature of many human communities. In 2010, 43 percent of the US population lived in marine coastal counties (US Census 2012), and from 1960 to 2010, the population of these counties increased by 87 percent, faster than the rest of the United States (62 percent). In addition to serving as attractive settlement locations, coastal areas provide critical ecosystem services, including critical habitat for commercially important species in some cases (Gutman 2007, Kroll et al. 2012, Hales et al. 2014). Abundant natural resource amenities also provide valuable recreation and tourism experiences (Hales et al. 2014). Further, new economic opportunities also exist in coastal areas, with many recent examples of emerging products (Barros et al. 2009), innovative seafood technologies (Ayer and Tyedmers 2009, Bugallo et al.
- 30 August 2017
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Agricultural and Resource Economics Review
- Vol. 46 (2) , 175-185
Open AccessSpecial Issue on the Economics of Changing Coastal Resources: The Nexus of Food, Energy, and Water Systems.
Viewed through the perspective of the nexus of food, energy, and water systems, improved management of coastal resources requires enhanced understanding of cross-system and cross-scale interactions and dynamics. The economics of changing coastal resources hinges on increased understanding of complex tradeoffs associated with these complex multisystem and multiscale relationships. How diverse forms of change will affect water quantity and quality as well as food and energy production in coastal areas is not well understood. Coastal resources provide many goods and services and influence markedly the nature of many human communities. In 2010, 43 percent of the US population lived in marine coastal counties (US Census 2012), and from 1960 to 2010, the population of these counties increased by 87 percent, faster than the rest of the United States (62 percent). In addition to serving as attractive settlement locations, coastal areas provide critical ecosystem services, including critical habitat for commercially important species in some cases (Gutman 2007, Kroll et al. 2012, Hales et al. 2014). Abundant natural resource amenities also provide valuable recreation and tourism experiences (Hales et al. 2014). Further, new economic opportunities also exist in coastal areas, with many recent examples of emerging products (Barros et al. 2009), innovative seafood technologies (Ayer and Tyedmers 2009, Bugallo et al.
- 1 November 2016
- Published by Elsevier in Land Use Policy
- Vol. 57, 44-52
Does reading scenarios of future land use changes affect willingness to participate in land use planning?
- 1 November 2016
- Published by Elsevier in Land Use Policy
- Vol. 57, 44-52
Does reading scenarios of future land use changes affect willingness to participate in land use planning?
- 1 April 2016
- Published by Elsevier in Food Control
- Vol. 62, 381-389
Importance of cohorts in analyzing trends in safe at-home food-handling practices
- 1 April 2016
- Published by Elsevier in Food Control
- Vol. 62, 381-389
Importance of cohorts in analyzing trends in safe at-home food-handling practices
- 21 March 2016
- Published by Springer Nature in Sustainability Science
- Vol. 12 (1) , 87-104
Transdisciplinary research partnerships in sustainability science: an examination of stakeholder participation preferences
- 21 March 2016
- Published by Springer Nature in Sustainability Science
- Vol. 12 (1) , 87-104
Transdisciplinary research partnerships in sustainability science: an examination of stakeholder participation preferences
- 1 December 2015
- Published by Elsevier in Energy Policy
- Vol. 87, 177-186
Public preferences for investments in renewable energy production and energy efficiency
- 1 December 2015
- Published by Elsevier in Energy Policy
- Vol. 87, 177-186
Public preferences for investments in renewable energy production and energy efficiency
- 29 October 2015
- Published by Springer Nature in Sustainability Science
- Vol. 11 (3) , 373-383
Whose values count: is a theory of social choice for sustainability science possible?
- 29 October 2015
- Published by Springer Nature in Sustainability Science
- Vol. 11 (3) , 373-383
Whose values count: is a theory of social choice for sustainability science possible?
- 10 August 2015
- Published by Springer Nature in Nature Climate Change
- Vol. 5 (12) , 1064-1067
Australians' views on carbon pricing before and after the 2013 federal election
- 10 August 2015
- Published by Springer Nature in Nature Climate Change
- Vol. 5 (12) , 1064-1067
Australians' views on carbon pricing before and after the 2013 federal election