Lisa Sangkum

Background: The 15-item Quality of Recovery scale (QoR-15), a short form of the QoR-40, is a widely used self-reported tool for measuring the postoperative quality of recovery. It has been translated into many languages. In this study, we aimed to validate a translated Thai version of the QoR-15 in patients undergoing elective abdominal surgery under general anesthesia. Methods: This was a single-center observational cohort study. The QoR-15 was translated into Thai and culturally adapted, which led to the items on severe and moderate pain being merged, yielding a 14-item scale: the QoR-14-Thai. Next, the QoR-14-Thai, a checklist measuring the patients’ activities of daily living (ADL), and a 100-mm visual analog scale for assessing their global health (VAS-GH) were administered to the study patients before and 24 h after their abdominal surgery. The validity, reliability, responsiveness, and feasibility of the QoR-14-Thai were assessed. Results: Among 166 patients, 140 completed the questionnaires, achieving a questionnaire completion rate of 100%. We observed moderate convergent validity between the postoperative QoR-14-Thai and the VAS-GH (r = 0.54, p < 0.001) and ADL checklist (r = 0.50, p < 0.001). The QoR-14-Thai was negatively correlated with the length of hospital stay (r = − 0.23, p < 0.006) and postoperative admission to the intensive care unit (r = − 0.85, p = 0.001). The QoR-14-Thai had excellent internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.869), split-half reliability (0.913), test–retest reliability (0.94), and high responsiveness (Cohen’s effect size: 1.01, standardized response mean: 0.73). The median time to complete the questionnaire was 2 min (interquartile range: 1–2). Conclusions: The QoR-14-Thai was deemed a valid, reliable, and convenient tool for evaluating the quality of recovery after elective abdominal surgery. Trial registration: This study was registered prospectively on the Thai Clinical Trials Registry, identifier TCTR20210326009, on March 26, 2021.

Purpose: This study measured the health‐related quality of life (HRQoL) and costs and conducted a cost–utility analysis and budget impact analysis of ambulatory knee arthroscopic surgery compared with inpatient knee arthroscopic surgery in Thailand from a societal perspective.Methods: Health outcomes were measured in units of quality‐adjusted life year (QALY) based on the Thai version of the EQ‐5D‐5L Health Questionnaire, and costs were obtained from an electronic database at a tertiary care hospital (Ramathibodi Hospital). A cost–utility analysis was performed to evaluate ambulatory and inpatient surgery using the societal perspective and a 2‐week time horizon. The incremental cost‐effectiveness ratio was applied to examine the costs and QALYs. One‐way sensitivity analysis was used to investigate the robustness of the model. Budget impact analysis was performed considering over 5 years.Results: A total of 161 knee arthroscopic patients were included and divided into two groups: ambulatory surgery (58 patients) and inpatient surgery (103 patients). The total cost of the inpatient surgery was 2235 United States dollars (USD), while the ambulatory surgery cost was 2002 USD. The QALYs of inpatient surgery and ambulatory surgery were 0.79 and 0.81, respectively, resulting in the ambulatory surgery becoming a dominant strategy (cost reduction of 233 USD with an increase of 0.02 QALY) over the inpatient surgery. The ambulatory surgery led to net savings of 4.5 million USD over 5 years. Medical supply costs are one of the most influential factors affecting the change in results.Conclusion: Ambulatory knee arthroscopic surgery emerged as a cost‐saving strategy over inpatient surgery, driven by lower treatment costs and enhanced HRQoL. Budget impact analysis indicated net savings over 5 years, supporting the feasibility of adopting ambulatory knee arthroscopic surgery. Our findings were advocated for its application across diverse hospitals and informed policymakers to improve reimbursement systems in low‐ to middle‐income countries and Thailand.Level of Evidence: Level IV.

Effective postoperative analgesia using multimodal approach improves maternal and neonatal outcomes after cesarean delivery. The use of neuraxial approach (local anesthetic and opioids) and intravenous adjunctive drugs, such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and acetaminophen, currently represents the standard regimen for post-cesarean delivery analgesia. Peripheral nerve blocks may be considered in patients who are unable to receive neuraxial techniques; these blocks may also be used as a rescue technique in selected patients. This review discusses the relevant anatomy, current evidence, and advantages and disadvantages of the various peripheral nerve block techniques. Further research is warranted to compare the analgesic efficacy of these techniques, especially newer blocks (e.g., quadratus lumborum blocks and erector spinae plane blocks). Moreover, future studies should determine the safety profile of these blocks (e.g., fascial plane blocks) in the obstetric population because of its increased susceptibility to local anesthetic toxicity.

Background: The Obstetric Quality of Recovery score (ObsQoR-10) is a questionnaire used to assess recovery after cesarean delivery. However, the original ObsQoR-10 is in English and was mainly validated in the Western population. We therefore evaluated the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the ObsQoR-10-Thai in patients undergoing elective cesarean delivery. Methods: The original ObsQoR-10 was translated into Thai, and psychometric validation was performed to evaluate the quality of post-cesarean recovery. The ObsQoR-10-Thai, activities of daily living checklist, and 100-mm visual analog scale of global health (VAS-GH) questionnaires were administered to the study participants before and 24 and 48-h postpartum. Validity, reliability, responsiveness, and feasibility of the ObsQoR-10-Thai were assessed. Results: We included 110 patients undergoing elective cesarean delivery. The mean ObsQoR-10-Thai score at baseline and 24 and 48-h postpartum was 83.35 ± 11.15, 56.75 ± 11.6, and 70.96 ± 13.65, respectively. The ObsQoR-10-Thai score differed significantly between the two groups divided based on the VAS-GH (≥ 70 vs. < 70): 75.58 ± 13.81 and 52.56 ± 10.61, respectively (P < 0.001). The convergent validity between the ObsQoR-10-Thai and VAS-GH was good (r = 0.60, P < 0.001). The ObsQoR-10-Thai displayed good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.87), split-half reliability (0.92), and test–retest reliability (0.99, 95% CI: 0.98–0.99). The median time to complete the questionnaire was 2 (IQR, 1–6) min. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that the ObsQoR-10-Thai is valid and has good reliability, with a high degree of responsiveness in terms of assessment of recovery after elective cesarean delivery. Trial registration: This study was registered on the Thai Clinical Trials Registry, identifier TCTR20210204001, registered on 04/02/2021 (Prospectively registration).

Purpose: Thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) is a recommended regional analgesia during video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). However, single-injection TPVB does not last long enough to provide sufficient acute postoperative pain relief. Continuous TPVB through a catheter is technically challenging and often unreliable. Intravenous dexamethasone extends the analgesic duration with some peripheral nerve blocks. However, data on the effect of intravenous dexamethasone on pain relief with TPVB are limited. This study aimed to assess the analgesic efficacy of intravenous dexamethasone in patients who received TPVB for VATS. Patients and Methods: In this multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial, we recruited patients aged between 18 and 80 years with the American Society of Anesthesiologists of physical status class 1– 3 and underwent elective VATS. Patients under general anesthesia randomly received 8 mg of intravenous dexamethasone (group D) or normal saline (group C). Ultrasound-guided TPVB (USG-TPVB) was performed at the T4–T5 and T6-T7 spaces. Multimodal analgesia was achieved via paracetamol, tramadol and intravenous morphine for both study groups. The primary outcome was time for the first analgesic requirement. Postoperative pain in terms of numeric rating score (NRS), total morphine consumption and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) were assessed. Results: After excluding one patient, 59 patients were analyzed. There were no intergroup differences in baseline characteristics. The time to first analgesic requirement was longer in group D (305 [240, 510] minutes) than in group C (270 [180, 300] minutes) (P value = 0.02). The NRS at rest and on movement was lower in group D than in group C at 12 hours but did not differ at other time points. Postoperative morphine consumption was significantly lower in group D than in group C at 6,12,24 and 48 hours. Incidences of PONV were comparable between the groups. Conclusion: Intravenous dexamethasone, used as an adjunct to a single-injection USG-TPVB prolonged analgesic duration, had an opioid-sparing effect and provided better postoperative pain relief after VATS.

Purpose: Unplanned overnight admission (UOA) is an important indicator for quality of care with ambulatory knee arthroscopic surgery (AKAS). However, few studies have explored the factors related to the UOA and how to predict UOA after AKAS. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a standardized peri-operative protocol for the AKAS and identify whether a correlation exists between the peri-operative surgical factors and UOA in the patients undergoing AKAS. We hypothesized that more surgical invasiveness and prolong tourniquet time increase the risk of UOA after AKAS. Method: A prospective cohort study was conducted between October 2017 and March 2021. All 184 patients operated on standard AKAS protocol. The UOA is defined as overnight hospitalization of a patient undergoing AKAS. Demographic and peri-operative data were recorded, and the procedure was categorized based on the surgical invasiveness based on less invasive (intra-articular soft tissue surgery) (n = 65) and more complex surgery (involving extra-articular soft tissue surgery or ligamentous reconstruction) (n = 119). The clinical risk factors for UOA were identified and analyzed with multivariate analysis. Results: The incidence of UOA in the more complex group (n = 7, 14.3%) was significantly higher than in the less invasive group (n = 3, 4.6%) (p = 0.049). The peri-operative factors significantly associated with UOA were age, more complex surgery, and longer tourniquet time (p < 0.10 all). However, the multivariate analysis revealed that longer tourniquet time was the only significant predictor for UOA (OR = 1.045, 95% CI = 1.022–1.067, p = 0.0001). The optimal cut-off points of tourniquet time for predicting UOA with the highest Youden index in the less invasive and more complex groups were 56 minutes and 107 minutes, respectively. Conclusion: The UOA after AKAS is more common in more complex surgery compared to less invasive surgery. This study showed that unplanned admission significantly associated with many factors—as patient factors, surgical invasiveness, and tourniquet time. However, tourniquet time is the only independent predictor for UOA. Therefore, strict perioperative management protocol must be applied in AKAS, and all patients having these risk factors should be prepared for UOA.

Background: Undiagnosed obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is associated with adverse perioperative outcomes. The STOP-Bang questionnaire is a validated screening tool for OSA. However, its precision may vary among different populations. This study determined the association between high-risk OSA based on the modified STOP-Bang questionnaire and perioperative adverse events. Methods: This cross-sectional study included patients undergoing elective surgery from December 2018 to February 2019. The modified STOP-Bang questionnaire includes a history of Snoring, daytime Tiredness, Observed apnea, high blood Pressure, Body mass index > 30 kg/m², Age > 50, Neck circumference > 40 cm, and male Gender. High risk for OSA was considered as a score ≥ 3. Results: Overall, 400 patients were included, and 18.3% of patients experienced perioperative adverse events. On the basis of modified STOP-Bang, the incidence of perioperative adverse events was 23.2 and 13.8% in patients with high risk and low risk (P-value 0.016) (Original STOP-Bang: high risk 22.5% vs. low risk 14.7%, P-value 0.043). Neither modified nor original STOP-Bang was associated with perioperative adverse events (adjusted OR 1.91 (95% CI 0.99–3.66), P-value 0.055) vs. 1.69 (95%CI, 0.89–3.21), P-value 0.106). Modified STOP-Bang ≥3 could predict the incidence of difficult ventilation, laryngoscopic view ≥3, need for oxygen therapy during discharge from postanesthetic care unit and ICU admission. Conclusions: Neither modified nor original STOP-Bang was significantly associated with perioperative adverse events. However, a modified STOP-Bang ≥3 can help identify patients at risk of difficult airway, need for oxygen therapy, and ICU admission. Trial registrations: This study was registered on Thai Clinical Trials Registry, identifier TCTR20181129001, registered 23 November 2018 (Prospectively registered).

Background: Continuous peripheral nerve catheters (CPNCs) have been used for postoperative pain relief. A common problem encountered with CPNCs is pericatheter leakage, which can lead to dressing adhesive failure. Frequent dressing changes increase the risk of catheter dislodgement and infections. Adhesive glue is effective in securing the peripheral nerve catheter and decreasing leakage around the catheter insertion site. This study aimed to evaluate the incidence of pericatheter leakage with fixation using 2-octyl cyanoacrylate glue (Dermabond^®) as compared to sterile strips.Methods: Thirty patients undergoing unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with continuous femoral nerve catheter for postoperative analgesia were randomized into the catheter fixation with 2-octyl cyanoacrylate glue (Dermabond^®) group or the sterile strip group. The primary outcome was the incidence of pericatheter leakage. Secondary outcomes included the frequent of catheter displacement, the difficulty of catheter removal, pain score and patient satisfaction.Results: The incidence of pericatheter leakage at 24 and 48 hours was 0% versus 93% and 0% versus 100% in the Dermabond^® and sterile strip groups, respectively (P < 0.001). The incidence of displacement at 24 and 48 hours was 6.7% versus 93.3% and 6.7% versus 100% in the Dermabond^® and sterile strip, respectively (P < 0.001). There was no difference in numeric rating scale, difficulty of catheter removal, or satisfaction scores between groups.Conclusion: Catheter fixation with 2-octyl cyanoacrylate glue (Dermabond^®) decreased the incidence of pericatheter leakage, as well as catheter displacement, over 48 hours as compared to sterile strip fixation.