José Miguel Senabre-Gallego

Objective: Sjögren disease (SjD) is a systemic autoimmune condition that frequently involves the salivary glands. Salivary gland ultrasound (SGUS) has emerged as a promising noninvasive tool, and the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) group has proposed a standardized semiquantitative scoring system. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of OMERACT SGUS in routine clinical practice, using the 2016 American College of Rheumatology/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (ACR/EULAR) criteria as the gold standard for diagnosis, and to compare its performance with salivary flow and Schirmer test. Methods: A prospective study was conducted including 103 consecutive outpatients referred for dryness evaluation. Two blinded sonographers performed SGUS of parotid glands (PGs) and submandibular glands (SMGs), applying the OMERACT 0-3 scale. Positivity was defined as a score ≥ 2 in at least 1 gland. Results: Among 103 participants, 51 fulfilled the 2016 ACR/EULAR criteria. Overall, SGUS achieved sensitivity of 66.7% and specificity of 76.9%. PG analysis showed high specificity (92.3%) but lower sensitivity (49%), whereas SMGs demonstrated higher sensitivity (58.8%) but lower specificity (78.8%). Schirmer test and unstimulated whole salivary flow rate (UWSFR) showed sensitivities of 49% and 52.9%, respectively. Stimulated whole salivary flow rate had very high specificity (94.2%) but poor sensitivity (17.6%). In patients aged < 40 years, UWSFR sensitivity dropped markedly to 20% (vs age ≥ 40 years: 57.1%), whereas SGUS maintained stable performance. Conclusion: In real-world settings, SGUS using the OMERACT score demonstrates high specificity, particularly in PGs, and moderate sensitivity, outperforming UWSFR in younger patients. These findings support SGUS as a practical adjunct to established diagnostic tests and reinforce its potential role in refining the diagnostic workup of suspected SjD.

Our aim was to assess the relationship between serum adalimumab levels, anti-drug antibodies (ADA) and disease activity in patients with axial spondylarthritis (SpA). We have carried out a single-centre cross-sectional study. adalimumab and ADA levels were analysed with ELISA and correlated with SpA activity using BASDAI and ASDAS scores. Adalimumab cut-off value was calculated to discriminate inactive disease/low disease activity (BASDAI < 4; ASDAS < 2.1) from moderate/high disease activity (BASDAI ≥ 4; ASDAS ≥ 2.1), using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Up to January 2016, 51 consecutive patients were included. The median (range) age was 46.6 (18–68) and 47.1% were women. ADA prevalence was 27.5%, with none detected in the 21.6% receiving concomitant disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) (p = 0.021). Adalimumab level was normal (> 3 mg/l) in 36 patients (70.6%), all without ADA. Fifteen patients (29.4%) had subtherapeutic adalimumab levels (< 3 mg/l), with ADA in 14 (93%). Median adalimumab (mg/l) was significantly higher in patients with inactive disease/low disease activity: BASDAI < 4 vs ≥ 4: 9.5 vs 2.6 (p < 0.01); ASDAS-CRP < 2.1 vs ≥ 2.1: 9.3 vs 0.3 (p < 0.001); ASDAS-ESR < 2.1 vs ≥ 2.1: 9.9 vs 3.0 (p < 0.001), and this finding was consistent with the result of the multivariate model. Patients with inactive disease/low disease activity presented significantly lower ADA levels. The adalimumab level cut-offs and area under the curve (AUC) obtained in the ROC curves were: ASDAS-CRP (< 2.1) 4.6 mg/l (AUC 81.2%; 95% CI 67.5–94.9; p < 0.001); ASDAS-ESR (< 2.1) 7.7 mg/l (AUC 82.4%; 95% CI 69.3–95.5; p < 0.001); BASDAI (< 4) 6.4 mg/l (AUC 73.5%; 95% CI 58.6–88.3; p < 0.01). In conclusion, presence of ADA in axial SpA patients treated with adalimumab was associated with lower serum drug levels. ADA levels were lower and adalimumab levels were higher in patients with inactive disease/low disease activity based on BASDAI and ASDAS indices. Concomitant treatment with MTX reduces de likelihood of finding ADA. Serum adalimumab levels above 4.6 mg/l are recommended to avoid compromising efficacy.

Obesity can be a factor that affects response to anti-TNF drugs. However, studies on patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) are rare. We aimed to determine whether obesity affects serum levels of adalimumab (ADL), and immunogenicity and clinical efficacy of the drug in patients with AS. A cross-sectional study on 57 patients with axial AS receiving ADL was conducted. They received DMARD per standard of care at their rheumatologist's discretion. Patients' body mass index (BMI) was obtained when ADL treatment began. Clinical response was evaluated using the Spanish versions of the BASDAI index and the ASDAS ESR index. Serum concentrations of free ADL (trough level) and anti-ADL antibodies were measured using Promonitor-ADL and Promonitor Anti-ADL ELISA kits (Progenika Grifols SA, Spain), just prior to the next subcutaneous injection of ADL. Patients with BMI >30 kg/ m2 (obese) as opposed to BMI <25 kg/ m2 (normal), presented lower blood ADL levels [5.0 (5.52) vs. 9.14 (4.3), p=0.032], increased ASDAS scores (2.58 [0.79] vs. 1.9 [0.83], p=0.03), and shorter ADL treatment time: 1.01 [0.84] vs. (1.85 [1.65]; p=0.08]), and increased BASDAI results (5.04 [2.5] vs. 3.5 [1.88]; p=0.06). Obese patients showed a lower probability of clinical response to ADL versus non-obese patients with regard to achieving BASDAI ≤4 (OR: 3.5, 95%CI: 0.84-17.19; p=0.05) or ASDAS ≤2.1 (OR: 4.64, 95%CI: 1.02-24.13; p=0.02). Of the AS patients receiving treatment with ADL, those that are obese had significantly lower serum ADL levels and decreased clinical response without an increase in immunogenicity.

RÉPLICA: “REVISIÓN DE LOS EFECTOS BENEFICIOSOS DE LA INGESTA DE COLÁGENO HIDROLIZADO SOBRE LA SALUD OSTEOARTICULAR Y EL ENVEJECIMIENTO DÉRMICO”

The aim of this paper is to assess the usefulness of measuring serum levels of adalimumab (ADL) and anti-ADL antibodies in 57 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with ADL for at least 3 months in daily practice. All patients received concomitant disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD). Receiver-operator characteristics (ROC) analysis was used to obtain the cut-off value of ADL for low disease activity (DAS28-ESR ≤3.2). Anti-ADL antibodies were detected in 4 (7%) patients with a mean (SD) DAS28 score of 4.6 (0.9). Patients with positive anti-ADL antibodies had significantly lower levels of ADL and higher DAS28 scores than those with negative antibodies. Patients with DAS28 ≤3.2 as compared with patients with DAS28 >3.2 showed significantly better SDAI score, higher serum concentrations of ADL and none of them showed anti-ADL antibodies. The cut-off of serum level of ADL for DAS28 11.3 mg/L. Patients in the medium group were closed to clinical remission (median DAS28 2.7) and patients in the high group were on clinical remission (DAS28 2.1). Serum levels of ADL should be maintained >4.3 mg/L. In patients with ADL levels >11.3 mg/L, a decrease of the dose of ADL or an increase in the interval between doses may be planned. The presence of anti-ADL antibodies was associated with a loss of clinical efficacy of ADL.

Patients treated with adalimumab (ADL) can induce anti-ADL antibodies (AAA) formation that is associated with low drug levels and clinical non-response. But, in the majority of the assays, the measurement of AAA is hampered by the presence of the drug itself. In support of immunogenicity assessment in clinical samples with subtherapeutic ADL levels, we proved acid pre-treatment for AAA detection with the Promonitor-enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Were measured AAA after acidification in 32 serum samples with a subtherapeutic ADL trough level. ADL and AAA concentrations were measured by ELISA (Promonitor). The impact of drug concentration on AAA recovery (with or without acidification) was also evaluated by mixing known amounts of ADL (0.25, 0.5 and 1 mg/L) and AAA (100, 200, 300 and 400 AU/mL) from clinical samples in pooled serum. The drug significantly inhibited the detection of AAA in untreated samples. And progressively higher levels of ADL cause increasing inhibition of signal. Acid pre-treatment carried a significant increase in assay response, particularly at lower free ADL concentrations. AAA were detected in the 53 % of the samples after acid dissociation. In seven patients, the positive AAA after dissociation was detected in the first monitoring of ADL and five patients were positive 3 months later for AAA with the standard assay. Monitoring AAA using acid dissociation in patients with subtherapeutic circulating level of ADL could detect precocious problems of bioavailability, assess the immunogenicity of ADL and may be used to optimise dose regimens, thereby preventing prolonged use of inadequate therapy and guide change of treatment.

Peer reviewed article authored by (Senabre-Gallego JM, Santos-Ramírez C, Santos-Soler G, Salas-Heredia E, Sánchez-Barrioluengo M, Barber X, Rosas J). Read article or submit your manuscript for publishing.