Gillian A. Whitfield
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Gillian A. Whitfield has a total of 404 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Neil Gunn Burnet
Proton Centre, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
7 shared publications - Simona Gaito
Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
7 shared publications - Peter Sitch
Proton Clinical Outcomes Unit (PCOU), The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
5 shared publications - Ed Smith
The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
4 shared publications Frances Charlwood
4 shared publicationsA. France
Proton Clinical Outcomes Unit (PCOU), The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
3 shared publications
Latest Publications
- Open Access
- 17 September 2026
- Published by Elsevier in Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 60
Drivers of Change in Radiotherapy Practice: Lessons From a UK Tertiary Cancer Centre (2013–2023)
- 17 September 2026
- Published by Elsevier in Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 60
Open AccessDrivers of Change in Radiotherapy Practice: Lessons From a UK Tertiary Cancer Centre (2013–2023)
- Open Access
- 11 September 2026
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Otology & Neurotology
- Vol. 47 (10) , e1217-e1225
Monitoring Hearing Function in Patients With Sporadic Vestibular Schwannoma: A Feasibility Study to Inform a Future Randomized Controlled Trial
Objective: There is a need for a definitive RCT comparing upfront stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) versus watch-and-wait (WW) for long-term hearing preservation in vestibular schwannoma (VS). Specific objectives of this feasibility study were to: (1) assess patient eligibility and recruitment/ retention rates, (2) determine completion rates/ times, and (3) estimate the variance in key proposed outcome measures to inform sample-size estimation for an RCT. Study design: Nonrandomized, single-centre, prospective study. Setting: Tertiary-referral centre. Patients: Thirty-one patients with sporadic VS undergoing WW (n = 22) or SRS (n = 9). Intervention(s): Four-frequency average pure-tone audiometry (4FAPTA) thresholds, Word Recognition Scores (WRS), monaural/antiphasic Digits-in-Noise speech reception thresholds (DiN SRT 50 ), and self-reported outcomes including the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) and Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI). Main outcome measures: Feasibility metrics (recruitment, completion rates, testing times). Variance of outcome measures (hearing-related: 4FAPTA, monoaural/ antiphasic DiN-SRT 50 , WRS. Patient-reported outcomes: SSQ, TFI. Results: Forty-four patients were recruited over 7 months. Thirty-one (70.5%) met inclusion criteria, and 25 (80%) completed all tests. Average time to complete the assessments was 1 hour 42 minutes. Mean 4FAPTA (±SD) in VS-affected ears was 42 ± 14 dB HL (WW) and 55 ± 9.4 dB HL (SRS). Antiphasic DiN-SRT 50 thresholds were WW: -14.2 dB SNR ± 4.1; SRS: -11.6 dB SNR ± 1.9, and 4FAPTA and antiphasic DiN-SRT 50 were correlated ( P < 0.001) in VS-affected ears. Conclusions: This study has demonstrated sufficient eligibility and recruitment/retention rates for the proposed RCT and high-test completion rates with acceptable duration. Variability estimates of key outcome measures (DiN-SRT 50, 4FAPTA) have also been provided to determine the sample size for the RCT.
- 11 September 2026
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Otology & Neurotology
- Vol. 47 (10) , e1217-e1225
Open AccessMonitoring Hearing Function in Patients With Sporadic Vestibular Schwannoma: A Feasibility Study to Inform a Future Randomized Controlled Trial
Objective: There is a need for a definitive RCT comparing upfront stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) versus watch-and-wait (WW) for long-term hearing preservation in vestibular schwannoma (VS). Specific objectives of this feasibility study were to: (1) assess patient eligibility and recruitment/ retention rates, (2) determine completion rates/ times, and (3) estimate the variance in key proposed outcome measures to inform sample-size estimation for an RCT. Study design: Nonrandomized, single-centre, prospective study. Setting: Tertiary-referral centre. Patients: Thirty-one patients with sporadic VS undergoing WW (n = 22) or SRS (n = 9). Intervention(s): Four-frequency average pure-tone audiometry (4FAPTA) thresholds, Word Recognition Scores (WRS), monaural/antiphasic Digits-in-Noise speech reception thresholds (DiN SRT 50 ), and self-reported outcomes including the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) and Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI). Main outcome measures: Feasibility metrics (recruitment, completion rates, testing times). Variance of outcome measures (hearing-related: 4FAPTA, monoaural/ antiphasic DiN-SRT 50 , WRS. Patient-reported outcomes: SSQ, TFI. Results: Forty-four patients were recruited over 7 months. Thirty-one (70.5%) met inclusion criteria, and 25 (80%) completed all tests. Average time to complete the assessments was 1 hour 42 minutes. Mean 4FAPTA (±SD) in VS-affected ears was 42 ± 14 dB HL (WW) and 55 ± 9.4 dB HL (SRS). Antiphasic DiN-SRT 50 thresholds were WW: -14.2 dB SNR ± 4.1; SRS: -11.6 dB SNR ± 1.9, and 4FAPTA and antiphasic DiN-SRT 50 were correlated ( P < 0.001) in VS-affected ears. Conclusions: This study has demonstrated sufficient eligibility and recruitment/retention rates for the proposed RCT and high-test completion rates with acceptable duration. Variability estimates of key outcome measures (DiN-SRT 50, 4FAPTA) have also been provided to determine the sample size for the RCT.
- Open Access
- 9 May 2026
- Published by Elsevier in EJC Paediatric Oncology
- Vol. 7
Dentofacial side-effects in childhood cancer survivors: the SMILE consortium
- 9 May 2026
- Published by Elsevier in EJC Paediatric Oncology
- Vol. 7
Open AccessDentofacial side-effects in childhood cancer survivors: the SMILE consortium
- Open Access
- 28 March 2026
- Published by Elsevier in EJC Paediatric Oncology
- Vol. 7
Challenges of delivering bi-daily general anaesthetic for hyperfractionated accelerated proton beam therapy for high-risk medulloblastoma
- 28 March 2026
- Published by Elsevier in EJC Paediatric Oncology
- Vol. 7
Open AccessChallenges of delivering bi-daily general anaesthetic for hyperfractionated accelerated proton beam therapy for high-risk medulloblastoma
- Open Access
- 28 February 2026
- Published by Elsevier in Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 53, 104099
Baseline Neurocognitive Functioning in Children/Teenagers and Young Adults Treated for Central Nervous System Malignancies Prior to Proton Therapy
- 28 February 2026
- Published by Elsevier in Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 53, 104099
Open AccessBaseline Neurocognitive Functioning in Children/Teenagers and Young Adults Treated for Central Nervous System Malignancies Prior to Proton Therapy
- Open Access
- 20 February 2026
- Published by Elsevier in Radiotherapy and Oncology
- Vol. 219, 111448
Systematic review of facial deformation following paediatric head and neck radiation therapy: A call for standardised outcome assessment and dose–response evidence
- 20 February 2026
- Published by Elsevier in Radiotherapy and Oncology
- Vol. 219, 111448
Open AccessSystematic review of facial deformation following paediatric head and neck radiation therapy: A call for standardised outcome assessment and dose–response evidence
- 4 October 2025
- Published by Elsevier
- Vol. 212, 289-299
Proton therapy for vestibular schwannomas
- Open Access
- 10 May 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 44, 103868
The National Referral Service for Proton Beam Therapy in England: A Journey Towards Equitable Access
- 10 May 2025
- Published by Elsevier in Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 44, 103868
Open AccessThe National Referral Service for Proton Beam Therapy in England: A Journey Towards Equitable Access
- Open Access
- 17 November 2024
- Published by Elsevier in Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
- Vol. 32, 100675
Variations in linear energy transfer distributions within a European proton therapy planning comparison of paediatric posterior fossa tumours
- 17 November 2024
- Published by Elsevier in Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
- Vol. 32, 100675
Open AccessVariations in linear energy transfer distributions within a European proton therapy planning comparison of paediatric posterior fossa tumours
- 1 October 2024
- Published by Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) in RadioGraphics
- Vol. 44 (10) , e240036
Skull Base Chordoma and Chondrosarcoma: Neuroradiologist’s Guide to Diagnosis, Surgical Management, and Proton Beam Therapy
Skull base chordomas and chondrosarcomas are distinct types of rare, locally aggressive mesenchymal tumors that share key principles of imaging investigation and multidisciplinary care. Maximal safe surgical resection is the treatment choice for each, often via an expanded endoscopic endonasal approach, with or without multilayer skull base repair. Postoperative adjuvant radiation therapy is frequently administered, usually with particle therapy such as proton beam therapy (PBT). Compared with photon therapy, PBT enables dose escalation while limiting damage to dose-limiting neurologic structures, particularly the brainstem and optic apparatus, due to energy deposition being delivered at a high maximum with a rapid decrease at the end of the penetration range (Bragg peak phenomenon). Essential requirements for PBT following gross total or maximal safe resection are tissue diagnosis, minimal residual tumor after resection, and adequate clearance from PBT dose-limiting structures. The radiologist should understand surgical approaches and surgical techniques, including multilayer skull base repair, and be aware of evolution of postsurgical imaging appearances over time. Accurate radiologic review of all relevant preoperative imaging examinations and of intraoperative and postoperative MRI examinations plays a key role in management. The radiology report should reflect what the skull base surgeon and radiation oncologist need to know, including distance between the tumor and PBT dose-limiting structures, tumor sites that may be difficult to access via the endoscopic endonasal route, the relationship between intradural tumor and neurovascular structures, and tumor sites with implications for postresection stability. ©RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article.
- 1 October 2024
- Published by Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) in RadioGraphics
- Vol. 44 (10) , e240036
Skull Base Chordoma and Chondrosarcoma: Neuroradiologist’s Guide to Diagnosis, Surgical Management, and Proton Beam Therapy
Skull base chordomas and chondrosarcomas are distinct types of rare, locally aggressive mesenchymal tumors that share key principles of imaging investigation and multidisciplinary care. Maximal safe surgical resection is the treatment choice for each, often via an expanded endoscopic endonasal approach, with or without multilayer skull base repair. Postoperative adjuvant radiation therapy is frequently administered, usually with particle therapy such as proton beam therapy (PBT). Compared with photon therapy, PBT enables dose escalation while limiting damage to dose-limiting neurologic structures, particularly the brainstem and optic apparatus, due to energy deposition being delivered at a high maximum with a rapid decrease at the end of the penetration range (Bragg peak phenomenon). Essential requirements for PBT following gross total or maximal safe resection are tissue diagnosis, minimal residual tumor after resection, and adequate clearance from PBT dose-limiting structures. The radiologist should understand surgical approaches and surgical techniques, including multilayer skull base repair, and be aware of evolution of postsurgical imaging appearances over time. Accurate radiologic review of all relevant preoperative imaging examinations and of intraoperative and postoperative MRI examinations plays a key role in management. The radiology report should reflect what the skull base surgeon and radiation oncologist need to know, including distance between the tumor and PBT dose-limiting structures, tumor sites that may be difficult to access via the endoscopic endonasal route, the relationship between intradural tumor and neurovascular structures, and tumor sites with implications for postresection stability. ©RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article.