Xiaoping Ji

Vascular calcification, a common complication of metabolic diseases such as diabetes and obesity, is closely associated with chronic inflammation and contributes to cardiovascular morbidity. The adipokine visfatin, which is secreted by visceral fat, is a proinflammatory mediator linked to metabolic dysfunction. In this study, we investigated its role in vascular calcification. A murine model was established by vitamin D injection. Serum visfatin levels were significantly elevated in patients with higher coronary artery calcification scores and in calcified mice, accompanied by increased visfatin expression in visceral fat. Adipose tissue-specific overexpression of visfatin further exacerbated vitamin D-induced vascular calcification. In cultured vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs), visfatin increased osteogenic differentiation under calcification conditions. Mechanistically, visfatin directly bound to TLR4 to promote osteogenic transformation of VSMCs, whereas TLR4 knockout markedly attenuated visfatin- and calcification medium-induced aortic calcification both in vivo and in vitro. Furthermore, the sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) empagliflozin alleviated vascular calcification and reduced serum visfatin levels in mice. Mechanistically, empagliflozin suppressed p38/NF-κB activation, inhibited NF-κB nuclear translocation, and reduced NF-κB binding to the visfatin promoter, thereby decreasing visfatin expression in adipocytes. Collectively, these findings identify visfatin as a proinflammatory adipose-derived regulator of vascular calcification via TLR4 and a potential therapeutic target for vascular calcification and related cardiovascular disorders. Graphical Abstract The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Background: As an extremely rare genetic disorder, limb-girdle muscular dystrophy type 2Y (LGMD2Y) is associated with progressive muscle weakness and potential cardiac involvement. Despite being less common compared with other muscular dystrophies, cardiac manifestations in LGMD2Y can lead to severe heart failure (HF). The diagnosis and management of cardiac involvement are crucial for improving outcomes in these patients. Case summary: In this study, the case of a 23-year-old woman who has suffered from progressive muscle weakness since age 13 and was initially diagnosed with metabolic myopathy was presented. Four months before admission, she developed symptoms of HF, like chest oppression and leg oedema. Echocardiography showed a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 26% and LV dilation. Genetic testing identified a missense variant in torsin A interacting protein 1 (TOR1AIP1) (OMIM #614512), which confirmed LGMD2Y. During hospitalisation for acute HF, she was treated with intravenous diuretic, nesiritide, levosimendan and guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT). After 2 years of follow-up, her LVEF increased to 41%, and her N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels stabilized, with no hospital readmissions for HF exacerbations. Discussion: It is essential to investigate the aetiology of HF, as even rare causes can be identified. Early diagnosis and tailored management, including GDMT for HF, are critical for improving patient outcomes. Additionally, this case highlights the importance of close cardiac monitoring in LGMD subtypes prone to cardiomyopathy.

Although the “obesity paradox” is comprehensively elucidated in heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), the role of body composition in left ventricular (LV) remodeling, LV reverse remodeling (LVRR), and clinical outcomes is still unclear for HF with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF). Our study is a single-centre, prospective, and echocardiography-based study. Consecutive HFmrEF patients, defined as HF patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) between 40 and 49%, between January 2016 to December 2021 were included. Echocardiography was re-examined at 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up to assess the LVRR dynamically. Body mass index (BMI), fat mass, fat-free mass, percent body fat (PBF), CUN-BAE index, and lean mass index (LMI) were adopted as anthropometric parameters in our study to assess body composition. The primary outcome was LVRR, defined as: (1) a reduction higher than 10% in LV end-diastolic diameter index (LVEDDI), or a LVEDDI < 33 mm/m2, (2) an absolute increase of LVEF higher than 10 points compared with baseline echocardiogram, or a follow-up LVEF ≥50%. The secondary outcome was a composite of re-hospitalization for HF or cardiovascular death. A total of 240 HFmrEF patients were enrolled in our formal analysis. After 1-year follow-up based on echocardiography, 113 (47.1%) patients developed LVRR. Patients with LVRR had higher fat mass (21.7 kg vs. 19.3 kg, P = 0.034) and PBF (28.7% vs. 26.6%, P = 0.047) compared with those without. The negative correlation between anthropometric parameters and baseline LVEDDI was significant (all P < 0.05). HFmrEF patients with higher BMI, fat mass, PBF, CUN-BAE index, and LMI had more pronounced and persistent increase of LVEF and decline in LV mass index (LVMI). Univariable Cox regression analysis revealed that higher BMI (HR 1.042, 95% CI 1.002–1.083, P = 0.037) and fat mass (HR 1.019, 95% CI 1.002–1.036, P = 0.026) were each significantly associated with higher cumulative incidence of LVRR for HFmrEF patients, while this relationship vanished in the adjusted model. Mediation analysis indicated that the association between BMI and fat mass with LVRR was fully mediated by baseline LV dilation. Furthermore, higher fat mass (aHR 0.957, 95% CI 0.917–0.999, P = 0.049) and PBF (aHR 0.963, 95% CI 0.924–0.976, P = 0.043) was independently associated with lower risk of adverse clinical events. Body composition played an important role in the LVRR and clinical outcomes for HFmrEF. For HFmrEF patients, BMI and fat mass was positively associated with the cumulative incidence of LVRR, while higher fat mass and PBF predicted lower risk of adverse clinical events but not LMI.

Aims: Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is frequently detected via echocardiography in individuals with Fabry disease (FD), sometimes leading to confusion with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) of other aetiologies. Considering this diagnosis challenge, FD should be included in the list of differential diagnosis for patients presenting with LVH. To address this concern, we conducted a prospective screening study in China, using dried blood spot (DBS) testing, to evaluate patients with unexplained LVH. Methods: Our study was designed as a nationwide, multicentre prospective investigation. A total of 1015 patients from 55 different centres who were diagnosed with LVH by echocardiography were screened in the study from September 2022 to December 2023. Demographic information, biochemistry data, echocardiography parameters and clinical observations were meticulously collected from all participants. The DBS method was used to assess α-galactosidase A (α-Gal A) activity in males and both α-Gal A and globotriaosylsphingosine (lyso-Gb3) levels in females. Results: The final screening population included 906 patients (589 males, 65%) with LVH, characterized by a mean maximal myocardial thickness of 14.8 ± 4.6 mm and an average age of 56.9 ± 17.2 years. In total, 43 patients (38 males, 5 females) exhibited low α-Gal A activity measurement (1.1 ng/mL). Among these patients, eight individuals (7 males and 1 female) were genetically confirmed to harbour pathogenic GLA mutations, resulting in a total prevalence of 0.88%. Compared with patients without FD, patients with FD tended to have proteinuria (75% vs. 21.2%, P = 0.001), family history of HCM (37.5% vs. 2.3%, P < 0.01) and neuropathic pain (37.5% vs. 4.4%, P < 0.01) but lower systolic blood pressure (118.5 ± 12.5 vs. 143.3 ± 29.3 mmHg, P = 0.017). Five mutations were previously recognized as associated with FD while the remaining two, p.Asp313Val (c.938A>T) and c.547+3A>G, were deemed potentially pathogenic. Subsequent familial validation post-diagnosis identified an additional 14 confirmed cases. Conclusions: This pioneering screening study for FD among Chinese patients with unexplained LVH using DBS measurement, revealed an FD detection rate of 0.88%. Our findings confirmed that the combined measurement of lyso-Gb3 and α-Gal A activity is beneficial for primary screening of FD in patients with LVH. Given the availability of efficacious therapies and the value of cascade screening in extended families, early detection of FD in LVH patients is clinically important.

Background: Serum uric acid (SUA) is an important pathogenetic and prognostic factor for heart failure (HF). Gender differences are apparent in HF. Furthermore, gender differences also exist in the association between SUA and prognosis in various cardiovascular diseases. However, the gender difference for SUA in the prediction of long-term prognosis in HF is still ambiguous. Methods: A total of 1593 HF patients (897 men, 696 women) from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 1999–2018 cycle were enrolled in our final analysis. Participants were categorized according to gender-specific SUA tertile. We assessed the association between SUA and long-term prognosis of HF patients, defined as all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality, in different genders via Kaplan–Meier curve analysis, Cox proportional hazard model, and Fine-Gray competing risk model. The restricted cubic spline (RCS) was performed to investigate the dose-response relationship between SUA and outcomes. Results: Gender differences exist in demographic characteristics, clinical parameters, laboratory tests, and medication of HF patients. After a median follow-up of 127 months (95% CI 120–134 months), there were 853 all-cause deaths (493 events in men, 360 events in women) and 361 cardiovascular deaths (206 events in men, 155 events in women). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that SUA had gender difference in the prediction of cardiovascular mortality (Log-rank p < 0.001, for male, Log-rank p = 0.150, for female), but not in all-cause mortality. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that elevated SUA levels were associated with higher all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality in men (HR 1.11, 95% CI 1.05-1.18, p < 0.001, for all-cause death; HR 1.18, 95% CI 1.09-1.28, p < 0.001, for cardiovascular death), but not in women (HR 1.05, 95% CI 0.98-1.12, p = 0.186, for all-cause death; HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.91-1.12, p = 0.902, for cardiovascular death). Even using non-cardiovascular death as a competitive risk, adjusted Fine-Gray model also illustrated that SUA was an independent predictor of cardiovascular death in men (SHR 1.17, 95% CI 1.08-1.27, p < 0.001), but not in women (SHR 0.98, 95% CI 0.87 − 1.10, p = 0.690). Conclusions: Gender differences in the association between SUA and long-term prognosis of HF existed. SUA was an independent prognostic predictor for long-term outcomes of HF in men, but not in women.

BACKGROUND It is not clear whether sacubitril/valsartan is beneficial for patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and low systolic blood pressure (SBP). This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of sacubitril/valsartan in HFrEF patients with SBP < 100 mmHg. METHODS & RESULTS An observational study was conducted on 117 patients, 40.2% of whom had SBP < 100 mmHg without symptomatic hypotension, and 59.8% of whom had SBP ≥ 100 mmHg in an optimized HF follow-up management system. At the 6-month follow-up, 52.4% of patients with SBP < 100 mmHg and 70.0% of those with SBP ≥ 100 mmHg successfully reached the target dosages of sacubitril/valsartan. A reduction in the concentration of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide was similar between patients with SBP < 100 mmHg and SBP ≥ 100 mmHg (1627.5 pg/mL and 1340.1 pg/mL, respectively; P = 0.75). The effect of sacubitril/valsartan on left ventricular ejection fraction was observed in both SBP categories, with a 10.8% increase in patients with SBP < 100 mmHg (P < 0.001) and a 14.0% increase in patients with SBP ≥ 100 mmHg (P < 0.001). The effects of sacubitril/valsartan on SBP were statistically significant and inverse across both SBP categories (P = 0.001), with an increase of 7.5 mmHg in patients with SBP < 100 mmHg and a decrease of 11.5 mmHg in patients with SBP ≥ 100 mmHg. No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of the occurrence of symptomatic hypotension, deteriorating renal function, hyperkalemia, angioedema, or stroke. CONCLUSIONS Within an optimized HF follow-up management system, sacubitril/valsartan exhibited excellent tolerability and prompted left ventricular reverse remodeling in patients with HFrEF who presented asymptomatic hypotension.