Jan Hofland

Journal of Medical Internet Research - International Scientific Journal for Medical Research, Information and Communication on the Internet #Preprint #PeerReviewMe: Warning: This is a unreviewed preprint. Readers are warned that the document has not been peer-reviewed by expert/patient reviewers or an academic editor, may contain misleading claims, and is likely to undergo changes before final publication, if accepted, or may have been rejected/withdrawn. Readers with interest and expertise are encouraged to sign up as peer-reviewer, if the paper is within an open peer-review period. Please cite this preprint only for review purposes or for grant applications and CVs (if you are the author). Background: The systemic inflammatory response following on-pump cardiac surgery may induce post-operative hemodynamic instability and impairment of renal function. EA-230, a linear tetrapeptide (AQGV) derived from the β-chain of the human chorionic gonadotropin pregnancy hormone has shown immunomodulatory and renoprotective effects in several animal models of systemic inflammation. In phase I studies and a phase IIa study during human experimental endotoxaemia, these immunomodulatory effects were confirmed and an excellent safety profile was found. Objectives: To examine the immunomodulatory and renoprotective effects of EA-230, as well as the safety and tolerability, in patients with systemic inflammation following on-pump cardiac surgery. Methods: We describe a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in which 180 elective patients undergoing on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting with or without concomitant valve surgery will be enrolled. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either EA-230, 90 mg/kg/hour, or placebo, infused from the start of the surgical procedure until the end of the use of the cardiopulmonary bypass. The primary endpoint is the modulation of the inflammatory response by EA-230, quantified as the change in interleukin-6 plasma concentrations following surgery. Key secondary endpoints are safety and renal function. The study will be conducted in two parts to enable an interim safety analysis by an independent data monitoring committee at n=60, and an adaptive design is used to re-assess statistical power halfway the study. Ethics and dissemination: This study is approved by the independent competent authority and ethics committee and will be conducted in accordance with the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki, guidelines of Good Clinical Practice and European Directive 2001/20/CE regarding the conduct of clinical trials. Results of this study will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed scientific journal. Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov; NCT03145220 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03145220)

BACKGROUND The cardiac surgery–induced systemic inflammatory response may induce postoperative hemodynamic instability and impairment of renal function. EA-230, a linear tetrapeptide (A-Q-G-V), is derived from the beta chain of the human chorionic gonadotropin pregnancy hormone. It has shown immunomodulatory and renoprotective effects in several animal models of systemic inflammation. In phase 1 and phase 2a studies, these immunomodulatory effects were confirmed during human experimental endotoxemia, and EA-230 was found to have an excellent safety profile. OBJECTIVE The objective of this first in-patient study is to test the safety and tolerability as well as the immunomodulatory and renoprotective effects of EA-230 in a proof-of-principle design in patients with systemic inflammation following on-pump cardiac surgery. METHODS We describe a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in which 180 elective patients undergoing on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting, with or without concomitant valve surgery, are enrolled. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio and will receive either EA-230 (90 mg/kg/hour) or a placebo. These will be infused at the start of the surgical procedure until the end of the use of the cardiopulmonary bypass. The primary focus of this first-in-patient study will be on safety and tolerability of EA-230. The primary efficacy end point is the modulation of the inflammatory response by EA-230 quantified as the change in interleukin-6 plasma concentrations after surgery. The key secondary end point is the effect of EA-230 on renal function. The study will be conducted in 2 parts to enable an interim safety analysis by an independent data monitoring committee at a sample size of 60. An adaptive design is used to reassess statistical power halfway through the study. RESULTS This study has been approved by the independent competent authority and ethics committee and will be conducted in accordance with the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki, guidelines of Good Clinical Practice, and European Directive 2001/20/CE regarding the conduct of clinical trials. Results of this study will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed scientific journal. Enrollment of this study commenced in July 2016, and results are expected at the end of 2018. CONCLUSIONS This adaptive phase 2 clinical study is designed to test the safety and tolerability of EA-230 in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. In addition, efficacy end points focused on the effect of the systemic inflammatory response and renal function are investigated. CLINICALTRIAL ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03145220; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03145220 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/74JPh8GNN) INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPOR DERR1-10.2196/11441

Background A Surgical Patient safety Observation Tool (SPOT) was developed and tested in a multicentre observational pilot study. The tool enables monitoring and benchmarking perioperative safety performance across departments and hospitals, covering international patient safety goals. Methods Nineteen perioperative patient safety observation topics were selected from Dutch perioperative patient safety guidelines, which also cover international patient safety goals. All items that measured these selected topics were then extracted from available local observation checklists of the participating hospitals. Experts individually prioritized the best measurement items per topic in an initial written Delphi round. The second (face to face) Delphi round resulted in consensus on the content of SPOT, after which the measurable elements (MEs) per topic were defined. Finally, the tool was piloted in eight hospitals for measurability, applicability, improvement potential, discriminatory capacity and feasibility. Results The pilot test showed good measurability for all 19 patient safety topics (range of 8–291 MEs among topics), with good applicability (median 97 (range 11·8–100) per cent). The overall improvement potential appeared to be good (median 89 (range 72·5–100) per cent), and at topic level the tool showed good discriminatory capacity (variation 27·5 per cent, range in compliance 72·5–100 per cent). Overall scores showed relatively little variation between the participating hospitals (variation 13 per cent, range in compliance 83–96 per cent). All eight auditors considered SPOT a straightforward and easy‐to‐use tracer tool. Conclusion A comprehensive tool to measure safety of care was developed and validated using a systematic, stepwise method, enabling hospitals to monitor, benchmark and improve perioperative safety performance.

Reduction of blood loss after cardiac surgery remains challenging. The effectiveness of adherence to a protocol on cessation of anticoagulants and platelet-inhibiting medications was investigated together with the influence of protocol violations on blood loss after surgery, use of blood products, surgical re-explorations and 30-day mortality. Between 2009 and 2013, data were collected prospectively for all elective cardiac surgery procedures in adult patients (n = 1637). Two groups were distinguished: Group 1 adhered to the protocol for cessation or continuation of medication (n = 1287, 79%) and Group 2 violated the protocol (n = 350, 21%). Median blood loss was 300 ml (interquartile range 175–500 ml). Eighty patients underwent re-exploration due to blood loss (5%). Thirty-day mortality was 2% (n = 27). Protocol violation was associated with increased blood loss [median 275 ml (175–475 ml) vs 350 ml (250–612); P ≤ 0.001] and with increased average use of fresh frozen plasma (226 ml vs 139 ml; P << 0.00001), red blood cell transfusion (115 ml vs 87 ml; P = 0.081) and thrombocyte transfusions (52 ml vs 37 ml; P = 0.0082). The number of re-explorations (4% vs 6%; P = 0.39) and mortality risk (1% vs 2%; P = 0.72) did not differ. Balancing the benefit of continuing platelet inhibitors or anticoagulants versus cessation before surgery remains challenging. Adherence to the protocol will lead to lower blood loss and in a lower consumption of blood products although the decision to go for re-exploration and 30-day mortality does not differ compared with the protocol violation. Stopping medication does not lead to thromboembolic events.

Background: Ischemic myocardial damage accompanying coronary artery bypass graft surgery remains a clinical challenge. We investigated whether xenon anesthesia could limit myocardial damage in coronary artery bypass graft surgery patients, as has been reported for animal ischemia models. Methods: In 17 university hospitals in France, Germany, Italy, and The Netherlands, low-risk elective, on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery patients were randomized to receive xenon, sevoflurane, or propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia for anesthesia maintenance. The primary outcome was the cardiac troponin I concentration in the blood 24 h postsurgery. The noninferiority margin for the mean difference in cardiac troponin I release between the xenon and sevoflurane groups was less than 0.15 ng/ml. Secondary outcomes were the safety and feasibility of xenon anesthesia. Results: The first patient included at each center received xenon anesthesia for practical reasons. For all other patients, anesthesia maintenance was randomized (intention-to-treat: n = 492; per-protocol/without major protocol deviation: n = 446). Median 24-h postoperative cardiac troponin I concentrations (ng/ml [interquartile range]) were 1.14 [0.76 to 2.10] with xenon, 1.30 [0.78 to 2.67] with sevoflurane, and 1.48 [0.94 to 2.78] with total intravenous anesthesia [per-protocol]). The mean difference in cardiac troponin I release between xenon and sevoflurane was −0.09 ng/ml (95% CI, −0.30 to 0.11; per-protocol: P = 0.02). Postoperative cardiac troponin I release was significantly less with xenon than with total intravenous anesthesia (intention-to-treat: P = 0.05; per-protocol: P = 0.02). Perioperative variables and postoperative outcomes were comparable across all groups, with no safety concerns. Conclusions: In postoperative cardiac troponin I release, xenon was noninferior to sevoflurane in low-risk, on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery patients. Only with xenon was cardiac troponin I release less than with total intravenous anesthesia. Xenon anesthesia appeared safe and feasible.

Summary: Prophylactic intra‐operative administration of dexamethasone may improve short‐term clinical outcomes in cardiac surgical patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate long‐term clinical outcomes and cost effectiveness of dexamethasone versus placebo. Patients included in the multicentre, randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled DE xamethasone for Cardiac Surgery ( DECS ) trial were followed up for 12 months after their cardiac surgical procedure. In the DECS trial, patients received a single intra‐operative dose of dexamethasone 1 mg.kg ⁻¹ (n = 2239) or placebo (n = 2255). The effects on the incidence of major postoperative events were evaluated. Also, overall costs for the 12‐month postoperative period, and cost effectiveness, were compared between groups. Of 4494 randomised patients, 4457 patients (99%) were followed up until 12 months after surgery. There was no difference in the incidence of major postoperative events, the relative risk (95%CI) being 0.86 (0.72‐1.03); p = 0.1. Treatment with dexamethasone reduced costs per patient by £921 [€1084] (95% CI £−1672 to −137; p = 0.02), mainly through reduction of postoperative respiratory failure and duration of postoperative hospital stay. The probability of dexamethasone being cost effective compared with placebo was 97% at a threshold value of £17,000 [€20,000] per quality‐adjusted life year. We conclude that intra‐operative high‐dose dexamethasone did not have an effect on major adverse events at 12 months after cardiac surgery, but was associated with a reduction in costs. Routine dexamethasone administration is expected to be cost effective at commonly accepted threshold levels for cost effectiveness.

Cardiac surgery and postoperative admission to the ICU may lead to posttraumatic stress disorder and depression. Perioperatively administered corticosteroids potentially alter the risk of development of these psychiatric conditions, by affecting the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. However, findings of previous studies are inconsistent. We aimed to assess the effect of a single dose of dexamethasone compared with placebo on symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder and depression and health-related quality of life after cardiac surgery and ICU admission. Follow-up study of a randomized clinical trial. Five Dutch heart centers. Cardiac surgery patients (n = 1,244) who participated in the Dexamethasone for Cardiac Surgery trial. A single intraoperative IV dose of dexamethasone or placebo was administered in a randomized, double-blind way. Symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder, depression, and health-related quality of life were assessed with validated questionnaires 1.5 years after randomization. Data were available for 1,125 patients (90.4%); of which 561 patients received dexamethasone and 564 patients received placebo. Overall, the prevalence of psychopathology was not influenced by dexamethasone. Posttraumatic stress disorder and depression were present in, respectively, 52 patients (9.3%) and 69 patients (12.3%) who received dexamethasone and in 66 patients (11.7%) and 78 patients (13.8%) who received placebo (posttraumatic stress disorder: odds ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.55-1.20; p = 0.30; depression: odds ratio, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.64-1.31; p = 0.63). Subgroup analysis revealed a lower prevalence of posttraumatic stress disorder (odds ratio, 0.23; 95% CI, 0.07-0.72; p < 0.01) and depression (odds ratio, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.11-0.77; p < 0.01) in female patients after dexamethasone administration. Health-related quality of life did not differ between groups and was not associated with psychopathology. Overall, our findings suggest that exogenous administration of the glucocorticoid receptor agonist dexamethasone-compared with placebo-during cardiac surgery does not positively or negatively affect the prevalence of posttraumatic stress disorder and depression. However, in female patients, beneficial effects on the occurrence of posttraumatic stress disorder and depression may be present.