Per Sjøgren

Introduction: Chronic noncancer pain affects approximately one-fourth in population-based studies calling for more nuanced insights by applying the Graded Chronic Pain Scale-Revised (GCPS-R) framework for classifying graded chronic noncancer pain distribution in national disease surveillance. Objectives: The GCPS-R framework was included in the comprehensive questionnaire repeatedly used in the Danish National Health and Morbidity Surveillance program to provide more distinct measures for chronic non-malignant pain disease manifestation in Denmark. Methods: A cross-sectional study inviting randomly 25,000 adults 16 years and older to self-report questionnaires comprising the GCPS-R framework as part of the nationwide Danish National Health Survey 2023. Prevalences (%) and multivariate-adjusted odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) by ordinal logistic regression were calculated for GCPS-R by sex, area of living, age, country of origin, socioeconomic factors, body mass index, and Charlson Comorbidity Index. Results: The prevalence of chronic noncancer pain was overall 28.1% (95% CI 27.2%–29.0%) in 8,643 included individuals without cancer diagnosis counting 7.4% (6.9%–8.0%) with mild-impact, 7.1% (6.6%–7.6%) with bothersome-impact, and 13.6% (12.9%–14.4%) with high-impact chronic noncancer pain. Women had 66% (odds ratio (OR) 1.66; 95% CI 1.50–1.84) elevated odds of more severely graded chronic noncancer pain referenced to men. Socioeconomic factors influenced odds inversely. Body mass index was related to GCPS-R by dose-response effects of more than doubled elevated odds in World Health Organization obese class II (2.42; 1.92–3.06) and obese class III (4.43; 3.30–5.93) referenced to normal body mass index individuals. Comorbidity elevated odds of more severely graded chronic noncancer pain by 86% (1.86; 1.57–2.19) referenced to individuals without comorbidity. Conclusions: More than one-quarter individuals reported chronic noncancer pain characterized particularly by high-impact graded chronic noncancer pain when applying the GCPS-R framework for classifying graded chronic noncancer pain distribution in national disease surveillance for rational health care administration.

Aims: Patients with heart failure (HF) often experience delayed identification of palliative care needs. While communication with HF patients and their caregivers is increasingly stressed, systematic conversations about end-of-life care wishes remain a gap. This study explores a dyad experience of Advance Care Planning (ACP) conversations in an HF outpatient clinic. Methods and results: A qualitative interview study with 15 patients diagnosed with end-stage HF and 14 caregivers. Through qualitative content analysis and investigator triangulation, three subthemes emerged: ‘ACP as a harsh reality’, ‘ACP as a catalyst for crucial conversations’, and ‘ACP conversations help appreciating life’s small moments and adjusting hope’. Despite significant symptom burden, many patients lacked awareness of their end-stage HF prognosis. Following an initial ‘reality shock’, ACP conversations facilitated open discussions about end-of-life care wishes. Especially spousal caregivers experienced a significant caregiving load, generating complex emotions for both patients and their families. Notably, patients prioritized self-care, daily activities, and social interaction for maintaining quality of life. Conclusion: This study highlights a gap between patients with end-stage HF disease status and their comprehension of disease severity. Early integration of ACP may address knowledge gaps, enable informed decision-making, and alleviate caregiver burden. The study also emphasizes the patient-and family-centred care to support self-care, daily life activities, and social connections for improved quality of life throughout the disease trajectory. Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05269875

Background: Danish Palliative Care Database comprises five quality indicators: (1) Contact with specialised palliative care (SPC) among referred patients, (2) Waiting time of less than 10 days, (3) Proportion of patients who died from (A) cancer or (B) non-cancer diseases, and had contact with SPC, (4) Proportion of patients completing the patient-reported outcome measure at baseline (EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL), and (5) Proportion of patients discussed at a multidisciplinary conference. Purpose: To investigate changes in the quality indicators from 2010 until 2020 in cancer and non-cancer patients. Patients/material: Patients aged 18+ years who died from 2010 until 2020. Method: Register-based study with the Danish Palliative Care Database as the main data source. Indicator changes were reported as percentage fulfilment. Results: From 2010 until 2020, the proportion of patients with non-cancer diseases in SPC increased slightly (2.5–7.2%). In 2019, fulfilment of the five indicators for cancer and non-cancer were: (1) 81% vs. 73%; (2) 73% vs. 68%; (3A) 50%; (3B) 2%; (4) 73% vs. 66%; (5) 73% vs. 65%. Whereas all other indicators improved, the proportion of patients waiting less than 10 days from referral to contact decreased. Differences between type of unit were found, mainly lower for hospice. Interpretation: Most patients in SPC had cancer. All indicators except waiting time improved during the 10-year period. The establishment of the Danish Palliative Care Database may have contributed to the positive development; however, SPC in Denmark needs to be improved, especially regarding a reduction in waiting time and enhanced contact for non-cancer patients.

Background The Domus study, a randomized controlled trial (RCT), evaluated the effect of home-based specialized palliative care (SPC) reinforced with a psychological intervention for the patient-caregiver dyad on increasing advanced cancer patients’ time spent at home, as opposed to hospitalized, and the number of home deaths. As palliative care extends to include support for patients’ families and may thus assist caregivers and decrease demands on them, in this study we evaluated a secondary outcome, caregiver burden. Material and Methods Patients with incurable cancer and their caregivers were randomized (1:1) to care as usual or home-based SPC. Caregiver burden was assessed using the Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI) at baseline and 2, 4, 8 weeks and 6 months after randomization. Intervention effects were assessed in mixed effects models. Results A total of 258 caregivers were enrolled. Eleven per cent of informal caregivers experienced severe caregiver burden at baseline. Caregiver burden increased significantly over time in both groups (p = 0.0003), but no significant effect of the intervention was seen on overall caregiver burden (p = 0.5046) or burden subscales measuring role and personal strain. Conclusion In line with the majority of previous RCTs, the Domus intervention was not able to significantly reduce caregiver burden. Future interventions should consider targeting only caregivers reporting the greatest caregiver burden.

Palliative medicine has traditionally focused on people affected by cancer with rapidly advancing disease progression. However, as more people live longer time with serious illnesses, including lung diseases, the need of palliative care for these patients if also increasing. There is a lack of research and clinical knowledge about what palliative care is for people affected by chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and interstitial lung disease. The aim of this paper is to describe the development process of an easy to use and clinically relevant model for the palliative care approach in people affected by severe illnesses. The developed model consists of four components, which originated the title” 4,2,4,2 model”. Each number has a specific meaning: the first 4 = the four disease trajectories that patients may experience; 2 = the two forms of knowledge, objective, and intuitive that must be achieved by the health professionals to gain an understanding of the situation; 4 = the four dimensions of suffering physically, mentally, socially and existentially/spiritually; and 2 = the two roles that health-care professionals must be able to take in when treating patients with serious illnesses. The 4-2-4-2 model proposes an easy-to-use and clinically relevant model for palliative approach and integration of PC and pulmonary medicine. Another important purpose of this model is to provide HPs with different educational backgrounds and from different medical fields with a ‘golden standard approach’ to enhance the focus of the palliative approach in both the clinic and teaching. The effect and consequences of the use of the 4-2-4-2 model should be explored in future clinical trials. Furthermore, it should be investigated whether teaching the model creates a change in clinical approach to patients with serious illnesses as well as whether these changes are long-lasting.

Objectives Burnout, which is a state of prolonged physical and psychological exhaustion, seems to be a prevalent and serious problem among healthcare workers. Our aim was to investigate the prevalence of burnout symptoms among members of Danish Society of Palliative Medicine (DSPaM). Methods All 160 physician members of DSPaM were invited to a questionnaire survey. The Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (CBI) was used to evaluate and differentiate between personal, work-related and client-related burnout. Results 76 members responded (47,5%). 51% regularly received supervision. Scores on personal burnout demonstrated that 25% had no symptoms and 55% had symptoms that required attention; however, no respondents needed immediate intervention. Regarding work-related burnout: 40% had no symptoms, 20% had symptoms that needed attention and 3% needed immediate help. Regarding client-related burnout: 65% had no symptoms, 32% had symptoms that needed attention and none needed immediate intervention. Conclusions This survey demonstrated a relatively low rate of burnout symptoms among members of the DSPaM. In particular, the client-related burnout score was low, while higher scores were observed in personal and work-related burnout. Despite the relatively low overall levels of burnout, it is notable that about half of the physicians reported personal burnout, which needs to be addressed.

Background: While hospitals remain the most common place of death in many western countries, specialised palliative care (SPC) at home is an alternative to improve the quality of life for patients with incurable cancer. We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of a systematic fast-track transition process from oncological treatment to SPC enriched with a psychological intervention at home for patients with incurable cancer and their caregivers. Methods: A full economic evaluation with a time horizon of six months was performed from a societal perspective within a randomised controlled trial, the DOMUS trial (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01885637). The primary outcome of the health economic analysis was a incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), which is obtained by comparing costs required per gain in Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALY). The costs included primary and secondary healthcare costs, cost of intervention and informal care from caregivers. Public transfers were analysed in seperate analysis. QALYs were measured using EORTC QLQ-C30 for patients and SF-36 for caregivers. Bootstrap simulations were performed to obtain the ICER estimate. Results: In total, 321 patients (162 in intervention group, 159 in control group) and 235 caregivers (126 in intervention group, 109 in control group) completed the study. The intervention resulted in significantly higher QALYs for patients when compared to usual care (p-value = 0.026), while being more expensive as well. In the 6 months observation period, the average incremental cost of intervention compared to usual care was €2015 per patient (p value < 0.000). The mean incremental gain was 0.01678 QALY (p-value = 0.026). Thereby, the ICER was €118,292/QALY when adjusting for baseline costs and quality of life. For the caregivers, we found no significant differences in QALYs between the intervention and control group (p-value = 0.630). At a willingness to pay of €80,000 per QALY, the probability that the intervention is cost-effective lies at 15% in the base case scenario. Conclusion: This model of fast-track SPC enriched with a psychological intervention yields better QALYs than usual care with a large increase in costs. Trial registration: The trial was prospectively registered 25.6.2013. Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01885637.

Background Early and integrated specialized palliative care is often recommended but has still only been investigated in relatively few randomized clinical trials. Objective To investigate the effect of early specialized palliative care plus standard care versus standard care on the explorative outcomes in the Danish Palliative Care Trial (DanPaCT). Methods We conducted a randomized multicentre, parallel-group clinical trial. Consecutive patients with metastatic cancer were included if they had symptoms or problems that exceeded a predefined threshold according to the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30). Outcomes were estimated as the differences between the intervention and the control groups in the change from baseline to the weighted mean of the 3- and 8-week follow-ups measured as areas under the curve. Results In total, 145 patients were randomized to early specialized palliative care plus standard care versus 152 to standard care only. Early specialized palliative care had no significant effect on any of the symptoms or problems. Of the 21 items addressing satisfaction, specialized palliative care improved the item ‘overall satisfaction with the help received from the health care system’ with 9 points (95% confidence interval 3.8 to 14.2, p = 0.0006) and three other items (all p < 0.05). Conclusion In line with the analyses of the primary and secondary outcomes in DanPaCT, we did not find that specialized palliative care, as provided in DanPaCT, affected symptoms and problems. However, patients in the intervention group seemed more satisfied with the health care received than those in the standard care group. Trial registration NCT01348048

Interventional techniques to manage cancer-related pain may be efficient treatment modalities in patients unresponsive or unable to tolerate systemic opioids. However, indication and selection of the right technique demand knowledge, which is still incipient among clinicians. The present article summarizes the current evidence regarding the five most essential groups of interventional techniques to treat cancer-related pain: Neuraxial analgesia, minimally invasive procedures for vertebral pain, sympathetic blocks for abdominal cancer pain, peripheral nerve blocks, and percutaneous cordotomy. Furthermore, indication, mechanism, drug agents, contraindications, and complications of the main techniques of each group are discussed.

Background: The focus of specialized palliative care is to improve quality of life for patients with incurable cancer and their relatives including an increased opportunity to make their own choice of place of care and death. Aim: To investigate whether a systematic fast-track transition from oncological treatment to specialized palliative care at home for patients with incurable cancer reinforced with a psychological dyadic intervention could result in more time spent at home and death at home. Secondary aims were to investigate effects on quality of life, symptomatology and survival. Design: A prospective, single-centre, randomized controlled trial ( Clinicaltrials.gov : NCT01885637). Setting/participants: In all, 340 patients with incurable cancer and no or limited antineoplastic treatment options. Results: No statistically significant difference was found regarding number of deaths (4%, p = 0.460) and time spent at home (3%, p = 0.491). The secondary outcomes indicated that the intervention resulted in improved quality of life (−11.6 ± 25.5, p = 0.005, effect size = −0.44, 95% confidence interval = −0.77; −0.11), social functioning (−15.8 ± 31.4, p = 0.001, effect size = −0.50, 95% confidence interval = −0.84; −0.17) and emotional functioning (−9.1 ± 21.2, p = 0.039, effect size = −0.43, 95% confidence interval = −0.76; −0.10) after 6 months. A linear mixed-effect regression model confirmed a possible effect on emotional and social functioning at 6 months. Regarding survival, no differences were found between groups ( p = 0.605). No adverse effects were seen as consequence of the intervention. Conclusions: The main findings indicated that the intervention had no effect on time spent at home or place of death. However, the intervention resulted in a weak improvement of quality of life, social functioning and emotional functioning after 6 months.