Lauren K. Dedow
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Research Subjects
Lauren K. Dedow has a total of 14 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
Charles Chen
1 shared publication- Edward S. Buckler
Institute for Genomic Diversity, Cornell University
1 shared publication - Emily Oren
Department of Molecular, Cell and Developmental Biology University of California Los Angeles Los Angeles CA USA
1 shared publication - Jason G. Wallace
Institute of Plant Breeding Genetics and Genomics, University of Georgia, Athens, USA
1 shared publication Karl Kremling
1 shared publication- Mark Stitt
Max Planck Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology, Am Muehlenberg 1, D-14476 Potsdam-Golm, Germany
1 shared publication
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 14 February 2022
- Published by Wiley in Plant Direct
- Vol. 6 (2) , e367
Fake news blues: A GUS staining protocol to reduce false‐negative data
The β‐glucuronidase gene, uidA (GUS), has remained a favorite reporter gene in plants since its introduction in 1987 for its stability and versatility in a variety of fluorometric, spectrophotometric, and histochemical techniques. One of the most popular uses is as a reporter gene for visualizing endogenous promoter activities within plant tissues. Despite this popularity, specific protocols for minimizing nonrepresentative staining patterns, including false negatives, in challenging tissue types are not common. This became a large issue during our work on dark‐grown Arabidopsis hypocotyls, and we set out to develop a protocol that would ensure accurate staining in a tissue that is biologically resistant to reagent penetration. Through extensive testing using a variety of constitutive and endogenous promoter::GUS fusion lines, we have developed an optimized GUS staining protocol that combines the use of acetone as a fixative, deliberate physical damage, and proper positive and negative controls to help ensure accurate staining along the hypocotyl while minimizing false negatives. Hopefully, our recommendations will allow for improved staining that more accurately reflects the true activity of cloned endogenous promoters and thus facilitate a more accurate understanding of promoter activity in Arabidopsis hypocotyls and other hard‐to‐stain tissues.
- 14 February 2022
- Published by Wiley in Plant Direct
- Vol. 6 (2) , e367
Open AccessFake news blues: A GUS staining protocol to reduce false‐negative data
The β‐glucuronidase gene, uidA (GUS), has remained a favorite reporter gene in plants since its introduction in 1987 for its stability and versatility in a variety of fluorometric, spectrophotometric, and histochemical techniques. One of the most popular uses is as a reporter gene for visualizing endogenous promoter activities within plant tissues. Despite this popularity, specific protocols for minimizing nonrepresentative staining patterns, including false negatives, in challenging tissue types are not common. This became a large issue during our work on dark‐grown Arabidopsis hypocotyls, and we set out to develop a protocol that would ensure accurate staining in a tissue that is biologically resistant to reagent penetration. Through extensive testing using a variety of constitutive and endogenous promoter::GUS fusion lines, we have developed an optimized GUS staining protocol that combines the use of acetone as a fixative, deliberate physical damage, and proper positive and negative controls to help ensure accurate staining along the hypocotyl while minimizing false negatives. Hopefully, our recommendations will allow for improved staining that more accurately reflects the true activity of cloned endogenous promoters and thus facilitate a more accurate understanding of promoter activity in Arabidopsis hypocotyls and other hard‐to‐stain tissues.
- 27 April 2015
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Plant Physiology
- Vol. 168 (2) , 575-583
Genome-Wide Association of Carbon and Nitrogen Metabolism in the Maize Nested Association Mapping Population
Carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) metabolism are critical to plant growth and development and are at the basis of crop yield and adaptation. We performed high-throughput metabolite analyses on over 12,000 samples from the nested association mapping population to identify genetic variation in C and N metabolism in maize (Zea mays ssp. mays). All samples were grown in the same field and used to identify natural variation controlling the levels of 12 key C and N metabolites, namely chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, fructose, fumarate, glucose, glutamate, malate, nitrate, starch, sucrose, total amino acids, and total protein, along with the first two principal components derived from them. Our genome-wide association results frequently identified hits with single-gene resolution. In addition to expected genes such as invertases, natural variation was identified in key C4 metabolism genes, including carbonic anhydrases and a malate transporter. Unlike several prior maize studies, extensive pleiotropy was found for C and N metabolites. This integration of field-derived metabolite data with powerful mapping and genomics resources allows for the dissection of key metabolic pathways, providing avenues for future genetic improvement.
- 27 April 2015
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Plant Physiology
- Vol. 168 (2) , 575-583
Genome-Wide Association of Carbon and Nitrogen Metabolism in the Maize Nested Association Mapping Population
Carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) metabolism are critical to plant growth and development and are at the basis of crop yield and adaptation. We performed high-throughput metabolite analyses on over 12,000 samples from the nested association mapping population to identify genetic variation in C and N metabolism in maize (Zea mays ssp. mays). All samples were grown in the same field and used to identify natural variation controlling the levels of 12 key C and N metabolites, namely chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, fructose, fumarate, glucose, glutamate, malate, nitrate, starch, sucrose, total amino acids, and total protein, along with the first two principal components derived from them. Our genome-wide association results frequently identified hits with single-gene resolution. In addition to expected genes such as invertases, natural variation was identified in key C4 metabolism genes, including carbonic anhydrases and a malate transporter. Unlike several prior maize studies, extensive pleiotropy was found for C and N metabolites. This integration of field-derived metabolite data with powerful mapping and genomics resources allows for the dissection of key metabolic pathways, providing avenues for future genetic improvement.