Daniel Rippel
Current Organizations / Institutes
The organizations/institutes from the scholar's latest article
Previous Organizations / Institutes
The organizations / institutes from the scholar's other articles in the past ten years
Research Subjects
Research Interests
Daniel Rippel has a total of 46 co-authors. Here are the top co-authors by number of shared publications:
- Michael Freitag
BIBA - Bremer Institut für Produktion und Logistik GmbH at the University of Bremen
13 shared publications - Bernd Scholz-Reiter
University of Bremen and BIBA
10 shared publications Michael Lütjen
Bremer Institut für Produktion und Logistik GmbH, University of Bremen, Germany
5 shared publications- Michael Lütjen
Intelligent Production and Logistics Systems, BIBA – Bremer Institut Für Produktion Und Logistik GmbH at the University of Bremen
5 shared publications Christian Meinecke
4 shared publications- Haniyeh Dastyar
University of Bremen
2 shared publications
Latest Publications
- 26 August 2026
- Published by Taylor & Francis in International Journal of Production Research
- p. 1-37
User-centric assembly planning and instruction development – a systematic literature review and conceptual framework for integrating digital and assistive technologies
1. Assembly represents one of the most labour-intensive and knowledge-driven processes in manufacturing. In many industrial contexts, fully automated assembly remains infeasible due to high product...
- 26 August 2026
- Published by Taylor & Francis in International Journal of Production Research
- p. 1-37
User-centric assembly planning and instruction development – a systematic literature review and conceptual framework for integrating digital and assistive technologies
1. Assembly represents one of the most labour-intensive and knowledge-driven processes in manufacturing. In many industrial contexts, fully automated assembly remains infeasible due to high product...
- 28 July 2026
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Simulation
- p. 1-25
Simulation-based virtual testbed for energy flexibility in manufacturing
1. Manufacturing is widely recognized as an energy-intensive sector and a major contributor to greenhouse gas emissions. In light of rising energy costs and increasingly stringent environmental reg...
- 28 July 2026
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Simulation
- p. 1-25
Simulation-based virtual testbed for energy flexibility in manufacturing
1. Manufacturing is widely recognized as an energy-intensive sector and a major contributor to greenhouse gas emissions. In light of rising energy costs and increasingly stringent environmental reg...
- 9 June 2026
- Published by SAGE Publications in SIMULATION
- Vol. 102 (11) , 779-808
Frameworks for offshore wind farm installation scheduling with complementary application strategies using MILP and Petri nets
The scheduling of offshore wind farm (OWF) installations is a complex, weather-driven, and resource-constrained problem. Mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) models excel at cost and makespan optimization, but remain difficult to verify and validate beyond feasibility checks. Similarly, Petri nets (PNs) provide behavioral transparency and simulation fidelity, yet lack prescriptive optimality. This article presents frameworks that utilize complementary application strategies to address two key needs, thereby combining the strengths of both approaches. First, an iterative verification–validation framework is employed that derives local PN models from MILP solutions and compares them with knowledge-based PN representations using conformance and reachability checks. Implemented in a simulation environment for the installation of OWF, the framework enables consistent model verification, cross-model validation, and context-aware scheduling. Second, a cascading decision-support framework that selects or blends MILP, heuristic, and PN-based scheduling methods through standardized descriptors and context signals. Numerical experiments demonstrate that optimization minimizes offshore time and cost, but requires high computational efforts. In contrast, Heuristics deliver short-term plans rapidly, while PN-based schedules offer intermediate costs and longer planning horizons, demonstrating that hybrid, context-sensitive orchestration outperforms any single method.
- 9 June 2026
- Published by SAGE Publications in SIMULATION
- Vol. 102 (11) , 779-808
Frameworks for offshore wind farm installation scheduling with complementary application strategies using MILP and Petri nets
The scheduling of offshore wind farm (OWF) installations is a complex, weather-driven, and resource-constrained problem. Mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) models excel at cost and makespan optimization, but remain difficult to verify and validate beyond feasibility checks. Similarly, Petri nets (PNs) provide behavioral transparency and simulation fidelity, yet lack prescriptive optimality. This article presents frameworks that utilize complementary application strategies to address two key needs, thereby combining the strengths of both approaches. First, an iterative verification–validation framework is employed that derives local PN models from MILP solutions and compares them with knowledge-based PN representations using conformance and reachability checks. Implemented in a simulation environment for the installation of OWF, the framework enables consistent model verification, cross-model validation, and context-aware scheduling. Second, a cascading decision-support framework that selects or blends MILP, heuristic, and PN-based scheduling methods through standardized descriptors and context signals. Numerical experiments demonstrate that optimization minimizes offshore time and cost, but requires high computational efforts. In contrast, Heuristics deliver short-term plans rapidly, while PN-based schedules offer intermediate costs and longer planning horizons, demonstrating that hybrid, context-sensitive orchestration outperforms any single method.
- 2 March 2026
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Simulation
- p. 1-18
From literature to practice: taxonomy to compare system models for offshore wind farm applications
1. Offshore wind farm installation planning combines logistical, technical, and environmental complexities that demand robust and transparent decision-support models. These models support decisions...
- 2 March 2026
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Simulation
- p. 1-18
From literature to practice: taxonomy to compare system models for offshore wind farm applications
1. Offshore wind farm installation planning combines logistical, technical, and environmental complexities that demand robust and transparent decision-support models. These models support decisions...
- 2 January 2026
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 53-74
State of the Art
- 2 January 2026
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 149-188
Experimental Results
- 2 January 2026
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 11-35
Process Description and Requirements
- 2 January 2026
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 135-147
Experimental Setup and Base-Scenario
- 2 January 2026
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 37-51
Methodological Basics
- 2 January 2026
- Published by Springer Nature
- p. 75-123
Design of the Decision Support System