MNMarcela de Alencar Coelho Neto

Marcela de Alencar Coelho Neto

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article

Previous Organizations / Institutes

The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years


Marcela de Alencar Coelho Neto has a total of 11 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Definition, prevalence, clinical relevance and treatment of T‐shaped uterus: systematic review

    by M. A. Coelho Neto, A. Ludwin, F. Petraglia, W. P. Martins

    Objectives: To summarize in a systematic review the current evidence regarding definitions, diagnosis, prevalence, etiology, clinical relevance and impact of surgical treatment for T‐shaped uterus not related to diethylstilbestrol (DES) exposure, and to highlight areas on which future research should focus. Methods: A search of PubMed, Scopus and EMBASE was performed on 9 April 2020 using the search terms ‘t‐shaped OR t‐shape OR infantile OR (lateral indentation) OR (diethylstilbestrol OR DES) AND (uterus OR uterine OR uteri) AND (anomaly OR anomalies OR malformation OR malformations)’. Additionally, the reference lists of the included studies were searched manually for other relevant publications. All studies presenting data on T‐shaped uterus not associated with DES exposure and including at least 10 women were considered eligible. Studies regarding DES‐related T‐shaped uterus were excluded because DES has not been used since 1971. There were no restrictions on language, date of publication or status of publication. Results: Of 2504 records identified by the electronic search, 20 studies were included in the systematic review. The majority of studies were of poor quality. In 11 of 16 studies reporting on the diagnosis of T‐shaped uterus, the diagnostic method used was three‐dimensional ultrasound. There is no consensus on the definition of T‐shaped uterus, but the most cited criteria (4/16 studies) were of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology and the European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESHRE/ESGE; 2013). The prevalence of T‐shaped uterus varied from 0.2% to 10% in the four included studies reporting such data. With respect to etiology (except for DES), T‐shaped uterus was considered a primary condition in three studies and secondary to adhesions in five and adenomyosis in one. T‐shaped uterus was related to worse reproductive outcome based on subfertility (nine studies), miscarriage (seven studies), preterm delivery (two studies), ectopic pregnancy (one study) and repeat implantation failure (seven studies). Of the 12 studies that reported on the effects of surgical treatment of T‐shaped uterus by hysteroscopic metroplasty, some mentioned an improvement in pregnancy rate (rates ranging from 49.6% to 88%; eight studies), live‐birth rate (rates ranging from 35.1% to 76%; seven studies) and term‐delivery rate (four studies) and a reduction in miscarriage (rates ranging from 7% to 49.6%; five studies) and ectopic pregnancy (one study). However, the evidence is of very low quality with serious/critical risk of bias toward overestimating the intervention effect. Some authors reported no complications related to the procedure, while others mentioned persistence of the dysmorphism (rates ranging from 1.4% to 11%; three studies), bleeding (1.3%; one study), infection (2.6%; one study) and adhesions (11.1% and 16.8%; two studies). Conclusions: The prevalence, etiology and clinical relevance, with respect to reproductive outcome, of T‐shaped uterus remain unclear and there is no consensus on the definition and diagnostic method for this condition. Expectant management should be considered the most appropriate choice for everyday practice until randomized controlled trials show a benefit of intervention. © 2020 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology


  • Septate uterus according to ESHRE/ESGE, ASRM and CUME definitions: association with infertility and miscarriage, cost and warnings for women and healthcare systems

    by A. Ludwin, I. Ludwin, M. A. Coelho Neto, C. O. Nastri, B. Bhagavath, S. R. Lindheim, W. P. Martins

    Objectives: To estimate the differences in frequency of diagnosis of septate uterus using three different definitions and determine whether these differences are significant in clinical practice, and to examine the association between diagnosis of septate uterus, using each of the three definitions, and infertility and/or previous miscarriage as well as the cost of allocation to surgery.Methods: This was a secondary analysis of data from a prospective study of 261 consecutive women of reproductive age attending a private clinic focused on the diagnosis and treatment of congenital uterine malformations. Reanalysis of the datasets was performed according to three different means of defining septate uterus: following the recommendations of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM), a 2016 update of those of the American Fertility Society from 1988 (ASRM‐2016: internal fundal indentation depth ≥ 1.5 cm, angle of internal indentation < 90° and external indentation depth < 1 cm); following the recommendations of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology/European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESHRE/ESGE), published in 2013 and reaffirmed in 2016 (ESHRE/ESGE‐2016: internal fundal/uterine indentation depth > 50% of uterine‐wall thickness and external indentation depth < 50% of uterine‐wall thickness, with uterine‐wall thickness measured above interostial/intercornual line); and using a definition published last year which was based on the decision made most often by a group of experts (Congenital Uterine Malformation by Experts; CUME) (CUME‐2018: internal fundal indentation depth ≥ 1 cm and external fundal indentation depth < 1 cm). We compared the rate of diagnosis of septate uterus using each of these three definitions and, for each, we estimated the association between the diagnosis and infertility and/or previous miscarriage, and anticipated the costs associated with their implementation using a guesstimation method.Results: Although 32.6% (85/261) of the subjects met the criteria for one of the three definitions of septate uterus, only 2.7% (7/261) of them were defined as having septate uterus according to all three definitions. We diagnosed significantly more cases of septate uterus using ESHRE/ESGE‐2016 than using ASRM‐2016 (31% vs 5%, relative risk (RR) = 6.7, P < 0.0001) or CUME‐2018 (31% vs 12%, RR = 2.6, P < 0.0001) criteria. We also observed frequent cases that could not be classified definitively by ASRM‐2016 (gray zone: neither normal/arcuate nor septate; 6.5%). There were no significant differences (P > 0.05) in the prevalence of septate uterus in women with vs those without infertility according to ASRM‐2016 (5% vs 4%), ESHRE/ESGE‐2016 (35% vs 28%) or CUME‐2018 (11% vs 12%). Septate uterus was diagnosed significantly more frequently in women with vs those without previous miscarriage according to ASRM‐2016 (11% vs 3%; P = 0.04) and CUME‐2018 (22 vs 10%; P = 0.04), but not according to ESHRE/ESGE‐2016 (42% vs 28%; P = 0.8) criteria. Our calculations showed that global costs to the healthcare system would be highly dependent on the criteria used in the clinical setting to define septate uterus, with the costs associated with the ESHRE/ESGE‐2016 definition potentially being an extra US$ 100–200 billion over 5 years in comparison to ASRM‐2016 and CUME‐2018 definitions.Conclusions: The prevalence of septate uterus according to ESHRE/ESGE‐2016, ASRM‐2016 and CUME‐2018 definitions differs considerably. An important limitation of the ASRM classification, which needs to be addressed, is the high proportion of unclassifiable cases originally named, by us, the ‘gray zone’. The high rate of overdiagnosis of septate uterus according to ESHRE/ESGE‐2016 may lead to unnecessary surgery and therefore unnecessary risk in these women and may impose a considerable financial burden on healthcare systems. Efforts to define clinically meaningful and universally applicable criteria for the diagnosis of septate uterus should be encouraged. Copyright © 2019 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.


  • Open Access

    Subclinical Hypothyroidism and Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Outcomes

    by Marcela de Alencar Coelho Neto, Wellington de Paula Martins, Anderson Melo, Rui Alberto Ferriani, Paula Andrea Navarro

    Purpose Whether preconception elevated concentrations of thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) compromises reproductive outcomes in patients undergoing assisted reproduction techniques (ARTs) remains unclear. This study therefore compared the reproductive outcomes in patients with TSH concentrations of < 2.5 mIU/L, 2.5–4.0 mIU/L, and 4.0–10.0 mIU/L undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) for in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Methods This retrospective cohort study evaluated the medical records of all women with measured TSH concentrations who underwent IVF/ICSI between January 2011 and December 2012. The patients were divided into three groups: TSH < 2.5 mIU/L (group 1); THS ≥2.5 and < 4.0 mIU/L (group 2); and THS ≥4 mIU/L and < 10.0 mIU/L (group 3). Patients who were administered levothyroxine for treating hypothyroidism were excluded from the analysis. The primary endpoints were clinical pregnancy, miscarriage, live birth and multiple pregnancy rates. Results During the study period, 787 women underwent IVF/ICSI. Sixty were excluded because their TSH concentrations were unavailable, and 77 were excluded due to their use of levothyroxine. The prevalence of patients presenting elevated concentrations of TSH was of 5.07% (using a TSH threshold of 4.0 mIU/L) and of 29.99% (using a TSH threshold of 2.5 mIU/L). Patient characteristics, type of COS, and response to COS did not differ among the three groups, and there were no differences in clinical pregnancy (24.4% versus 25.9% versus 24.2%, p = 0.93); miscarriage (17.1% versus 14.3% versus 12.5%, p = 0.93); live birth (20.2% versus 22.2% versus 21.2%, p = 0.86); and multiple pregnancy rates (27.0% versus 21.4% versus 25.0%, p = 0.90) respectively. Conclusion Response to COS, live birth, and miscarriage rates were not altered in women with elevated concentrations of TSH undergoing IVF/ICSI, regardless of using a TSH threshold of 2.5 mIU/L or 4.0 mIU/L. These findings reinforce the uncertainties related to the impact of subclinical hypothyroidism on reproductive outcomes in women undergoing COS for ARTs. Objetivos Se concentrações elevadas de hormônio estimulante da tireoide (TSH) antes do parto comprometem resultados reprodutivos em pacientes submetidas a técnicas de reprodução assistida (TRA) é incerto. Este estudo comparou resultados reprodutivos de pacientes com concentrações de TSH < 2,5 mIU/L; 2,5–4,0 mIU/L e 4,0–10,0 mIU/L submetidas a estimulação ovariana controlada (EOC) para fertilização in vitro (FIV)/injeção intracitoplasmática de espermatozoide (ICSI). Métodos Este estudo de coorte retrospectiva avaliou prontuários médicos de todas as pacientes que tinham registro de concentrações de TSH submetidas a FIV/ICSI entre janeiro de 2011 e dezembro de 2012. As pacientes foram divididas em três grupos: aquelas com TSH < 2,5 mIU/L (grupo 1); entre 2,5 e 4,0 mIU/L (grupo 2) e entre 4,0 mIU/L e 10,0 mIU/L (grupo 3). As pacientes que estavam em uso de levotiroxina para tratamento de hipotireoidismo foram excluídas da análise. Os desfechos primários foram taxas de gravidez clínica, de abortamento, de nascido vivo e de gravidez múltipla. Resultados Durante o período do estudo, 787 mulheres foram submetidas a FIV/ICSI. Sessenta foram excluídas por causa da indisponibilidade das concentrações de TSH, e 77 foram excluídas porque estavam usando levotiroxina. A prevalência de pacientes apresentando elevação das concentrações de TSH foi de 5,07% (usando um limite de TSH de 4,0 mIU/L) e 29,99% (usando um limite de TSH de 2,5 mIU/L). As características das pacientes, tipo de EOC e reposta à EOC não diferiram entre os três grupos, nem houve diferenças nas taxas de gravidez clínica (24,4% versus 25,9% versus 24,2%, p = 0,93); abortamento (17,1% versus 14,3% versus 12,5%, p = 0,93); nascido vivo (20,2% versus 22,2% versus 21,2%, p = 0,86); e taxas de gestação múltipla (27,0% versus 21,4% versus 25,0%, p = 0,90), respectivamente. Conclusão Resposta à EOC, taxa de nascido vivo e de abortamento não foram alteradas em mulheres submetidas a FIV/ICSI com concentrações elevadas de TSH independente de usar um limite de 2,5 ou 4,0 mIU/L. Estes achados reforçam as incertezas relacionadas ao impacto do hipotireoidismo subclínico nos resultados reprodutivos de mulheres submetidas a EOC para TRA.