Jianming Li

Endoplasmic reticulum-mediated protein quality control (ERQC) safeguards secretory pathway proteostasis by recognizing, retaining, repairing, and removing misfolded proteins, and is therefore essential for plant growth, development, and stress tolerance. This system relies on ER-associated degradation (ERAD), in which irreparably misfolded proteins are first recognized in the ER, then exported across the ER membrane to the cytosol, where they are ubiquitinated by ER membrane-anchored ubiquitin ligases, and subsequently degraded by the cytosolic proteasome. Studies in yeast and mammals have defined several conserved ERAD branches, including a multiprotein ERAD complex centered on the polytopic ER membrane E3 ligase HMG-CoA reductase degradation protein 1 (Hrd1), which integrates substrate recognition, membrane retrotranslocation, ubiquitin conjugation, and cytosolic extraction. Recent advances in Arabidopsis show that plants retain the core Hrd1 ERAD architecture while incorporating additional regulatory elements that adapt this machinery to plant-specific physiological demands. Genetic and biochemical analyses of misfolded receptor kinases and engineered substrates have uncovered conserved and plant-specific components of the plant Hrd1 complex, revealing how the plant ERAD pathway integrates ERQC with hormone signaling, stress adaptation, immune responses, and growth regulation. This review synthesizes recent advances in plant ERAD research and highlights key conceptual and mechanistic questions that remain to be resolved.

The unfolded protein response (UPR) signaling pathway is activated by the accumulation of misfolded proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and stimulates the production of ER chaperones to restore ER proteostasis. However, how UPR-induced proteins return to their pre-stress levels upon removal of ER stress remains unknown. TUNICAMYCIN-INDUCED 1 (TIN1) is an Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) protein that is normally expressed in pollen but is rapidly induced by ER stress in vegetative tissues. Here, we show that the ER-stress-induced TIN1 is rapidly degraded in the UPR recovery phase. We found that TIN1 degradation depends on its asparagine-linked glycans and requires both EMS-mutagenized bri1 suppressor 5 (EBS5) and EBS6 for its recruitment to the ER-associated degradation (ERAD) complex. Loss-of-function mutations in the core component of this Arabidopsis ERAD complex greatly stabilize TIN1. Interestingly, 2 other UPR-induced proteins that are coexpressed with TIN1 remained stable upon ER-stress removal, suggesting that rapid degradation during the stress-recovery phase likely applies to a subset of UPR-induced proteins. Further investigation is needed to uncover the mechanisms by which the ERAD machinery selectively degrades UPR-induced ER proteins.

Brassinosteroid-insensitive 1 (BRI1)-EMS suppressor 1 (BES1) and Brassinazole-resistant 1 (BZR1) are two highly similar master transcription factors of the brassinosteroid (BR) signaling pathway that regulates a variety of plant growth and development processes as well as stress responses. Previous genetic and biochemical analyses have established a complex regulatory network to control the two transcription factors. This network includes coordination with other transcription factors and interactors, multiple post-translational modifications (PTMs) and differential subcellular localizations. In this review, we systematically detail the functions and regulatory mechanisms of various PTMs: phosphorylation/dephosphorylation, ubiquitination/deubiquitination, SUMOylation/deSUMOylation and oxidation/reduction, in regulating the subcellular localization, protein stability and the transcriptional activity of BES1/BZR1. We also discuss the current knowledge about the BES1/BZR1 interactors mediating the dynamic nucleocytoplasmic shuttling of BES1 and BZR1.

Proteome composition is dynamic and influenced by many internal and external cues, including developmental signals, light availability, or environmental stresses. Protein degradation, in synergy with protein biosynthesis, allows cells to respond to various stimuli and adapt by reshaping the proteome. Protein degradation mediates the final and irreversible disassembly of proteins, which is important for protein quality control and to eliminate misfolded or damaged proteins, as well as entire organelles. Consequently, it contributes to cell resilience by buffering against protein or organellar damage caused by stresses. Moreover, protein degradation plays important roles in cell signaling, as well as transcriptional and translational events. The intricate task of recognizing specific proteins for degradation is achieved by specialized systems that are tailored to the substrate's physicochemical properties and subcellular localization. These systems recognize diverse substrate cues collectively referred to as “degrons,” which can assume a range of configurations. They are molecular surfaces recognized by E3 ligases of the ubiquitin-proteasome system but can also be considered as general features recognized by other degradation systems, including autophagy or even organellar proteases. Here we provide an overview of the newest developments in the field, delving into the intricate processes of protein recognition and elucidating the pathways through which they are recruited for degradation.

Maintenance of proteome integrity is essential for cell function and survival in changing cellular and environmental conditions. The endoplasmic reticulum (ER) is the major site for the synthesis of secretory and membrane proteins. However, the accumulation of unfolded or misfolded proteins can perturb ER protein homeostasis, leading to ER stress and compromising cellular function. Eukaryotic organisms have evolved sophisticated and conserved protein quality control systems to ensure protein folding fidelity via the unfolded protein response (UPR) and to eliminate potentially harmful proteins via ER-associated degradation (ERAD) and ER-phagy. In this review, we summarize recent advances in our understanding of the mechanisms of ER protein homeostasis in plants and discuss the crosstalk between different quality control systems. Finally, we will address unanswered questions in this field.

The biosynthesis of C_27–29 sterols from their C₃₀ precursor squalene involves C24-alkylation and the removal of three methyl groups, including two at the C4 position. The two C4 demethylation reactions require a bifunctional enzyme known as 3β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase/C4-decarboxylase (3βHSD/D), which removes an oxidized methyl (carboxylic) group at C4 while simultaneously catalyzing the 3β-hydroxyl→3-keto oxidation. Its loss-of-function mutations cause ergosterol-dependent growth in yeast and congenital hemidysplasia with ichthyosiform erythroderma and limb defect (CHILD) syndrome in humans. Although plant 3βHSD/D enzymes were well studied enzymatically, their developmental functions remain unknown. Here we employed a CRISPR/Cas9-based genome-editing approach to generate knockout mutants for two Arabidopsis 3βHSD/D genes, HSD1 and HSD2, and discovered the male gametophytic lethality for the hsd1 hsd2 double mutation. Pollen-specific expression of HSD2 in the heterozygous hsd1 hsd2/+ mutant not only rescued the pollen lethality but also revealed the critical roles of the two HSD genes in embryogenesis. Our study thus demonstrated the essential functions of the two Arabidopsis 3βHSD/D genes in male gametogenesis and embryogenesis.

The biosynthesis of C27-29 sterols from their C30 precursor squalene involves C24-alkylation and removal of three methyl groups, including two at the C4 position. The two C4 demethylation reactions require a bifunctional enzyme known as 3β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase/C4-decarboxylase (3βHSD/D) that removes an oxidized methyl (carboxylic) group at C4 while simultaneously catalyzing the 3β-hydroxyl3-keto oxidation. Its loss-of-function mutations cause ergosterol-dependent growth in yeast and congenital hemidysplasia with ichthyosiform erythroderma and limb defect (CHILD) syndrome in humans. Although plant 3βHSD/D enzymes were well studied enzymatically, their developmental functions remain unknown. Here we employed a CRISPR/Cas9-based genome-editing approach to generate knockout mutants for two Arabidopsis 3βHSD/D genes, HSD1 and HSD2, and discovered the male gametophytic lethality for the hsd1 hsd2 double mutation. Pollen-specific expression of HSD2 in the heterozygous hsd1 hsd2/+ mutant not only rescued the pollen lethality but also revealed critical roles of the two HSD genes in embryogenesis. Our study thus demonstrated essential functions of the two Arabidopsis 3βHSD/D genes in male gametogenesis and embryogenesis.

Brassinosteroids (BRs) play vital roles in the plant life cycle and synthetic BRs are widely used to increase crop yield and plant stress tolerance. Among them are 24R-methyl-epibrassinolide (24-EBL) and 24S-ethyl-28-homobrassinolide (28-HBL), which differ from brassinolide (BL, the most active BR) at the C-24 position. Although it is well known that 24-EBL is 10% active as BL, there is no consensus on the bioactivity of 28-HBL. A recent outpouring of research interest in 28-HBL on major crops accompanied with a surge of industrial-scale synthesis that produces mixtures of active (22R,23R)-28-HBL and inactive (22S,23S)-28HBL, demands a standardized assay system capable of analyzing different synthetic “28-HBL” products. In this study, the relative bioactivity of 28-HBL to BL and 24-EBL, including its capacity to induce the well-established BR responses at molecular, biochemical, and physiological levels, was systematically analyzed using the whole seedlings of the wild-type and BR-deficient mutant of Arabidopsis thaliana. These multi-level bioassays consistently showed that 28-HBL exhibits a much stronger bioactivity than 24-EBL and is almost as active as BL in rescuing the short hypocotyl phenotype of the dark-grown det2 mutant. These results are consistent with the previously established structure–activity relationship of BRs, proving that this multi-level whole seedling bioassay system could be used to analyze different batches of industrially produced 28-HBL or other BL analogs to ensure the full potential of BRs in modern agriculture.

Correlation of RARγ expression with patients' clinicopathological variables in 91 cases of CRC (S1); Human RARγ shRNA target sequences (S2); Primers for qPCR (S3).