Eric Alani

Homologous recombination (HR) is one of the most effective pathways a cell can employ to repair DNA double strand breaks (DSBs). While most of the HR machinery has been characterized, less is known about how chromatin is reorganized and participates in repair. Here, we use a break-induced replication (BIR) assay, which measures conservative copying of a donor chromosome arm onto a single-ended recipient sequence, to explore a direct role for the SIR2/3/4 (SIR) silent chromatin complex in HR. Specifically, we measure an early step of BIR, D-loop extension, and simultaneously monitor localization of the SIR complex at the initiating DSB and an ectopic donor locus. Interestingly, we observe an ∼four- fold increase in Sir2 and Sir3 protein levels upon DSB induction and detect an enrichment of all three SIR complex subunits at the DSB and donor loci during periods of active D-loop extension. ChIP-seq experiments reveal enrichment of SIR complex subunits that extend up to 15 kb from the DSB site. This enrichment is substantially reduced in rad51Δ and rad52Δ mutants that show defects in BIR. Lastly, we show that sir mutations confer slowed D-loop extension kinetics between divergent substrates and increase the rate of mutation during BIR. These data are consistent with a model in which the SIR complex acts to stabilize the extending D-loop during BIR, leading to more efficient, and thus less mutagenic repair. Author Summary: Double-strand breaks (DSBs) are among the most dangerous types of DNA lesions that occur in a cell; if unrepaired, they can cause cell death and deleterious chromosomal rearrangements. Homologous recombination (HR) is one of the most effective pathways to repair DSBs. While the machinery involved in HR has been characterized, less is known about how HR acts within a chromatin environment which contains DNA packaged into a compact state. In baker’s yeast transcriptionally inactive “silent” chromatin is present at a limited number of domains in the cell. Bound to and regulating the transcriptional inactivity of these domains is the SIR complex. Curiously, various components of the SIR complex have been shown to localize to HR repaired DSBs. However, little is known about how they participate in HR. In this study we use a break-induced replication (BIR) assay, which measures conservative copying of a donor chromosome onto a single-ended recipient sequence, to characterize roles for the SIR complex in HR. We detect an enrichment of all three SIR complex subunits at the recipient and donor loci during periods of active repair. ChIP-seq, a method that detects protein-DNA interactions genome-wide, reveals enrichment of SIR complex subunits up to 15 kb from each side of the DSB site. This enrichment is significantly reduced in mutants that show defects in BIR. We assess the functional consequences of the loss of the SIR complex, showing that sir mutations slow early steps in BIR and increase the rate of mutation. Our data are consistent with a model in which the SIR complex acts to stabilize early intermediates in BIR, leading to more efficient, and thus less mutagenic repair.

The accurate segregation of homologous chromosomes during the Meiosis I reductional division in most sexually reproducing eukaryotes requires crossing over between homologs. In baker's yeast approximately 80% of meiotic crossovers result from Mlh1–Mlh3 and Exo1 acting to resolve double-Holliday junction intermediates in a biased manner. Little is known about how Mlh1–Mlh3 is recruited to recombination intermediates to perform its role in crossover resolution. We performed a gene dosage screen in baker's yeast to identify novel genetic interactors with Mlh1–Mlh3. Specifically, we looked for genes whose lowered dosage reduced meiotic crossing over using sensitized mlh3 alleles that disrupt the stability of the Mlh1–Mlh3 complex and confer defects in mismatch repair but do not disrupt meiotic crossing over. To our surprise we identified genetic interactions between MLH3 and DMC1, the recombinase responsible for recombination between homologous chromosomes during meiosis. We then showed that Mlh3 physically interacts with Dmc1 in vitro and in vivo. Partial complementation of Mlh3 crossover functions was observed when MLH3 was expressed under the control of the CLB1 promoter (NDT80 regulon), suggesting that Mlh3 function can be provided late in meiotic prophase at some functional cost. A model for how Dmc1 could facilitate Mlh1–Mlh3's role in crossover resolution is presented.

The accurate segregation of homologous chromosomes during the Meiosis I reductional division in most sexually reproducing eukaryotes requires crossing over between homologs. In baker’s yeast approximately 80 percent of meiotic crossovers result from Mlh1-Mlh3 and Exo1 acting to resolve double-Holliday junction (dHJ) intermediates in a biased manner. Little is known about how Mlh1-Mlh3 is recruited to recombination intermediates and whether it interacts with other meiotic factors prior to its role in crossover resolution. We performed a haploinsufficiency screen in baker’s yeast to identify novel genetic interactors with Mlh1-Mlh3 using sensitized mlh3 alleles that disrupt the stability of the Mlh1-Mlh3 complex and confer defects in mismatch repair but do not disrupt meiotic crossing over. We identified several genetic interactions between MLH3 and DMC1, the recombinase responsible for recombination between homologous chromosomes during meiosis. We then showed that Mlh3 physically interacts with Dmc1 in vitro and at times in meiotic prophase when Dmc1 acts as a recombinase. Interestingly, restricting MLH3 expression to roughly the time of crossover resolution resulted in a mlh3 null-like phenotype for crossing over. Our data are consistent with a model in which Dmc1 nucleates a polymer of Mlh1-Mlh3 to promote crossing over.

In most sexually reproducing organisms crossing over between chromosome homologs during meiosis is essential to produce haploid gametes. Most crossovers that form in meiosis in budding yeast result from the biased resolution of double Holliday junction (dHJ) intermediates. This dHJ resolution step involves the actions of Rad2/XPG family nuclease Exo1 and the Mlh1-Mlh3 mismatch repair endonuclease. Here, we provide genetic evidence in baker’s yeast that Exo1 promotes meiotic crossing over by protecting DNA nicks from ligation. We found that structural elements in Exo1 that interact with DNA, such as those required for the bending of DNA during nick/flap recognition, are critical for its role in crossing over. Consistent with these observations, meiotic expression of the Rad2/XPG family member Rad27 partially rescued the crossover defect inexo1null mutants, and meiotic overexpression of Cdc9 ligase reduced the crossover levels ofexo1DNA-binding mutants to levels that approached theexo1null. In addition, our work identified a role for Exo1 in crossover interference. Together, these studies provide experimental evidence for Exo1-protected nicks being critical for the formation of meiotic crossovers and their distribution.

In most sexually reproducing organisms crossing over between chromosome homologs during meiosis is critical for the viability of haploid gametes. Most crossovers that form in meiosis in budding yeast result from the biased resolution of double Holliday Junction (dHJ) intermediates. This dHJ resolution step involves the actions Rad2/XPG family nuclease Exo1 and the Mlh1-Mlh3 mismatch repair endonuclease. At present little is known about how these factors act in meiosis at the molecular level. Here we show that Exo1 promotes meiotic crossing over by protecting DNA nicks from ligation. We found that structural elements in Exo1 required for interactions with DNA, such as bending of DNA during nick/flap recognition, are critical for its role in crossing over. Consistent with these observations, meiotic expression of the Rad2/XPG family member Rad27 partially rescued the crossover defect in exo1 null mutants, and meiotic overexpression of Cdc9 ligase specifically reduced the crossover levels of exo1 DNA binding mutants to levels approaching the exo1 null. In addition, our work identified a role for Exo1 in crossover interference that appears independent of its resection activity. Together, these studies provide experimental evidence for Exo1-protected nicks being critical for the formation of meiotic crossovers and their distribution.

The DNA mismatch repair (MMR) factor Mlh1–Pms1 contains long intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) whose exact functions remain elusive. We performed cross-linking mass spectrometry to identify interactions within Mlh1–Pms1 and used this information to insert FRB and FKBP dimerization domains into their IDRs. Baker's yeast strains bearing these constructs were grown with rapamycin to induce dimerization. A strain containing FRB and FKBP domains in the Mlh1 IDR displayed a complete defect in MMR when grown with rapamycin. but removing rapamycin restored MMR functions. Strains in which FRB was inserted into the IDR of one MLH subunit and FKBP into the other subunit were also MMR defective. The MLH complex containing FRB and FKBP domains in the Mlh1 IDR displayed a rapamycin-dependent defect in Mlh1–Pms1 endonuclease activity. In contrast, linking the Mlh1 and Pms1 IDRs through FRB-FKBP dimerization inappropriately activated Mlh1–Pms1 endonuclease activity. We conclude that dynamic and coordinated rearrangements of the MLH IDRs both positively and negatively regulate how the MLH complex acts in MMR. The application of the FRB-FKBP dimerization system to interrogate in vivo functions of a critical repair complex will be useful for probing IDRs in diverse enzymes and to probe transient loss of MMR on demand.

The MutL family of DNA mismatch repair proteins (MMR) acts to maintain genomic integrity in somatic and meiotic cells. In baker’s yeast, the MutL homolog (MLH) MMR proteins form three heterodimeric complexes, MLH1-PMS1, MLH1-MLH2, and MLH1-MLH3. The recent discovery of human PMS2 (homolog of baker’s yeast PMS1) and MLH3 acting independently of human MLH1 in the repair of somatic double-strand breaks questions the assumption that MLH1 is an obligate subunit for MLH function. Here we provide a summary of the canonical roles for MLH factors in DNA genomic maintenance and in meiotic crossover. We then present the phenotypes of cells lacking specific MLH subunits, particularly in meiotic recombination, and based on this analysis, propose a model for an independent early role for MLH3 in meiosis to promote the accurate segregation of homologous chromosomes in the meiosis I division.

Baker’s yeast contains a large number of duplicated genes; some function redundantly, whereas others have more specialized roles. We used the MLH family of DNA mismatch repair (MMR) proteins as a model to better understand the steps that lead to gene specialization following a gene duplication event. We focused on two highly conserved yeast MLH proteins, Pms1 and Mlh3, with Pms1 having a major role in the repair of misincorporation events during DNA replication and Mlh3 acting to resolve recombination intermediates in meiosis to form crossovers. The baker’s yeast Mlh3 and Pms1 proteins are significantly diverged (19% overall identity), suggesting that an extensive number of evolutionary steps, some major, others involving subtle refinements, took place to diversify the MLH proteins. Using phylogenetic and molecular approaches, we provide evidence that all three domains (N-terminal ATP binding, linker, C-terminal endonuclease/MLH interaction) in the MLH protein family are critical for conferring pathway specificity. Importantly, mlh3 alleles in the ATP binding and endonuclease domains improved MMR functions in strains lacking the Pms1 protein and did not disrupt Mlh3 meiotic functions. This ability for mlh3 alleles to complement the loss of Pms1 suggests that an ancestral Pms1/Mlh3 protein was capable of performing both MMR and crossover functions. Our strategy for analyzing MLH pathway specificity provides an approach to understand how paralogs have evolved to support distinct cellular processes.

The DNA mismatch repair (MMR) factor Mlh1-Pms1 contains long intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs). While essential for MMR, their exact functions remain elusive. We performed cross-linking mass spectrometry to identify the major interactions within the Mlh1-Pms1 heterodimer and used this information to insert FRB and FKBP dimerization domains into the IDRs of Mlh1 and Pms1. Yeast bearing these constructs were grown with rapamycin to induce dimerization. Strains containing FRB and FKBP domains in the Mlh1 IDR displayed complete MMR defects when grown with rapamycin, but removing rapamycin restored MMR functions. Furthermore, linking the Mlh1 and Pms1 IDRs through FRB-FKBP dimerization disrupted Mlh1-Pms1 binding to DNA, inappropriately activated Mlh1-Pms1, and caused MMR defects in vivo . We conclude that dynamic and coordinated rearrangements of the MLH IDRs regulate how the complex clamps DNA to catalyze MMR. The application of the FRB-FKBP dimerization system to interrogate in vivo functions of a critical repair complex will be useful for probing IDRs in diverse enzymes and to probe transient loss of MMR on demand.