BHBenjamin Hennart

Benjamin Hennart

*This is an algorithmically generated author record based on publicly available information.

Current Organizations / Institutes

The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article

Previous Organizations / Institutes

The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years


Benjamin Hennart has a total of 245 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:


Latest Publications

  • Open Access

    Development of a dosing algorithm integrating pharmacogenetic markers and inflammation for individualization of initial voriconazole maintenance doses

    by Elodie Gautier-Veyret, Othilie Giannoni, Marc Manceau, Capucine Arrive, Sylvia Klomp, Matthieu Roustit, Fabien Lamoureux, Benjamin Hennart, Caroline Solas, Sarah Baklouti, et al.

    Achieving early therapeutic trough concentrations (Cmin) of voriconazole (VRC) is crucial for treatment efficacy and to avoid side effects. Since VRC Cmin are influenced by numerous determinants, this multicenter retrospective study aimed to develop a multiparametric dosing algorithm for individualizing initial VRC maintenance doses. Individual data regarding VRC Cmin from adult patients and associated parameters (age, sex, underlying disease [presence of hematological disease/other], weight, dose, route of administration, indication: curative/prophylactic, cytochrome [CYP]2C19 and 3A genotypes, C-reactive protein [CRP], transaminases, bilirubin, and proton pump inhibitor treatment) were collected from six previously published studies and routine care data from seven laboratories (building cohort). A mixed-effects model predicting VRC Cmin was developed on this building cohort using a stepwise cross-validation procedure and then externally validated on an independent cohort (validation cohort). The building and validation cohorts included 977 VRC Cmin in 277 patients and 47 VRC Cmin in 33 patients, respectively. The initial model, which integrated VRC daily dose, CYP2C19 genotype, and CRP, was enriched by two additional covariates: age and underlying disease. The final model had an R ² of 0.69 but tended to underestimate low VRC Cmin and overestimate high VRC Cmin. Finally, a formula derived from this final model was proposed and integrated into an Excel sheet to individualize initial VRC maintenance doses. The developed predictive model allowed for the creation of a multiparametric dosing algorithm for the individualization of initial VRC maintenance doses. The benefit of this algorithm will soon be evaluated in a prospective pilot study to improve initial VRC exposure.

  • Sevoflurane diffusion across four paediatric cardiopulmonary bypass oxygenators: a laboratory investigation

    by Martin Dubernet, Vincent Bonnet, Tony Vanden Dorpe, Benjamin Hennart, Jean-François Wiart, Mouhamed D. Moussa

  • Open Access

    French‐Speaking Network of Pharmacogenetics (RNPGx) Recommendations for Clinical Use of Mavacamten

    by Louis Lebreton, Jean‐Christophe Boyer, Claire Lafay‐Chebassier, Benjamin Hennart, Sarah Baklouti, Séverine Cunat, Paul Vilquin, Yves Medard, Elodie Gautier‐Veyret, Clara Laffitte‐Redondo, et al.

    Mavacamten, the first drug in the class of β‐cardiac myosin modulator, is used for the treatment of patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. This orally administered drug demonstrates wide interpatient variability in pharmacokinetics parameters, due in part to variant CYP2C19 alleles. Individuals who are CYP2C19 poor metabolizers have increased exposure and are at increased risk of reduced cardiac hypercontractility. To ensure the safety of all patients, European Medicines Agency recommends CYP2C19 preemptive genotyping, and consecutively, to adapt maintenance and initial mavacamten doses, and to manage drug–drug interactions, according to CYP2C19 phenotype. In this article, we summarize evidence from the literature supporting the association between CYP2C19 phenotype and pharmacological features of mavacamten and provide, beyond biologic guidelines, therapeutic recommendations for the use of mavacamten based on CYP2C19 and CYP3A4/CYP3A5 genotype.


  • Open Access

    Complete DPYD genotyping combined with dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase phenotyping to prevent fluoropyrimidine toxicity: A retrospective study

    by Côme De Metz, Benjamin Hennart, Estelle Aymes, Pierre‐Yves Cren, Niels Martignène, Nicolas Penel, Maël Barthoulot, Aurélien Carnot

    Introduction: In April 2019, French authorities mandated dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) screening, specifically testing uracilemia, to mitigate the risk of toxicity associated with fluoropyrimidine‐based chemotherapy. However, this subject is still of debate as there is no consensus on a standardized DPD deficiency screening test. We conducted a real‐life retrospective study with the aim of assessing the impact of DPD screening on the occurrence of severe toxicity and exploring the potential benefits of complete genotyping using next‐generation sequencing.Methods: All adult patients consecutively treated with 5‐fluorouracil (5‐FU) or its oral prodrug at six cancer centers between March 2018 and February 2019 were considered for inclusion. Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency screening included gene encoding DPD (DPYD) genotyping using complete genome sequencing and DPD phenotyping (uracilemia or dihydrouracilemia/uracilemia ratio) or both tests. Associations between each DPD screening method and (i) severe (grade ≥3) early toxicity and (ii) fluoropyrimidine dose reduction in the second chemotherapy cycle were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression analysis. Furthermore, we assessed the concordance between DPD genotype and phenotype using Cohen's kappa.Results: A total of 551 patients were included. Most patients were tested for DPD deficiency (86%) including DPYD genotyping only (6%), DPD phenotyping only (8%), or both (72%). Complete DPD deficiency was not detected in the study population. Severe early toxicity events were observed in 73 patients (13%), with two patients (0.30%) presenting grade 5 toxicity. Despite the numerically higher toxicity rate in untested patients, the occurrence of severe toxicity was not significantly associated with the DPD screening method (p = 0.69). Concordance between the DPD genotype and phenotype was weak (Cohen's kappa of 0.14).Conclusion: Due to insufficient numbers, our study was not able to demonstrate any added value of DPYD genotyping using complete genome sequencing to prevent 5‐FU toxicity. The optimal strategy for DPD screening before fluoropyrimidine‐based chemotherapy requires further clinical evaluation.


  • Open Access

    Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Pharmacogenetic Testing as Guides to Psychotropic Drug Dose Adjustment: An Observational Study

    by Elodie Cuvelier, Houda Khazri, Cloé Lecluse, Benjamin Hennart, Ali Amad, Jean Roche, Michel Tod, Guillaume Vaiva, Olivier Cottencin, Pascal Odou, et al.

    To avoid the failures in therapy with psychotropic drugs, treatments can be personalized by applying the results of therapeutic drug monitoring and pharmacogenetic testing. The objective of the present single-center observational study was to describe the changes in psychotropic drug management prompted by therapeutic drug monitoring and pharmacogenetic testing, and to compare the effective drug concentration based on metabolic status with the dose predicted using an in silico decision tool for drug–drug interactions. The study was conducted in psychiatry wards at Lille University Hospital (Lille, France) between 2016 and 2020. Patients with data for at least one therapeutic drug monitoring session or pharmacogenetic test were included. Blood tests were performed for 490 inpatients (mainly indicated by treatment monitoring or failure) and mainly concerned clozapine (21.4%) and quetiapine (13.7%). Of the 617 initial therapeutic drug monitoring tests, 245 (40%) complied with good sampling practice. Of the patients, 51% had a drug concentration within the therapeutic range. Regardless of the drug concentration, the drug management did not change in 83% of cases. Thirty patients underwent pharmacogenetic testing (twenty-seven had also undergone therapeutic drug monitoring) for treatment failure; the plasma drug concentration was outside the reference range in 93% of cases. The patient’s metabolic status explained the treatment failure in 12 cases (40%), and prompted a switch to a drug metabolized by another CYP450 pathway in 5 cases (42%). Of the six tests that could be analyzed with the in silico decision tool, all of the drug concentrations after adjustment were included in the range estimated by the tool. Knowledge of a patient’s drug concentration and metabolic status (for CYD2D6 and CYP2C19) can help clinicians to optimize psychotropic drug adjustment. Drug management can be optimized with good sampling practice, support from a multidisciplinary team (a physician, a geneticist, and clinical pharmacist), and decision support tools.


  • Open Access

    Targeted Metabolomics Analysis Suggests That Tacrolimus Alters Protection against Oxidative Stress

    by Marie Joncquel, Julie Labasque, Julie Demaret, Marie-Adélaïde Bout, Aghilès Hamroun, Benjamin Hennart, Mathieu Tronchon, Magali Defevre, Isabelle Kim, Alain Kerckhove, et al.

    Tacrolimus (FK506) is an immunosuppressant that is experiencing a continuous rise in usage worldwide. The related side effects are known to be globally dose-dependent. Despite numerous studies on FK506, the mechanisms underlying FK506 toxicity are still not well understood. It is therefore essential to explore the toxicity mediated by FK506. To accomplish this, we conducted a targeted metabolomic analysis using LC−MS on the plasma samples of patients undergoing FK506 treatment. The aim was to identify any associated altered metabolic pathway. Another anti-calcineurin immunosuppressive therapy, ciclosporin (CSA), was also studied. Increased plasma concentrations of pipecolic acid (PA) and sarcosine, along with a decrease in the glycine/sarcosine ratio and a tendency of increased plasma lysine was observed in patients under FK506 compared to control samples. Patients under CSA do not show an increase in plasma PA compared to the control samples, which does not support a metabolic link between the calcineurin and PA. The metabolomics changes observed in patients under FK506 highlight a possible link between FK506 and the action of an enzyme involved in both PA and sarcosine catabolism and oxidative pathway, the Peroxisomal sarcosine oxidase (PIPOX). Moreover, PA could be investigated as a potential biomarker of early nephrotoxicity in the follow-up of patients under FK506.


  • Open Access

    Tranexamic acid dose–response relationship for antifibrinolysis in postpartum haemorrhage during Caesarean delivery: TRACES, a double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre, dose-ranging biomarker study

    by Anne-Sophie Ducloy-Bouthors, Sixtine Gilliot, Maeva Kyheng, David Faraoni, Alexandre Turbelin, Hawa Keita-Meyer, Agnès Rigouzzo, Gabriela Moyanotidou, Benjamin Constant, Francoise Broisin, et al.


  • Open Access

    A Robust and Fast/Multiplex Pharmacogenetics Assay to Simultaneously Analyze 17 Clinically Relevant Genetic Polymorphisms in CYP3A4, CYP3A5, CYP1A2, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, ABCB1, and VKORC1 Genes

    by Camille Tron, Régis Bouvet, Marie-Clémence Verdier, Fabien Lamoureux, Benjamin Hennart, Christèle Dubourg, Eric Bellissant, Marie-Dominique Galibert

    In the field of pharmacogenetics, the trend is to analyze a panel of several actionable genetic polymorphisms. It may require the use of high-throughput sequencing which demands expensive reagents/instruments and specific skills to interpret results. As an alternative, the aim of this work was to validate an easy, fast, and inexpensive multiplex pharmacogenetics assay to simultaneously genotype a panel of 17 clinically actionable variants involved in drug pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics. We designed primers to perform a multiplex PCR assay using a single mix. Primers were labeled by two fluorescent dye markers to discriminate alleles, while the size of the PCR fragments analyzed by electrophoresis allowed identifying amplicon. Polymorphisms of interest were CYP3A4*22, CYP3A5*3, CYP1A2*1F, CYP2C9*2-*3, CYP2C19*2-*3-*17, VKORC1-1639G > A, ABCB1 rs1045642-rs1128503-rs2229109-rs2032582, and CYP2D6*3-*4-*6-*9. The assay was repeatable and a minimum quantity of 10 ng of DNA/ sample was needed to obtain accurate results. The method was applied to a validation cohort of 121 samples and genotyping results were consistent with those obtained with reference methods. The assay was fast and cost-effective with results being available within one working-day. This robust assay can easily be implemented in laboratories as an alternative to cumbersome simplex assays or expensive multiplex approaches. Together it should widespread access to pharmacogenetics in clinical routine practice.


  • Open Access

    Pharmacokinetics of Curative Tranexamic Acid in Parturients Undergoing Cesarean Delivery

    by Sixtine Gilliot, Anne-Sophie Ducloy-Bouthors, Florence Loingeville, Benjamin Hennart, Delphine Allorge, Gilles Lebuffe, Pascal Odou

    The aim of this study was to evaluate the population pharmacokinetics of tranexamic acid (TXA) administered intravenously at a single dose of 0.5 or 1 g in parturients undergoing active hemorrhagic cesarean delivery and to evaluate the influence of patient variables on TXA pharmacokinetics. Subjects from three recruiting centers were included in this PK sub-study if randomized in the experimental group (i.v TXA 0.5 g or 1 g over one minute) of the TRACES study. Blood samples and two urinary samples were collected within 6 h after TXA injection. Parametric non-linear mixed-effect modeling (Monolix v2020R1) was computed. The final covariate model building used 315 blood and 117 urinary concentrations from seventy-nine patients. A two-compartment model with a double first-order elimination from the central compartment best described the data. The population estimates of clearance (CL), central volume of distribution (V1), and half-life for a typical 70 kg patient with an estimated renal clearance of 150 mL/min (Cockroft–Gault) were 0.14 L/h, 9.25 L, and 1.8 h. A correlation between estimated creatinine clearance and CL, body weight before pregnancy, and V1 was found and partly explained the PK variability. The final model was internally validated using a 500-run bootstrap. The first population pharmacokinetic model of TXA in active hemorrhagic caesarean section was successfully developed and internally validated.


  • Open Access

    Impact of Tacrolimus Daily Dose Limitation in Renal Transplant Recipients Expressing CYP3A5: A Retrospective Study

    by Rémi Lenain, Mehdi Maanaoui, Aghilès Hamroun, Romain Larrue, Cynthia Van Der Hauwaert, Jean-Baptiste Gibier, Viviane Gnemmi, Sébastien Gomis, Myriam Labalette, Franck Broly, et al.

    The pharmacokinetic variability of tacrolimus can be partly explained by CYP3A5 activity. Our objective was to evaluate a tacrolimus sparing policy on renal graft outcome according to CYP3A5 6986A>G genetic polymorphism. This retrospective study included 1114 recipients with a median follow-up of 6.3 years. Genotyping of the 6986A>G allelic variant corresponding to CYP3A5*3 was systematically performed. One year after transplantation, tacrolimus blood trough concentration (C0) target range was 5–7 ng/mL. However, daily dose was capped to 0.10 mg/kg/day regardless of the CYP3A5 genotype. A total 208 CYP3A5*1/- patients were included. Despite a higher daily dose, CYP3A5*1/- recipients exhibited lower C0 during follow-up (p < 0.01). Multivariate analysis did not show any significant influence of CYP3A5*1/- genotype (HR = 0.70, 0.46–1.07, p = 0.10) on patient-graft survival. Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) decline was significantly lower for the CYP3A5*1/- group (p = 0.02). The CYP3A5*1/- genotype did not significantly impact the risk of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) (HR = 1.01, 0.68–1.49, p = 0.97) despite significantly lower C0. Based on our experience, a strategy of tacrolimus capping is associated with a better GFR evolution in CYP3A5*1/- recipients without any significant increase of BPAR incidence. Our study raised some issues about specific therapeutic tacrolimus C0 targets for CYP3A5*1/- patients and suggests to set up randomized control studies in this specific population.