BABlair Anton

Blair Anton

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article

Previous Organizations / Institutes

The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years


Blair Anton has a total of 85 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:

  • Karen A. Robinson

    Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD

    4 shared publications
  • Paul W. Ladenson

    Division of Health Sciences Informatics (H.L., K.A.R.), Department of Medicine, and Welch Medical Library (B.A.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205; and Divisions of General Internal Medicine (K.A.R., I.J.S.) and Endocrinology and Metabolism (P.W.L.), Departments of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21287

    3 shared publications
  • Anne E. Sumner

    2 shared publications
  • Catherine Kim

    2 shared publications
  • Eugenie S. Heitmiller

    2 shared publications
  • Henry Li

    Division of Health Sciences Informatics (H.L., K.A.R.), Department of Medicine, and Welch Medical Library (B.A.), Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205; and Divisions of General Internal Medicine (K.A.R., I.J.S.) and Endocrinology and Metabolism (P.W.L.), Departments of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21287

    2 shared publications

Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Libraries advancing health equity:a literature review

    by Amanda J. Wilson, Catherine Staley, Brittney Davis, Blair Anton

    Purpose: Progress toward health equity is necessary to reduce health disparities, and health literacy is key to achieving this goal. Because libraries provide access to knowledge and insights about their communities, they are effective partners in advancing health equity and implementing programs to reduce health disparities. A literature review on library programs and activities that focus on promoting health equity was conducted.Design/methodology/approach: A literature review on library programs and activities concerning health equity and social determinants of health was conducted. Relevant literature was identified from searches of databases, library publications and grey literature.Findings: The authors found 224 eligible sources and many types of libraries advancing health equity. Libraries frame their role in advancing health equity through external programs in three ways: (1) providing access to high-quality health information, (2) delivering health literacy training and resources and (3) connecting their communities with community health services. Libraries also advance health equity by focusing on internal library operations and providing research services focused on cultural humility and competence as they apply to health care.Originality/value: This literature review will help the National Library of Medicine (NLM) develop a strategy to support libraries advancing health equity through information made available by programs and activities of NLM and the Network of the National Library of Medicine.


  • Implementation strategies to reduce surgical site infections: A systematic review

    by Promise Ariyo, Bassem Zayed, Victoria Riese, Blair Anton, Asad Latif, Claire Kilpatrick, Benedetta Allegranzi, Sean Berenholtz

    Background: Surgical site infections (SSIs) portend high patient morbidity and mortality. Although evidence-based clinical interventions can reduce SSIs, they are not reliably delivered in practice, and data are limited on the best approach to improve adherence.Objective: To summarize implementation strategies aimed at improving adherence to evidence-based interventions that reduce SSIs.Design: Systematic reviewMethods: We searched PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, the WHO Regional databases, AFROLIB, and Africa-Wide for studies published between January 1990 and December 2015. The Effective Practice and Organization Care (EPOC) criteria were used to identify an acceptable-quality study design. We used structured forms to extract data on implementation strategies and grouped them into an implementation model called the “Four Es” framework (ie, engage, educate, execute, and evaluate).Results: In total, 125 studies met our inclusion criteria, but only 8 studies met the EPOC criteria, which limited our ability to identify best practices. Most studies used multifaceted strategies to improve adherence with evidence-based interventions. Engagement strategies included multidisciplinary work and strong leadership involvement. Education strategies included various approaches to introduce evidence-based practices to clinicians and patients. Execution strategies standardized the interventions into simple tasks to facilitate uptake. Evaluation strategies assessed adherence with evidence-based interventions and patient outcomes, providing feedback of performance to providers.Conclusions: Multifaceted implementation strategies represent the most common approach to facilitating the adoption of evidence-based practices. We believe that this summary of implementation strategies complements existing clinical guidelines and may accelerate efforts to reduce SSIs.


  • The Pediatric Critical Care Transfusion and Anemia Expertise Initiative Consensus Conference Methodology

    by Melania M. Bembea, Stacey L. Valentine, Scot T. Bateman, Lisa M. Wilson, Blair Anton, Nancy Harger, Karen A. Robinson

    Objectives: This article describes the methodology used for Pediatric Critical Care Transfusion and Anemia Expertise Initiative Consensus Conference. Design: Consensus conference of international experts in pediatric critical care and transfusion medicine, following standards set by the Institute of Medicine, using the Research and Development/UCLA Appropriateness Method, modeled after the Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference. Topics related to RBC transfusion in children with or at risk for critical illness were divided into nine subgroups with a systematic review of the literature. Methods: The panel of 38 content and four methodology experts met three times over the course of 2 years and collaborated to develop evidence-based and, when evidence was lacking, expert-based clinical recommendations as well as research priorities for RBC transfusions in critically ill children or those at risk for critical illness. Electronic searches were conducted using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases from 1980 to May 2017. Agreement was obtained using the Research and Development/UCLA Appropriateness Method. We used a standardized data extraction form to construct evidence tables and graded the evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system. Main Results: The consensus conference resulted in 102 recommendation statements, of which 57 were clinical (20 evidence based and 37 based on expert consensus) and 45 detailed recommendations for future research. Dissemination was done via decision tree, a primary publication listing all statements, and separate publications for each subtopic that include supporting arguments for each recommendation. Conclusions: A consensus conference of experts from around the world developed recommendations for RBC transfusions in critically ill children or children at risk for critical illness, the identification of current research gaps, and future research priorities.


  • Non-pharmacological interventions for sleep promotion in hospitalized children

    by Sapna R Kudchadkar, Sean Barnes, Blair Anton, Daniel J Gergen, Naresh M Punjabi


  • Risks, Benefits, and Recommendations for Pastoral Care on Inpatient Psychiatric Units: A Systematic Review

    by Steven Pennybaker, Patrick Hemming, Durga Roy, Blair Anton, Margaret S. Chisolm

    A systematic review was conducted of the biomedical literature regarding pastoral care (PaC) providers on inpatient psychiatric units with the aim of answering 3 questions: (1) What are the risks and benefits of PaC providers’ presence on inpatient psychiatric units? (2) What are current recommendations for integration of PaC providers into a psychiatric team? and (3) What gaps exist in the literature? PubMed, PsycInfo, Embase, CINAHL, and Scopus were searched from the start of each database to July 9, 2014 using terms related to PaC providers and inpatient psychiatry. Two independent reviewers performed full-text reviews of each article identified by independent review of all titles/abstracts from the electronic search and by a hand search of articles included in reference lists. Inclusion criteria were: English-language article, published in a peer-reviewed journal, and focus on a PaC provider working in a psychiatric hospital setting. One author performed data extraction. Forty-nine articles were identified by electronic (84%) and hand search (16%), 18 of which were evaluative studies: 5 qualitative and 13 quantitative. Most of the literature viewed integration of PaC providers in inpatient treatment teams as beneficial. Potential harms were noted and mitigation strategies suggested, including providing training to PaC providers concerning psychiatric illness, clearly defining roles, and enhancing team integration. None of the articles reported outcomes data. Psychiatric inpatients often have unmet spiritual needs. Although the literature suggests potential benefits of PaC providers for psychiatric inpatients, more rigorous studies are needed to establish these benefits as efficacious. The authors of this review recommend the cautious integration of PaC providers into the psychiatric inpatient care team.


  • Response to the Letter to the Editor

    by Henry Li, Karen A. Robinson, Blair Anton, Ian J. Saldanha, Paul W. Ladenson

  • The Decade in Clinical Thyroid Disease: An Analysis of Published Literature

    by David S. Cooper, Blair Anton

    Background: The purpose of this study was to assess the current status of the clinical thyroidology literature using bibliographic analysis. Methods: The subject “clinical thyroidology” was divided into six broad topics: iodine deficiency/iodine nutrition, hypothyroidism, hyperthyroidism/thyrotoxicosis, thyroiditis/autoimmune thyroid disease, thyroid nodules/multinodular goiter, and thyroid cancer. Using Scopus, an online bibliographic searching tool, this study sought to examine the trends in the publication of clinical thyroid disease–related research articles over the decade from 2006 through the end of 2015. Citation counts were also retrieved for individual research papers in order to find papers that might have had a bigger impact on clinical practice. Review articles, guidelines, and editorials were excluded. Results: A total of 19,055 articles were published in the broad area of clinical thyroid disease. The largest proportion was in the topic of thyroid cancer, accounting for >30% of the total. The numbers of papers published annually on thyroid nodules and thyroid cancer increased progressively over the decade. The largest proportion of clinical thyroid publications emanated from the United States, and the majority of papers were published in subspecialty journals. Within each clinical thyroid topic, the most highly cited papers published from 2006 to 2015 were identified, and outliers—that is, papers that had been cited far more often that others in the topic—were also identified. The most highly cited paper in all of clinical thyroidology was a 2006 study describing the increase in thyroid cancer incidence in the United States ( JAMA 295:2164–2167). Most of the highly cited clinical papers were case series or cohort studies, rather than randomized controlled trials. Conclusions: The number of papers in clinical thyroid disease is expanding rapidly, with >1000 papers published annually over the last decade. Research papers on thyroid nodules and cancer accounted for 51% of all clinical thyroid disease–related papers. More randomized controlled trials have been published in the last few years, portending a bright future for clinical thyroidology.


  • Top Cited Papers

    Sex Differences in the Cardiovascular Consequences of Diabetes Mellitus

    by Judith G. Regensteiner, Sherita Golden, Amy G. Huebschmann, Elizabeth Barrett-Connor, Alice Y. Chang, Deborah Chyun, Caroline S. Fox, Catherine Kim, Nehal Mehta, Jane F. Reckelhoff, et al.


  • Promoting perioperative advance care planning: a systematic review of advance care planning decision aids

    by Rebecca A Aslakson, Anne Lr Schuster, Jessica Reardon, Thomas Lynch, Catalina Suarez-Cuervo, Judith A Miller, Rita Moldovan, Fabian Johnston, Blair Anton, Matthew Weiss, et al.

    This systematic review identifies possible decision aids that promote perioperative advance care planning (ACP) and synthesizes the available evidence regarding their use. Using PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, SCOPUS, Web of Science, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Sociological Abstracts, researchers identified and screened articles for eligibility. Data were abstracted and risk of bias assessed for included articles. Thirty-nine of 5327 articles satisfied the eligibility criteria. Primarily completed in outpatient ambulatory populations, studies evaluated a variety of ACP decision aids. None were evaluated in a perioperative population. Fifty unique outcomes were reported with no head-to-head comparisons conducted. Findings are likely generalizable to a perioperative population and can inform development of a perioperative ACP decision aid. Future studies should compare the effectiveness of ACP decision aids.


  • Neuromonitoring During Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

    by Melania M. Bembea, Ryan Felling, Blair Anton, Cynthia F. Salorio, Michael V. Johnston

    Neurologic injury remains a significant morbidity and risk factor for mortality in critically ill patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Our goal was to systematically review the literature on the use of neuromonitoring methods during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Electronic searches of PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Scopus were conducted in March 2014, using a combination of medical subject heading terms and text words to define concepts of extracorporeal life support, neurologic monitoring techniques, evaluation, and outcomes. Studies were selected based on inclusion and exclusion criteria defined a priori. Two authors reviewed all citations independently. A standardized data extraction form was used to construct evidence tables by neuromonitoring method. Evidence was graded using the Oxford Evidence-Based Medicine scoring system. Of 3,459 unique citations, 39 studies met the inclusion criteria. Study designs were retrospective observational cohort studies (n = 20), prospective observational studies (n = 17), case-control studies (n = 2), and no interventional studies. Most studies evaluated newborns (n = 30). Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation neuromonitoring methods included neuroimaging (head ultrasound) (n = 12); intermittent, conventional, multichannel electroencephalography (n = 5); 1- to 2-channel amplitude-integrated electroencephalography (n = 2); Doppler ultrasound (n = 7); cerebral oximetry (n = 6); plasma brain injury biomarkers (n = 4); and other (n = 3). All evidence was graded 2B-4, with the majority of studies graded 3B (20/39 studies) and 4 (10/39 studies). Due to the heterogeneity of the studies included, aggregate analysis was not possible. Data supporting the use and effectiveness of current neuromonitoring methods are limited. Most studies have modest sample sizes, are observational in nature, and include patient populations that are of different ages and pathologies, with very limited data for pediatric and adult ages. Well-designed studies with adequate power and standardized short- and long-term outcomes are needed to develop guidelines for neuromonitoring and ultimately neuroprotection in patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.