Gary John Stephens

Increasing interest in psychedelic and related drugs as potential therapies for a wide spectrum of difficult‐to‐treat conditions, that extend beyond neuropsychiatric disorders, provided the impetus for this themed issue. This collection of reviews and original articles includes the mechanistic basis of how these drugs act, the current status of preclinical research and progress in clinical trials, and insight into the regulatory processes that determine clinical approval. In this editorial, we introduce these aspects and provide an overview of current controversies and challenges in the field, as well as highlighting the exciting potential that these drugs offer. LINKED ARTICLES: This article is part of a themed issue Emerging Therapeutic Opportunities for Psychedelic and Related Drugs. To view the other articles in this section visit http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.v183.14/issuetoc

Reflecting the global expansion of research, the British Journal of Pharmacology ( BJP ) has observed a substantial increase in the number of studies focusing on natural products. However, disparities in publication requirements between studies of synthetic small molecules and natural products have led to variable acceptance rates. Building on the progress observed following the 2020 and 2024 BJP editorial on natural products, this updated editorial aims to harmonise expectations across different research domains and promote fair and unbiased assessment of natural product studies. By standardising these criteria, the BJP reaffirms its commitment to maintaining scientific rigour whilst ensuring that the guidelines are clear and practical, thereby contributing to high‐quality research reporting that advances pharmacological science.

Increasing interest in psychedelic and related drugs as potential therapies for a wide spectrum of difficult to treat conditions that extend beyond neuropsychiatric disorders provided the impetus for this Themed Issue. This collection of reviews and original articles includes the mechanistic basis of how these drugs act, the current status of preclinical research and progress in clinical trials, and insight into the regulatory processes that determine clinical approval. In this Editorial we introduce these aspects and provide an overview of current controversies and challenges in the field, as well as highlighting the exciting potential that these drugs offer.

In the 2025 novel drug mini‐review, one can take a full measure of the ingenuity that underlies current drug design and development, despite the year's smaller harvest (46 novel drugs) compared to 2024 (53) and 2023 (70). 54% of the novel drugs are first‐in‐class (FIC). The emphasis on proteins/antibodies is maintained (~25% novel drugs in 2025), an industry trend that does not seem to abate. Fewer than half of the novel medicines address major or common disorders. Among the FIC drugs, it is worth mentioning the Na _v 1.8 channel inhibitor suzetrigine, the first non‐opioid approved to palliate acute pain; the first positive allosteric modulator of transient receptor potential melastatin 8 (TRPM8), acoltremon, that increases basal tear production in dry eye disease, a globally common disorder; lerodalcibep, a ‘third generation’ adnectin inhibitor of the protease Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin type 9 (PCSK9) to treat elevated LDL‐c; and zoliflodacin and gepotidacin, both innovatively targeting bacterial topoisomerases to treat uncomplicated urinary tract infections. Most of the approved medicines target unmet medical need areas and/or orphan indications (the latter alone accounting for 41% of the 2025 novel drugs) by applying imaginative approaches. These approaches include: the combination of two FIC drugs, the RAF/MEK clamp avutometinib paired with the FAK/Pyk2 inhibitor defactinib, to block more efficiently the RAS–RAF–MEK–ERK/FAK oncogenic pathway in low‐grade serous ovarian cancer; fitusiran, the first RNAi therapy for haemophilia, targeting for the first time the production of the natural anticoagulant anti‐thrombin in the liver; and brensocatib, which attenuates the activation of downstream neutrophil proteases by inhibiting the protease DPP1, thereby preventing lung tissue destruction in bronchiectasis. The landscape of novel drugs approved in 2025 reveals that pharmaceutical innovation continues to advance through FIC mechanisms, sophisticated therapeutic approaches, and a strong focus on unmet medical need.

In the past year, the European Medicines Agency (EMA), the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) authorised 53 novel drugs. While the 2024 harvest is not as rich as in 2023, when 70 new chemical entities were approved, the number of ‘orphan’ drug authorisations in 2024 (21) is similar to that of 2023 (24), illustrating the dynamic development of therapeutics in areas of unmet need. The 2024 approvals of novel protein therapeutics (15) and advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs, 6) indicate a sustained trend also noticeable in the 2023 new drugs reviewed in this journal last year (16 and 11, respectively). Clearly, the most striking characteristic of the 2024 drug yield is the creative pharmacological design, which allows these medicines to employ a novel approach to target a disease. Some notable examples are the first drug successfully using a ‘dock‐and‐block’ mechanism of inhibition (zenocutuzumab), the first approved drug for schizophrenia designed as an agonist of M₁/M₄ muscarinic receptors (xanomeline), the first biparatopic antibody (zanidatamab), binding two distinct epitopes of the same molecule, the first haemophilia therapy that instead of relying on external supplementation of clotting factors, restores Factor Xa activity by inhibiting TFPI (marstacimab), or the first ever authorised direct telomerase inhibitor (imetelstat) that reprogrammes the oncogenic drive of tumour cells. In addition, an impressive percentage of novel drugs were first in class (28 out of 53 or 53% of the total) and a substantial number can be considered disease agnostic, indicating the possibility of future approved extensions of their use for additional indications. The 2024 harvest demonstrates the therapeutic potential of innovative pharmacological design, which allows the effective targeting of intractable disorders and addresses crucial, unmet therapeutic needs.

In the past year, the FDA, the EMA or the MHRA authorised fifty-three (53) novel drugs. While this 2024 harvest is not as rich as that of 2023, when 70 new chemical entities were approved, the number of “orphan” drug authorisations in 2024 (21) is similar to that of 2023 (24), illustrating the very dynamic development of therapeutics in areas of high unmet need. Clearly, the most striking characteristic of the 2024 drug yield is the creative pharmacological design, which allows these medicines to employ a novel approach to target a disease. Some such 2024 notable examples are: the first drug successfully using a ”dock-and-block” mechanism of inhibition (zenocutuzumab), the first approved drug for schizophrenia designed as an agonist of M1/M4 muscarinic receptors (xanomeline), the first biparatopic antibody (zanidatamab), binding two distinct epitopes of the same molecule, the first haemophilia therapy that instead of relying on external supplementation of clotting factors, restores Factor Xa activity by inhibiting TFPI (marstacimab), or the first ever authorized direct telomerase inhibitor (imetelstat) that reprogrammes the tumour cells’ oncogenic drive. In addition, in 2024 an impressive percentage of the novel drugs were first-in-class (28 out of 53, or 53% of the total) and a substantial number of them can be considered disease-agnostic, indicating the possibility of future approved extension of their use into additional indications. Overall, the 2024 harvest demonstrates the therapeutic potential of innovative pharmacological design, which allows the effective targeting of intractable disorders and addresses crucial, unmet therapeutic needs

Background/Objectives: Recent studies, typically using patient cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), have suggested that different autoantibodies (Aabs) acting on their respective receptors, may underlie neuropsychiatric disorders. The GluN1 (NR1) subunit of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) has been identified as a target of anti-NMDAR Aabs in a number of central nervous system (CNS) diseases, including encephalitis and autoimmune epilepsy. However, the role or the nature of Aabs responsible for effects on neuronal excitability and synaptic plasticity is yet to be established fully. Methods: Peptide immunisation was used to generate Aabs against selected specific GluN1 extracellular sequences based on patient-derived anti-NMDAR Aabs that have been shown to bind to specific regions within the GluN1 subunit. ‘Protein A’ purification was used to obtain the total IgG, and further peptide purification was used to obtain a greater percentage of NMDAR-target specific IgG Aabs. The binding and specificity of these anti-NMDAR Aabs were determined using a range of methodologies including enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays, immunocytochemistry and immunoblotting. Functional effects were determined using different in vitro electrophysiology techniques: two-electrode voltage-clamps in Xenopus oocytes and measures of long-term potentiation (LTP) in ex vivo hippocampal brain slices using multi-electrode arrays (MEAs). Results: We show that anti-NMDAR Aabs generated from peptide immunisation had specificity for GluN1 immunisation peptides as well as target-specific binding to the native protein. Anti-NMDAR Aabs had no clear effect on isolated NMDARs in an oocyte expression system. However, peptide-purified anti-NMDAR Aabs prevented the induction of LTP at Schaffer collateral-CA1 synapses in ex vivo brain slices, consistent with causing synaptic NMDAR hypofunction at a network level. Conclusions: This work provides a solid basis to address outstanding questions regarding anti-NMDAR Aab mechanisms of action and, potentially, the development of therapies against CNS diseases.

Psychedelic drugs are under active consideration for clinical use and have generated significant interest for their potential as anti‐nociceptive treatments for chronic pain, and for addressing conditions like depression, frequently co‐morbid with pain. This review primarily explores the utility of preclinical animal models in investigating the potential of psilocybin as an anti‐nociceptive agent. Initial studies involving psilocybin in animal models of neuropathic and inflammatory pain are summarised, alongside areas where further research is needed. The potential mechanisms of action, including targeting serotonergic pathways through the activation of 5‐HT _2A receptors at both spinal and central levels, as well as neuroplastic actions that improve functional connectivity in brain regions involved in chronic pain, are considered. Current clinical aspects and the translational potential of psilocybin from animal models to chronic pain patients are reviewed. Also discussed is psilocybin's profile as an ideal anti‐nociceptive agent, with a wide range of effects against chronic pain and its associated inflammatory or emotional components. LINKED ARTICLES: This article is part of a themed issue Emerging Therapeutic Opportunities for Psychedelic and Related Drugs. To view the other articles in this section visit http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.v183.14/issuetoc

Natural products (NPs) have long been used as a rich source of bioactive compounds for drug development. Recent technological advancements have revitalised natural products research as evidenced by increased publications in this field. In this editorial review, we highlight key points from the 2020 British Journal of Pharmacology (BJP) practical guide, which outlines standards for natural products research reports, and provide papers published in BJP between years 2020 to 2023 that demonstrate adherence to these guidelines. Looking ahead, we discuss the potential of chemical proteomics approaches to elucidate natural products mechanisms of action and identify therapeutic targets for future research. By fostering innovation, we aim to advance natural products research and contribute to the development of novel therapeutics that will have a significant impact on healthcare.